CoreysDigs: Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS

READ Parts 1–5 first:

Part 1: Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth Crisis (extensive historical timeline)

Part 2: The Rockefeller Foundation’s Plan to Sterilize Through Anti-fertility Vaccines & Crops

Part 3: DNA Collection and Biotechnology Companies

Part 4: Population Control on Multiple Fronts

Part 5: GMOs, Big Tech & Geoengineering’s Role in Eugenics

End Game

Are they trying to heal the world OR shape the world? Because, for all of their efforts and investments in “saving lives,” statistics show the percentage of women dying during giving birth have increased, premature babies have increased, autism has significantly increased, the rate of sperm count in men has decreased to a staggering 50%, AIDS is still prevalent (according to those funding it), cancer has not been cured, diabetes is off the charts, the government has paid out $4.1 billion for injury and death claims due to vaccinations, our food is loaded with poisons, our water has contained arsenic, food allergies in children has increased 50%, the MMR vaccine contains fetal DNA, our soil has been taken over by genetically modified food, full-term abortions are the new trend, and we are about to move into 5G when radiofrequency radiation is already a category 1 human carcinogen. Again – are these billionaire philanthropists and scientists trying to heal the world OR shape the world?

When is enough, enough? When will these “world leaders,” agencies, organizations, and governments be held accountable?

The real question is – are they compiling all of this DNA and running genetic testing for purposes of healing those with illness and disease, or are they attempting to modify DNA to create the “highly-gifted race” Galton strived for? Depopulation would appear to be thriving, so you tell me?

Are all of these “genetic modifications” any different from the path eugenicists were on, portending to be in the name of health? Disguised by clever phrasing to make people believe the phrase “family planning” is a heartfelt gesture rather than a means to promote every possible medical avenue to prevent more births, or that “population-based science” is truly looking out for ones best interest. Does this statement below sound like it came right out of Margaret Sanger’s mouth in the 1920s?

We envision a world where population-based science and evidence are discovered, developed and translated to improve the lives of all through universal equitable access to family planning and reproductive health.

It’s not. This is a statement straight from Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health. How about “strengthen the next generation of champions.” That’s a catchy one as well.

All of this gives one pause when considering what goes into vaccines. If one were trying to alter another’s DNA without being able to run tests on a specific person first, it wouldn’t be hard to imagine that it could result in having a negative impact on that person. Yet, by having a database of millions of DNA samples from a large population, it may give them the ability to test how the DNA might impact the general population overall. In theory, all of this leaves room for the fact that vaccines may be causing autism, anxiety disorder, seizures, depression, paralysis, POTS, and other undesirable conditions, as well as death. Yet, big pharma and the scientific world, suggest that there are no lasting side effects, and certainly do not cause any of the aforementioned conditions. How is this possible, with millions of people from all different genetic make-ups, to react exactly the same? It’s not logical.

The 2030 Agenda

What is this “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” the U.N. implemented in 2015 along with 190 world leaders, including former president Barack Obama and Pope Francis, among all the usual suspects rallying for these causes?

2030 agenda

Ultimately it can be summed up as the United Nations taking over as global governance. Their plan of attack is from the top down, and their agendas began long before this “New Urban Agenda” was agreed to in 2016. This New York conference brought in over 50,000 people including more than 200 mayors and another 140 city delegations. The Habitat conference only convenes every 20 years, and the focus was on anti-capitalism and global standards the UN wants cities operating under. Technocracy is coming to a city near you, where “inclusive” and “inclusivity” are the big buzz words for this push. We’ve certainly seen a lot of that rolled out in the past couple years.

The implementation of the New Urban Agenda contributes to the implementation and localization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in an integrated manner, and to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets, including SDG 11 of making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.

While they purport it to be about equality, climate change, family planning, and ending world hunger, when you read the fine print, it paints a different story. And, when you review the statistics of what is taking place in this world due to these agendas they’ve been carrying out for decades, leading up to this “urban agenda,” it’s quite apparent which direction this is headed.

• Unlimited migration across open borders, and all cities are expected to embrace this.

• Common market with free trade.

• One-world standards for everything.

• They will develop and implement housing policies at all levels to ensure coherence among national, sub-national, and local development strategies, land policies, and housing supply.

• Federal grants will be directly tied to the United Nations, meaning cities applying will be following their rules…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.