Google wants to cite only the best experts in their fields in order to justify its position. Who better than liberal billionaire George Soros?
In the Google presentation, “The Good Censor,” leaked to Breitbart, the search media company cited 27 so-called “experts” for different aspects of digital freedom and online censorship. Among those experts were George Soros, a ProPublica article, New York Times editorial board member Sarah Jeong, former New Republic editor Franklin Foer, and Slate writer April Glaser. (ProPublica is one of many news entities funded by Soros. His Open Society Foundation gave at least $737,411 to the non-profit journalism group.)
Google quoted Soros in the section about transparency regarding global positions, writing: “US-based IT monopolies are already tempted to compromise themselves in order to gain entrance to these vast and fast growing markets. The dictatorial leaders in these countries may be only too happy to collaborate with them since they want to improve their methods of control over their own populations and expand their power and influence in the United States and the rest of the world.” …
There is a growing consensus in the narrative within the alternative news community (commentators, their insiders, and members in general) that has become too big, too coherent to ignore. Even among the more skeptical of the commentators who have long bemoaned that real tangible action of disclosure and legal proceedings seems to be taking forever, there is now a real optimism, even a certainty among several, that this time things will be different.
The broad strokes of the narrative go as follows: Donald Trump was originally asked by a military and political Alliance of patriots to run for office, and the election of Donald Trump in 2016 represented the triumph of this Alliance over the Deep State and their chosen candidate Hillary Clinton. Trump ran on an anti-establishment platform that resonated with awakening voters as Trump promised to ‘drain the swamp’–essentially indicating that crimes that were being committed against the American people would be brought to light and the Deep State insiders perpetrating them would be brought to justice.
Since Donald Trump took office, the Alliance has been working meticulously to convene secret Grand Juries to indict Deep State criminals, keeping the indictments sealed until everything lines up to enable them to make mass arrests and begin military tribunals. The confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh seems to pave the way for legal support from the Supreme Court, as needed, to authorize actions that will get the ball rolling such as the release of unredacted FISA Documents which will lay bare the complicity of key players gumming up the works such as US Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, which will lead to their removal from power and finally end Deep State obfuscation.
What The Commentators Are Saying
There are many commentators in the alternative news community who have been at this game for a long time, and to be at this game for a long time, one needs to be in the habit of being circumspect and objective when it comes to making unverifiable claims about actions that will soon come to pass. There is a sense, though, within the community, that insider testimony, outside evidence, and the sometimes cryptic political maneuvers and messages that are now taking place on a regular basis are all converging into the narrative described above, such that it is no longer a question of if the Deep State will be removed from power, but when.
The similarity of opinion is striking, as you will see from the small handful of comments below that I’ve grabbed from some recent posts and videos:
‘You’re going to see arrests, and you’re going to see indictments, and then you’re gonna see convictions, and some of them will spend the next 10 years just going from their cell to the courtroom, before they’re even tried and convicted, which they will be. They are scared to death.’–John B. Wells
‘The prosecution of these criminals is set to finally start now that the U.S. military government backing President Donald Trump has secured a majority on the Supreme Court with the confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Pentagon sources say. “Attorney General Jeff Sessions has already met with the real special prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Huber in Utah, so that the 57,000 indictments may be unsealed,” the sources explain.“The seating of Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court should unleash declassification of FISA and other documents as well as military tribunals,” the sources say.’–Ben Fulford
‘Amendments were passed to the Manual for Military Courts-Martial in 2018 that make this possible, among other legal maneuvers. Corey Goode’s trusted insiders also reported last week that military courts were being formed, and would work in conjunction with the Department of Justice and Attorney Generals at the state level.’–David Wilcock
‘The Deep State’s on the run, the Deep State is panicked and we’re about to enter a rule of law reset. The first phase: Kavanaugh. The second phase: Declassification. <The third phase:> Military Tribunals will go into effect for the high-level players when it comes to sedition and treason.’–Dave Janda
‘The Deep State is terrified of military tribunals. We are still in a state of war. Technically, it is legal right now for military tribunals to take anybody who is considered an agent of a foreign power and try them under a military tribunal rather than in a US court of law. I think that is the bottom line. Kavanaugh is about helping Trump take down the Deep State.’–Robert David Steele
I suppose the question is, is this near-certainty and optimism justified? We have to face the fact that such ‘imminent’ predictions have been given alternative news air-time from many different corners of legal and military activism for many years now. Some of the most vocal commentators lost their popularity and their credibility as a consequence when historic actions did not unfold as predicted. And information from anonymous insiders is difficult to completely trust, because it’s, well, anonymous, and therefore unverifiable. So we have to ask the question as to whether these people are mostly reading each other’s mail, or if there is enough substantial and verifiable evidence for us to put stock in the claim that a Deep State takedown is underway.
This talk will demonstrate what everyone has long feared but never proven: there are hardware backdoors in some x86 processors, and they’re buried deeper than we ever imagined possible. While this research specifically examines a third-party processor, we use this as a stepping stone to explore the feasibility of more widespread hardware backdoors.
Remember, fetuses aren’t really composed of cells, fatty or otherwise. Nor are brains largely composed of fat. And inducing mechanical disruptions or (in the worst case) catastrophic vacuum implosions in growing fetal cells which develop and differentiate based on epigenetic cues from their cellular microenvironment is, well, just what the doctor ordered!
So what is the mechanism of cellular disruption in cavitation and how does it differ from ionizing EM radiation? Aside from acoustic vs electromagnetic mechanisms of energy transfer, there isn’t a whole lot of difference. A tiny region of tissue experiences a very concentrated energy field resulting in random and permanent structural changes (i.e. disintegration). The only question is the energy density of imploding microbubbles vs the energy density of uv, xray or gamma ray photons and the spectrum of such energies emitted by the machine and absorbed by a given region of tissue. At the lower end of the scale, the difference between implosion and disruption is only one of degree, analogous to the difference between xrays and microwaves in their impact on living tissue.
Clearly, we’re dealing with a probabilistic question whose parameters are largely defined by uncontrollable variables such as (in the case of ultrasound) lensing and reflection effects caused by variations in tissue density (such as concave pelvic bones), and variations in the types of machines and duration of exposures in the hands of doctors who are well trained to be ignorant of such issues, in contrast to their chinese counterparts (see below).
In an ultrasonic cleaner, the object to be cleaned is placed in a chamber containing a suitable solution (in an aqueous or organic solvent, depending on the application). In aqueous cleaners, surfactants (e.g., laundry detergent) are often added to permit dissolution of nonpolar compounds such as oils and greases. An ultrasound generating transducer built into the chamber, or lowered into the fluid, produces ultrasonic waves in the fluid by changing size in concert with an electrical signal oscillating at ultrasonic frequency. This creates compression waves in the liquid of the tank which ‘tear’ the liquid apart, leaving behind many millions of microscopic ‘voids’ or ‘partial vacuum bubbles’ (cavitation). These bubbles collapse with enormous energy; temperatures and pressures on the order of 5,000 K and 135 MPa are achieved; however, they are so small that they do no more than clean and remove surface dirt and contaminants. The higher the frequency, the smaller the nodes between the cavitation points, which allows for cleaning of more intricate detail….
135 MPa is around 20,000 pounds per square inch! 5,000K is around 3 times the melting point of iron. Amazing but true. F=MA with A getting very very large, which is why you can easily hammer a nail that you couldn’t possibly push into a block of wood.
So the question is what is the rate and density and duration of the random concentrations of energy possible with a typical fetal ultrasound and what is the probability distribution for biological disruption and/or cavitation? Even for a well-controlled exposure, we’re talking about a poisson distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution , which has the property that the “tail” never goes to zero. This is in keeping with the corresponding distribution for ionizing EM radiation https://ratical.org/radiation/CNR/NoSafeThresh.html which is probably why “routine” xrays of pregnant women were tied to childhood cancers back in the bad old days of medical quackery which are thankfully behind us.
Rather than try to calculate all the frequencies, energy densities and cross sections, not to mention the varieties of fetal ultrasound machines and techniques in use, an epidemiological approach is probably best, especially given that we don’t really know a whole hell of a lot about the microbiology of developing fetuses or the actual usage of entertainment “gee-wiz” ultrasound out in the real world. Any volunteers?
It turns out that china has been doing actual research into this issue for some time, as opposed to the blanket of censorship and lack of funding which has descended on american medical ultrasound research.
Sometimes fetal ultrasound is needed, but its risks are vastly understated in american medical education. Subjecting children to a needless risk of life-long injury is never “routine” for the victims.
Doctors are supposed to be for dealing with medical emergencies, not creating them. Gloria Lemay ( http://www.glorialemay.com/ ) says that upwards of 95% of healthy women can birth naturally at home. Virtually 100% of healthy women who choose a standard obstetrical approach to birth subject their babies to needless physical and psychological risks, including antibiotic-resistant hospital infections, premature cord clamping and imprinted trauma which can result in life long chronic stress.
Ah yes, another case of resistance to medical authority. Time for a lobotomy? Electroshock? What’s your expert opinion doctor?
There’s probably a “mental illness” custom manufactured for such cases. They’re especially concerned that awareness of this “mental illness” is a form of mental illness in itself, which is becoming pandemic among their pool of guinea — er — patients.
I wonder what they call it? Mediphobia? Failure to submit? No doubt heroic measures are called for.
12-year-old girl becomes paralyzed after being injected with Gardasil… doctors say it’s all in her mind
(Natural News) Vaccines are heralded as “life-saving” medicine, but for Mia Blesky, that’s anything but true. The preteen from England was given the first round of the Gardasil shot at school when she was just 12 years old, and life has never been the same ever since. Within just 24 hours, Mia’s Gardasil nightmare was already unfolding. The family says that the morning after getting jabbed, Mia was unable to walk and had a burning sensation running down her spine. Within a matter of weeks, the paralysis spread to all four limbs. But that’s not the worst part: Doctors refuse to acknowledge the fact that Mia’s symptoms began after her vaccination. Instead, health officials say that Mia’s paralysis is in her head — and they are even recommending she be institutionalized.
Instead of helping this vaccine-injured child, British health authorities want to lock her away in a mental hospital — probably so no one will hear or believe her family’s tragic story.
HPV vaccine maims another young girl
According to Mia’s family, she has lost all ability to use her limbs, suffers from incontinence and struggles to keep regular food down. She went from being a normal, healthy 12-year-old child who dreamed of being a pop star, to being bed-ridden and unable to move. Mia is paralyzed from the neck down, but is still able to speak and sing. …
Mia’s family says that she was taken to the hospital the day after she received her first Gardasil vaccine. Her mom, Gini Blesky, says that the morning after, she could not walk; her legs were shaky and couldn’t bare any weight, with a burning sensation on both sides of her spine. Doctors sent her home, saying she just needed some acetaminophen and a bath.
But as the symptoms of paralysis worsened, Mia was taken back to the emergency room. Mia was admitted to the hospital for a few days but was ultimately released.
Within ten days, Gini says, Mia had completely lost the use of her legs. Within a few more weeks, she lost the use of both arms. And the mainstream medical community is refusing to actually help her.
“When Mia was admitted to hospital, the doctors said it was a form of self-harm and she was doing it to herself,” Gini told Daily Mail.
‘They discharged her after a few days. They gave her no treatment. We had to buy her a wheelchair. I had to carry her to the car,” she added.
‘It has been absolutely awful, but the doctors say it’s psychological and down to bullying or sexuality issues, which is rubbish. The only thing they have offered to do is section her,” Gini said.
Mia’s mom states that health authorities have offered no other form of care for her daughter, and have refused to acknowledge her concerns about the Gardasil vaccine — even though countless other girls have experienced similar symptoms post-vaccination…..
Just in time for midterms, Facebook has removed 559 pages and 251 accounts they claim have been spreading misinformation and spam. Several of the pages however – some with millions of followers, were pro-Trump conservatives who had spent years cultivating their followings….