Category Archives: Law

120+ retired military flag officers warn US ‘under assault’ by socialists, Marxists, urges Americans to fight back | American Military News

More than 120 retired military flag officers with Flag Officers 4 America published an open letter Monday warning that the United States is in “deep peril” and under “tremendous assault” by supporters of socialism and Marxism, urging Americans to get involved in “a fight for our survival as a Constitutional Republic like no other time since our founding.”

“Under a Democrat Congress and the Current Administration, our Country has taken a hard left turn toward Socialism and a Marxist form of tyrannical government which must be countered now by electing congressional and presidential candidates who will always act to defend our Constitutional Republic. The survival of our Nation and its cherished freedoms, liberty, and historic values are at stake,” the letter states.

“We urge all citizens to get involved now at the local, state and/or national level to elect political representatives who will act to Save America, our Constitutional Republic, and hold those currently in office accountable,” it continued. “The “will of the people” must be heard and followed.”

In the letter, the retired generals and admirals slammed the 2020 election process, citing “election irregularities.” The group also argued that Democrats’ bills H.R. 1 and S. 1, designed to federalize voting standards, would “destroy election fairness” and “[end] our Representative Republic.”…

Read the entire letter and see list of distinguished signers at https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/05/120-retired-military-flag-officers-warn-us-under-assault-by-socialists-marxists-urges-americans-to-fight-back/

Radical New Rules for Post-America

By Victor Davis Hanson
March 31, 2021

There are 10 new ideas that are changing America, maybe permanently.

1) Money is a construct. It can be created from thin air. Annual deficits and aggregate national debt no longer matter much…

2) Laws are not necessarily binding anymore…

3) Racialism is now acceptable. We are defined first by our particular ethnic or religious tribe, only secondarily—if at all—by an American commonality…

4) The immigrant is mostly preferable to the citizen..

5) Most Americans should be treated as we would treat little children. They cannot be asked to provide an ID to vote. “Noble lies” by our elites about COVID-19 rules are necessary to protect “Neanderthals” from themselves…

6) Hypocrisy is passé. Virtue-signaling is alive…

7) Ignoring or perpetuating homelessness is preferable to ending it…

8) McCarthyism is good. Destroying lives and careers for incorrect thoughts saves more lives and careers…

9) Ignorance is preferable to knowledge. Neither statue-toppling, name-changing, nor the “1619 Project” require any evidence or historical knowledge…

10) Wokeness is the new religion, growing faster and larger than Christianity itself…

Americans privately fear these rules, while publicly appearing to accept them…

Read more on each point at https://amgreatness.com/2021/03/31/radical-new-rules-for-post-america

Wisconsin Supreme Court Strikes Down Governor’s COVID Emergency Declarations

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on March 31 struck down Gov. Tony Evers’s statewide mask mandate, ruling the Democrat overstepped his legal authority by declaring multiple states of emergency amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The question in this case is not whether the Governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully. We conclude he did not,” Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote in the opinion.

Evers initially declared a state of emergency in March 2020. He declared additional states of emergency in July and September. Evers has since issued new states of emergency on an ongoing basis.

Jeré Fabick of the Heartland Institute sued Evers over the second and third declarations, asserting they were unlawful; four justices agreed.

Wisconsin law specifies that no state of emergency may last longer than 60 days unless the state legislature extends it through a joint resolution. The governor didn’t obtain legislative approval for his extensions and explicitly went against lawmakers in February…

More at https://www.theepochtimes.com/wisconsin-supreme-court-strikes-down-governors-unlawful-emergency-declarations_3757191.html

WHO Insider Blows Whistle on Big Brother Bill Gates & GAVI

Bill Gates, filthy rich person with zero ethics, medical training or license, but a specialist in the spread of viruses. due to his aggressive marketing of the MS-DOS operating system, has somehow attained “nation state” status at the World Health Organization (WHO) where he dictates the world’s reactions to COVID-19.

Gates Sr was a an attorney and deeply involved in Planned Parenthood and eugenics. And if that isn’t bad enough, Gates Jr has legal immunity for all he is doing: pushing the oppressive masking, social distancing, lockdowns, VACCINES, and so on… pushing the world to the brink of disaster with disease, death, destruction of economies… and remedies from which he profits.

Should money give anyone the authority to behave like Big Brother, the dictator in 1984? (See book and movie.)

Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger is a health scientist who does research, training and teaching in public health. Early on in her career, she began working with WHO, doing research which she says was “science for politics.” In this video she talks about the “suspicious” activities of Bill Gates and the reservations she has about the actions of the WHO, GAVI and Gates… she says Switzerland is the center of corruption, and that GAVI and Bill Gates have total immunity from everything they do.

Worse, when the pandemic began, she found that many breaches to international health regulations were occurring, and more. The rules under which countries work with WHO virtually put WHO in charge of all rules and formal edicts and announcements — with Gates being right there as part of the executive board like an unofficial member state, making decisions that affect the entire world.

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/03/08/who-insider-blows-whistle-on-gates-and-gavi.aspx

Supreme Court Rules States Can Charge Illegal Immigrants For I.D. Theft – Conservative Brief

DUH?!?
HUH?!?

Four of nine Supreme Court Justices think it’s ok for illegal aliens to commit identity theft?!?

Any group of nine people in any field of employment would probably come up with a better score than five out of nine.

Excuse me, but why did this even have to go to the Supreme Court – and why did tney agree to hear the case? Aren’t there already laws against identity theft?

The Supreme Court recently took on a case involving undocumented workers and ruled that illegal aliens who steal Americans’ Social Security numbers can be charged with a crime.

The SCOTUS issued a major 5-4 decision that illegal immigrants who use someone else’s information when filling out tax forms for employment can face criminal charges…

https://conservativebrief.com/court-rules-36184/

Missing 13th Amendment Found: “No Lawyers In Public Office”?

This story reveals a modification to the U.S. Constitution that must have required a great deal of “behind the scenes” work to accomplish. Who could have done that, and why?

What this article says to me is that the possibility for healing our country is contained in a return to our roots. Could a restoration of the original U.S. Constitution and its original 13th Amendment make the United States whole again? Could it be freed at last from the grip of the British monarchy?

Just imagine how very different Congress would be without a privileged class that is above the law, rather than the current self-appointed aristocracy. Imagine if, rather than the unwieldy, convoluted legal system we now have, important decisions were made in simple, plain, clear language, featuring qualities such as fairness, common sense, economic soundness, logic, ethics and compassion. Imagine (as difficult as it may be) an honest Congress (say that ten times in rapid succession).

Working at law offices in big cities taught me that the work of lawyers is not always as it seems to be. Experts in “Environmental Law”, for example, did not work to protect the environment. Rather, they worked to help big companies skirt the rules and get what they wanted, despite the law. Environmental Law firms were experts in twisting and turning and defying the law. They taught big companies how to rape the environment yet stay within the letter of a huge, convoluted legal system, made by lawyers for lawyers rather than made by people for The People.

Written by David M. Dodge, Researcher
Date: 08/01/91

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn, were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine.

By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a 13th Amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. Moreover, after studying the Amendment’s language and historical context, they realized the principle intent of this “missing” 13th Amendment was to prohibit lawyers from serving in government. So began a seven-year, nationwide search for the truth surrounding the most bizarre Constitutional puzzle in American history — the unlawful removal of a ratified Amendment from the Constitution of the United States.

Since 1983, Dodge and Dunn have uncovered additional copies of the Constitution with the “missing” 13th Amendment printed in at least eighteen separate publications by ten different states and territories over four decades from 1822 to 1860. In June of this year (1991), Dodge uncovered the evidence that this missing 13th Amendment had indeed been lawfully ratified by the state of Virginia and was therefore an authentic Amendment to the American Constitution. If the evidence is correct and no logical errors have been made, a 13th Amendment restricting lawyers from serving in government was ratified in 1819 and removed from the U.S. Constitution during the tumult of the Civil War. Since the Amendment was never lawfully repealed, it is still the Law today. The implications are enormous…

Read much more at http://themillenniumreport.com/2015/10/the-missing-13th-amendment-no-lawyers-allowed-in-public-office/

Election Do-Over? Latinos For Trump Sue to Shut Congress Down Over Civil Rights Violations

Will be interesting to follow this lawsuit. They want to have a new election, which seems to be a good idea, given the mess of the 2020 election.

“We know that to the left’s disappointment, the judge in our case is interested in hearing more about the Civil Rights violations that we have recorded. We have affidavits from many people, minorities, including people who immigrated here from Cuba who say that their Civil Rights were violated in the 2020 Presidential elections and that their vote was not honored. To minorities, all we have is the idea that our vote, which is sacred, is going to be protected by the United States government, and it is clear that our rights were not protected,” Gracia said.

WHAT THEY WANT

a. Permanent injunctive relief in the form of a new federal election for both Congress and the President and Vice President.
b. Permanent injunctive relief forever restraining Defendants from participating in any action relating to the process of electing public officials, other than casting their own lawful vote as a citizen of the United States, or at least restraining Defendants from such participation in the new federal election to be ordered after trial on the merits,
c. Permanent injunctive relief forever restraining Defendants from violating Plaintiffs constitutional rights described herein,
d. General Damages in an amount to be determined at the time of trial;
e. Punitive Damages in an amount to be determined at the time of trial;
f. Reasonable attorneys fees’ and costs of suit;
g. Prejudgment and post-judgment interest

Read much more at https://djhjmedia.com/kari/election-do-over-latinos-for-trump-sue-to-shut-congress-down-over-civil-rights-violations/

Medical coercion is against international law

A message from “Joe Public” on Facebook:

Now this is called coercion, and where medical procedures are concerned, it is against international law. The Nuremberg Code Article 6 and the 2005 UNESCO statement on bioethics and human rights.
If I am badgered or continually pestered, by any man or woman to take an experimental biological agent from a supplier who accepts no liability for the damage it may cause, and that man or woman does not accept that I have still yet to make my informed individual decision on whether I consent or not, then I will be taking names, and legal action. The law is very clear.
Here is a refreshers course for you.
THE NUREMBERG CODE (set up after the WW2 atrocities committed by the Nazis in the concentration camps))
The Nuremberg Code is an international document regulating the principles of conducting medical experiments and procedures on people. The Code was developed and adopted after the Nuremberg trial of doctors in 1947, as a result of which many, many citizens were sent to the gallows, in particular for the forcible administration of different vaccines to people.
The code has only ten points and it reads:
*1. The absolutely necessary condition for conducting an experiment on a person is the voluntary consent of the latter.
2. The experiment should bring positive results to the society, unattainable by other methods or research methods; it should not be random, essentially non-binding in nature.
3. The experiment should be based on data obtained in laboratory studies on animals, knowledge of the history of the development of this disease or other studied problems. Its holding should be organized in such a way that the expected results justify the fact of its holding.
4. When conducting an experiment, it is necessary to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and damage.
*5. None of the experiments should be carried out if there is reason to assume the possibility of death or a disabling injury to the subject; an