Tylenol may cause neurological damage in children

(Natural News) Our love for over-the-counter drug acetaminophen (Tylenol) is a classic example of a logical fallacy turned deadly, wherein our belief that “just because everyone takes it” suddenly makes a substance safe and effective. Scores of literature now suggest that Tylenol may have detrimental effects on human health, particularly on developing infants. It is for this reason that expecting mothers should be very careful when taking this drug, even avoid it altogether.

The research isn’t new, either. Dozens of studies that linked a potential cause-and-effect relationship between Tylenol use and neurotoxicity have been made but were ignored by the medical community because it went against the norm. After all, taken in “recommended” doses, the drug showed itself to be relatively effective and caused little to no side-effects in adults (so they claim).

But what about gestating babies? Evidence points out that acetaminophen has an observable and statistically measurable effect on brain development. Studies in animal models (both in mice and rats) demonstrate that when taken during pregnancy, acetaminophen causes long-term alterations in the brain which eventually manifest themselves in problems with social function.

This may be a reason why more studies have linked autism to acetaminophen use during pregnancy. Margaret McCarthy, the head of the pharmacology department at the University of Maryland, has said that there is a “probable mechanism” by which the drug damages the brain during development. She and her team also noted that the male brain is more sensitive to acetaminophen during gestation which may explain the gender bias in autism….


Fire departments are ‘going dark’ and becoming secret public safety organizations

Across the country fire departments in ConnecticutGeorgia, Tennessee, North Carolina and Illinois have begun encrypting their radio transmissions, effectively turning them into secret public safety organizations.

The latest fire department to ‘go dark’ and hide its communications from the public is the Denver Fire Department in Colorado.

The Denver Post reported that once the fire department learned that they could no longer communicate with the Colorado Police Department which also went dark; they decided they had to do the same thing.

Fire department spokesman Greg Pixley said, “that the fire department was not planning on encrypting its channels, but said that the department later learned it would need to do so to facilitate easy communication with police. It’s difficult to switch between encrypted and unencrypted channels.”

A 2016 Homeland Security report titled “Considerations for Encryption in Public Safety Radio Systems” has served as a blueprint to turn police and fire departments into secret public safety organizations.

The report reads like a who’s who of federal agencies helping public safety organizations go dark.

On page 2 of the report the Federal Partnership for Interoperable Communications which is a Homeland Security organization, thanked four different Homeland Security organizations for their help.

“The Federal Partnership for InteroperableCommunications wishes to acknowledge the valuable input of the following groups and organizations: Department of Homeland Security OneDHSEmergency Communications Committee, SAFECOM Emergency Response Council, the National Council for Statewide Interoperability Coordinators and the DHS SouthwestBorder Communications.”

How is that for redundancy? Thank yourself four times for helping turn public safety into a national secret.

Why does Homeland Security want to create a secret first responders communications network?…


Public safety, or RICO government safety?   Corruption grows spontaneously and penetrates every nook and cranny of the power structure regardless of political ideology.   It’s a generic problem which has no known algorithmic preventative.   Public awareness is the only known solution, and encrypting routine government communication will hinder this public oversight function.

Encryption will have two consequences: it will hinder the ability of street criminals to act with impunity, and it will aid the ability of official criminals to act with impunity.

Which is the bigger problem?   Which operates on a more robust social networking substrate (complete with secret societies) and has access to more resources and legal defenses?   Which largely creates the other by funneling public resources into bottomless pits of payoffs and offshore accounts as main street becomes more impoverished?

As the government pushes personal privacy and the 4th amendment aside, it gathers more privacy for itself.

San Diego Has Been Turned Into A Massive Chinese-Style Public Surveillance Network

Can you imagine a city in the United States secretly creating a Chinese-style public surveillance network that can identify everyone? Can you imagine that same city secretly creating a Chinese-style public watchlisting network?

Well imagine no more because it has already happened.

When I wrote about “covert facial recognition streetlights coming to a city near you” last year, I never would have dreamt that my article would become a reality so quickly.

A recent article in the San Diego Reader reveals how a hacker discovered emails between the Port of San Diego and BriefCam. The emails revealed that law enforcement is secretly using a network of 400 facial recognition surveillance cameras to identify everyone.

Last year, BriefCam announced a “breakthrough” in real-time facial recognition surveillance.

“Robust multi-camera search capabilities identify men, women, children and vehicles with speed and precision, using 25 classes and attributes, face recognition, appearance similarity, color, size, speed, path, direction, and dwell time.”

According to another article, the City of San Diego is using GE’s CityIQ streetlights to listen to everyone.

In 2017, civil rights advocates sent a letter to the mayor and city council asking the city not to install GE’s streetlights.

“Devices capable of monitoring and recording residents invade privacy, chill free speech, and disparately impact communities of color.”

But as the article revealed, San Diego ignored the public’s concerns and secretly installed 3200 spying GE streetlights….


Concentration of power is not politically driven, it’s a systemic issue of spontaneous self-organization mediated by politicians acting under the imposed biases and conditioning of the system.   And it’s accelerating because it synergizes itself.

US Regime Change Blueprint Proposed Venezuelan Electricity Blackouts as ‘Watershed Event’ for ‘Galvanizing Public Unrest’

A September 2010 memo by a US-funded soft power organization that helped train Venezuelan coup leader Juan Guaido and his allies identifies the potential collapse of the country’s electrical sector as “a watershed event” that “would likely have the impact of galvanizing public unrest in a way that no opposition group could ever hope to generate.”

The memo has special relevance today as Guaido moves to exploit nationwide blackouts caused by a major failure at the Simon Bolivar Hydroelectric Plant at Guri dam – a crisis that Venezuela’s government blames on US sabotage.

It was authored by Srdja Popovic of the Center for Applied Non-Violent Action and Strategies (CANVAS), a Belgrade-based “democracy promotion” organization funded by the US government that has trained thousands of US-aligned youth activists in countries where the West seeks regime change.

This group reportedly hosted Guaido and the key leaders of his Popular Will party for a series of training sessions, fashioning them into a “Generation 2007” determined to foment resistance to then-President Hugo Chavez and sabotage his plans to implement “21st century socialism” in Venezuela….


The Global Economic Reset Begins With An Engineered Crash

For a few years now, since at least 2014, the phrase “global economic reset” has been circulating in the financial world. This phrase is used primarily by globalist institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to describe an event in which the current system as we know it will either die out or evolve into a new system where “multilateralism” will become the norm. The reset is often described in an ambiguous way. IMF banking elites will usually mention the end results of the shift, but they say little about the process to get there.

What we do know is that the intent of the globalists is to use this reset to create a more centralized monetary system and micro-managed global economy. At the core of this new structure would be the IMF along with perhaps the BIS and World Bank.  It is a plan that has been supported openly by both western and eastern governments, including Russia and China.

As noted, the details are few and far between, but the IMF describes the use of open borders and human migrations during the reset as a means to transfer capital from various parts of the world. It is a novel if not utterly insane way to transfer wealth that only makes sense if you understand that the globalist goal is to deliberately conjure a geopolitical catastrophe….

The assertion in the mainstream media is that this recessionary downturn is new. This is not the case. What began in 2008 was an epic implosion of multiple national economies, and what we are seeing in 2019 is the final culmination of that process – The end game….

I predicted both the success of the Brexit vote as well as Trump’s win in 2016 based on the theory that the globalists would allow or even help populists to gain a political foothold, only to crash the economic system on their heads and then blame them for the disaster. So far my theory is proving correct….

The Fed started the tightening process for a reason; the establishment is ready to start the “global economic reset”, and they have their populist scapegoats in place. The crash in fundamentals returned in mid-2018, and I believe that crash will finally be acknowledged publicly by the media in mid-2019.

The point of it all is described in the very IMF interviews and documents I linked to above – Total centralization of the global economic framework, managed by the IMF. They describe it as “multilateralism” or a “multipolar world order”; this is meant to fool us into believing that the reset is about “decentralization”. It isn’t. They intend to move us from one unipolar economic structure to another unipolar economic structure that is even more centralized. That is all.

The crash itself is simply a means to an end. It is a tool to gain fiscal and psychological leverage against the public. The everything bubble was created for a reason. The Fed has tightened into economic weakness over the past year for a reason. The timing of Trump’s trade war and summit failures have happened for a reason. The timing of the Brexit chaos is happening now for a reason. The globalists are pulling the plug on economic life support today; the crash is engineered, and sovereignty movements are supposed to take the blame.

The best option at this time is to continuously force the issue of central bank culpability. Liberty activists have to keep the focus on them and their criminal participation in economic sabotage, and we cannot assume that any government or political leader will be friendly to our cause. The globalists have started the crisis, and we must finish it by making sure they are held accountable.


“The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”
— Quote from Caroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope, Chapter 20