The Israeli People Committee (IPC), a civilian body made of leading Israeli health experts, has published its April report into the Pfizer vaccine’s side effects indicating damage to almost every system in the human body. If the findings by IPC are genuine, then Pfizer vaccine is linked to more deaths in Israel than AstraZeneca’s in the whole of Europe. The findings are catastrophic on every possible level. This is a detailed report that highlights the most devastating findings.
The verdict of the Israeli People Committee is that “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” The report is long and detailed (read full report below).
“We received 288 death reports in proximity to vaccination (90% up to 10 days after the vaccination), 64% of those were men.”
Yet the report states, “according to data provided by the Ministry of Health, only 45 deaths in Israel were vaccine related.”
If these are the genuine numbers, then Israel has failed to report on its experimental results genuinely.
We have been hearing a lot about the rare side effects of the AstraZeneca vaccine and more than 300 cases of blood clots found in Europe.
German scientists have found the exact 2 step process how the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine causes blood clots in recipients. They describe a series of events that has to happen in the body before the vaccines create these large clots.
If the findings by IPC are genuine, then Pfizer vaccine is linked to more deaths in Israel than AstraZeneca’s in the whole of Europe….
These reports indicate damage to almost every system in the human body. Our analysis found a relatively high rate of heart-related injuries.
26% of all cardiac events occurred in young people up to the age of 40, with the most common diagnosis in these cases being Myositis or Pericarditis.
Also, a high rate of massive vaginal bleeding, neurological damage, and damage to the skeletal and skin systems has been observed.
It should be noted that a significant number of reports of side effects are related, directly or indirectly, to Hypercoagulability (infarction), Myocardial infarction, stroke, miscarriages, impaired blood flow to the limbs, pulmonary embolism.”
Read the summary of the Israeli People Committee report in English below….
As the 2020 election audit continues in Arizona, Maricopa County was forced to admit to auditors that the voting machines did not have passwords for administrative functions during the election.
Maricopa County reported to auditors today that they do not have a password to access the administrative function of their voting machines, according to a report by Christina Bobb of One America News. The administrative function is seperate from the regular function of the voting machines.
“If you think of it like your computer, you know, a lot of people can log in as users, but very few people can log in as administrators. So when the auditors were examining the machines, they were examining it as a user,” explained Bobb on OAN. “And then they reached the point where they needed the administrative password, and when they reached back out to the county, the county was forced to acknowledge that they did not have the password. Which means they didn’t have it for the election. Which means they did not have any control over the machines for the election.”…
So who WAS controlling the machines?
Unspecified “security risk to law enforcement data” in officials’ refusal to turn over subpoenaed internet routers to state legislature
Law enforcement officials in Maricopa County, Arizona are refusing to turn over electronic devices subpoenaed by the Arizona State Legislature this week, claiming that compliance with the legislature’s lawful order would create an unspecified “security risk” to “law enforcement data.”
A letter signed by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and addressed to former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett vigorously defended officials’ decision to not turn over internet routers, but did not elaborate on the purported risk that complying with the subpoena would cause.
“While the County was delivering the subpoenaed material to the Senate’s custody on Thursday, April 22, 2021, MCAO was notified that delivering routers, or ‘virtual images’ of routers, posed a significant security risk to law enforcement data utilized by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office as well as numerous federal agencies,” the letter stated, adding, “We also learned that if criminal elements or others gained access to this data, it might compromise county and federal law enforcement efforts and put the lives of law enforcement personnel at risk.”
The letter continued, “For the past week, we have attempted to find a solution that would allow the County to provide virtual images of the routers as we had planned. But we have been unable to find a way to eliminate the significant risks to MCSO and its state and federal law enforcement partners.”
As National File previously reported, Arizona Democrats recently settled a lawsuit with a firm involved in the audit of ballots cast in Maricopa County during the 2020 election:
After a lengthy lawsuit that saw the Democrats achieve few victories in their goal of stopping the audit of the 2020 ballots in Maricopa County, Arizona, they have reached a settlement with the firm involved in the audit and the Senate Republicans that will see the firm, Cyber Ninjas, cease verifying the signatures on early voting envelopes with the signatures on file from the voter.
With only 9 days left to go before the audit is set to be completed, signature verification will cease immediately. According to the settlement, Cyber Ninjas “and their agents will not compare signatures on early ballot envelopes with signatures from the voter registration file.The Senate Defendants warrant and represent that they are not currently comparing signatures on early ballot envelopes with signatures from the voter registration file, and will notify Plaintiffs within 48hours of any decision to undertake such signature comparison and afford Plaintiffs 48 hours to respond to resolve any concerns.” Additionally, “If the parties cannot resolve the issue in a mutually agreeable manner, Plaintiffs may seek emergency injunctive and/or declaratory relief in court to seek compliance with the law.”
In what has to be the most illogical thought process known to mankind, over half of Americans are “concerned” that some others are refusing to take the vaccine. Vaccine believers are so into this new religion that they are overly concerned about what others do, or do not do.
The main question no pro-vaccine advocate can answer, is if your vaccine works (and that’s why you go it right?) then why does someone else have to be vaccinated? Are you saying it doesn’t work? Probably, because Fauci even said it doesn’t work. Probably because it’s not a vaccine anyway. That’s evidenced by the rulers constantly telling people it won’t stop you from getting COVID, it’ll “lessen the symptoms.” And even then, if you believe it works to do that, why not just let the people who won’t get it suffer and we can compare down the road which ones made the right choice during this gigantic medical experiment of all of humanity?
In a new poll, it has become all too obvious that humans are willing to suspend their logical and critical thinking in exchange for blind obedience to their master.
New polling shows just how many Americans are willing to suspend critical thinking in exchange for obedient submission. Three times more concerned with people in their areas not getting vaccinated against Covid-19 than they are with the availability or distribution of the jabs.
The main concern among Americans appears to be vaccine hesitancy from their fellow citizens. While over half of American adults have received at least one dose of a vaccine, 55% of those surveyed said they are concerned about people in their local areas choosing not to get vaccinated. Among that group, 28% are “very” worried and 27% are“moderately” worried. Another 16% said they are “not too” worried, while 30% are not concerned. -RT …
The sheep are just thinking what they’re told to think, but the thought dictators either want to eliminate the control group as they always do with vaccine trials, or this is the last trial they expect to conduct.
A “new” proposal by the Biden administration to create a health-focused federal agency modeled after DARPA is not what it appears to be. Promoted as a way to “end cancer,” this resuscitated “health DARPA” conceals a dangerous agenda.Last Wednesday, President Biden was widely praised in mainstream and health-care–focused media for his call to create a “new biomedical research agency” modeled after the US military’s “high-risk, high-reward” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. As touted by the president, the agency would seek to develop “innovative” and “breakthrough” treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, and diabetes, with a call to “end cancer as we know it.”
Far from “ending cancer” in the way most Americans might envision it, the proposed agency would merge “national security” with “health security” in such as way as to use both physical and mental health “warning signs” to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic “pre-crime” organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as “wrongthink.”
The Biden administration has asked Congress for $6.5 billion to fund the agency, which would be largely guided by Biden’s recently confirmed top science adviser, Eric Lander. Lander, formerly the head of the Silicon Valley–dominated Broad Institute, has been controversial for his ties to eugenicist and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his relatively recent praise for James Watson, an overtly racist eugenicist. Despite that, Lander is set to be confirmed by the Senate and Congress and is reportedly significantly enthusiastic about the proposed new “health DARPA.”
This new agency, set to be called ARPA-H or HARPA, would be housed within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and would raise the NIH budget to over $51 billion. Unlike other agencies at NIH, ARPA-H would differ in that the projects it funds would not be peer reviewed prior to approval; instead hand-picked program managers would make all funding decisions. Funding would also take the form of milestone-driven payments instead of the more traditional multiyear grants.
ARPA-H will likely heavily fund and promote mRNA vaccines as one of the “breakthroughs” that will cure cancer. Some of the mRNA vaccine manufacturers that have produced some of the most widely used COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, stated just last month that “cancer is the next problem to tackle with mRNA tech” post-COVID. BioNTech has been developing mRNA gene therapies for cancer for years and is collaborating with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to create mRNA-based treatments for tuberculosis and HIV.
Other “innovative” technologies that will be a focus of this agency are less well known to the public and arguably more concerning.
The Long Road to ARPA-H
ARPA-H is not a new and exclusive Biden administration idea; there was a previous attempt to create a “health DARPA” during the Trump administration in late 2019. Biden began to promote the idea during his presidential campaign as early as June 2019, albeit using a very different justification for the agency than what had been pitched by its advocates to Trump. In 2019, the same foundation and individuals currently backing Biden’s ARPA-H had urged then president Trump to create “HARPA,” not for the main purpose of researching treatments for cancer and Alzheimer’s, but to stop mass shootings before they happen through the monitoring of Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs….
In an April 4 letter he sent to the Spring 2021 virtual meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Pope Francis officially called for a new system of “global governance” and “universal vaccines” to cure the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) and other pressing “problems.”
The letter, which only mentions “God” once, talks about the pressing need to “confront a series of grave and interrelated socio-economic, ecological, and political crises.”
It mentions vaccines three different times while segueing in and out of topics related to “climate change.”
“We are, in fact, in debt to nature itself, as well as the people and countries affected by human-induced ecological degradation and biodiversity loss,” Francis claims.
Replete with language that sounds as though it was ripped right from the pages of World Economic Forum (WEF) head Klaus Schwab’s “Great Reset” manifesto, Francis’ letter advocates for a “green financial agenda” to replace the current financial system.
Throughout his eight-year tenure as pope, Francis has addressed the WEF directly on four separate occasions.
He also allowed the Vatican to hold a roundtable event at WEF’s annual Swiss conference site in Davos.
Francis would like to see “a justly financed vaccine solidarity” – meaning “equitable” vaccine distribution for the Chinese virus worldwide – in order to fulfill “the law of love and the health of all.”
Francis also mentions in his letter the secular fraternity outlined in his recent encyclical Fratelli Tutti.
“Here, I reiterate my call to government leaders, businesses and international organizations to work together in providing vaccines for all, especially for the most vulnerable and needy,” Francis writes.
Pope Francis Wants A One-World Government Now
Just prior to the letter’s issuance, Francis issued a call for a “new world order,” arguing that the world should operate under a single globalist system of governance….
A poll of nations throughout the world has shown that the U.S. is seen as a greater threat to democracy than nations such as China or Russia.
The poll commissioned by the Alliance of Democracies Foundation featured responses from 50,000 people in 53 different countries to determine the results. A whopping 44 percent of respondents said they feared the U.S. as a threat to democracy, as opposed to 38 percent of respondents fearing the Chinese and 28 percent of respondents fearing the Russian impact on democracy.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who chairs the Alliance of Democracies Foundation, is interpreting the results of the poll as showing a need for more globalism.
“This poll shows that democracy is still alive in people’s hearts and minds. We now need to come out of the Covid-19 pandemic by delivering more democracy and freedom to people who want to see their countries become more democratic,” he said.
“The positive support for an Alliance of Democracies, whether the UK’s D10 initiative or President Biden’s Summit for Democracy, shows that people want more cooperation to push back against the autocrats. Leaders should take note of these perceptions and act upon them,” Rasmussen added.
In all actuality, the findings demonstrate that the U.S. is too involved in the affairs of the world, and their interventionist foreign policy is majorly backfiring.
Big League Politics reported on how President Trump and his allies in the Republican Party fought back against the endless wars that have caused America to lose so much respect and prestige abroad:…
As usual, the globalists are the problem that they purport to address.
BTW: whatever respect the rest of the world had for this country was largely due to Project Mockingbird, the CIA’s program of infiltration of the global media and movie industries, which is almost as effective against foreign audiences as domestic ones. We are all being played.
The Gateway Pundit’s Jordan Conradson interviewed Arizona Audit Director Ken Bennett after the Biden Department of Justice threatened to interfere with the Arizona State Audit.
On Wednesday the Biden Department of Justice threatened to interfere in the Senate audit of the Maricopa County ballots….