The “pit to distress” atrocity: https://web.archive.org/web/20140411202246/http://pregnancy.about.com/b/2009/07/10/pit-to-distress.htm
Note that zero consideration is paid to the baby’s subjective experience of essentially suffering a miscarriage. Normal labor is initiated by the fetus, not the mother. Most likely even a “routine” induction would be imprinted by the baby as total maternal rejection. A hell of a way to start life.
Birth Complications Combined With Early Maternal Rejection at Age 1 Year Predispose to Violent Crime at Age 18 Years
The obstetrical industry is a self-perpetuating emergency and a war on humanity, I’ve come to believe that allowing men to become involved in birth was the worst single thing that has ever happened in human history. Seriously. A single birth trauma usually lasts a lifetime and can give rise to countless catastrophes, including new subconsciously traumatized and often circumcised male OB’s, perpetuating the cycle. This is a highly virulent plague which remains invisible to the vast majority of human rights activists. But for god’s sake don’t tell anyone. People might think you’re weird.
One consequence of male doctors’ inevitable lack of intuition about birth is doctor frustration and fear, leading to, in the worst cases, doctor abuse:
Cruelty in Maternity Wards: Fifty Years Later
Fifty years have passed since a scandal broke over inhumane treatment of laboring women in U.S. hospitals, yet first-person and eyewitness reports document that medical care providers continue to subject childbearing women to verbal and physical abuse and even to what would constitute sexual assault in any other context. Women frequently are denied their right to make informed decisions about care and may be punished for attempting to assert their right to refusal. Mistreatment is not uncommon and persists because of factors inherent to hospital social culture. Concerted action on the part of all stakeholders will be required to bring about systemic reform.
“Cruelty in Maternity Wards” was the title of a shocking article published just over 50 years ago in Ladies’ Home Journal in which nurses and women told stories of inhumane treatment in labor and delivery wards during childbirth (Schultz, 1958). Stories included women being strapped down for hours in the lithotomy position, a woman having her legs tied together to prevent birth while her obstetrician had dinner, women being struck and threatened with the possibility of giving birth to a dead or brain damaged baby for crying out in pain, and a doctor cutting and suturing episiotomies without anesthetic (he had once nearly lost a patient to an overdose) while having the nurse stifle the woman’s cries with a mask.
The article shook the country and triggered a tsunami of childbirth reform that included the founding of the American Society for Psychoprophylaxis in Obstetrics, now known as Lamaze International. Nonetheless, as Susan Hodges (2009) recently noted in her guest editorial published in The Journal of Perinatal Education, despite enormous differences in labor and delivery management, decades later, inhumane treatment remains distressingly common.
American childbearing women still suffer mistreatment at the hands of care providers, ranging from failure to provide supportive care to disrespect and insensitivity to denial of women’s right to make informed decisions to common use of harmful medical interventions to outright verbal, physical, and even sexual assault. Furthermore, the more extreme examples are not aberrations but merely the far end of the spectrum. Abuse, moreover, results from factors inherent to the system, which increases the difficulties of implementing reforms.
ABUSE IN CHILDBIRTH: PARALLELS WITH DOMESTIC ABUSE
According to domesticviolence.org (an online resource devoted to helping individuals recognize, address, and prevent domestic violence), domestic violence and emotional abuse encompass “name-calling or putdowns,” “keeping a partner from contacting their family or friends,” “actual or threatened physical harm,” “intimidation,” and “sexual assault” (“Domestic Violence Definition,” 2009, para. 2). In all cases, the intent is to gain power over and control the victim. One could add that perpetrators, obstetric staff or otherwise, feel entitled to exert this control on grounds of the victim’s inferior position vis-a-vis the perpetrator as the following illustrate: …” — J Perinat Educ. 2010 Summer; 19(3): 33-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920649
Link to draft legislation: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0130&from=EN
This is how ludicrous the situation has become. They simply will not stop gaslighting us. They can’t. If people are given a chance to think and research, the spell wears off. And so they’re doing their best to maintain a constant state of fear. That’s how mind control works. It’s literally a kind of occult spell, just what you’d expect from a government of luciferians.
An event with the theme of ‘women’s empowerment’ to be hosted by the Clinton Foundation has been roundly ridiculed after it emerged that it will feature Bill Clinton.
A Press release announced that Kamala Harris will discuss “the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on women, and empowering women and girls in the US and around the world,” with Clinton on Friday….
The agenda of complete control over humanity is being pushed forward by the United States’ central bank, the Federal Reserve. The Fed is actively pushing hard to get a digital dollar out there, so every single transaction can be tracked, traced, taxed, and shut off when they decide.
If we, as human beings, allow this to be our future, we deservc to be the slaves they see us as. A fully centralized and controlled currency system will be a means to further enslave the population making it almost impossible to dissent or break free, ever.
According to Pymnts, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said that the Fed’s project of totalitarian slavery has merit because it could benefit unbanked and underbanked Americans. A Fedcoin or equivalent has the potential to sidestep the middleman between commercial banks or credit card networks. Because settlement would be in near-real-time, chances for fraud would be reduced. Yellen said at a recent conference that a digital currency launched by the Fed and tied to the blockchain could result in payments that are faster, safer, and less expensive.
This will all be dependent on your servitude to the masters. If you step out of line, you won’t have access to your digital wallet in this controlled and centralized system that they want. If you want your universal basic income pittance, you will have to get the experimental gene therapy “vaccine.” If you want to buy or sell, you will submit to the beast system and accept the digital dollar.
Have we learned nothing from the last century of central banking in the United States? Apparently not. Centralizing control over the currency into the hands of the few will enslave the masses to them. We’ve already been through this. We should step away from centralization, not forward into its traps.