Every few years, a new “depopulation” theory pops up — the idea that world governments or global elites are secretly trying to shrink the human population using vaccines, GMOs, or pharmaceuticals. Some folks believe it’s already happening. Others say it’s pure paranoia. Like most things that spread online, the truth lives somewhere in the messy middle.
Where this idea came from
Back in the 1960s and 70s, population growth was a major public worry. People like Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb, warned that overpopulation would lead to famine and collapse. Governments and global organizations started funding family-planning programs, mostly focused on education, access to birth control, and women’s health. Some of those programs — especially in poorer countries — crossed ethical lines with coercive or forced sterilizations. That part is true and documented. It left deep scars and a long shadow of distrust.
So, when modern voices like Canadian writer Kevin Mugur Galalae argue that medicine and agriculture are being used to quietly lower birth rates today, they’re pulling from that history. Galalae’s claim is that vaccines, GMOs, and pollution are part of a deliberate plan to reduce fertility and shorten lifespans. It’s a sweeping accusation — one that sounds like science fiction but hits a nerve because it mixes real issues (pollution, unethical medical history, government secrecy) with unproven claims.
What the science actually says
Vaccines don’t cause infertility. In fact, the World Health Organization, CDC, and multiple large studies have found no link between vaccines and reproductive harm. Flu shots don’t shorten lives — they save them.
GMOs are another hot button. They’ve been studied for decades, and while some people dislike them for environmental or corporate reasons, mainstream science hasn’t found evidence that they cause infertility or genetic damage. The biggest concerns around GMOs are ecological — things like crop diversity, pesticide resistance, and corporate control — not secret sterilization plots.
That doesn’t mean there aren’t legitimate worries about chemicals, heavy metals, or pollution. There are — but those problems are environmental and economic, not part of a coordinated “medical genocide.”
The real population conversation
The global population is expected to level off this century — not through hidden agendas, but because of changing lifestyles. As education and living standards rise, birth rates naturally fall. That’s been true everywhere from Japan to Brazil. Most demographers say we’ll peak around 10 billion people, then slowly decline.
It’s normal for that to make people uneasy. Some worry about the planet’s limits; others worry about shrinking families, labor shortages, or cultural shifts. Those are valid debates. But calling it a “genocide” doesn’t help — it oversimplifies a really complex, human story.
Why people still believe the darker version
Mistrust in institutions runs deep, especially after real scandals like Tuskegee, forced sterilizations of Indigenous women, or dangerous chemical cover-ups. When people see patterns of secrecy and harm, they start connecting dots — sometimes too many dots. It’s a kind of defensive logic: If they lied before, maybe they’re lying again.
I get it. I’ve had those late-night “what if” moments too. But I’ve learned that cynicism and curiosity aren’t the same thing. Asking hard questions is healthy — assuming the worst about everyone isn’t.
A small reflection
If there’s a real population problem, it’s not that there are “too many humans.” It’s that too many of us still live under systems that treat life as disposable — whether that’s poverty, pollution, or profit. Fixing that doesn’t require secret sterilization programs. It requires honesty, compassion, and maybe fewer billionaires building rockets while nurses reuse gloves.
Sometimes the simplest explanation is the truest: medicine was built to heal, not to harvest. And while governments have made terrible mistakes, science itself is still mostly full of people trying to help — imperfectly, but genuinely.
Comments are closed