Vaccination of Pregnant Women: Prosecute the Medical Mafia

Does this not fit the definition of organized crime?   Is organized crime a new category of liberal tolerance?

To repeat: the clearest indication of the malevolent intentions behind public health policy wrt the flu is the ongoing suppression of the efficacy of vitamin D in normal dosages (i.e. what a shirtless caucasian would get from spending 30 minutes in the sun: 5000-10,000 IU per day)

Not a single scientist, immunologist, infectious disease specialist or medical doctor has ever been able to establish a scientific foundation for the vaccination of infants or pregnant women, yet every year just like clock work, western populations are heavily bombarded by flu vaccine propaganda. In the last few years some media outlets have begun reporting the reality flu vaccines are not effective for circulating strains.

One study led by researchers at the School of Public Health and the University of Georgia, explored the determinants of trust in flu vaccines among adults, including trust in its efficacy and in the vaccine production process. The authors stressed the utmost importance of enhancing trust in the flu vaccine and vaccine process which appears to being failing specific demographics.

Trust is failing because of lack of scientific governance not science itself. More vaccine skeptics are challenging how research is prioritized and funded, how trials are designed and evidence collected and analyzed, which studies get published, and how scientific evidence is used to inform policy decisions. The critics charge scientific institutions with bias say, having financial interests that work against the public interest and it’s working against the pharmaceutical industrial complex as millions now continue to reject the flu vaccine. Influenza vaccination coverage in the United States remains below national targets and racial/ethnic differences persist according to a study in Vaccine.

Behind the scenes, biostatisticians have been a driving force behind the promotion of mass vaccination campaigns. Most of what they term “statistically significant studies” are lacking credibility by any stretch of the imagination that we could refer to as scientific integrity.

More Pregnant Women Refusing Flu Vaccines

An overwhelming majority of pregnant women who visit the doctor’s office are now refusing the flu vaccine over fears it will harm their fetus and their fears are now scientifically justified. More than 90% of all expecting mothers will now say no to the flu vaccine due to fear of miscarriage and delivery of toxic byproducts to their unborn child.

In 2011, Dr. Alessandro Bertoucci who analyzed the practices of 256 physicians treating more than 600,000 patients, reported that a staggering 91% of pregnant women are declining influenza vaccines due to fears of miscarriage and suspected toxins in the vaccine itself.

A study published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates. It showed a 4250% increase in fetal deaths according to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data when comparing three consecutive influenza seasons. It was a confirmation that many anti-vaccine advocates have long awaited and further establishes and adds to preliminary evidence that vaccinations are toxic poisons having no place in the human body.

The study, Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, was conducted by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller who has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.

While the CDC states on its website that “low doses of thimerosal in vaccines do not cause harm, and are only associated with minor local injection site reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site,” the journal BioMed Research International now provides direct evidence that the CDC’s safety assurances about the mercury-containing preservative are not fact-based, according to the article’s lead author, Brian Hooker, PhD.

What most people do not realize is although the FDA gave a two year deadline to remove thimerosal from vaccines after the deadly neurotoxin was banned in 1999, they continue to appear in 60 percent of vaccine formulations to this day.

Factually, Thimerosal is a mercury-containing compound that is a known human carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and immune-system disruptor at levels below 1 part-per-million, and a compound to which some humans can have an anaphylactic shock reaction. It is also a recognized reproductive and fetal toxin with no established toxicologically safe level of exposure for humans.

There are dozens of scientific inquiries and studies on the adverse effects of thimerosal, including gastrointestinal abnormalities and immune system irregularities.

Another remarkable fact is that although all pregnant women are encouraged to receive the flu vaccine by health and medical authorities, the safety and effectiveness for pregnant women or nursing mothers has also not been established. Perhaps this is why studies show many spontaneous abortions and stillbirths after pregnant women are vaccinated.

5 Myths to Keep in Mind About Flu Vaccines…. repost from


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.