The first episode of the 9-part series started this evening. Each episode is online for 24 hours.
by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, DO, AOBNMM, ABHIM
VAERS data sets for COVID Vaccine Injuries can be found, downloaded and searched here.
In December 2020, the first vaccines for coronavirus disease were granted an EUA – Emergency Use Authorization – by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Vaccine administration began immediately. Were you first in line? I hope you were not, and I hope no one you care about ran to get this injection either.
This is not “just another vaccine” and this is not “just like getting a flu shot.” The ingredients are experimental and the mRNA is coded to produce a protein that CAN modify your genes.
What We Know About the COVID Vaccines
According to the Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker, as of Dec. 26, 2020, 83 vaccines are in Phase 1, 2 or 3 human and animal clinical trials, with 18 approaching the final stages of testing. Never before have so many companies tested so many different vaccines at the same time, against a virus that has not been isolated. Of those in the trials, five vaccines are now early use, with three vaccines approved for clinical use Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca. Here’s what we have been told, so far:
There has been talk out thar in the wildlands of Twitter from people who don’t believe the evidence that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is real. Has the ‘the COVID virus’ ever been isolated in cell culture, visualised by electron microscopy, reacted with antibodies, genetically sequenced and otherwise characterised in many samples collected from people with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) all over the world during the past nine months? Sigh, yes, and yes the ‘COVID virus’ is real. Here are a few of the scientific endeavours that show this virus has been isolated from clinically diagnosed, ill and laboratory-confirmed human COVID-19 cases….
To believe this evidence of course, one must believe in the objectivity of the institutions and journals that publish it as well as the financiers which fund them. Unfortunately it’s not a given that such entities are immune from financial incentives and the widespread psychopathy which is concentrated in both the financial and the academic domains. It’s a given that some of them are malthusians and eugenicists given their actions and sometimes their public statements. One need look no further than the glaring corruption which perpetuates the suppression of cheap, safe and effective preventions and treatments for covid as well as the science and history of vaccine injury, not to mention other scandals such as the circumcision scam. And of course you can forget about the MSM acting as a watchdog on any of this, they’re subject to the same pressures. Ultimately everything we think we know about all this his hearsay. That’s the difficult truth, which is why one must always be alert to dissent in the ranks of the “authorities”.
Reading the entity called the establishment is always more complex than taking its pronouncements at face value. FWIW, I’m nearly convinced the virus is real, I’m fairly sure it’s manmade, and it’s obvious that it’s being used to pursue larger agendas which are far more detrimental than the virus itself.
A positive aspect of the recent anti-ivermectin statement by Merck is that dozens of ‘big pharma’ lobbyists, who immediately shared the statement on Twitter, are now getting exposed, among them many journalists, a US NIH representative, some industry-linked professors, and one of the most influential German government ‘covid science communicators’.
Merck,maker of Ivermectin in the US in an official statement today: No base for potential effect; Concerning side effect … I doubt that this would impact the pretentious superstitious mind set but worth putting out in Respect to Rationality! https://t.co/3nE9JVWdfx pic.twitter.com/m5S0yTJ0MM
— Eid Azar (@EidAzar) February 5, 2021
Merck hat eine Stellungnahme zu Ivermectin als Therapie bei COVID19 veröffentlicht. Hierzu gibt es in den Social Media immer wieder „Werbung“.Merck.com https://t.co/8vsdaoFyug
— Sandra Ciesek (@CiesekSandra) February 6, 2021
Keep in mind that Merck provided no evidence, whatsoever, for any of its claims, did not refute any of the existing evidence, studies and meta-studies, and falsely claimed ‘unproven safety’. The entire statement is a desperate appeal to (supposed) authority, and anyone pushing it is simply exposing themselves as a lobbyist not interested in actual evidence-based medicine….
Just two days after WaPo said it was “plausible” and “must be investigated”, and less than week after finally getting access to Wuhan’s high security virus lab (for the first time in over a year), WHO investigators have reported preliminary “independent” findings that the COVID virus came from animals, confirming China’s heavily promoted narrative and dismissing the likelihood of any leak from the lab in close proximity (a lab that is coincidentally designed to examine the world’s most dangerous pathogens and is led by virologist Shi Zhengli, known as China’s “Batwoman,” for her extensive work on bat-borne coronaviruses).
In what we estimate is the fastest “investigation” and findings report of any global organization ever, AP reports that WHO food safety and animal diseases expert Peter Ben Embarek made the assessment in a summation Tuesday of a WHO team’s investigation into the possible origins of the coronavirus in the central Chinese city of Wuhan, where the first cases were discovered in December 2019….
Prof Peter Daszak is part of the WHO Coronavirus Investigation team currently visiting the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China.
(Source: ABC Australia, Vic – 06 Feb 2021)
According to the NIH’s own funding documents, Prof Peter Daszak was the ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE, INC. Project Leader for Collaborating with the Wuhan Institute Of Virology (WIV) into Bat Corona-Viruses Gain-Of-Function (GoF) research. https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=9819304&icde=49645421GoF
GoF research is virologist jargon for making genetic modification to non-human hosted viruses in the lab to make them more virulent and transmissible as a way of gauging how many mutations it takes to make a virus in another species able to jump to and infect humans. Some scientists argue that this GoF research is necessary to gauge how close the world is to the next pandemic. The project began in 1-JUN-2014 and funding began in 24-JUL-2019. All great in theory provided there are no accidental leaks from labs.
The reason this GoF research was being funded by the US in China is that a moratorium was placed on this kind of risky research in both the US and Europe….
They are trying to see how far can they push parents, Americans, Christians, the good people of the world. The satanic Luciferian “elite” are obsesed with everything sexual, intrusive, anal. Read Kerth Barker’s books to understand how they work against human decency. They are laughing at us, every step of the way.
Human Rights Watch categorically condemns the probing of the rectum as part of a forced medical exams for homosexuals. Like COVID anal swabs, these exams involve insertion of foreign objects into the most private and sensitive regions of the human body.
This is how Human Rights Watch views this practice:
“Forced anal examinations are a form of cruel, degrading, and inhuman treatment that can rise to the level of torture. They violate the Convention against Torture, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the African Convention on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Forced anal exams are invasive, intrusive, and profoundly humiliating.”…
“Some people subjected to these examinations experience lasting psychological trauma. Several victims told Human Rights Watch that they experienced forced anal examinations as a form of sexual violence. Human Rights Watch believes that they are a form of sexual assault. Medical personnel who conduct forced anal exams do so in violation of international principles of medical ethics, including the prohibition on medical personnel participating in any way in acts of torture or degrading treatment.”…
Especially disconcerting is the fact that children are among the first demographic group being subjected to this ignominious and traumatizing procedure…
According to these “scientists,” this procedure is especially well-suited for young children. But to subject children to this makes no sense from a medical point of view. The travesty of probing children’s rectums for evidence of a respiratory disease could not be more glaring. If they really wanted to find out whether children had COVID or any other communicable illness of the respiratory tract, they would swab their mouths, not their bottoms. This is how it has always been done.
Normal children are at virtually zero risk from COVID. It is almost unheard of for young people under 18 years of age to die of this disease. Your healthy child is less likely to die of COVID than to be killed by lightning. Furthermore, children are not known to be particularly potent spreaders of the virus. Thus, there is no need to subject them to indiscriminate blanket testing, much less to testing protocols involving such a drastic and unnecessary procedure.
The imposition of the anal test on children has nothing to do with medical concerns and everything to do with governments subjugating their populations through humiliation and medical terror…