In this speech delivered at a Health-and-Freedom rally in Orange County, California, human-rights attorney Leigh Dundas lights the fire of liberty in the hearts of her audience as she shows the parallels between the rise of tyranny in Nazi Germany under the banner of nationalism and the rise of tyranny in America under the banner of public health. Her passion is contagious, and you will be drawn to her call to action. This speech will be remembered in history. 2021 April 18 – Source: Obscured Friends.
You can view this video from several sources. Cached versions are adjusted for optimum quality, if needed, and they provide access if original sources fail.
Mark Crispin Miller teaches a course on Mass Persuasian and Propaganda at the NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development for 20 years. He is now suing 20 department colleagues for libel after they signed a letter to the dean of his school demanding a review of Miller’s conduct. Today we talk to Miller about his course, his views, his libel suit, and the state of free speech in the era of increasing COVID tyranny.
SHOW NOTES: …
In one of the strangest reactions to the Derek Chauvin trial verdict, House speaker Nancy Pelosi thanked George Floyd for “sacrificing [his] life for justice.”
“Thank you, George Floyd, for sacrificing your life for justice,” Pelosi said Tuesday. “For being there to call out to your mom—how heartbreaking was that?—call out for your mom, ‘I can’t breathe.’ But because of you and because of thousands, millions of people around the world who came out for justice, your name will always be synonymous with justice. And now we have to make sure justice prevails in the sentencing, but that’s its own procedure.”
You have to hear it to believe it. Watch:
Democrat Nancy Pelosi thanks George Floyd for being killed pic.twitter.com/2r2e2Ffz9Z
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) April 20, 2021
To her it’s a big political PR show. This is the mindset of most of the politicians in washington, but especially the demoncrats, who are constantly trying to pose as champions of the black community.
On the 28th anniversary of the violent end to the Waco Siege, the National Association for Gun Rights condemned the nomination of David Chipman to be director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
At the time, Chipman was an ATF field agent who posed in a photo in the rubble of the ATF siege that claimed the lives of 76 people, including 25 children.
“Nominating David Chipman to head the ATF is absolutely abhorrent. Choosing Chipman to direct the ATF is about as smart as nominating Ted Kaczynski to head the United States Postal Service,” said Dudley Brown, President of the National Association for Gun Rights. “We’re actively mobilizing our 4.5 million members in opposition to his nomination.”
At the moment, David Chipman works as a gun control advocate and senior lobbyist for Giffords – a civilian disarmament organization that has recently become prominent in its gradual efforts to regulate, and eventually abolish the Second Amendment.
On previous occasions, Chipman has given multiple testimonies before Congress, where he has called for infringing on the Second Amendment rights of lawful Americans.
“No presidential administration should ever nominate someone for a law enforcement leadership job who was an active participant in government sanctioned mass murder. Chipman’s confirmation vote is a watershed moment for any U.S Senator who claims even cursory support for the Second Amendment,” Brown said in his concluding remarks.
Chipman’s nomination is shaping up to be one of the biggest fights for Second Amendment supporters in the next few months….
Speaking of Giffords:
According to a new peer-reviewed paper, “The Myth of a Food Crisis,” corrupt philanthropic and academic sectors in agriculture and development perpetuate the lie that Big Ag is the only way to feed the world.
Sustainable, local, organic food grown on small farms has a tremendous amount to offer. Unlike chemical-intensive industrial-scale agriculture, it regenerates rural communities; it doesn’t pollute rivers and groundwater or create dead zones; it can save coral reefs; it doesn’t encroach on rainforests; it preserves soil and it can restore the climate. Why do all governments not promote it?
For policymakers, the big obstacle to global promotion and restoration of small-scale farming (leaving aside the lobbying power of agribusiness) is allegedly that, “it can’t feed the world.” If that claim were true, local food systems would be bound to leave people hungry and so promoting them becomes selfish, short-termist and unethical.
Nevertheless, this purported flaw in sustainable and local agriculture represents a curious charge because, no matter where one looks in global agriculture, food prices are low because products are in surplus.
Often, they are in huge surplus, even in the hungriest countries. Farmers will tell you they are going out of business because, as a result of these surpluses, prices are low and continuously falling. Indeed, declining agricultural prices are a broad trend continuing, with the odd blip, for over a century, and applying to every commodity. This downward trend has continued even through a recent biofuel boom designed to consume some of these surpluses. In other words, the available data contradict the likelihood of food shortages. Despite the rising global population, food gluts are everywhere.
Global food models
The standard justification for claiming that these surpluses will one day turn into global food shortages comes from various mathematical models of the food system. These models are based on food production and other figures supplied to the UN by national governments. Whereas anecdotal or local evidence is necessarily suspect, these models claim to be able to definitively assess and predict the enormous, diverse and highly complex global food system.
The most prominent and most widely cited of these food system models is called GAPS (Global Agriculture Perspectives System). GAPS is a model created by researchers at the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in Rome. These models — and most often GAPS — are thus what is being cited in any quantitative discussion of future food needs. GAPS, for example, is the basis for the common ‘60% more food needed by 2050’ prediction, what Britain’s chief scientist John Beddington called “a perfect storm” facing humanity.
How reliable are these food system models?
In 2010 Professor Thomas Hertel of Purdue University gave the annual presidential address of the U.S. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. He chose to discuss the ability of mathematical models like GAPS to predict future supplies (this work was subsequently published). Hertel told his audience that those models are faulty.
What Hertel highlighted is that economic analysis has plainly shown that food supplies respond to long-term prices. That is, when prices for food items increase, food production also increases. For example, when prices increase, it becomes more worthwhile for farmers to invest in boosting their yields; but when prices are low there is little such incentive. Other actors in the food system behave similarly.
Yet global food models, noted Hertel, have adopted the opposite interpretation: they assume global food supplies are insensitive to prices.
In the firm but diplomatic tone expected of a presidential address, Hertel told his audience:
“I fear that much of this rich knowledge has not yet worked its way into the global models being used for long run analysis of climate, biofuels and agricultural land use … it is not clear that the resulting models are well-suited for the kind of long run sustainability analysis envisioned here.”
This is rather important. Since the whole point of these models is long-term prediction, if global food models underestimate the ability of food systems to adjust to higher demand, they will tend to predict a crisis even when there isn’t one.
Like all mathematical models, GAPS and other food system models incorporate numerous assumptions. These assumptions are typically shared across related models, which is why they tend to give similar answers. The reliability of all such models therefore depends crucially on the validity of shared assumptions like the one Hertel focused on.
Hertel’s analysis therefore prompts two important questions. The first is this: If GAPS contains an assumption that contradicts the collective wisdom of conventional agricultural economics, what other questionable assumptions hide in global food models?
The second question is this: Is it significant that the error identified by Hertel will tend to generate predictions that are unnecessarily alarmist?…
When the last small farmer succumbs to “the market” and everyone eats toxic factory food, the depopulation begins in earnest.
Yet another safe, cheap and effective treatment. But be sure to stay muzzled in your isolation chamber until you get medicine’s latest tinker-toy tech injected into you.
Patients with a self-administered nasal spray application found to have reduced SARS-CoV-2 log viral load by more than 95% in infected participants within 24 hours of treatment, and by more than 99% in 72 hours
Trial concluded that treatment accelerated clearance of SARS-CoV-2 by a factor of 16-fold versus a placebo
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated 79 confirmed cases of COVID-19, the majority heavily-infected with the UK variant
No adverse events were recorded in the group
Submission for Emergency Use in the UK and Canada for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19 is planned immediately
Biotech company SaNOtize Research & Development Corp., (SaNOtize), Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust in Surrey, UK, and Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services, UK, on Thursday announced results of clinical trials indicating that SaNOtize’s Nitric Oxide Nasal Spray (NONS) represents a safe and effective antiviral treatment that could prevent the transmission of COVID-19, shorten its course, and reduce the severity of symptoms and damage in those already infected….
Judicial Watch, a legal accountability group has shared a 600 page report detailing that the US government has been buying and trafficking “fresh” aborted baby body parts. According to the report these body parts were purchased by the FDA to perform biological experiments such as drug testing and to “humanize” mice.
Judicial Watch has revealed the recent emails between US FDA employees and the California-based Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR).
Those emails in a 600 page report (read below) prove that between 2012 and 2018, the agency spent tens of thousands of dollars buying aborted babies for unethical scientific experiments.
The contract was terminated by the Trump administration in 2018. It resulted in halting government fetal tissue research as the contracts were unlawful.
The ABR has been under investigation earlier as well as it has been trafficking and harvesting fetal organs like lungs, livers, eyeballs and even the fetal brains from aborted babies.
The email conversations between FDA and ABR were revealed and those were really disturbing.
$12,000 were paid upfront for each baby to ABR. And, the organs were shipped “Fresh; on wet ice.”
FDA doctors requested for fetal organs and they say, “It is strongly preferred to have a male fetus if at all possible … [but] undetermined sex or female is better than no tissue.”…
(Natural News) We have reached the tipping point where covid tyranny has become a crime against humanity. It’s no longer about protecting “public health” — and it never was, of course — it’s now about enslaving and exterminating as many human beings as possible under the cover of covid-19.
The latest insanity comes from Michigan, where we are told that infants from two to four years old must now be forced to wear masks. It’s all about cruelty against children and mask indoctrination at a young age, of course. There is zero evidence that masks reduce infections, and zero evidence that 2-4 year old infants are at any real risk from the coronavirus.
There is tremendous evidence, however, that masking and socially distancing children is horrifyingly bad for their mental health and social development. These children are being essentially tortured by a corrupt medical establishment that seeks to inject pregnant women with experimental gene-altering medical treatments, all while denying them knowledge of vitamin D, zinc and other preventative interventions that carry almost zero risk.
In Oregon, they’re trying to make masks permanent so that the fascism Oregon health officials can demonize people for not wearing a mask, even five years from now. It’s pure insanity and it’s a crime against humanity.
The mask pushers, vaccine pushers and covid pushers have all become Holocaust-class criminals against the human race, and they can’t wait to achieve their goals of mass extermination and widespread infertility.
Today’s Situation Update podcast covers the truth of how all the covid vaccines used in America cause blood clots, too. And it covers Maxine Waters and her direct incitement of politically motivated violence, as well as NASA’s hilarious claim that they have a helicopter flying on Mars — a planet which NASA claims has only 0.6% of Earth’s atmosphere. It’s an incredible moment in history, for sure, when NASA claims to have flown a helicopter on a planet with virtually no atmosphere (which is obviously required for the helicopter rotor to produce lift).
Hear the full, hilarious podcast here:
I’ve also posted another special podcast report that reveals the re-platforming of America (and the whole world, actually) thanks to the rising up of new, alternative platforms. At the Tulsa event, I met and interviewed the founders of several important platforms, including Clouthub, PureSocial, Health Freedom Hub and FrankSpeech. You’ll hear those interviews as we post this content in the days ahead….
It’s taken much longer than it should have but at last it seems to be happening: the lockdown paradigm is collapsing. The signs are all around us.
The one-time hero of the lockdown, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, has seen his support tank from 71% to 38%, along with ever more demands that he resign. Meanwhile, polls have started to favor Florida governor and lockdown opponent Ron DeSantis for influence over the GOP in the future. This remarkable flip in fortunes is due to the dawning realization that the lockdowns were a disastrous policy. DeSantis and fellow anti-lockdown governor Kristi Noem are the first to state the truth bluntly. Their honesty has won them both credibility.
Meanwhile, in Congressional hearings, Representative James Jordan (R-OH) demanded that Dr. Fauci account for why closed Michigan has worse disease prevalence than neighboring Wisconsin which has long been entirely open. Fauci pretended he couldn’t hear the question, couldn’t see the chart, and then didn’t understand. Finally he just sat there silent after having uttered a few banalities about enforcement differentials.
The lockdowners are now dealing with the huge problem of Texas. It has been fully open with no restrictions for 6 weeks. Cases and deaths fell dramatically in the same period. Fauci has no answer. Or compare closed California with open Florida: similar death rates. We have a full range of experiences in the US that allow comparisons between open and closed and disease outcomes. There is no relationship.
Or you could look to Taiwan, which had no stringencies governing its 23.5 million people. Deaths from Covid-19 thus far: 11. Sweden, which stayed open, performed better than most of Europe.
The problem is that the presence or absence of lockdowns in the face of the virus seem completely uncorrelated with any disease trajectory. AIER has assembled 33 case studies from all over the world showing this to be true.
Why should any of this matter? Because the “scientists” who recommended lockdowns had posited very precisely and pointedly that they had found the way to control the virus and minimized negative outcomes. We know for sure that the lockdowns imposed astonishing collateral damage. What we do not see is any relationship between lockdowns and disease outcomes.
This is devastating because the scientists who pushed lockdowns had made specific and falsifiable predictions. This was probably their biggest mistake. In doing so, they set up a test of their theory. Their theory failed. This is the sort of moment that causes a collapse of a scientific paradigm, as explained by Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962). ….
Unfortunately I doubt the collapse of the paradigm alone is going to change public policy. As long as the MSM maintains the mirage the politicians will continue to rule with impunity. There are still too many sheep out there.