(HealthDay)—With several potential COVID-19 vaccines now in clinical trials, U.S. policymakers need to plan for the next hurdle: Ensuring Americans actually get vaccinated.
That’s according to a new report from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. It lays out recommendations for winning the public’s trust of any future vaccine, and helping them access it as easily as possible.
The U.S. government’s so-called Operation Warp Speed has laid its goal out: Deliver 300 million doses of a safe, effective COVID-19 vaccine by January 2021.
As of July 11, 22 vaccines were in some stage of human clinical trials, according to The New York Times coronavirus vaccine tracker.
The race to develop a safe, effective vaccine against the new coronavirus has been record-setting. Normally, vaccines take years to move from initial research to approval. In this case, scientists got a boost from having the genetic makeup of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) in hand early in the pandemic.
Some of the leading vaccine candidates, including the Moderna Inc. vaccine now in clinical trials, are based on that genetic information.
“But it’s one thing to make a clinically successful vaccine,” said Monica Schoch-Spana, a senior scientist with the Hopkins center. “It’s another to make it socially acceptable.”…
They’re trying very hard to normalize (“make socially acceptable”) autism and other vaccine-induced diseases as well. Among our “betters” though, eugenics and mass murder achieved social acceptance decades ago.
Just a quick rehash: They refuse to mention the cheap, easy and safe preventions and treatments for covid, they refuse to admit the known and demonstrable dangers of vaccines, and now they’re apparently manufacturing new viruses to push mandatory untested taxpayer-funded vaccines as they deliberately crash the economy, of which the latter will kill far more people than even their most “optimistic” projections for covid.
Investigation to follow Council of Europe Health Committee Chairman’s accusations that WHO officials ‘re-defined pandemics’ to deliberately create demand for the ‘swine flu’ vaccine in spite of insufficient testing on its safety or effectiveness
Drug firms collaborated with WHO officials to deliberately create a “campaign of panic” and a ‘false disaster’ over swine flu pandemic fears when one was not evident, top European health official Wolfgang Wodarg has indicated.
Wolfgang Wodarg, head of health at the Council of Europe, claims that the threshold for alert was deliberately lowered at the WHO, allowing a “pandemic” to be declared despite the mildness of the ‘swine flu.’ That designation would force a demand for the vaccine, which was subsequently purchased by governments or health facilities and pushed on the public through a full-scale fear campaign in the media.
“The WHO in collaboration with some big pharmaceutical companies and their scientists, re-defined pandemics and lowered the alarm-threshold. Those new standards forced politicians in most states to react immediately and sign marketing commitments for additional and new vaccines against “swine-flu” and spend billions of dollars to catch up.”
“Never before the search for traces of a virus was carried out so broadly and intensively, besides, many cases of death that happen to coincide with seropositive H1N1 lab-findings were simply attributed to “swine-flu” and used to foster fear.”
Wodarg is focusing on the motives for profit, as well as the ties between the World Health Organization (WHO), the pharmaceutical-industrial complex and research scientists, a nexus which Canada Free Press points out is eerily similar to the Climategate revelations that CRU research scientists fudged data to “hide the decline” in proxy temperatures in order to support global warming claims. Wodarg stated:
“A group of people in the WHO is associated very closely with the pharmaceutical industry.”
“The great campaign of panic we have seen provided a golden opportunity for representatives from labs who knew they would hit the jackpot in the case of a pandemic being declared.”
“In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies have influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards, to alarm governments worldwide. They have made them squander tight healthcare resources for inefficient vaccine strategies and needlessly exposed millions of healthy people to the risk of unknown side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines.”
Wodarg also raised concerns about the safety of swine flu vaccines in an interview with France’s L’Humanite. He highlighted the intentional deception, which subjected innocent people to an experimental and untested formula.
“The vaccines were developed too quickly. Some ingredients were insufficiently tested,” he said.
“But there is worse to come. The vaccine developed by Novartis was produced in a bioreactor from cancerous cells, a technique that had never been used until now.”
“In April when the first alarm came from Mexico I was very surprised at the figures furnished by the World Health Organization (WHO) to justify the declaration of a pandemic. I was immediately suspicious: the numbers were very low and the alarm level very high. There were not even into a thousand patients when there was already talk of the pandemic of the century.”
“In reality there was no reason to sound the alarm at this level. This was only possible because in early May the WHO changed its definition of a pandemic. Before that date there had to be not only a disease which had broke out in several countries at once but also one that had very serious consequences with the number of deaths above the usual average. This aspect was removed from the new definition, to retain the rate of spread of disease as the only criteria.”
“Among the things that aroused my suspicions there was therefore on one side this determination to sound the alarm. And on the other side, some curious facts. Such as, for example, the recommendation by WHO to carry out two injections for vaccines. That had never been done before. There was no scientific justification for this. There was also the recommendation to use only special patented vaccines… that major laboratories had designed and manufactured to be ready in case of a pandemic developing. And by proceeding in this way they did not hesitate to endanger the persons vaccinated.”
Wodarg emphasized the need to find the source of corruption and restore trustworthiness on the part of health authorities in nations across the world, most of which helped to fan the flames of panic while neglecting the need for safety among the public it is meant to protect:
“We want to clarify everything that brought about this massive operation of disinformation. We want to know who made decisions, on the basis of what evidence, and precisely how the influence of the pharmaceutical industry came to bear on the decision-making.”
Dr. Wodarg suggested that, “The Council of Europe and its member-states should ask for immediate investigations and consequences, on their national levels, as well as on the international level.”
“We must make sure people can rely on the analysis and the expertise of national and international public institutions. The latter are now discredited, because millions of people have been vaccinated with products with inherent possible health risks.”
Infowars.com and many other alternative news sites have warned since day one that the swine flu scare was hoax. Though media outlets across the country bombarded the airwaves with scary stories meant to sell the public on another inoculation, far fewer deaths have been caused by the virus than by the seasonal flu.
Wodarg likewise points out this fact: “It’s just a normal kind of flu. It does not cause a tenth of deaths caused by the classic seasonal flu.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, a 47 nation body encompassing democratically elected members of parliament, has begun hearings to investigate whether the H1N1 swine flu pandemic was falsified or exaggerated in an attempt to profit from vaccine sales.
A PACE resolution, passed last month, gave context to the hearings which began yesterday in Strasbourg.
“In order to promote their patented drugs and vaccines against flu, pharmaceutical companies influenced scientists and official agencies, responsible for public health standards to alarm governments worldwide and make them squander tight health resources for inefficient vaccine strategies and needlessly expose millions of healthy people to the risk of an unknown amount of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines. The “bird-flu”-campaign (2005/06) combined with the “swine-flu”-campaign seem to have caused a great deal of damage not only to some vaccinated patients and to public health-budgets, but to the credibility and accountability of important international health-agencies.”
Heading the hearings will be chairman of the Health Committee of PACE, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former German lawmaker, a medical doctor and epidemiologist. Wodarg has referred to the swine flu pandemic as “one of the greatest medical scandals of the century.”
Wodarg charges that the WHO altered the definition of a pandemic from an outbreak in several continents at once with an above-average death rate, to one where the spread of the disease is constant.
The Parliamentary inquiry will determine if a “falsified pandemic” was declared by WHO in June 2009 on the advice of medical advisors, many of whom have close financial ties to the very pharmaceutical giants – GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Novartis, – that produced the H1N1 vaccines.
[efoods]It will also look into the controversy surrounding the fact that two shots were initially advised when it was later revealed that one dose was entirely suitable.
Pharmaceutical companies are thought to have made a profit of somewhere in the region of $7.5-$10 billion on H1N1 vaccines. The worldwide death toll from H1N1 is thought to be around 13,500, just over a third of the number who die from regular flu every year in the U.S. alone.
PACE has noted that the alleged conspiracy could have exposed “millions of healthy people to the risk of side-effects of insufficiently tested vaccines”.
PACE will also hold a debate next week entitled ‘Faked pandemics, a threat to health’, to be attended by representatives of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the European pharmaceutical industry.
“Unlike the European Parliament, it has no decision-making powers, but, as was demonstrated by its report into extraordinary rendition, it does have the power to make life uncomfortable for the powers that be,” notes the Irish TImes.
This video is for those of us who appreciate British wit and humor. I’ve been “aghast” at the expressions of shock and horror, blame, shame and guilt, made by the mask police on Facebook and Twitter. Transcripts of this talk and other videos are on the website. www.VernonColeman.com. So here he is – Vernon Coleman – unwinding the morass of thought control surrounding mandatory mask-ation…
The UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals integrate many of the components of the 2010 Rockefeller Report including the Lockstep Scenario; population reduction; World Health Organization (WHO); Event 201; global vaccination program; cascading economic collapse; the multiple trillion dollar bailout known as the CARES Act; the new US Treasury and Federal Reserve relationship; special purpose vehicles (SVPs); bottomless well of liquidity at the Fed; the Fed hires Blackrock; supply chain disruptions; debt deflation; Universal Basic Income (UBI); collapse of oil prices; massive shift of capital to the top; the coming mega-depression; food insecurity leading to famine; World Bank and International Monetary Fund; unemployment and bankruptcies; privatization; who benefits.
Finance and economic expert Alasdair Macleod says the gold market is “extremely dangerous as far as the bullion banks, swaps and trading desks” that, at some point soon, are going to have to deliver physical gold they do not have. Macleod explains, “I find it difficult to see how they can close it. . . . The possibility of a default and the possibility of a ‘force majeure’ is increasing all the time in this current situation. This is a difficult thing to predict, but unless someone can show me there is a way out of this . . . I can’t see how these banks can be rescued.”…
The great USA – the land of the free – where life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are supposed to be the foundation of this country, is being shredded by tyrannical governors for a political agenda. And, by all appearances, they seem to be okay with sending people to their death to achieve this goal. When cures and freedoms are intentionally suppressed and fear is stoked, it is a recipe for disaster.
Ask Yourself These Questions
Despite the fact that Hydroxychloroquine was well documented to have been saving lives from COVID-19, the media, CDC, FDA, coronavirus task force, politicians, and Hollywood all pushed dangerous messages and fear tactics around it, only later after thousands allegedly died from COVID-related deaths, did they come clean about its ability to cure. Only then, did the FDA lift the restrictions on it. Many of these individuals and organizations knew the history and benefits of Hydroxychloroquine, as well as recent data on its life-saving abilities with COVID. Why didn’t they want Americans to have access to this extremely inexpensive drug?
The CDC, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx of the coronavirus task force, all repeatedly instructed every American citizen to stay home and not seek help if they didn’t feel well. They told people that only those who were extremely sick and couldn’t breathe should go to a hospital for help, which meant the inflammation caused by the virus would be so drastic that they would more than likely be put on a ventilator, resulting in death. This is not how America deals with sickness, virus, or disease. This is a country that treats people before symptoms worsen. Why did they want Americans to stay home and suffer until the virus escalated instead of allowing them to be treated?
Perhaps the biggest atrocity are the hospitals in New York that were putting healthy people in with COVID-positive patients, and in some cases documenting some as positive who in fact tested negative. If that wasn’t enough to inflate the numbers, Governor Cuomo made sure the death toll vastly increased by sending COVID-positive patients to nursing homes – the very place that hosts those most susceptible to the virus. Why would he do that?
The level of reports coming out on how COVID-positive patients allegedly tested positive, how these numbers were documented, and how deaths were recorded, reveals overwhelming data illustrating how the numbers have been conflated since the virus hit. In fact, the tactics being used after the US “flattened the curve” are even more disturbing because they are being used by governors to instill mandatory masks and lockdown businesses again. Dr. Birx and several state officials have told people that anyone who has died from other comorbidities, that also tested positive for COVID, was being documented as COVID for cause of death in numerous states. There are volumes of evidence, whereby even the CDC had to fess up to the antibody test showing COVID-positive when in fact a person could have the common cold, a different coronavirus strain all together, and if the antibody tests come up positive for COVID, they are being documented as new cases. Why are these numbers being intentionally inflated and how are governors getting away with creating unconstitutional mandates and unlawful demands that grossly overstep their authority, based on these numbers?
And finally, why are governors trying to force everyone to wear masks when the Surgeon General, Dr. Fauci, and the World Health Organization all told people they will not protect anyone from the virus? Why are they pushing this, when even the CDC doesn’t have scientific evidence to prove they work, let alone telling people to wear basic cloth masks? Instead of providing evidence that they can prevent the spread of COVID, mainstream media focuses on trying to debunk all of the science that shows the harm wearing masks can cause. Millions of people are suffering from respiratory issues, asthma, anxiety, and PTSD by wearing masks that are illegally mandated, yet some states are failing to provide these medical exemptions. What is the real reason they want you masked?
The WHO, GAVI, President Trump and A Vaccine
Though President Trump has officially pulled out of the World Health Organization (WHO), there is still concern over his potential support for Bill Gates’ GAVI and funding for a COVID-19 vaccine. As reported by Corey’s Digs in April, USAID committed $1.16 billion to GAVI over the course of the next four years when Mark Green was the administrator of USAID. Green announced his resignation in March and later went on to be the Executive Director of the McCain Institute. USAID has granted over $2 billion to GAVI between 2001-2019.
Despite President Trump’s repeated calls for Hydroxychloroquine and other potential treatments, in a recent summit, President Trump recorded a short message in support of GAVI, and the $8.8 billion that was raised is said to be going toward “essential vaccines” to the most vulnerable children in other countries, as well as a COVID-19 vaccine they intend to jab the globe with.
The question on everyone’s mind remains – is a vaccine inevitable? By April 2020, Iceland had already discovered 291 mutations of COVID-19. In order to isolate the virus to produce a “life-saving” vaccine, they would continuously have to reassess and create a new vaccine as it mutates which would be incredibly difficult for a respiratory virus. To date, they have never been able to produce a successful vaccine for a coronavirus. Is a vaccine even necessary when there is one treatment and quite possibly two treatments that are working effectively? If they do produce one, will it pass the FDA’s regulations? What happens if they do manage to pass it and collect data that shows it was ineffective? Will they falsify that information, or will they be ok with reflecting ultra-low efficacy rates just as they do with the flu vaccine that is still recommended, despite thousands of injury and death claims? These are all realistic questions rolling through everyone’s mind, and it’s important to maintain perspective as new information comes out, without jumping to conclusions. We don’t have all the answers yet.
In Florida and other states they have sneaky clauses stating that they can give mandatory vaccines by any means necessary when it comes to the health and safety of the country. This is important legislation everyone should be aware of, primarily before it is passed in your state. There are lawyers in the midst of battling this right now in Florida. This very scenario is reminiscent of 1907, when the forced “sterilization law” was created in the US, and resulted in sterilizing 60,000 Americans against their will by 1935 when it was shut down.
Is it possible that there simply aren’t enough constitutional lawyers that know how to win these overreaching laws and mandates against humanity? Is it possible that even if they do know how to win them, that they are faced with a corrupt justice system and a judge that will allow this injustice to continue? This is all plausible. Where are the citizens in all of this? Are they storming the court houses, calling their representatives, hiring lawyers to fight these battles, telling their communities to rise up and fight, assisting with campaigns and registering voters, making darn sure that the corrupt in power are recalled and removed while voting in those who will fight for our constitutional rights? Or is everyone staying snug as a bug in their homes because they’ve been instructed to stand down, submit, and hide in fear while slipping into cognitive dissonance and depression?
COVID CURES vs COVID FEARS
Fear is a funny thing – it can cause one to see things that aren’t really there, to believe things that don’t truly exist, and to submit to tyrants while rationalizing in their mind that they are just being “selfless instead of selfish.” All the while, their rights are being stripped away, and one day that fear is going to catch up with them and they will know what real fear is. The reality of the situation is that there are accessible and affordable treatments available, masks do not protect against coronavirus spread and are being used for intimidation and psychological warfare while shielding the terrorists and normalizing new “mandates” in the US. The reality is that there is a political agenda that seeks to destroy us from within, that goes far beyond the presidential election, into a land of communism that will stifle everyone and bring your life to a hard stop. The reality is, if you think George Floyd was an “I can’t breathe” movement for Black Lives Matter to rally this country together for black justice, you are sadly mistaken, and if you feel like “you can’t breathe” while wearing your mandatory mask – just you wait until you see what other “mandates” they have in store for you.
There is a choice to make, right here, right now. You either recognize the gravity of the situation, the magnitude of what is being attempted against all of humanity, and the complete and utter charade being played out via a totally treatable virus with a death rate less than half a percent, and you stand up and fight – Or, you continue to hide behind that mask in fear, you close up your business and submit to your masters, you shame your fellow Americans for standing up for everyone’s freedom, and you get lost in the abyss as our country self-destructs. What’s it going to be? Are you going to be “selfless” and care about humanity and your God given rights and freedoms, or are you going to be “selfish” and wallow in your fear? …
The dumpster fire of COVID predictions has shown exactly why it’s important to sustain and nurture skeptics, lest we blunder into scientific monoculture and groupthink. And yet the explosion of “cancel culture” intolerance of any opinion that doesn’t fit a shrinking “3 x 5 card” of right-think risks destroying the very tolerance and science that sustains our civilization.
Since World War II, America has suffered two respiratory pandemics comparable to COVID-19: the 1958 “Asian flu,” then the 1969 “Hong Kong flu.” In neither case did we shut down the economy—people were simply more careful. Not all that careful, of course—Jimi Hendrix was playing at Woodstock in the middle of the 1969 pandemic, and social distancing wasn’t really a thing in the “Summer of Love.”
And yet COVID-19 was very different thanks to a single “buggy mess” of a computer prediction from one Neil Ferguson, a British epidemiologist given to hysterical overestimates of deaths, from mad cow to bird flu to H1N1.
For COVID-19, Ferguson predicted 3 million deaths in America unless we basically shut down the economy. Panicked policymakers took his prediction as gospel, dressed as it was in the cloak of science.
Now, long after governments plunged half the world into a Great Depression, those panicked revisions are being quietly revised down by an order of magnitude, now suggesting a final tally comparable to 1958 and 1969.
COVID-19 would have been a deadly pandemic with or without Ferguson’s fantasies, but had we known the true scale and parameters of the threat we might have chosen better tailored means to both safeguard the elderly and at-risk, while sustaining the wider economy. After all, economists have long known that mass unemployment and widespread bankruptcies carry enormous health consequences that are very real to the victims suffering drained life savings, ruined businesses, broken families, widespread mental and physical health deterioration, even suicide. Decisions involve tradeoffs.
COVID-19 has illustrated the importance of free and robust inquiry. After all, panicked politicians facing media accusations of “killing grandma” aren’t in a very good position to evaluate these tradeoffs, and they need intellectual ammunition. Not only to show them which path is best, but to bolster them when a left-wing media establishment attacks.
Moreover, voters need this ammunition so they can actually tell the politicians what to do. This means two things: debate that is transparent, and debate that is tolerant of skeptics….
New Zealand is heading for tyranny and economic misery as authorities engage the military to run quarantines. The seriousness of the Covid-19 virus which killed only 22 continues to be overstated. Strict border controls continue and compassionate exceptions to quarantine rules will get tighter as the South Pacific Nation’s left collision Government deals with two Covid-19 positives slipping through undetected. New Zealand was lauded around the world for eliminating Covid-19 after being Covid-19 free for 24 days. The two new cases prompted criticism from around the world. There are warnings that the country might have to stay closed to the rest of the world for years to come if it wants to retain its coveted elimination status.
The New Zealand economy is showing signs of hemorrhaging and more job losses and business closures are predicted as Government wage subsidies end later this year. So far NZ$62.1 billion is allocated for Covid-19 relief. New Zealand, with a population of about 5 million, has an annual GDP of about NZ$333 billion in a good year. It is expected that 230,000 employers will still be receiving the government wage subsidy at the time of writing. Border closures have killed the picturesque adventure country’s tourism industry worth NZ$16.2 billion. The Covid-19 crisis lockdown resulted in an estimated 39% reduction in business at the strictest level and 24% at the next severe level. Registered unemployment is predicted to rise from 4% in January to 9% by November – the highest it has been in almost 30 years and that figure does not include people who do not qualify for the country’s job seeker benefit. As of mid-June, there were an extra 43,047 people registered with welfare services on top of the 111,000 registered in January. A John Hopkins University study from 1940 to 1974 showed that for every 1.4% rise in unemployment there is an increase in mortality of 2.7%. That will lead to many more deaths than Covid-19 – in fact, 135,000 extra deaths, not just the actual 22 or projected 80,000.
Public Falling Into Line but…
Despite the economic fallout and coming further pain the public mostly seems on board with government actions, not realizing the layer of tyranny being built beneath the public relations and “let’s be kind” veneer. It appears the New Zealand Government is hopeful the public will keep falling into line but has a concerning back-up plan should resistance appear.
A leaked email reveals Minister Jacinda Adern’s office instructing ministers to not explain anything to the media as the public was on board and things had gone well.
The military, who according to a former military man, is in training for public unrest in New Zealand, is now taking over the border quarantine enforcement in the wake of the two COVID cases which slipped through. And the military is being equipped with updated hardware including maritime patrol aircraft and new armored vehicles, according to Defence Minister Ron Mark who defended questions about whether the spending was wise in the current Covid-19 economy.
If that were not enough, the Government still has the new controversial Covid-19 Health Response Bill to fall back on which gives police sweeping powers to potentially enter homes without warrants while enforcing Covid-19 alert level rules. An internet censorship bill, which will give the Government powers to remove content it deems inappropriate, is also currently making its way into law. It is classified as urgent.
Authorities Hell-Bent on Pushing Fear
New Zealanders who are enjoying more freedom and rejoicing in the seeming eradication of Covid-19 are now being told by the New Zealand leftish media that it is normal to experience anxiety about the two new cases. It appears there is a suggestion being made that they should be fearful and we cannot live with any cases of Covid-19 in New Zealand at all. It is far too dangerous. After all 22 people died of the ghastly virus which needs to be stamped out at all costs. Yes, that is right. New Zealand had a death rate of between 4 and 5 people per million of population and those who sadly died were all over the age of 60, mostly with underlying health conditions and many in rest homes….