Lemonade Terrorists Get their Just Punishment

(Natural News) In order to maintain a safe and well-functioning society, it’s necessary to have law and order, which serves to keep the peace and protect the liberties of all people. But the legal system in the United States is utterly broken, as is the police system that thrives on depriving people of their God-given rights in exchange for “filthy lucre,” a.k.a. the love of money.

In the following clip, posted to REAL.video, Mark Passio from “What On Earth Is Happening” covers the recent spate of lemonade stand “crackdowns” where police officers have actually assaulted and arrested supposedly free Americans for “operating a ‘business’ without a license.”

As you’ll notice in the clip, the people serving lemonade on the White House lawn were merely exercising what Passio refers to as their natural law rights – that is, the freedom to live, breathe, and engage in harmless activity without the threat of interference or violence. But they were quickly targeted by jackboot cops who know nothing of natural law, and actually work against it every single day in order to get a paycheck.

“Setting up a lemonade stand, which has been a tradition in this country since its founding, [resulted in] cops … going over to them and saying that they’re operating a business without a license, to a child,” explains Passio. “You don’t need a license to do something that you have a natural law right to do, and that you’re not harming anyone as a result of that action.”

Cops in America would have been a perfect fit for manning the concentration camps in Nazi Germany

While these same cops would insist that they’re merely enforcing the law, which is their duty, what they fail to recognize is that there are many unjust and unconstitutional “laws” that violate natural law – and these natural law rights cannot be infringed.

These cops can be seen admitting this in the same video clip, revealing that they don’t really care what they’re told to do so long as they get paid….


The same brainwashing techniques are being used on the cops that were applied to doctors decades ago.   Transform altruistic motivations for joining up into fear-driven obedience.

A coincidence?

Let’s dispense with the purported public health concerns.   The idea is centralized control of the food supply by eliminating distributed, locally controlled, resilient and ecologically sound competition.   Hungry people will do anything to survive, including join death squads to enforce their own enslavement, such as thousands of peasants have done in latin america under US tutelage for decades.  http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/06/border-crisis-the-crocodile-tears-of-the-empire/   This is about far more than just lemonade, this is about the reliability of the food supply, which nearly came to a standstill after the “fed’s” housing megafraud bubble false flag.

Commercial Paper Market Froze in 2008: Warning of Things to Come

War on Raw Milk is About Economic Domination, not Health

Now the Push is on to Ban AGW Climate Deniers

How in the world could anyone ignore what is happening the sky day after day.   Do these planes have to do figure 8’s before people start paying attention?   Unless major cities have moved around in the past 20 years, they aren’t following predictable (or historical) flight paths.   Often they’re not even flying in a straight line, hundreds of miles from the nearest airport.  And the phrase “blue sky” seems to be largely obsolete,  a relic of an earlier time, you know, like arrowheads from the stone age.   But only on certain days.   If you actually start paying attention to your local weather broadcaster, compare the low-lying hazy streams that you often see  after “sunny day” forecasts with ordinary low-lying cumulus clouds.   (not high-flying cirrus clouds) You know, the ones that look like cotton balls?   Kinda like clouds look?  Hmmm…

Here’s a good intro to cloud physics: http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211_fall2010.web.dir/Levi_Cowan/index.html

If you don’t see the profit/social control/population control motivations behind the AGW hoax it’s because  you don’t think like a rockefeller.   Consider yourself lucky.    Now consider this: if the planet really is your plantation via the fake money scam ( http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2017/03/censored-ben-franklin-on-the-real-cause-of-the-american-revolution/ ) and all the other scams laundered through wall street and london, you’re aleady running out of new business opportunities.   You need to manufacture crises and their subsequent “cleanups” to keep the profits coming in.   This is called disaster capitalism and it’s fostered through techniques such as the “Shock Doctrine” (see the book).   It’s just a variation on agriculture: invest some energy in manipulating and disrupting natural processes (in this case the natural process of human socioeconomic self-organization) and reap the harvest later.    Just another business model for the ubergarchs:

AGW is an excuse to impose carbon credits and global taxation to finance global government and the disaster capitalist business model.   Seriously, they’re that brazen.   Why not?  They own most of the media and the vast majority of the people blindly follow whatever their trusted friends on the TV screen say.   When TV’s are enhanced to include neural interfaces to the viewer then trust will give way to dopamine hits.   I’m only half joking.

Here’s an obvious elephant in the living room: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2018/08/soros-backed-media-matters-pushes-facebook-to-eliminate-global-warming-deniers/

But I’m sure I’m arguing with our authority simulacrums because I hate babies and apple pie.

(Natural News) The great social media purge of 2018 is showing no signs of slowing down: Now that Alex Jones has been banned, the left-wing is on a power trip — and they’re already demanding more censorship. Media Matters, a left-wing organization funded by George Soros, has already stepped up to the soapbox, calling out Facebook for allowing “climate deniers” to have space on the network.

Writing for The Guardian, Dana Nuccitelli also recently called out the social media giant, with a headline declaring, “Facebook video spreads climate denial misinformation to 5 million users.” She goes on to argue that fake news is still running amok at Facebook. The call to silence anyone who presents opposing information is strong, and it’s coming from a variety of fronts.

Climate science is far from settled

The truth is that there is plenty of science to support the notion that global warming as we’ve come to know it is a hoax. Earlier this year, a pair of climate experts re-assessed simulations carried out by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The team ultimately found the future impact of climate change was overstated by up to 45 percent.

In 2017, a shocking report revealed that climate scientists had been fudging temperature data to make climate change look more pronounced. The science on climate change is far from a settled matter. Multiple reports have shown that much of the science surrounding climate change has been tampered with in one way or another.

Science that contradicts previously held beliefs is not automatically “fake news.” If that were the case, we’d all still believe the Earth is flat. It is wrong to silence every point of view that doesn’t align with left-wing dogma. These are important studies and people have the right to know about them. People have the right to hear and see divergent opinions: It encourages critical thinking and independent thought.

More censorship coming down the pike

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated in a recent interview that he does not support flat-out banning “climate denial” or similar ideas. He reportedly commented, “Our goal with fake news is not to prevent anyone from saying something untrue — but to stop fake news and misinformation spreading across our services. If something is spreading and is rated false by fact checkers, it would lose the vast majority of its distribution in News Feed.”

Zuckerberg espoused similar sentiments regarding InfoWars before banning him from the site. How long will it take for the Zuck to cave into the pressure from Democrats and left-wing organizations this time remains to be seen. But one thing is for sure: The Left  doesn’t want conservatives to have any space to voice their opinions, at all.

As Media Matters writes, “Combating fake news is key to combating climate change. As an editorial in the journal Nature Communications argued last year, ‘Successfully inoculating society against fake news is arguably essential’ if major climate initiatives are to succeed. Facebook could be a big part of the solution.”

They go on to accuse Facebook of “kowtowing” to conservatives; it would seem the Left won’t be happy until the conservative voice has been erased from the internet entirely. The notion of inoculating society against certain points of view is particularly troublesome — it’s as if the Left is admitting they want to control what people think.

The censorship of Alex Jones was just the beginning. Now liberals want to censor climate science — what will come next, censoring pro-liberty speech?

See coverage of real climate news at ClimateScienceNews.com.

Sources for this article include:




Al Gore’s Credibility on “Global Warming”

Mind Control on the Left

The Real Enemy: YOU

Feds ban First Amendment rights for skeptical weather scientists

Benghazi Eyewitness Says He Was Ordered to Stand Down

This is old news but it wasn’t reported on CNN or BSNBC or any other tendril of the fake news octopus when AJ was already talking about it years ago based on his own interviews with military personnel.  After all, Hillary was so busy doing whatever she does in private (only her “god” knows) to be bothered with responding to 8 hours of pleas from the field to defend their own ambassador from imminent death.

Corporate journalism is so very complicated you know.   Multiple eyewitnesses to the same event can’t be trusted without vetting from the majority stockholders whose business interest are far flung and deeply embedded in the status quo which generates massive profits based on such “incompetence.”   This is why corporate behemoths are such reliable sources of actual factual (non ideological, non derivable, non fantasy-based) events.   Or something like that.

I wonder why they want to get rid of Alex Jones?

Hero Of Benghazi: Stand Down Orders Were Given Directly To Me

John Tiegen, one of the four “Heroes of Benghazi,” joins Alex to discuss Hillary Clinton’s response to what happened on 9/11/2012. She proved politicians care more about elections than the lives of Americans.


Hilary’s Success Story in Libya: Slave Auctions

Gaddafi Warned of CIA-Sponsored Islamic Terror in Europe 6 Years Ago

The Battle For Libya’s 144 Tons Of Gold


This is CNN, and CBS and NBC and ABC and MSNBC and NYT and the Brainwashington Compost and the entire US MSM

5G: FCC Bans Moratoria on Communications Facilities Deployment

The FCC has banned moratoria related to wired and wireless telecommunications equipment deployment. In a party-line vote Aug. 2, the FCC adopted its Third Report and Order and Declaratory Ruling, which also creates a One-Touch Make-Ready regime for pole attachments. In addition to knowing how the moratorium ban will impact local governments, local governments, as discussed below, have the option to ask the FCC to reconsider the Order by Sept. 4 or file an appeal by Oct. 2.

What the Order Does:
The FCC found that both express moratoria and de facto moratoria on wired and wireless telecommunications equipment violate 47 USC 253 as they effectively halt or suspend the acceptance, processing or approval of applications or permits. Section 253 states: “No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service.” The FCC’s Declaratory Ruling also:

  • Declares that moratoria are generally not protected by the exceptions Congress made available to states in Section 253(b) or local governments in Section 253(c), and perhaps Section 332(c)(7)(A).
  • Invites impacted carriers to file petitions under Section 253(d) with the FCC challenging specific alleged moratoria and directs the FCC staff to act promptly on such petitions.

What is a Moratorium
Having declared that both express and de facto moratoria violate section 253(a), the FCC defines each moratorium as follows:

  • Express moratoria are “…state or local statutes, regulations, or other written legal requirements that expressly, by their very terms, prevent or suspend the acceptance, processing, or approval of applications or permits necessary for deploying telecommunications services and/or facilities.”
  • De Facto moratoria are “…state or local actions that are not express moratoria, but that effectively halt or suspend the acceptance, processing, or approval of applications or permits for telecommunications services or facilities in a manner akin to an express moratorium.”…