Following is an article about a type of mass trauma based mind- and social-control. If you remember the visual imprint, get ready for the emotional deluge. Don’t keep it bottled up. Find someone who understands PTSD.
Not only is she beautiful and brilliant – she is also brilliant and beautiful. Always worth watching and listening and her observations are always worth considering.
She discusses the timing of the “invasion” of the Capitol… right in the middle of the Congress discussing the Electoral College results. Vote fraud was preempted by the story of the storming of the Capitol.
What is it they say? “Go figger?”
Insisting on factual accuracy does not make one an apologist for the protesters. False reporting is never justified, especially to inflate threat and fear levels.
Glenn Greenwald, Feb 16 2020
What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned.
But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media. Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are.
Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago. And anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful reporting about what happened, then you’re trying to “minimize” what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves.
One of the most significant of these falsehoods was the tale — endorsed over and over without any caveats by the media for more than a month — that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by the pro-Trump mob when they beat him to death with a fire extinguisher. That claim was first published by The New York Times on January 8…
The problem with this story is that it is false in all respects. From the start, there was almost no evidence to substantiate it…
Despite this alleged brutal murder taking place in one of the most surveilled buildings on the planet, filled that day with hundreds of cellphones taping the events, nobody saw video of it. No photographs depicted it. To this day, no autopsy report has been released. No details from any official source have been provided…
Sicknick’s brother said that “Sicknick had texted [the family] Wednesday night to say that while he had been pepper-sprayed, he was in good spirits.” That obviously conflicted with the Times’ story that the mob “overpowered Sicknick” and “struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher,” after which, “with a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support.”…
The fire extinguisher tale was far from the only false or dubious claim that the media caused to circulate about the events that day. In some cases, they continue to circulate them…
It’s worth reading this article. Glenn Greenwald is an excellent researcher and writer and has explained clearly how the facts have been distorted in this and other stories about the January 6 Capitol invasion.
Read lots more at https://greenwald.substack.com/p/the-false-and-exaggerated-claims
Do I believe it can’t happen here? No. Do I believe there are preparations for it? I don’t know but I wouldn’t be surprised. Behind the scenes, the luciferians who puppet this planet are capable of absolutely anything.
“Our state is not a prison camp,” the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Jeff Hoverson, said… [he] called mask mandates “diabolical silliness,” referring to them as a conspiracy run by “unelected, wealthy bureaucrats who are robbing our freedoms and perpetuating lies.”
Only one representative spoke against the bill, Rep. Jason Dockter, a Republican. He argued that cities, counties, schools and businesses should have “local control” of their affairs.
Well then, Rep Dockter [hmm – something like a “doctor”?], I think that truly local control should be in the hands of individuals, not cities, countires, schools or businesses. If someone wants to wear a mask, fine. If they don’t want to wear a mask, fine. I’d like to see the public’s understanding of masks revert to pre-Covid times: “a face covering worn by a criminal to hide or disguise his identity”. Masks are popular attire at Satanic Luciferian rituals and parties: see “Eyes Wide Shut” and read Kerth Barker’s books.
The level of insanity that has accompanied the mask issue serves the purposes of those who wish to divide us and see our health and cognitive abilities decline. Oxygen is an important factor in a healthy body and mind. Something loving, something kind, something very attentive, keeps us breathing, 24/7… and then there is that other thing that wants to dumb us down and to stop the breath from moving through us, altogether.
With no data showing COVID vaccines are safe for pregnant women, and despite reports of miscarriages among women who have received the experimental Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, Fauci and other health officials advise pregnant women to get the vaccine.
In December, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization to two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines against COVID-19. Because the unapproved vaccines’ status is investigational, anyone who gets an injection (whether they realize it or not) is agreeing to participate in an ongoing experiment.
Recognizing that there are many unknowns, many Americans have refused the experimental jab, including members of the armed forces and healthcare workers, but with one notable exception: healthcare providers who are pregnant.
Even without data from Pfizer or Moderna sufficient “to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy,” expectant doctors, nurses and others appear eager for the shots, perhaps influenced by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, which states that neither a conversation with a clinician nor even a pregnancy test are necessary prerequisites.
Do these individuals know that as of Feb. 12, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) had already received 111 reports of adverse events experienced by women who were pregnant at the time of their Pfizer or Moderna injection?
The first such report was submitted Dec. 22, just 10 days after authorization of the Pfizer vaccine. Nearly a third (31%) of the women had miscarriages or preterm births, which occurred within as little as one day of injection — the majority after a single dose of vaccine.
The descriptions of miscarriages and premature births accompanying the VAERS reports are tragic and hair-raising.
For example, a 37-year-old who received her first dose of the Moderna vaccine at 28 weeks of pregnancy, just after an ultrasound showed a healthy placenta, was discovered to have “significant placenta issues just one week later.” A repeat ultrasound showed that the placenta had “calcified and aged prematurely,” leading to recommended hospitalization for the duration of her pregnancy.
A 35-year-old, also vaccinated at around 29 weeks of pregnancy, “noticed decreased motion of the baby” two days after receiving the Pfizer injection. The following day, “the baby was found to not have a heartbeat.”
Two Pfizer vaccine recipients in earlier stages of pregnancy (first trimester) had miscarriages after experiencing “intolerable” abdominal pain and uterine bleeding extensive enough, in one case, to require “emergency surgery and a blood transfusion.”
At least some of the individuals submitting these reports — taking stock of the tight temporal relationship between vaccination and adverse event — clearly judged it premature to rule out vaccine causality, especially in cases where the women were otherwise healthy and taking no other drugs or vaccines.
Fauci’s willingness to make light of potential COVID vaccine risks for pregnant women, only two months into the rollout of experimental vaccines, defies logic. Fauci is not only the Biden administration’s chief medical advisor but the longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (which holds patents and will receive royalties for the Moderna vaccine)….
By Larry Johnson
The so-called “attack” on the U.S. Capitol was a set up, with several thousand Trump supporters acting as unwitting bit players in an event incited by Antifa and BLM agitators disguised as Trump supporters. The FBI knew something was going to happen at the Capitol but did nothing to prevent nor deter it. The FBI and the U.S. Capitol Police just stepped back and let swarms of Trump supporters into the Capitol.
It is essential to be very clear about what happened and what did not happen. This was not a “riot” if riot means people hurling rocks and bottles or igniting Molotov cocktails and torching all structures in their reach. The vast majority of those who entered the Capitol behaved more as tourists than anarchists. There was no wanton, massive destruction of art work, furniture or signs inside the building. Walls were not covered with graffiti or feces.
Most importantly, the Trump supporters did not kill a single person. I want to reiterate that point because my bookkeeper, who had listened to the media lies, believed that at least seven people died and that the Trump folks killed them all, including the Capitol policeman. All a lie.
Glenn Greenwald did a masterful job in deconstructing this monstrous propaganda: …….
Even some in the independent media have bought into the hype surrounding the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID vaccine and its “non-profit” nature. But once you peel back the layers of obfuscation you quickly find not only the profit motive hiding underneath, but the dark specter of eugenics.
Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout joins us to discuss her recent article, “Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement.”
- Unlimited Hangout
- Schwab Family Values
- Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement
- Successful Not-for-Profit Oxford COVID Vaccine Threatens Big Pharma Profit Logic
- The Year Ahead – Part 2: Biosecurity
- GSK to start production of Ebola vaccine as tests on humans begin (2014)
- Episode 208 – The Galton Institute Exposed
- Major U.K. genetics lab accused of misusing African DNA
- Eugenics: The Future Of Human Life In The 21st Century
- Event Review: Selective Reproduction, Bioethics, and the Idea of Eugenics
- Who Is Bill Gates?
- Palantir’s Tiberius, Race, and the Public Health Panopticon
A new peer-reviewed article links phthalates, a group of neurotoxic chemicals found in hundreds of consumer products including toys, floor coverings and food packaging, to long-lasting neurodevelopmental harm in fetuses, infants and children.
The study, “Neurotoxicity of Ortho-Phthalates: Recommendations for Critical Policy Reforms to Protect Brain Development in Children,” was published Feb. 18 in the American Journal of Public Health.
Project TENDR, which stands for Targeting Environmental Neuro-Development Risks, is a collaboration of leading scientists, health professionals and environmental advocates who came together over growing scientific evidence linking toxic environmental chemicals to neurodevelopmental disorders.
According to the study, data from longitudinal birth cohort studies conducted over the last decade have shown associations between prenatal exposure to phthalates and attention deficit disorder, hyperactivity, behavior problems and adverse cognitive development including lower IQ, poorer, psychomotor development and impaired social communication.
To protect child brain development, Project TENDR is calling for the removal of phthalates from consumer products that contribute to exposure of pregnant women, women of reproductive age, infants and children.
The study’s lead author, Stephanie Engel, professor of epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, told CNN:
“What we want to accomplish is to move the public health community, including regulators, toward this goal of elimination of phthalates. We have enough evidence right now to be concerned about the impact of these chemicals on a child’s risk of attention, learning and behavioral disorders.”
Responding to the study, Eileen Conneely, senior director of the chemical products and technology division of the American Chemistry Council, told CNN that while encouraged by continuous research efforts into the science and health of phthalates, “we believe that studies acknowledging a causal link between phthalates and human adverse health effects have been overinterpreted.”