Dr. Judy Mikovitz Drops Bombshells About COVID-19 and Much More
It is with great sadness that I announce that all three Twitter accounts of my good friends, Ty and Charlene Bollinger, the founders of The Truth About Cancer, have been suspended by Twitter.
This is not the first censorship I have seen this week, as we see other journalists that are interviewing scientists, doctors, lawyers and experts about COVID-19, 5G, Bill Gates and much more, and either their interviews are coming down or in some cases their entire pages.
Ty and Charlene just finished the release of the new The Truth About Vaccines series with two additional episodes and two roundtables with three medical doctors, one scientist, attorney Bobby Kennedy, and Del Bigtree.
I was honored to be in multiple episodes of the series and we are so saddened to see all of their pages – not just one, but all – ripped down by Twitter.
Doctors at UPMC Pittsburgh have released today they found a COVID cure and are submitting it for FDA approval and safety testing so how much do we wanna bet one or more will mysteriously die
— Thicc Chungus (@anactualwalnut) April 2, 2020
A molecular biologist at the University of Pittsburgh was found dead last weekend in what police believe was a murder-suicide, according to multiple reports.
Ross Township police discovered the body of Dr. Bing Liu, 37 in his home with gunshots to his head, neck, torso, and extremities, according to a statement from the department. A second man, identified as 46-year-old Hao Gu, was found dead in his vehicle from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to reports.
Police said the men knew one another, but didn’t reveal a possible motive behind the incident.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, the department where Bing worked, said on its website on Monday:
“Bing was on the verge of making very significant findings toward understanding the cellular mechanisms that underlie SARS-CoV-2 infection and the cellular basis of the following complications. We will make an effort to complete what he started in an effort to pay homage to his scientific excellence.”
“His loss will be felt throughout the entire scientific community. Please keep his family, friends, and colleagues in your thoughts. Thank you.”
Liu was further described as a leader and mentor who developed quantitative models for a range of complex processes, providing valuable insight both in the lab and to clinicians. The University of Pittsburgh released this statement Tuesday:
“The University of Pittsburgh is deeply saddened by the tragic death of Bing Liu, a prolific researcher and admired colleague at Pitt. The University extends our deepest sympathies to Liu’s family, friends and colleagues during this difficult time.”
According to police, the two victims knew each other. Investigators say they believe the male found in his car shot and killed the man in the Elm Court home before coming back to his car and taking his own life.
Dr Ivet Bahar, head of the Computational and Systems Biology Department, said Liu had only recently begun researching COVID-19 and ‘was just starting to obtain interesting results,’ according to the Daily Mail….
As governments from countries including the U.S., Germany, Italy and the U.K., explore the possibility of issuing so-called “immunity passports,” a leading global health and legal scholar warns that such action poses significant practical, equitable, and legal issues. In contrast, if and when a vaccine is developed, vaccination certificates will likely play an important role in ending the pandemic and protecting global health.
Writing in The Lancet, Alexandra L. Phelan, SJD, LLM, LLB, an assistant professor at Georgetown University Medical Center and a faculty member of its Center for Global Health Science and Security, writes that immunity passports “create an artificial restriction on who can and cannot participate in social and economic activities,” warning that this creates “a perverse incentive for individuals to seek out infection.”
“Immunity passports would be ripe for both corruption and implicit bias” and would “exacerbate the harm inflicted by COVID-19 on already vulnerable populations,” Phelan argues. And she adds that the people “most incentivised to seek out infection might also be those unable or understandably hesitant to seek medical care due to cost and discriminatory access.”
Immunity passports would also face legal challenges, argues Phelan, who is also an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law and a member of its O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. While the International Health Regulations prohibit health measures that are discriminatory and impede international travel, at present, she explains, countries may not have laws to expressly address discrimination experienced by those without “immunoprivilege.”
“Immunity passports would risk enshrining such discrimination in law and undermine the right to health of individuals and the population through the perverse incentives they create,” she writes.
In contrast, if and when a vaccine is developed, “vaccination certificates” may be an important tool to incentivize vaccination, evidence protection, and resume international trade and travel. …
Thus the echo-chamber keeps humming. Questioning the integrity of our “public health” institutions, which are basically subsidiaries of big pharma, is beyond the algorithms of our compartmentalized legal-rules-based opinionators. There are psychiatric categories for such delusion when they conflict with the status quo, but no such labels seem to apply when the status quo itself is based on delusion.
The idea of seeking out infection is intriguing though. Suppose large numbers of people who ignore the FDA’s starvation-level RDAs of essential nutrients like vitamin D, C, zinc, selenium etc deliberately expose themselves to the virus and then go to church services together for a month. The health outcomes and symbolism would be hard to miss even for our autistic technocrats. The creator’s invention of the human body is light-years ahead of anything that medicine can conceive of, much less improve on. The point would be driven home if they wore bloodstained men attire.
Of course such a demonstration would never make it into the MSM, but might appear in local media if it had an appropriate PR angle. Some kind of satiric “suicide cult” publicity might work.
Reported by Newsweek
Biowarfare research is illegal in the USA, so Fauci “outsourced” the research to China. A comment left under video:
“Finally” is right! I got an email back in November/December stating that this was a WEAPONIZED virus, crafted by a bio-weapons lab in China! They didn’t have who was paying the bills, but they nailed the mechanism! (Believe me, I’m frantically searching for the email!) They did float the idea that there would be the ‘possibility’ of governments going beyond self-policing, but they did stress that the economic damage would be devastating!
I thought at the time that the PTB couldn’t be that stupid, but then I realized that this had all the earmarks of an economic coup! Cui bono? “Who benefits?” The World Bank for one. The children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the same bastards who brought us The Federal Reserve and then plunged the US and the world into a catastrophic Depression and financed the Nazis into WWII! Read the book “Tragedy & Hope” pub. 01/1966 by Carroll Quigley for a look at some of the NWO’s blueprints.
But there’s also a 2nd prong to this engineered crisis: What better way to get rid of a lot of those “Useless eaters”. The quote has been making the rounds since the 1930s. “Useless eaters” or “Lebensunwertes Leben” was the term used by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime to describe human beings considered to be a drain on public resources: The disabled, the elderly, the chronic poor, and the Jews. The designation of “useless eaters” was a foundation stone for the U.S. & the Nazi’s Eugenics programs and Hitler’s “Final Solution”. The term has been thrown around with increasing regularity by those in power.
Is this Fauci’s new version of the “Final Solution”?
After he left the presidency of Harvard University, Derek Bok offered this anatomy of the soul of American higher education today: “Universities are like riverboat gamblers and exiled royalty: their desires are never satisfied.”
But Harvard Magazine has now upped the ante, going far beyond an insatiable desire for mere money. The May-June 2020 edition of the magazine calls for the abolition of the family. Not in those words exactly, of course, given the bad odor the phrase has acquired: “the abolition of the family” is “arguably the most infamous demand of The Communist Manifesto,” written by Marx and Engels. But totalitarianism by any other name still destroys the family, and this appears to be the intention of the article.
Written by Erin O’Donnell, and appearing on the Harvard-linked website of Harvard Law Professor Elizabeth Bartholet, the article, titled, “The Risks of Homeschooling,” announces, with great alarm, that “a rapidly increasing number of American families are opting out of sending their children to school, choosing instead to educate them at home. Homeschooled kids now account for roughly 3 percent to 4 percent of school-age children in the United States, a number equivalent to those attending charter schools, and larger than the number currently in parochial schools.”
What could be more horrible than parents educating their own children? For Harvard Magazine, apparently not much. For Bartholet, homeschooling “not only violates children’s right to a ‘meaningful education,’ and their right to be protected from potential child abuse, but may keep them from contributing positively to a democratic society.”
Given just how evil Bartholet finds homeschooling to be, her “solution” to this perceived problem isn’t unexpected—she “recommends a presumptive ban” on parents educating their own children. …
George W Bush is in the news again today, and once again it’s not for the only legitimate reason that he should ever be in the news, namely a war crimes tribunal. No, it’s because his voice was used in a cutesy feel-good video about unity during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“Let us remember how small our differences are in the face of this shared threat,” Bush is heard saying. “We are not partisan combatants. We are human beings, equally vulnerable and equally wonderful in the sight of God.”
And, needless to say, Democrats are all over social media orgasming in their pants about it.
“This video made me ugly cry,” tweeted actress-turned-McResistance pundit Alyssa Milano.
“A REAL president,” tweeted the other Alyssa Milano, Debra Messing.
“In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today,” tweeted former Democratic congresswoman Katie Hill to thunderous online applause.
The Intercept’s Mehdi Hasan spent all day on Twitter defending his position that Dubya is superior to Trump, at one point even arguing “You can be a sane warmonger. You can be a warmonger but be an ok human being to your friends and family. You can be a warmonger and be able to handle a domestic public health crisis.”
In a million years I never thought I’d be crying watching this, thinking how much better we’d all feel if Bush were president today. Wtf. https://t.co/SSR3ieZEFP
— Katie Hill (@KatieHill4CA) May 2, 2020
For years rank-and-file Democrats have been giving the true Butcher of Baghdad a majority approval rating, running with the common narrative that while Bush perhaps made some “mistakes”, Trump is spectacularly worse. Here are five things that are highlighted by that common perspective:
1. It shows how little Democrats care about the lives of human beings overseas….
Amen. And it shouldn’t be surprising given that the whole left-right thing is synthetic.
Let me begin by saying I don’t know anything definitive about the origin of COVID-19. I don’t know if it is a natural mutation or a manmade biological weapon. I don’t trust the government and its media corporations to report the truth on the virus or the actual number of victims it has claimed. The WHO—owned by Merck, the GAVI Alliance, and the Gates Foundation—and the CDC—allowed to receive “gifts” from Big Pharma and corporations—are corrupt institutions that have lied about pandemics in the past, so why should we believe them now?
Despite revised numbers and evidence computer models were seriously flawed—one might argue deliberately so—the corporate media continues to report COVID-19 as something akin to the Black Death. It has done a successful job of scaring the hell out of millions if not billions of people.
“The real number of COVID-19 deaths are not what most people are told and what they then think. How many people actually died from COVID-19 is anyone’s guess,” said Dr. Annie Bukacek in April. “Based on inaccurate, incomplete data, people are being terrorized by fear-mongers into relinquishing freedoms.”
But here is something a script-reading establishment media avoids reporting—the death toll from a decimated economy will be far higher than anything inflicted by this virus (or whatever it is).
COVID-19 is a near-perfect cover for the engineered crash of an economy already on Federal Reserve funny money life support. Instead of assigning blame to the responsible culprits—mega-banks, the financial and “investment” (speculation) class, transnational corporations, and their handmaids in government—blame is placed on an invisible virus that may or may not be manufactured precisely for the purpose of taking down the economy…
Read much more here: https://kurtnimmo.blog/2020/05/02/fear-and-loathing-of-the-covid-19-economy/
Within 48 hours both Facebook and then Youtube have deleted the accounts of David Icke for posting “content that disputes the existence and transmission of Covid-19 as described by the WHO and the NHS.” Other platforms may soon fall in suit, as they did with Alex Jones in 2018.
This article is not about David Icke. I will say it again in italics for the especially dense: this article is not about David Icke. This article is about why we shouldn’t be okay with monopolistic billionaire-owned Silicon Valley tech giants with extensive ties to US government agencies controlling human communication.
I know next to nothing about David Icke, and I have done exactly zero research into his views for this article; for all I know he’s every bit the raving lunatic the narrative managers say he is. It doesn’t matter. What matters is that we’re seeing a consistent and accelerating pattern of powerful plutocratic institutions collaborating with the US-centralized empire to control what ideas people around the world are permitted to share with each other, and it’s a very unsafe trajectory. Making this conversation about Icke and his views distracts from the very important topic we need to actually focus on discussing….
I think it’s pretty clear that this is not a us-centric empire. Nation-states aren’t in the habit of committing suicide the way the USA has been doing for 30+ years in every conceivable way: exporting industrial production, meducating the kids, toxic vaccines, sabotaging the dollar etc. The US government, like so many others, is a puppet of other interests and it’s not hard to figure out the business model of such interests: disaster capitalism. It’s also not hard to figure out the philosophy of people who partake in such a business model: luciferianism. And lastly, it’s not hard to figure out some of the internal structure and dynamics of the entities involved in this business.