Pelosi & Schiff Connected to Ukrainian Arms Dealer

Apparently some politicians see their positions as a means of gaining access to power and wealth. T’will be interesting to see what comes of all this “impeachment” talk in DC. Seems it may be designed to protect the criminal politicians and to “Block that kick!” from President Trump’s busy little legal bees.

Presently there are well over 112,000 sealed indictments waiting to be opened, while thousands have already been unsealed. Politicians who have exploited their positions to gain wealth might be named in the ones yet to be unsealed.

Oh, and Ukranian-born Igor Pasternick and Hungarian-born “Public Enemy #1” George Soros are buds.

Joe Biden is not the only key Democrat that has some explaining to do about Ukraine dealings.


See also

Ron Paul: Impeachment…or CIA Coup?

You don’t need to be a supporter of President Trump to be concerned about the efforts to remove him from office. Last week House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced impeachment proceedings against the President over a phone call made to the President of Ukraine. According to the White House record of the call, the President asked his Ukrainian counterpart to look into whether there is any evidence of Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 election and then mentioned that a lot of people were talking about how former US Vice President Joe Biden stopped the prosecution of his son who was under investigation for corruption in Ukraine.

Democrats, who spent more than two years convinced that “Russiagate” would enable them to remove Trump from office only to have their hopes dashed by the Mueller Report, now believe they have their smoking gun in this phone call.

It this about politics? Yes. But there may be more to it than that.

It may appear that the Democratic Party, furious over Hillary Clinton’s 2016 loss, is the driving force behind this ongoing attempt to remove Donald Trump from office, but at every turn we see the fingerprints of the CIA and its allies in the US deep state.

In August 2016, a former acting director of the CIA, Mike Morell, wrote an extraordinary article in the New York Times accusing Donald Trump of being an “agent of the Russian Federation.” Morell was clearly using his intelligence career as a way of bolstering his claim that Trump was a Russian spy – after all, the CIA should know such a thing! But the claim was a lie.

Former CIA director John Brennan accused President Trump of “treason” and of “being in the pocket of Putin” for meeting with the Russian president in Helsinki and accepting his word that Russia did not meddle in the US election. To this day there has yet to be any evidence presented that the Russian government did interfere. Brennan openly called on “patriotic” Republicans to act against this “traitor.”

Brennan and his deep state counterparts James Comey at the FBI and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper launched an operation, using what we now know is the fake Steele dossier, to spy on the Trump presidential campaign and even attempt to entrap Trump campaign employees.

Notice a pattern here?

Now we hear that the latest trigger for impeachment is a CIA officer assigned to the White House who filed a “whistleblower” complaint against the president over something he heard from someone else that the president said in the Ukraine phone call.

Shockingly, according to multiple press reports the rules for CIA whistleblowing were recently changed, dropping the requirement that the whistleblower have direct, first-hand knowledge of the wrongdoing. Just before this complaint was filed, the rule-change allowed hearsay or second-hand information to be accepted. That seems strange.

As it turns out, the CIA “whistleblower” lurking around the White House got the important things wrong, as there was no quid pro quo discussed and there was no actual request to investigate Biden or his son.

The Democrats have suddenly come out in praise of whistleblowers – well not exactly. Pelosi still wants to prosecute actual whistleblower Ed Snowden. But she’s singing the praises of this fake CIA “whistleblower.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer once warned Trump that if “you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you.” It’s hard not to ask whether this is a genuine impeachment effort…or a CIA coup!

The issue is nationalism (regional self-determination) vs globalism (joining a planetary borg administered by the transnational corporate elite).   If you think the current political/economic situation is an indictment of the former, you’re not seeing who’s responsible for it: the transnational corporate elite.   Trump, for all his faults, may be our last chance to avoid what has already been imposed in the “developing world”.    We have already been sold down the river, the question is whether we can turn the boat against the current in time to avoid the waterfall ahead.


The White Helmets and the Militarization of Humanitarianism in Syria

September 2019 – according to reports from Syrian Alikhbaria TV channel (in Arabic), Nusra Front or Al Qaeda terrorists (rebranded as Hayat Tahrir Al Sham or HTS) installed surveillance cameras at the western side of the Abu Duhur humanitarian corridor at Al-Sultan hill to monitor civilians who attempt to flee the terrorist-held areas of Idlib to safe zones controlled by the Syrian Arab Army and Russian military and humanitarian agencies.

On September 26th 2019, medical sources informed Al Watan newspaper in Damascus that Nusra Front terrorists opened fire on civilians trying to use the Abu Duhur corridor – 2 civilians were killed and 20 others wounded.

The targeting of civilians attempting to flee terrorist-occupied and controlled areas of Syria is a familiar one, reported in East Aleppo and Eastern Ghouta as the SAA advanced towards final liberation of these districts. The value of these civilians for the terrorists is primarily as human shields, hostages to be used as instruments to turn back the inevitable sweep to victory of the SAA across Syria.

It has also been reported to me, by civilians and medical staff in the region, that the armed groups demand upwards of $ 500 of an already impoverished civilian population to be allowed to exit via these Russian/Syrian-established corridors.

Who is providing the terrorist groups still occupying the north-west of Syrian territory, Idlib, with the surveillance equipment and early warning technology to monitor airstrikes and civilian movement?

This article will provide evidence that the White Helmets are a militarized faux “humanitarian” organisation, seemingly providing essential early warning technology to alert the armed groups of imminent airstrikes by Syria and Russia.

The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (UK FCO) is one of the primary financiers of this pseudo “first responder” group that has usurped the original and Syrian Civil Defence, established inside Syria in 1953.

The White Helmets are already proven to be auxiliaries of the multiple extremist offshoots or forerunners of Al Qaeda and ISIS in Syria – this article will demonstrate the extent to which the group provides cover for the supply of military and “humanitarian” equipment that essentially enables the armed groups to combat the Syrian military campaign to reclaim “every inch” of Syrian territory from the terrorist groups acting as proxies for the US Coalition and their allies in the Gulf States, Israel and Turkey….

Swedish Medical Associations Say White Helmets Murdered Kids for Gas Attack Videos

Organ Harvesting of Syrian Refugees

The Push For Mandatory Vaccines Is Galvanizing A Resistance Movement

The push for mandatory vaccines seems to be gaining momentum in the United States. To be more precise, states are beginning to look more at removing exemptions which currently allow non-vaccinated children to attend school. As per the CDC, each individual state has vaccination requirements for daycare and school entry that often apply not only to children attending public schools, but also to those attending private schools and daycare facilities. All states provide medical exemptions, and some state laws also offer exemptions for religious and/or philosophical reasons. State laws also establish mechanisms for enforcement of school vaccination requirements and exemptions.

Some states are in the process of attempting to remove, or have already removed, religious and philosophical exemptions. And in California, where they have already removed religious and philosophical exemptions, they have just passed a law that gives lawmakers, not doctors, the final authority of whether or not a medical exemption will be approved.

In the latest episode of The Collective Evolution Show on CETV, Joe Martino and I examine the push for more stringent mandatory vaccines laws that are arising in several state legislatures. The clip below is the first segment. You can watch the full episode by signing up for a free 7-day trial on CETV.

California Bill SB276

Very much in the news has been California’s Bill SB276. As mentioned, the new law puts medical exemptions under the authority of the government rather than doctors. The popular resistance to this was significant, and because of pressure put onto Senator Richard Pan, the sponsor of the bill, as well as Governor Gavin Newsome. At Newsome’s request, a tag-along companion Bill SB714, which made some concessions to protect existing medical exemptions, was also signed into law with the passage of SB276.

With SB276 becoming law, a strong contingent of citizens have been galvanized to stay together and fight to reverse the impact of this bill, which, in combination with earlier changes that removed religious and philosophical exemptions in California, forces parents in California to have their children fully vaccinated if they are to go to public or private school. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gave a rousing speech right after the bill was passed into law, and certainly gives rise to the belief that opposing mandatory vaccinations is the new civil rights movement in the United States, one which RFK Jr. underscored as ‘the most important battle, probably, in human history.’

Maine Bill 798

In Maine, LD798 recently passed into law. It removes ALL philosophical and religious exemptions for vaccines and will potentially impact 8000 children in the state as far as their inability to go to school until they are fully vaccinated. However, after the legislation passed, a group entitled ‘Mainers for Health and Parental Rights’ was formed and organized to enact a ‘People’s Veto’ on this law, described below:

The people’s veto is a constitutional provision (Art. 4, Pt.3, §17) that allows the citizens of Maine, through the initiative and referendum process, to repeal a piece of legislation passed by the legislature. The people’s veto came into being as part of the initiative and referendum process enacted in 1909.  To repeal a particular piece of legislation, a petition must be presented within 90 days of legislative adjournment and meet the signature requirements of any initiative proposal.  If the petition is certified, the law is set aside until the issue can be voted on at the next election.

The requirement was that 64,000 signatures of Maine Voters (of which there are just over 1M in the state) needed to be collected within 90 days of the legislation being passed. On September  16th, the group presented almost 93,000 signatures to the government, which represents the herculean effort of getting consent from almost 10% of voters in the entire state! This ensured that the law would be set aside until elections next March, where LD798 will be on the ballot for the people of Maine to vote upon.

The Takeaway

If we are to evolve, we must walk through our darkness rather than avoiding it. Complementing the internal work of examining our personal shadow, conscious activism involves the collective external actions that confront the darkness of humanity, where we stand firmly for what we believe in.

As we work to awaken our fellow human beings to the notion that the government and the corporations do not work in our self-interest, the momentum that these movements create could not only empower us within the political process, but more importantly help us in stepping away from the current political system entirely.


CNN Lavishes Praise on Criminality of the CIA

It is perfectly logical for the corporate media to slobber praise on the CIA, the progenitor of its current format of endless propaganda, lies, and alternate versions of reality.

Hear the true stories of the agencies keeping us safe on #Declassified: Untold Stories of American Spies. Sunday at 9 p.m. ET/PT

— CNN (@CNN) September 27, 2019

This tweet is truly Orwellian. The CIA has not kept us “safe.” It has in fact done quite the opposite.

In addition to MKUltra and the search for a perfect brainwashed assassin, this agency of the national security state imported Nazis (the Gehlen organization), engaged in a secret terror campaign with NATO targeting civilians (Operation Gladio), illegally and against its useless charter undermined the constitutional rights of Americans dissenting against the Vietnam War (Operation CHAOS), engineered the sadistic MKUltra program, deals deadly drugs, established crooked banks to finance black projects, has overthrown governments in numerous countries, and as previously mentioned, turned the corporate media into a propaganda machine—the CIA’s “Mighty Wurlitzer”—churning out an endless stream of propaganda.

Now we must endure propaganda from a news outlet that permitted the Pentagon to run a psychological operation from its headquarters during Bush the Elder’s criminal destruction of Iraq.

Mike Rogers will host this latest televised accretion of odious lies and historical revisionism. Recall his previous gig—Chairman of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Here is something “declassified,” yet never talked about and now denounced as domestic terror radicalization—the subway terrorists mentioned in the following teaser were created by the CIA.

The FBI is notorious for staging fake terror plots.

CNN is little different than Fox or any other corporate “news” operation—all read government scripts closely and rarely deviate from the official narrative, never mind the absurdity of many of these contrived and obviously “fake news” narratives, most notably 9/11 and the subsequent war on manufactured terror.

I suspect this “tribute” is funded by the CIA, which has worked closely with Hollywood and corporate media to make sure we are left in the dark and filled up with fictional nonsense about freedom-hating terrorists and other “threats,” now including conspiracy theories the FBI says must be urgently confronted and eliminated.

The CIA controls far more than we know and are willing to accept. Is it possible many of the more outlandish conspiracy theories are part of the CIA effort to criminalize alternative media? After all, back in 1967, the CIA

wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories.  The dispatch was marked “psych” –  short for “psychological operations” or disinformation –  and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.

CNN Covers for Elite Pedophiles, Says “Don’t Read Podesta Emails”

This is CNN, and CBS and NBC and ABC and MSNBC and NYT and the Brainwashington Compost and the entire US MSM

2016: Top German Journalist Admits Mainstream Media Is Completely Fake: “We All Lie For The CIA”

New doubts about Epstein “suicide”

Is the “Dead” Epstein Photographer CIA?

… I cannot prove Roger-William Farrington [the photographer -rw] works for the CIA, but I wouldn’t be surprised. The deep state and its cronies are busy at work trying to bury this story and hide the vast pedophile and sex slave network maintained by the elite.

If we are to believe the state is actively pursuing the case, we must ask why Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of documented British intelligence and Mossad agent Robert Maxwell, and Jean-Luc Brunel (model agency mogul described as Epstein’s “pimp”) are still at large.

I don’t believe Epstein is dead. I also believe the man Farrington took the photo of was not only not Epstein, but also wasn’t dead. Read the story linked above for further details.

The CIA (if indeed the rogue agency is involved) ain’t what it used to be.  The photographic “evidence” backing up the claim the serial rapist and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is obviously fake.

The nose of the person on the hospital bed does not match Epstein’s as it is much more hooked than that of the convicted paedophile child-trafficker, also to make matters worse his ears are totally different also… It is 100% safe to say this is a total facial recognition failure on all levels… Jeffrey Epstein’s ear cartilage does not match the person on the bed, his nose is not the same, nor is his cheekbone.

In addition, the website includes an anonymous post allegedly posted by a prison employee.


I have no doubt about the existence of an elite pedo network. There is ample evidence it exists.

Epstein may well have killed himself, although this claim is now in serious doubt. I really don’t believe a highly narcissistic sexual predator would off himself in a suicide-proof prison cell. Epstein may have thought he would skate like he did previously, although there was ample evidence of his activity both then and now.

The Farrington photograph of the “dead” Epstein reveals that the man shown is not the notorious child rapist and multimillionaire (thanks largely to Les Wexner). It is proof that the CIA if it is indeed involved, can no longer fabricate believable evidence.

The charter-busting agency will need to try harder in the future, largely due to so many internet sleuths and researchers following up every last detail on a case that has the potential to bust the elite pedo network wide open.

American Families Are Rejecting Hi-Tech School Curriculums and Their Zombifying Effect

For many years, Silicon Valley parents (aka tech inventors) have been sending their kids to private low-tech schools and limiting their use of tech, whereas other American families are being told that providing “high tech” educations is what’s best for their kids.  An increasing number of experts and studies continue to warn that this is definitely NOT best for kids (see 1, 2, 3), and it’s not just about eye damage (see 1, 2) from excessive screen use.

When students at a private school in Australia were given a choice between a high-tech education or no-tech education, they chose no-tech.  When American families aren’t given a choice, some are removing their kids from schools.  From The New York Times:

The seed of rebellion was planted in classrooms. It grew in kitchens and living rooms, in conversations between students and their parents.

It culminated when Collin Winter, 14, an eighth grader in McPherson, Kan., joined a classroom walkout in January. In the nearby town of Wellington, high schoolers staged a sit-in. Their parents organized in living rooms, at churches and in the back of machine repair shops. They showed up en masse to school board meetings. In neighborhoods with no political yard signs, homemade signs with dark red slash marks suddenly popped up.

Silicon Valley had come to small-town Kansas schools — and it was not going well.

“I want to just take my Chromebook back and tell them I’m not doing it anymore,” said Kallee Forslund, 16, a 10th grader in Wellington.

Eight months earlier, public schools near Wichita had rolled out a web-based platform and curriculum from Summit Learning. The Silicon Valley-based program promotes an educational approach called “personalized learning,” which uses online tools to customize education. The platform that Summit provides was developed by Facebook engineers. It is funded by Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook’s chief executive, and his wife, Priscilla Chan, a pediatrician.


Then, students started coming home with headaches and hand cramps. Some said they felt more anxious. One child began having a recurrence of seizures. Another asked to bring her dad’s hunting earmuffs to class to block out classmates because work was now done largely alone.

“We’re allowing the computers to teach and the kids all looked like zombies,” said Tyson Koenig, a factory supervisor in McPherson, who visited his son’s fourth-grade class. In October, he pulled the 10-year-old out of the school.

In a school district survey of McPherson middle school parents released this month, 77 percent of respondents said they preferred their child not be in a classroom that uses Summit. More than 80 percent said their children had expressed concerns about the platform.

The resistance in Kansas is part of mounting nationwide opposition to Summit…