Why get “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) when natural immunity is a far better and much safer option?
While it might be politically incorrect to say it, natural immunity is “robust, long-lasting, and broadly effective even in the case of mutations,” to quote a new report from the Brownstone Institute, which identified some 30 different studies that prove natural immunity to be preferable to fake vaccine “immunity.”
Contracting the virus and recovering from it is the best way to stay protected against future infections. The same cannot be said for vaccines and their “booster” shots, however, which are actually destroying people’s immune systems.
Around half of the country already has natural immunity, and likely billions of people in other countries around the world do as well. Why, then, would anyone feel the need to get injected?
The answer is that nobody actually needs to get injected, though many already have due to fear or mandates. This is fueling the creation of new “variants” that are driving up hospitalizations and deaths.
Thanks to the diligent work of Paul Elias Alexander and Rational Ground’s “cheat sheet” on natural immunity, we now know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the best immunity is the kind God gave us – not the kind that Big Pharma and the government are trying to force on us.
People who get jabbed for covid are more than 13 times more likely to develop a “breakthrough” infection
It is worth your while to look through the list of studies published by the Brownstone Institute. Each one delineates how natural immunity is powerful, highly effective, and long lasting.
One of them found that people who get jabbed for the Chinese Virus have a 13.06-fold increased risk of developing a so-called “breakthrough” infection, which the media is calling the “Delta variant.”
Compared to unvaccinated people with natural immunity who are unlikely to get sick, the “fully vaccinated” are much more prone to developing symptomatic disease, which is why hospitals are now overflowing with really sick jabbed people.
Another study found that people who get vaccinated “shed” infectious SARS-CoV-2 germs onto others. Some of these germs might be deadlier mutations that would not have existed apart from the vaccine.
Yet another study determined that anybody who has ever tested “positive” for the Wuhan Flu is “unlikely to benefit” from getting jabbed. If only the government and the media had informed the public about this before tens of millions of people rushed out to get the needle.
A longitudinal analysis found that natural exposure to Chinese Germs without a vaccine creates “durable and broad immune memory” post-infection. After the infection is gone, an unvaccinated person remains immune due to persistent antibody responses and memory B and T cells.
The list goes on with study after study showing immense benefits to just leaving one’s immune system alone to do its thing without any syringes. The government disagrees with this science, but it is science nonetheless and deserves more public attention….
American truckers don’t like taking orders. But the Biden administration has increased pressure on some of them to take the vaccine—willing or unwilling.
All through the pandemic, truckers endured hardships to keep America’s infrastructure running. They waited in line for hours in sight of bathrooms they weren’t allowed to use. On the road, some died alone of COVID-19.
Now, with supply chains disrupted, Americans need them more than ever. But faced with the prospect of mandated vaccination, many drivers are considering quitting.
“I’d fight it,” said veteran trucker Mike Widdins, referring to a vaccine mandate. “I think a lot of us will be quitting. Who likes to be forced to do stuff you don’t want to do?”
Widdins isn’t alone in his willingness to leave trucking if he’s required to vaccinate. Polls by trucking publications Commercial Carrier Journal and OverDrive indicate that up to 30 percent of truckers will seriously consider quitting if required to vaccinate. If they quit, the consequences for America may be massive. US Transport estimates that 70 percent of American freight goes by truck.
“It would hurt shipping big-time,” Widdins said…..
Clearly, that’s the whole idea. Even biden isn’t this incompetent and besides this country has been under a full spectrum attack for decades. Biden is just the icing on the cake. We’re under the shock doctrine.
10 months into the COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns in the UK, statistics provided by the UK’s Health Security Agency now clearly show that those who have been fully vaccinated are suffering far worse health and are susceptible to infections at greater rates than the unvaccinated.
Natural immunity is quite obviously more effective than “vaccine immunity,” which wanes very quickly, and apparently in the process destroys one’s natural immunity as well, providing the perfect repeat-business model craved by the pharmaceutical companies, who will now pitch regular booster shots, along with all their side effects including twice as many people dying than people who have died after all vaccines for the past 30 years.
And of course the COVID-19 shots do not stop transmission (they never even claimed to do this), so the vaccinated will keep on infecting each other.
This is great news for Big Pharma, and devastating news for the public who were fooled into taking these experimental gene-therapy shots.
Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day; there is no justification for Vaccine Passports
IT’S OFFICIAL: Most of the UK’s vaccinated population are suffering far higher rates of infection than the unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day.
by Martin Zandstra
The UK’s Health Security Agency publishes detailed Covid statistics, which, for the last 7 weeks, have been tabulated by age-group and vaccination status. This now allows important questions to be answered.
The Agency says most vaccinated suffer substantially higher rates of infection, and their latest chart provides a snap-shot:
All of the UK’s 30-and-over vaccinated now endure far higher rates of infection than their unvaccinated counterparts. But as a snap-shot, this tells us nothing of how this arose, or how it may yet develop. Here we re-present the agency’s data in a time-series, to promote better understanding of the trends and implications….
Unfortunately, it does not stop there; Following the data shows the vaccinated descend well into negative territory, which may prompt us to ask how all earlier vaccinated cohorts are now doing?
In terms of vulnerability to infection, the answer is not so well:
The entire 40-79 vaccinated cohort is deeply negative, now below minus 50%, meaning they suffer more than double the infection rate of their unvaccinated counterparts, and there is no obvious end in sight; Given the consistent and strongly negative continuing trend for all adult cohorts, it is impossible to guess where or when these trajectories might bottom out.
But does the trend result from increased vulnerability amongst the vaccinated, or is improved resistance developing amongst the unvaccinated? The answer appears to be both:
Unvaccinated adults are enjoying significantly lowered infection rates, but the vaccinated are very clearly headed in the opposite direction:
This begs the question: Why should the vaccinated suffer mounting infection rates, while case-rates of the unvaccinated both declined and are lower? Surely, we should expect the vaccinated to do better – certainly no worse?
Yet, for all but one adult cohort, the exact opposite is true, and even for them, it seems likely for not much longer:
It has been suggested infection amongst the unvaccinated has induced robust natural immunity leading towards their herd-immunity. That may well be a factor, but, as we have seen, the vaccinated have similarly been infected, and at least for the 40-79 cohort, at much higher rates. Why should this not benefit the vaccinated as well?
Are we to understand infection after vaccination may not produce similar broad immunity?
Vaccination is intended to alter subsequent immune response to infection, which is, of course, the whole point; It is conceivable this altered response may mute the development of broad long-lasting immunity that otherwise typically results from natural infection. That might then leave the vaccinated more open to re-infection, and might help explain these results. But this remains speculation, we simply do not know today.
What we do know from the UK data, is that anyone vaccinated more than few months ago is at greatly higher risk of Covid infection, and is therefore greatly more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.
Much has been said and written to show the vaccinated are equally capable of transmitting Covid. But because their symptoms are often muted, they are also more likely to be out and about; add this to escalating infection rates, and there can be little doubt the vaccinated now constitute by far the greatest Covid transmission risk.
In light of this, vaccine passports are clearly senseless; They are nothing more than an invitation to infection, for which no justification can now possibly remain.
Read the full article at The Expose.
**Apologies for the glitchy video playback issues: this Mac video card issue is being addressed!!**
Attorney Mitch Fine joins SGT Report to convey the FACTS about any vaccine “mandate”: It’s blatantly illegal and any citation of a more than 100-year old Supreme Court ruling that claims force jabbing American citizens is “legal” is LAWFARE and a LIE.
Mask mandates in public schools should continue for the foreseeable future even after children receive Covid-19 vaccines, the director of the CDC has indicated.
Speaking with Meet the Press Sunday, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky essentially admitted the experimental vaccines, soon set to be authorized for children 5 to 11, still won’t be enough to bring an end to the mask debacle that has had parents in school board meetings up in arms.
“What’s your advice to parents regarding lifting mask mandates in schools once children are vaccinated?” host Andrea Mitchell asked Walensky.
“Our case numbers are coming down and that’s so encouraging. We still have 75,000 new cases a day of Covid and still having death rates of 1,200 to 1,500 deaths per day,” Walensky explained, ignoring the fact most of those deaths are not in the 0-17 age group.
“As we roll out these vaccines for our children, and we have hopeful we will be able to, it’s also critically important that our kids are able to stay in school.”
Walensky goes on to cite stats claiming masks are effective and falsely claimed they’re necessary to keep schools open.
“We saw a couple weeks ago new science that demonstrated that schools that masked had 3.5 times less likelihood of having outbreaks than schools that didn’t. In my mind, the most important thing right now as we work to get our cases down, as we work to get our children vaccinated, is that we continue the masking to keep our kids in school.”
What Walensky doesn’t explain is: if the vaccines work, why continue masking?
The school mandates, many of which were put into place only a week before classes started in the fall, have vexed parents across the country who have taken to airing their grievances at school board meetings.
Meanwhile, the masks help cultivate an atmosphere of fear and anxiety necessary for the globalists to continue steering humanity into a perpetual prison-planet lockdown run by billionaire technocrats and oligarchs – while they themselves are personally excluded from wearing face coverings.
Anti-Vaccine Mandate protests continued to rock France and Italy with hundreds of thousands taking to the streets Saturday, downplayed by governments and the media.
In an astonishing revelation of the depth of media manipulation, a protestor in the Northern Italian port city of Trieste on Oct. 18 demonstrated how the official city webcams showed the main square to be empty when it was in fact full of protestors.
This is truly incredible.
Check out the video here:
Naturally, Facebook-related “Fact Checkers” called the evidence you can see with your own eyes a “conspiracy theory”. City officials stated the webcam involved simply had the wrong angle. Watch the footage above to judge for yourself if there is a “wrong angle” that can make the Piazza Unitá d’Italia look deserted….
NOW – Large migrant caravan has left Tapachula, Mexico for the US.pic.twitter.com/EprRkn62iv
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 23, 2021
UPDATE – The migrant caravan has just overrun a roadblock set up by forces of the Mexican Instituto Nacional de Migración.pic.twitter.com/tM9CoA6xLc
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 23, 2021
Few people, including this author, saw the real driving force behind Agenda 21 and the Biodiversity Convention in 1992. This article is necessarily long and detailed. Some may find it difficult to follow. However, the research is explosive and gives a new and poignant explanation of how and why the world was thrown upside down with a pandemic narrative orchestrated by Big Pharma and the biotechnology industries.In the interest of space, I have purposefully left out other important areas that tie into this story. One is the Transhuman dream of creating Humanity 2.0 via genetic engineering. Another is how it ties into the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, which contains a rich narrative on Transhumanism and resetting the human race. Lastly, what is the full meaning of “Living in harmony with nature.” These will be explored in future articles.
My sincere hope is that other investigative journalists and researchers will pick up the trail and blow the lid off the greatest story never (yet) told on planet earth. ⁃ TN Editor
> The major concern at the 1992 Convention on Biodiversity was “protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries.”
> The United Nations defined Biodiversity as “genetic resources”, which meant that genetic material was to be owned, exploited, and controlled through genetic engineering performed by the Biotech industry.
> The Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework calls for digital genetic sequencing of all species, including humans, to be stored as a global common asset and made available for licensing by the biotechnology industry.
> It intends to “bring about a transformation in society’s relationship with biodiversity and to ensure that, by 2050, the shared vision of living in harmony with nature is fulfilled.”
In 1992, the original UN Convention on Biological Diversity was conducted in parallel with the Agenda 21 Conference under the name of the UN Conference on Economic Development (UNCED). Both were held in Rio de Janiero, Brazil, and were sponsored by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Agenda 21 was called “the agenda for the 21st century” and was centered around Sustainable Development, a resource-based economic system closely resembling historic Technocracy.
According to the International Institute for Sustainable Development:
Sustainable development has been defined in many ways, but the most frequently quoted definition is from Our Common Future, also known as the Brundtland Report:
“Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”(emphasis added)
The book, Our Common Future, was published in 1987 and became the blueprint for the Rio conference just 5 years later. The author and head of the UN study known as the Brundtland Commission, was chaired by Trilateral Commission member Gro Harlem Brundtland. She was the Prime Minister of Norway and previously, the Minister of the Environment. It is no surprise that a Trilateral Commission member created this policy that has literally turned the world upside down. In fact, it was the Trilateral Commission in 1973 who originally declared that their members would create its self-declared “New International Economic Order”. (see Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II, Wood & Sutton)
The Rio conference proposed the question, what can be done to save the world from excessive development that causes pollution, global warming, loss of rain forests, etc. The answer was that more development was needed and by the same actors that were previously wrecking habitats and plundering nations. In other words, more development was needed to erase the effects of previous development. Brundtland convinced the UN that this somehow made sense, and it was subsequently adopted as “the agenda for the 21st century” in 1992.
Others saw through the smoke and mirrors. Two environmental researchers and authors noted in their book, The Earth Brokers: “free trade and its promoters came to be seen as the solution to the global ecological crisis.”
They could not have been more blunt:
“We argue that UNCED has boosted precisely the type of industrial development that is destructive for the environment, the planet, and its inhabitants. We see how, as a result of UNCED, the rich will get richer, the poor poorer, while more and more of the planet is destroyed in the process.”
In 2021, this result could not be more clearly seen: the rich are off the charts, the poor are in the gutters and the planet and its economic systems are in tatters.
How did we get here? Here is the first hint when they concluded:
“Neither Brundtland, nor the secretariat, nor the governments drafted plan to examine the pitfalls of free trade and industrial development. Instead, they wrote up a convention on how to ‘develop’ the use of biodiversity through patents and biotechnology.”(emphasis added)
For all else that UNCED purported to be, its true mission was capturing and using biodiversity for the sake of the biotechnology industry.
This fact has been largely overlooked until the Great (pandemic) Panic of 2020, when it became apparent that the global takeover was being orchestrated by elements of that very same biotechnology industry.
Agenda for the 21st century, indeed.
What Biodiversity really means
Once I learned what to look for, I saw it everywhere. Let’s start with Our Common Future (Brundtland, 1987):
“The diversity of species is necessary for the normal functioning of ecosystems and the biosphere as a whole. The genetic material in wild species contributes billions of dollars yearly to the world economy in the form of improved crop species, new drugs and medicines, and draw materials for industry.” (emphasis added)
The specific development of biodiversity is seen in Chapter 6, Species and Ecosystems: Resources for Development:
“Species and their genetic materials promise to play an expanding role in development, and a powerful economic rationale is emerging to bolster the ethical, aesthetic, and scientific case for preserving them. The genetic variability and germplasm material of species make contributions to agriculture, medicine, and industry worth many billions of dollars per year… If nations can ensure the survival of species, the world can look forward to new and improved foods, new drugs and medicines, and new raw materials for industry.”
Further on, Brundtland states:
“Vast stocks of biological diversity are in danger of disappearing just as science is leaning how to exploit genetic variability through the advances of genetic engineering… It would be grim irony indeed if just as new genetic engineering techniques begin to let us peer into life’s diversity and use genes more efficiently to better human conditions, we looked and found this treasure sadly depleted.”
Conclusion #1: The word “biodiversity” is explained to mean “genetic resources”. Genes are something to be exploited and used more efficiently than they are used in their natural state.
Turning back to The Earth Brokers, the authors’ observations provide an eye-witness account of what they actually saw at the UNCED and Biodiversity Convention summit:
“The convention implicitly equates the diversity of life – animals and plants – to the diversity of genetic codes, for which read genetic resources. By doing so, diversity becomes something that modern science can manipulate. Finally, the convention promotes biotechnology as being ‘essential for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.”
If there is any doubt as to what the goal is, they conclude with this mind-blowing statement:
“The main stake raised by the Biodiversity Convention is the issue of ownership and control over biological diversity… the major concern was protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries.”
To reinforce the thought, the authors bluntly stated, “they wrote up a convention on how to ‘develop’ the use of biodiversity through patents and biotechnology.”
Note carefully that ownership and control over genes was not a side issue or a minor stake: It was the MAIN STAKE!
Conclusion #2: Genetic resources means genetic material is to be owned, exploited and controlled through genetic engineering performed by the Biotech industry.
Conclusion #3: UNCED and Agenda 21 was largely a smokescreen to obscure the reality of Conclusion #2.
Despite the fact than the UNCED conference was expected to bridge the gaps between the North and South, it was apparent that it was totally dominated by the developed nations of the North. The Earth Brokers explained that all solutions were provided by “Western science, Western technology, Western information, Western training, Western money and Western institutions.”
Conclusion #4: The third world was being set up to be plundered yet once again, in the name of Sustainable Development and Biodiversity. The prize is genetic engineering and ownership of the resulting genetically engineered products….