MSM still predicting a Covid APOCALYPSE, but their web of lies is collapsing around them

The mainstream media is still trying to drum up fear and hysteria on the basis of cherry-picked statistics. A glance at the figures is enough to prove them liars. Someone should let them know: no one is listening anymore.

The US has recently surpassed 2 million cases, according to official figures, representing almost one-third of the world’s coronavirus infections. Much of the reporting on recent statistics features words like ‘spikes’, ‘surges’, and ‘hot spots’, but patterns in the statistics suggest that some areas have dwindling levels of the virus, while it is only now beginning to spread in others.

What can I say? They’re lying. There has been a clear and persistent drop in cases ever since the peak towards the end of April, about six weeks ago. This is just another example of MSM outlets publishing half-truths, cherry-picked statistics, and agenda-driven stories in order to push their narrative. Your best bet for getting good information is alternative outlets like this one and various lone voices on Twitter.

One such voice is that of former New York Times reporter turned novelist and pundit Alex Berenson, who tweeted on Friday to dispel this tired MSM narrative.

In an apparent reference to his former ‘legacy media’ employer, Berenson’s Twitter bio reads “In the wrong lane, trying to turn against the flow.” That is a noble cause. He has been an outspoken critic of the US government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak and to lockdowns in general, and recently published an eBook entitled: ‘Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns: Part 1: Introduction and Death Counts and Estimates’. By definition, this puts him totally and irrevocably at odds with pretty much every mainstream news outlet, and CNN in particular….

Media Blackout: The Federal Court Case To End Water Fluoridation

As we are inundated with headlines about violent riots and looting being passed off as mostly peaceful protests, or how the dreaded virus continues to spread in communities around the world, there is another story taking place which directly affects hundreds of millions of people globally that is being blacked out by the mainstream corporate media.

Unlike the aforementioned crises which are being cited as the justification for the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset, this public health crisis actually has a rather simple solution: to end water fluoridation by no longer adding the toxic substance to the nation’s water supply.

You would think this would be a straightforward process, considering the mountains of studies which conclude fluoride is a harmful neurotoxin attributed to lower IQs and ADHD. Unfortunately, government regulatory agencies have been not only defending this practice for generations, they champion the forced medication as a great achievement in medical history.

Right now, in perhaps one of the most important trials of our time, the Fluoride Action Network is taking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head on in an unprecedented court case that could lead to the end of water fluoridation in the US and possibly worldwide as other nations would likely follow suit.

In this interview, Spiro is joined by Dr. Paul Connett of the Fluoride Action Network to discuss the current court case against the EPA and water fluoridation as the first week of the trial has come to an end and the second, possibly final week is about to begin.

Become an Activist Post Patron for $1 per month at Patreon.

Fluoride Action Network

Link & Times To Watch The Trial Live

Spiro’s Interview with Dr. Paul Connett & his Son, Attorney Michael Connett

Follow Spiro on BitChute Follow on Twitter

TCR interview with Paul Connett, PhD on water fluoridation

Water Fluoridation Increases Suggestibility

Scientific American 1/2008: Second Thoughts about Fluoride (PDF)

2011-11-26 Fluoride Warnings for Infants
2011-12-02 Another study connects low-dose fluoride to neurodegenerative disorders
2011-12-29 Video: The Fluoride Deception
2012-01-03 New Study on Fluoride Shows No Benefits and Major Safety Issues
2012-04-14 EPA tacitly admits Fluoride is IQ reducing contaminant
2012-06-16 CDC says fluoride has no evidence of benefit for infants
2012-07-27 New Harvard Study Corroborates Link Between Fluoride and Lower IQ in Children
2012-09-13 Portland OR: Last Refuge from Fluoridation Under Attack
2012-10-04 Harvard Study Confirms Fluoride Reduces Children’s IQ
2013-02-01 Video: Fluoridegate
2013-08-30 The ultimate “F you” – Fluoride in your water
2013-12-05 What should the simple folk drink? Fluoride lowers IQs…
2014-02-19 Study: Fluoride Lowers Children’s Intelligence By 7 IQ Points
2014-05-24 The War on Children: New Study Confirms Fluoride is Neurotoxic
2014-06-13 Baby “formula” + fluoridated water = Brain Damage
2014-06-15 Fluoridation Scam Unheard of in Europe
2014-07-02 Fluoride: The Tide is Turning
2014-08-01 Conspiracy Theory: Water Fluoridation is Significant Cause of Cancer
2014-10-03 Alzheimer’s Disease Linked to Pineal Gland Calcification from Fluoride
2014-12-10 Fluoride Robs You of Your Health While Believed to Be Good
2015-01-30 Connett: 12 Arguments Against Water Fluoridation
2015-02-17 Nine Dangers of Fluoride Exposure
2015-02-24 Concered Citizens Warned of Fluoride Dangers in the ’50s, but We’re Still Drinking It Anyway
2015-02-26 Study links fluoride in water to hypothyroidism
2015-03-19 Fluoridated Water Linked to 30% More Hypothyroidism
2015-03-24 Fluoridated water increases ADHD rates
2015-03-25 Fluoride Linked to Coronary Heart Disease
2015-06-19 US Govt Reduces Water Fluoridation Dose
2015-06-30 Fluoridation May Not Prevent Cavities, Scientific Review Shows
2015-07-12 Fluoride, Fluoride, Everywhere
2015-07-13 Scientific Review: ‘No Evidence’ Water Fluoridation Prevents Cavities – but It Significantly Reduces IQ
2015-08-22 Snowmass, CO Ends Water Fluoridation
2015-10-25 The Spice That Prevents Fluoride from Destroying Your Brain
2015-11-17 Fluoride: Poison On Tap
2016-01-03 “New Research Suggests [Fluoridating Water] Is Dramatically Misguided”
2016-02-21 Fluoridated water & ADHD among children & adolescents in the US
2016-04-26 The fluoride wars: loving cancer, loving lower IQ
2016-04-27 Chloramine + Lead Pipes + Fluoride = Contaminated tap water
2017-02-20 Fluoride Officially Classified as a Neurotoxin in World’s Most Prestigious Medical Journal
2017-07-01 Fluoride Action Network Forces U.S. courts to review fluoride toxicity in drinking water
2017-07-05 Lawsuit could end water fluoridation in US based on neurotoxicity studies
2018-01-05 Water fluoridation linked to ADHD, obesity and depression
2018-03-23 Corbett: Dr. Paul Connett on the Case Against Fluoride
2018-04-07 Newsbud: Fluoride: A Big Mistake?
2018-06-24 Water Fluoridation Linked to Calcium Buildup in Brain, Heart, Pineal Gland
2018-06-25 Water Fluoridation Increases Suggestibility
2018-07-08 Hypothesis: How to Reverse Fluoride-Induced Pineal Calcification
2018-07-12 Yet another reason to fluoridate tap water
2018-10-13 Scientists Again Rediscover Fluoridation Linked to ADHD
2018-10-24 Fluoride Literally Turns the Pineal Gland to Stone
2018-12-12 Dementia has skyrocketed since 1990: Fluoride Connection?
2019-01-24 Higher Levels of Fluoride Consumption Linked with ADHD in Children & more
2019-01-25 U.S. water fluoridation: A forced experiment that needs to end
2019-02-25 Yet another study links fluoride exposure during pregnancy to increasing number of children with ADHD
2019-03-26 Iowa Town Bans Fluoride And Ends Program As Chemical’s Danger Becomes Apparent
2019-06-22 Young children are using dangerous amounts of fluoride toothpaste
2019-08-19 Association Between Maternal Fluoride Exposure During Pregnancy and IQ Scores in Offspring in Canada
2019-08-19 Fluoride Action Network Diversifies Social Media In Response to Creeping Internet Censorship
2019-08-26 Reprise: Yet another reason to fluoridate tap water
2019-09-18 An Honest Dentist on Water Fluoridation
2019-11-20 Fluoride Action Network | Fluoride & IQ: The 63 Studies
2020-03-14 Fluoridation’s Neurotoxicity
2020-03-15 Powerpoint: The Scientific Evidence for Fluoride’s Developmental Neurotoxicity.
2020-04-12 Chinese Warship Explodes In Flames after Shocking Research Finds Fluoridated Water Causes Coronavirus to Extinguish Oxygen

Robert Kiyosaki: What The Elites Don’t Want You To Know

Robert Kiyosaki, the author of Rich Dad, Poor dad says there’s something the elitists don’t want you to know.  There’s a simple way to take back your power, and it involves removing yourself from any centralized banking system.

These centralized systems were all set up for the elite by the elite, and they don’t want you to know you can remove yourself from the system, or the Matrix, so to speak. All you have to do is invest and spend outside of their system.  Decentralized systems are already in place, and the key to breaking free involves understanding that the central banks were not set up to help you.

The Federal Reserve, the United States central bank, has “printed” [created out of thin air] more than $2 trillion since the global economic crisis began, and when the Fed prints money it makes the price of assets like gold, silver, and Bitcoin go up. As Robert Kiyosaki says, central banks are run by the “controlling elite.” These elites do not like gold or because central banks cannot print gold. Equally, central banks do not like Bitcoin and the blockchain because what Robert calls people’s money, does not need central banks either.

Today, billions of people are trapped in a central banking system owned by the mega-rich and are losing big time because they are saving money. Kiyosaki says he knew the “leaders” of the world were screwed up, but even he didn’t think they were as diabolical as they have revealed themselves to be. “People are missing out on one of the biggest, catastrophic cash heists, of the whole world,” says Kiyosaki. “Our governments have really screwed up,” he adds. So it’s time to leave the system or be dragged into slavery by staying in it.  After all, they shut down the world to cover up something “very very big.”

Lynette Zang: The Plandemic is a Cover For The “Global Financial Reset”

Kiyosaki says to get crytpo. The reason he likes it is because it’s outside the system.  The elitists and politicians cannot control Bitcoin, and they are terrified of people realizing this. This is panicking  all of the control systems of the globe (the governments.) They do not want you to figure this out. This was put in a fine way by a man named Jake Ducey, who understands, like Kiyosaki, that we are embedded in this Matrix of mind control.  But we can remove ourselves, and it’s remarkably easy.

But first, it’s important for you to understand why they need you to think you can’t be free of the rigged system. Once you figure it out, you’ll break out immediately, and it renders them useless. As Duecy says, “what good is a lifetime politician, that’s been a politician for 40 years, that’s made all this money off of taxpayer money (theft) and insider investing…what good are they if we realize we can create a better world without them? It renders them useless. Now, what good are the people that are behind the scenes, pulling the strings on those types of puppets, and we don’t even know who they are, ad they hide in the shadows, what good are they? NONE! And that’s why there’s a vested interest in censorship and control of any information that uplifts and changes the thought patterns of too many people.”

In short, to break free from the system means to stop using their money and paying them (taxes) to keep you enslaved.  Instead, use alternative currencies that cannot be manipulated, and realize that you don’t need a master or a ruler ordering you around because, without them, we can still work together and create a future worth living.

This is all part of the Great Awakening, says Ducey.  You can remain enslaved to the system, or you can wake up, let go of it, and start really living now. I think it’s happening anyway, so you might as well make the decision live freely anyway.  The longer you hold out and insist you need a master dictating your life, the harder this transition to a better way of life will be for you.

Good ideas don’t require force.

Truck Drivers Reject Delivery To Cities With Defunded Or Disbanded Police

A popular trucking app called “CDLLife” polled its users Thursday and found an overwhelming number of drivers will not “pickup/deliver to cities with defunded/disbanded police departments.”  On Saturday afternoon, 1,212 users of the trucking app responded to the poll, with 79% saying they will not deliver loads to lawless cities. …

Censored: “Unreported Truths about COVID-19 and Lockdowns”

The first 1,000 words of Chapter 1 of a booklet censored by amazon


Maybe the most important questions of all:

How lethal is SARS-COV-2?

Whom does it kill?

Are the death counts accurate – and, if not, are they over- or understated?

Estimates for the lethality of the coronavirus have varied widely since January. Early Chinese data suggested the virus might have an “infection fatality rate” as high as 1.4 – 2 percent.

A death rate in that range could mean the coronavirus might kill more than 6 million Americans, although even under the worst-case scenarios some people would not be exposed, and others might have natural immunity that would prevent them from being infected at all.

As we have learned more about the virus, estimates of its lethality have fallen. Calculating fatality rates is complex, because despite all of our testing for COVID, we still don’t know how many people have been infected.

Some people who are infected may have no or mild symptoms. Even those with more severe symptoms may resist going to the hospital, then recover on their own. We have a clear view of the top of the iceberg – the serious infections that require hospitalization – but at least in the early stages of the epidemic we have to guess at the mild, hidden infections.

But to calculate the true fatality rate, we need to know the true infection rate. If 10,000 people die out of 100,000 infections, that means the virus kills 10 percent of all the people it infects – making it very, very dangerous. But if 10,000 people die from 10 million infections, the death rate is actually 0.1 percent – similar to the flu.

Unfortunately, figuring out the real infection rate is very difficult. Probably the best way is through antibody tests, which measure how many people have already been infected and recovered – even if they never were hospitalized or even had symptoms. Studies in which many people in a city, state, or even country are tested at random to see if they are currently infected can also help. Believe it or not, so can tests of municipal sewage. (I’ll say more about all this later, in the section on transmission rates and lockdowns.)

For now, the crucial point is this: randomized antibody tests from all over the world have repeatedly shown many more people have been infected with coronavirus than is revealed by tests for active infection. Many people who are infected with SARS-COV-2 don’t even know it.

So the hidden part of the iceberg is huge. And in turn, scientists have repeatedly reduced their estimates for how dangerous the coronavirus might be.

The most important estimate came on May 20, when the Centers for Disease Control reported its best estimate was that the virus would kill 0.26 percent of people it infected, or about 1 in 400 people. (The virus would kill 0.4 percent of those who developed symptoms. But about one out of three people would have no symptoms at all, the CDC said.) (

Similarly, a German study in April reported a fatality rate of 0.37 percent ( A large study in April in Los Angeles predicted a death rate in the range of 0.15 to 0.3 percent.

Some estimates have been even lower. Others have been somewhat higher – especially in regions that experienced periods of severe stress on their health care systems. In New York City, for example, the death rates appear somewhat higher, possibly above 0.5 percent – though New York may be an outlier, both because it has counted deaths aggressively (more on this later) and because its hospitals seem to have used ventilators particularly aggressively.

Thus the CDC’s estimate for deaths is probably the best place to begin. Using that figure along with several other papers and studies suggests the coronavirus has an infection fatality rate in the range of 0.15 percent to 0.4 percent.

In other words, SARS-COV-2 likely kills between 1 in 250 and 1 in 650 of the people whom it infects. Again, though, not everyone who is exposed will become infected. Some people do not contract the virus, perhaps because their T-cells – which help the immune system destroy invading viruses and bacteria – have already been primed by exposure to other coronaviruses. [Several other coronaviruses exist; the most common versions usually cause minor colds in the people they infect.] An early May paper in the journal Cell suggests that as many as 60 percent of people may have some preexisting immune response, though not all will necessarily be immune. (

The experience of outbreaks on large ships such as aircraft carriers and cruise liners also show that some people do not become infected. The best estimates are that the virus probably can infect somewhere between 50 to 70 percent of people. For example, on one French aircraft carrier, 60 percent of sailors were infected (none died and only two out of 1,074 infected sailors required intensive care).

Thus – in a worst-case scenario – if we took no steps to mitigate its spread or protect vulnerable people, a completely unchecked coronavirus might kill between 0.075 and 0.28 percent of the United States population – between 1 in 360 and 1 in 1,300 Americans.

This is higher than the seasonal flu in most years. Influenza is usually said to have a fatality rate among symptomatic cases of 1 in 1,000 and an overall fatality rate of around 1 in 2,000. However, influenza mutates rapidly, and its dangerousness varies year by year. The coronavirus appears far less dangerous than the Spanish flu a century ago, which was commonly said to kill 1 in 50 of the people it infected.

It appears more comparable in terms of overall mortality to the influenza epidemics of 1957 and 1968, or the British flu epidemics of the late 1990s. (Of course, the United States and United Kingdom did not only not shut down for any of those epidemics, they received little attention outside the health-care system.)…

The Powers That Be Are Ecstatic That the Left Believes the Biggest Problem Right Now Are Statues of Dead White Men

In the US and the EU both, we’ve witnessed the biggest monetary heist in history. We’re sailing into a depression that central banks have set up for us over the past two decades. And we’re doing so in the worst possible condition thanks to the Draconian, harebrained and unnecessary lockdowns that the politicians imposed on us.

Several of Empire’s wars and occupations continue in Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, and Syria. Tension is being needlessly cultivated with China and Russia, and the entire architecture of nuclear arms control is just about done being thrown in that trash bin of history.

Simultaneously the people of Venezuela, Iran, Cuba and North Korea continue to have their livelihoods needlessly strangulated as a form of Imperial collective punishment.

In the midst of all this, the left has graduated from protesting cops (which is a good thing, albeit not nearly as urgent as protesting the hunger blockade on Yemen) to protesting statues of dead white people.

Yeah. The number one priority for hundreds of thousands of indignant lefties right now are statues. Statues. Lumps of bronze shaped to resemble historical figures.

I can tell you one thing. The power elites are ecstatic. At a time of their biggest failure in a century, when their corruption, cowardice, and short-sightedness has brought us to the edge of the precipe, and when by all rights they should be bracing for an hour of reckoning there is instead a large protest movement raising hell about…statues.

Is it any wonder they are falling over themselves to accommodate them? …

The Enemy Within: A Story of the Purge of American Intelligence

“Western Europe has only 20 to 30 more years of democracy left in it; after that it will slide, engineless and rudderless, under the surrounding sea of dictatorship, and whether the dictation comes from a politburo or a junta will not make that much difference.”

– Willy Brandt (German Federal Chancellor, right before he stepped down in 1974)

Believe it or not, but the dystopic view that democracy is dead is by no measure a new idea. However, what might disturb you is where this design, in its contemporary form, really germinated from.

The idea that democracy is in a crisis and needs to be replaced with a new form of “governance” did not originate from the outcries of an oppressed people demanding their rights to a decent life. We are not presently seeing an organic, grassroots process in reforming how government, that is, democracy will be “improved” upon. Rather, what we are seeing is a controlled disintegration of the very thing we think we are trying to uphold, and this destruction has been in the works for over 45 years.

It is no coincidence that Samuel P. Huntington is very fond of the Willy Brandt quote “prophesising” the end of democracy (which was used at the beginning of both his books ‘The Crisis of Democracy’ and ‘Disaffected Democracies’), that is after all his purpose in life…to see to it that that prophecy comes true.

In this paper I will go through how the Henry Kissinger crew successfully purged the last significant remnants of decency within the CIA and reshaped the government structure into the Deep State that we see it grotesquely throbbing as today. In this story, we will see how those prominent figureheads who prophesise the “end of democracy” have been the very orchestrators of its destruction.

Continue reading The Enemy Within: A Story of the Purge of American Intelligence

Third Precinct in Minneapolis – a ‘playground’ for renegade cops

What went wrong? Apparently, it’s been wrong for a very long time.

Even before George Floyd was killed, the south Minneapolis precinct had a reputation for being home to police officers who played by their own rules.

Long before former officer Derek Chauvin knelt on George Floyd’s neck, the Third Precinct in south Minneapolis had a reputation for being home to police officers who played by their own rules.

One officer kicked a handcuffed suspect in the face, leaving his jaw in pieces. Officers beat and pistol-whipped a suspect in a parking lot on suspicion of low-level drug charges. Others harassed residents of a south Minneapolis housing project as they headed to work, and allowed prostitution suspects to touch their genitals for several minutes before arresting them in vice stings

Between 2007 and 2017, the city paid out $2.1 million to settle misconduct lawsuits involving Third Precinct officers. Judges have thrown out cases for “outrageous” conduct of the officers, and prosecutors have been forced to drop charges for searches found to be illegal, according to court records.

The brand of aggressive policing on display in the Floyd video has long been standard practice for some Third Precinct officers when dealing with suspects of nonviolent, low-level crimes, often involving people of color, said Abigail Cerra, a commissioner for Minneapolis’ Police Conduct Oversight Commission.

“My clients were constantly getting anal searches,” said Cerra, who also has been a public defender. “Not at the hospital. At the Third Precinct.”

Chauvin and the other three officers who assisted in Floyd’s arrest — all of whom worked at the Third Precinct — have been fired and now face criminal charges. That has not satisfied protesters, who continue to call for more action from city officials, ranging from drastically overhauling to dismantling the police force…

Much more at

“I am the majority!”

A comment left by Cal, below this video at NeedToKnow.News was especially helpful, I thought It contains several excellent quotes from the past – and one from the present.

This is where it is important to know what our government is, a constitutional republic. The US Constitution is the supreme law of this land, but it is much more then that, it is the supreme CONTRACT for ALL who serve within our governments, state, and federal. It addresses the American people and their weapons, and it does NOT give the governments any authority over them. BTW, the 2nd Amendment does refer to weapons of war from the words of our framers and founders.

“To disarm the people…[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them” George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788

Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops.” [An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787]

Joel Barlow: “The foundation of everything is that the people will form an equal representative government, that the people will be universally armed. A people that legislate for themselves ought to be in the habit of protecting themselves.”

Thomas Paine: “Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them.”

Richard Henry Lee: “Whereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them;”

Patrick Henry: “Let him candidly tell me, where and when did freedom exist when the sword and the purse were given up from the people? Unless a miracle in human affairs interposed, no nation ever retained its liberty after the loss of the sword and the purse.” “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.”

Joseph Story, 1833: “The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.”

Andrew Ford: “25 States allow anyone to buy a gun, strap it on, and walk down the street with no permit of any kind: some say it’s crazy. However, 4 out of 5 US murders are committed in the other half of the country: so who is crazy?”