One hour after the Biden Inauguration, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a timely update to governments and laboratory professionals around the world, superseding its previous instructions of December 14, 2020. The WHO’s notice focused on the cycle thresholds of PCR tests being used too high and that “careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed.”
The release stated, in part:
“The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect the virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.”
In other words, the misused and maligned PCR test, which created tens of thousands of false-positive results, is only an “aid to diagnosis” and should have been used as such. Agreed. Then why did the WHO wait ten months after its pandemic emergency declaration of March 11, 2020, to make that update? Why withhold this recommendation until after the Trump Administration left office?
We may never have a definitive answer. But five weeks after the WHO’s PCR test “information notice,” the cases plunged by 77 percent. Like magic, the pandemic evaporated into thin air as global health agencies tamed the “casedemic” where it always existed: in the inflated data and not as “bodies on the street” as the WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus warned about last year. It was an event that, not surprisingly, never came to fruition.
Here are a few important questions to ponder:
- Beyond the curious timing, what underlying purpose did the belated WHO instructions achieve in lowering the cases in Europe and, particularly, in the United States? And who did this new ruling serve?
- With the pandemic waning, New York City has hired a recovery czar, Lorraine Grillo, to restore the economy. Why have Big Pharma’s media organs continue to ramp up attacks on vaccine risk-aware groups?
- Why have the social media gatekeepers banned, censored, and de-platformed the analysis of skeptics who question COVID vaccines as the only way out, when the outbreak is clearly over and herd immunity appears to have been established?
Countermeasures Cannot be Mandated
Seeing through the fog of medical and scientific misinformation and propaganda, 33 health experts weighed in about the dangers of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines that were rushed to the market, given full liability protection as a “countermeasure.” Under the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) protocols, established over many years through a series of congressional acts, COVID experimental vaccines were given complete liability protection when the “national emergency” was declared on March 13, 2020.
The flip side to the experimentation of a countermeasure in the United States is the COVID vaccines are only authorized for emergency use; they are not approved by the FDA. Therefore, they cannot be mandated by the government at the federal or state level.
For licensing to happen, the FDA needs a minimum of four (4) months of vaccine data. That would put such a review in mid-April.
Then the question becomes: Did the lowering of the cases, via the WHO’s instructions on PCR tests controls, allow Big Pharma and the CDC to claim that the mRNA vaccines worked in taming the outbreak?
If the shots are approved by the FDA only a week or two after reviewing the data, would the Biden Administration mandate the experimental vaccines for all Americans, with no possible religious or medical exemptions? This now seems the logical go-forward path and would explain why the WHO announced a revised PCR test notice when it did.
Recall that in spring 2020, President Trump halted funding to the WHO, as a result of the organization withholding critical information on the outbreak, its source, and spread from Wuhan, China. In a complete reversal, President Joe Biden announced on February 18 at his first G7 global meeting he would immediately donate $2 billion to the COVAX program co-led by the World Health Organization and GAVI, found by Bill Gates. The goal is to vaccinate 20% of the world’s population with the experimental covid shots by the end of 2021.
The 27-minutes long, Ask the Experts video, which has been banned from YouTube but can be found on Rumble and UgeTube, showcases international experts in medicine, science, health, and journalism. Each speaker shared their insights, opinions, and advice on the experimental technology of the messenger RNA (mRNA) in the vaccines. They noted that mRNA jabs really aren’t vaccines per se, but a mix between “bioengineering gene therapy” (Dr. Andy Wakefield) and “medical devices” (Dr. David E. Martin) with roots in nanotechnology.
Although the experts addressed the COVID vaccines from different angles, several common themes emerged:
- Not safe, not effective
- No pandemic; COVID is the world’s greatest hoax
- Serious side effects, including anaphylaxis, autoimmunity, infertility, death
- Not enough data; no long-term safety data
- Too many false positives; misuse of PCR tests
Yet, one of the biggest takeaways from the video is censorship. The Experts know people are not allowed to question the science, debate the unproven technology, or discuss the dangers of the vaccines online or in public. That sets a dangerous precedent, to blindly entrust science and medicine to a single, higher, centralized authority. And it comes out of the IMF and World Economic Forum playbook of the Great Reset….