Mind Controlled Pop Icon Moving from Youtube to Mainstream

Seriously, this is getting brazen.

The Disturbing Meaning of Poppy’s “Time is Up”

Poppy is crossing over from YouTube to the mainstream. Unsurprisingly, her video “Time is Up” is one of the most blatant celebrations of Illuminati MKULTRA ever.

Poppy has been creeping out people on since 2015 on YouTube with hundreds of bizarre, surrealist and hypnotic videos. In my article “That Poppy”: The YouTube Star Under Illuminati Mind Control, I explained how her entire act revolves around MKULTRA. Indeed, nearly every video on that channel addresses a different facet of mind control as Poppy speaks to the camera in a robotic matter. Also, peppered throughout the videos, are lots of subtle yet unmistakable nods to satanism. In short, Poppy is 100% in-line with the agenda of the occult elite.

Poppy is also a recording artist signed with Island Records. She will soon release a second studio album entitled Am I a Girl? and embarking on a second world tour of the same name. And this time, the media push is strong. Indeed, slowly but surely, she is crossing over to the mainstream and is poised to become a household name.

Mainstream Exposure

When I first wrote about Poppy in 2017, she was a viral phenomenon with millions of YouTube views. However, she was still fairly unknown to the general public. This will probably change soon as she’s been getting that sweet media exposure that is usually reserved to the world’s biggest stars. And you better believe that everything about her is still focused on Illuminati mind control.

… The lyrics of the first verse could not be more blatantly about MKULTRA:

In the factory
In the sterile place where they made me
I woke up alone
Dizzy from the programming
Have I been wiped again?
Oh my God, I don’t even know…


YouTube Pop Star Under Illuminati Mind Control?

Has China Finally Lifted Its Thumb Off Of Gold?

via zerohedge.com

There’s a lot of talk about the Yuan price of gold falling out of a price suppression channel.  Both Zerohedge and Nomura have weighed in on this.

The Yuan price of gold surged overnight to above CNY 8500 per ounce which is a major breakdown.  But it’s also indicative of something that has long been suspected during this gold bear market.

China doesn’t want the price of gold to rise.  Those accumulating gold — China and Russia — have zero incentive to accumulate at higher prices.   And the gold chart of the last three years bears out that they have had to come in at higher prices on pullbacks because market bottoms keep coming in higher and higher.

The 2015 low was around $1050.  2016 at $1146.  2017 the low after a pullback in July couldn’t breach $1208 during a strong post-U.S. election rally.  This year the price was briefly pushed below $1200 in the longest downtrend of the seven year bear market but has since popped back over $1230 with its sights now set on  $1250.

China may have no choice here but to let the price of gold rise.  Because conditions in other markets are changing rapidly.  So, ultimately, what China wants really may not matter anymore.

Remember, the eurodollar markets broke in late May this year as Jeffrey Snider at Alhambra Partners reminds us daily.

The PBoC cut the reserve ratio again recently to free up liquidity in Chinese banks but it doesn’t seem to have stemmed the tide.  And that’s why it has continually loosened the Yuan fix rate, now approaching 7 vs. the U.S. dollar.

Offshore dollar markets are the pool of real savings in the global economy and it determines where we are headed.  And the offshore dollar hoarders are pulling out of China… and Europe… and Japan…. and South America….


Vaccination of Pregnant Women: Prosecute the Medical Mafia

Does this not fit the definition of organized crime?   Is organized crime a new category of liberal tolerance?

To repeat: the clearest indication of the malevolent intentions behind public health policy wrt the flu is the ongoing suppression of the efficacy of vitamin D in normal dosages (i.e. what a shirtless caucasian would get from spending 30 minutes in the sun: 5000-10,000 IU per day)

Not a single scientist, immunologist, infectious disease specialist or medical doctor has ever been able to establish a scientific foundation for the vaccination of infants or pregnant women, yet every year just like clock work, western populations are heavily bombarded by flu vaccine propaganda. In the last few years some media outlets have begun reporting the reality flu vaccines are not effective for circulating strains.

One study led by researchers at the School of Public Health and the University of Georgia, explored the determinants of trust in flu vaccines among adults, including trust in its efficacy and in the vaccine production process. The authors stressed the utmost importance of enhancing trust in the flu vaccine and vaccine process which appears to being failing specific demographics.

Trust is failing because of lack of scientific governance not science itself. More vaccine skeptics are challenging how research is prioritized and funded, how trials are designed and evidence collected and analyzed, which studies get published, and how scientific evidence is used to inform policy decisions. The critics charge scientific institutions with bias say, having financial interests that work against the public interest and it’s working against the pharmaceutical industrial complex as millions now continue to reject the flu vaccine. Influenza vaccination coverage in the United States remains below national targets and racial/ethnic differences persist according to a study in Vaccine.

Behind the scenes, biostatisticians have been a driving force behind the promotion of mass vaccination campaigns. Most of what they term “statistically significant studies” are lacking credibility by any stretch of the imagination that we could refer to as scientific integrity.

More Pregnant Women Refusing Flu Vaccines

An overwhelming majority of pregnant women who visit the doctor’s office are now refusing the flu vaccine over fears it will harm their fetus and their fears are now scientifically justified. More than 90% of all expecting mothers will now say no to the flu vaccine due to fear of miscarriage and delivery of toxic byproducts to their unborn child.

In 2011, Dr. Alessandro Bertoucci who analyzed the practices of 256 physicians treating more than 600,000 patients, reported that a staggering 91% of pregnant women are declining influenza vaccines due to fears of miscarriage and suspected toxins in the vaccine itself.

A study published in the Human and Experimental Toxicology journal found a direct statistical correlation between higher vaccine doses and infant mortality rates. It showed a 4250% increase in fetal deaths according to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data when comparing three consecutive influenza seasons. It was a confirmation that many anti-vaccine advocates have long awaited and further establishes and adds to preliminary evidence that vaccinations are toxic poisons having no place in the human body.

The study, Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity?, was conducted by Gary S. Goldman and Neil Z. Miller who has been studying the dangers of vaccines for 25 years.

While the CDC states on its website that “low doses of thimerosal in vaccines do not cause harm, and are only associated with minor local injection site reactions like redness and swelling at the injection site,” the journal BioMed Research International now provides direct evidence that the CDC’s safety assurances about the mercury-containing preservative are not fact-based, according to the article’s lead author, Brian Hooker, PhD.

What most people do not realize is although the FDA gave a two year deadline to remove thimerosal from vaccines after the deadly neurotoxin was banned in 1999, they continue to appear in 60 percent of vaccine formulations to this day.

Factually, Thimerosal is a mercury-containing compound that is a known human carcinogen, mutagen, teratogen and immune-system disruptor at levels below 1 part-per-million, and a compound to which some humans can have an anaphylactic shock reaction. It is also a recognized reproductive and fetal toxin with no established toxicologically safe level of exposure for humans.

There are dozens of scientific inquiries and studies on the adverse effects of thimerosal, including gastrointestinal abnormalities and immune system irregularities.

Another remarkable fact is that although all pregnant women are encouraged to receive the flu vaccine by health and medical authorities, the safety and effectiveness for pregnant women or nursing mothers has also not been established. Perhaps this is why studies show many spontaneous abortions and stillbirths after pregnant women are vaccinated.

5 Myths to Keep in Mind About Flu Vaccines….

https://govtslaves.info/2018/10/17/5-flu-vaccine-myths-every-person-should-know/ repost from https://preventdisease.com/news/18/101718_5-Flu-Vaccine-Myths-Every-Person-Should-Know.shtml


Monsanto Franken-Fruits hit the produce racks soon – watch out for genetically mutated mushrooms, tomatoes, bananas and strawberries

via govtslaves.info

(Natural News) Gene editing of food happens when scientists remove part of a plant or seed’s DNA sequence and replace it with bacteria or pathogens that would normally never grow that way in nature. There is absolutely no science proving this is safe for humans, so anyone who consumes genetically modified foods is playing Russian roulette with their health.

Monsanto, the most evil corporation on planet Earth, is now branding their latest fruit and vegetable science monsters that grow from “Crispr” gene editing during laboratory experimentation as “cutting-edge technology,” even though past GMO experiments (like with BT corn and Roundup Ready crops) have completely backfired, causing cancer, anxiety, depression, and kidney failure in tested lab animals.

If you’re into taking health RISKS, eat experimental peach-flavored strawberries, seedless tomatoes, non-browning mushrooms, and ultra-sweet strawberries

Pro biotech propagandists always refer to anyone who doesn’t want to eat genetically modified foods as “anti-science.” They believe that anything created in a laboratory is 100 percent safe for the environment, farm animals, and of course, humans. They lie and say there is a “World Scientific Consensus” that doesn’t exist. These biotech shills are the same pharma goons and charlatans that promote every vaccine and flu shot as “100% safe and effective,” even though the vaccine industry has paid out over $3.5 billion to parents whose children have been maimed by toxic immunizations. Now you’re asking, what does this have to do with food?

Consider this: To be anti-GMO is actually pro-science, not “anti-science.” When honest scientists research how inserting the genes of bacteria into produce affects animal health, the results are horrendously shocking, but Monsanto skews their own research to hide these facts and then has their shills bad-mouth all contesting research. This has been going on for decades, ever since GM corn and soy were first created in labs and grown on U.S. soil in the mid-1980s.

New versions of old fruits will be “planted” in the produce aisles conspicuously to trick consumers who avoid GM crops at all costs. If GMOs are so great for the environment, farm animals and humans, why doesn’t Monsanto put a bright sticker on everything GMO – bragging about it and announcing all food that’s gene edited? Why do they fight so hard to keep labels off genetically modified food if it’s supposedly going to save the world from starvation, drought, bugs, and weeds? The answer is simple. It’s all experimental and dangerous, using chemicals in laboratories to alter the genetic makeup of Mother Nature’s pure food, while their rogue scientists claim it’s all safe, sustainable, and “cutting edge” technology….


This is modern eugenics.   Eugenicists believe that their idea of subhumans tend to be low achievers, which will be the demographic which doesn’t have the education to research the GMO issue and avoid the chronic disease and cancer which results from eating GMO food.   Of course the dragnet will also entangle well-educated sheep but there’s no shortage of them anyway.

GM food banned in Monsanto canteen

Monsanto, the biggest promoter of genetically modified food, was hoist with its own petar when it was disclosed that it has a staff canteen in which GM produce is banned.

Monsanto, the biggest promoter of genetically modified food, was hoist with its own petar when it was disclosed that it has a staff canteen in which GM produce is banned.

The firm running the canteen at Monsanto’s pharmaceuticals factory at High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, serves only GM-free meals, Friends of the Earth said. In a notice in the canteen, Sutcliffe Catering, owned by the Granada Group, said it had taken the decision “to remove, as far as practicable, GM soya and maize from all food products served in our restaurant. We have taken the above steps to ensure that you, the customer, can feel confident in the food we serve.”

Monsanto confirmed the position. “Yes, this is the case, and it is because we believe in choice,” said the company’s spokesman, Tony Coombes. But employees at Monsanto’s agribusiness plant at Cambridge were happy to eat GM produce, he said. “The notice in the restaurant there says some products may contain GMOs [genetically modified organisms] – because our staff are happy to eat food sprayed with fewer chemicals.”…


The last statement is of course ludicrous.  As with all pesticides and herbicides, pests become tolerant over time.   The difference is that farmers no longer have to worry about their crops being impacted in the resultant chemical arms race, so the sky is the limit as far as spraying.  The crops are already toxic anyway, what difference will additional toxins make?   Aside from synergistic toxicity, I mean.

Apparently the same is true of the monsanto headquarters in st. louis.



Reprise: GMO Frankenfood and Appleton Wisconsin high school

Genetically Modified Soy Linked to Sterility, Infant Mortality

Petition to Stop Feeding Babies Genetically Engineered Infant Formula and Baby Food

GMO Education

“Smart” meters are wildly inaccurate: Study finds that readings can be 581% too high

via govtslaves.info

… The electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted by these devices have been linked to a variety of health problems, including headaches, fatigue, digestive issues and sleeping problems. There is also evidence that EMFs cause more serious conditions like autoimmune disorders and certain types of cancer. And, as if that wasn’t enough reason to refuse to have one of these devices in your home, research has found that they aren’t even accurate! Not only do they put your family’s health at risk, but they may be ripping you off financially at the same time.

As reported by Natural Health 365, a study published in the journal IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Magazine, conducted by researchers from the University of Twente and the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, found that some smart meters give readings far higher than the actual amount of energy consumed. In fact, some of these meter readings were over 580 percent higher than they should have been. …

To conduct the study, lead researcher Franz Leferink, Professor of Electromagnetic Compatibility at the UT, tested nine different electronic meters manufactured between 2004 and 2014. The meters were connected via electric switchboard to various power-saving devices – including energy-saving light bulbs, heaters, LED bulbs and dimmers. The team then compared actual energy consumption with the readings furnished by the electronic meters.

The results were profoundly disturbing. Five of the nine meters – more than half – gave readings higher than the actual power consumed – in some cases, a staggering 582 percent higher. Other readings were 475 percent, 566 percent, 569 percent and 581 percent higher than actual use. (This could theoretically reflect a near six-fold increase in a utility bill – a rip-off of outrageous proportions!)

Interestingly, of the remaining four meter types, two were accurate and only two billed less (32 percent) than the actual electricity consumed. The odds are overwhelming high, therefore, that you are more likely to get stuck with overbilling than underbilling.

Why the difference?

The researchers discovered that there is a design flaw in some meters which causes the elevated readings. Meters containing a “Rogowski coil” current sensor delivered faulty readings when used in combination with modern, energy-efficient switching devices like dimmers, LEDs and energy-saving lightbulbs. The reason for this is that when these modern devices are used, the electricity produces an erratic rather than a perfect waveform, which these types of meters have not been designed to read.

The meters associated with the lower readings in the study were those that used a “Hall effect-based” current sensor. (Related: ‘Smart’ meters threaten privacy, health and basic human rights.)

Unfortunately, all these types of meters are certified and meet legal requirements, which means you have to know exactly what you’re getting if you do decide to ignore the health risks and choose to install a smart meter in your home….


Switching power supplies all by themselves seem to be a real problem from a health perspective.   They cause discontinuities in the input circuit amperage which result in high frequency emissions for which the indoor power wires act as antennas into the home.   That’s one kind of RF emission from smart meters because they have built-in switching supplies.   The other RF emission comes from the built-in peer-to-peer mesh networking transmitter, which is constantly chatting with your neighbors’ meters to relay their data to other meters.   The network as a whole discovers the nearest utility receiver, which could be miles away, and funnels all the data to it.   Saves money for the utility (fewer receivers needed) but results in thousands of times more transmissions than required to report your own data.