Seymour Hersh questions media narrative on Salisbury poisoning

Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Seymour Hersch has questioned the UK government’s official line on the motives behind the Skripals’ poisoning, saying there is an “instinctive dislike” of Russia within the UK.

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s The Media Show, Hersch was responding to a question about whether journalists often bring their own “baggage or views” to stories before they’ve found out about what’s going on, and if this shaped how stories were reported.

He said there is “bias all the time” in the media, and that the UK is “riddled with bias” fueled by an “instinctive dislike” of Russia.

“There’s bias all the time, this country’s riddled with bias, there’s a great dislike of Russia here, an instinctive dislike,” he said.

“You saw that mess you had in March, the two Russians that were allegedly killed by nerve gas, which is essentially impossible,” he continued in reference to the poisoning of ex-Soviet double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury three months ago.

“If you kill them, you kill half the city with nerve gas,” he added, before saying that interest in reporting on the story has “dwindled away.”

“There’s something wrong with the story,” he added….

Media interest tends to dwindle as media narratives fall apart under scrutiny.   That seems to be  happening an awful lot these days.

Uber-Gangster Eric Holder Demands End to FISA Gate Investigation

On Friday, former Attorney General Eric ‘Fast and Furious’ Holder demanded “unprincipled” House Republicans halt their investigations into FISA abuse and Spygate, warning the probes “must stop.”

House Republicans held two hearings this week, demanding answers from Peter Strzok, FBI Director Wray and DAG Rosenstein about government surveillance during the 2016 election.

GOP lawmakers grilled Peter Strzok Wednesday in a closed-door deposition. According to Chairman Goodlatte, FBI counsel instructed Strzok not to answer many of the questions.

Wray and Rosenstein appeared on Capitol Hill Thursday for a Congressional hearing. House Republicans torched Rosenstein over his conflicts of interest in the Mueller probe and demanded he fork over classified documents on Trump-Russia.

Later Thursday afternoon, House Republicans passed a resolution giving DAG Rosenstein 7 days to turn over requested documents or face impeachment and or contempt charges.

House Republicans have Constitutional oversight of the FBI and DOJ, however; Obama’s corrupt Attorney General Eric Holder is calling on them to halt their investigations.

According to Eric Holder, the House Republicans are impacting the Mueller witch hunt by doing their job in smoking out the corruption in the FBI and DOJ.

Eric Holder tweeted: “The unprecedented disclosure of ongoing investigative material, FISA and national security documents to the complicit and unprincipled House Republicans sets a dangerous precedent and impacts the Mueller inquiry. It must stop. Lines have to be drawn.”…

Centralized Social Control: Macron Floats Military Draft While Unassimilated Muslims Destabilize the Streets

Problem reaction solution, and always with the aim of centralizing control.   As refugees from western military/corporate plunder flood the streets of paris, rothschild puppet macron wants to use the military as a tool of “social cohesion.”   But is it grassroots cohesion or top-down control that he’s after?   Is the government an expression of the people’s aspirations or vice versa?   And the human caused “climate change” (formerly global warming, formerly global cooling) hoax is trotted out on cue.   There can be no credibility without transparency, starting with the 9/11 false flag and the endless military assaults and mass migrations which resulted from it.

French President Emmanuel Macron is floating the idea of reintroducing compulsory military service. The plan intends on introducing youths to military life and service from the age of 16 for both girls and boys. The unpopular programme is expected to cost the French government [i.e. french peasants -rw] nearly $2 billion….

Europe “must get used to mass immigration” instead of resisting it, says French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron.

Macron, former investment banker at Banque Rothschild and rival to Marine Le Pen in the French presidential race, shared his views at a “climate change” debate last week.

“We have entered a world of great migrations and we will have more and more of it,” Macron told the crowd. “In the coming decades we will have migrations from geopolitical conflicts that will continue to play, and we will have climate change migrations because the planet is in a state of deep imbalance.”

Macron also claimed “man-made climate change” was a “contributing factor” in the mass migrations of over a million Muslims that’s gripped Europe since 2015.

“France will not be able to stem it, and Europe will be affected immediately,” he said. “We will see a migratory phenomenon far greater than what we have seen [with migrants from] Syria.”

Macron’s comments come as no surprise given that Macron was working on an alliance with Hillary Clinton last year after hosting a private roundtable dinner in October to address how to counter the rise of populist movements worldwide.

Populist candidate Le Pen said that the media was “campaigning hysterically” for Macron much like the US mainstream media did for Hillary Clinton….

The Muslim Weapon

Trade War Provides Perfect Cover For The Elitist Engineered Global Reset

Over the past several months, I have been examining the underlying or hidden motivations behind the currently expanding global trade war, including the impressive level of cognitive dissonance surrounding the issue. The political left doesn’t seem to have an intelligent grasp of economic issues in the slightest.  I’m not seeing any critical discussion from leftist media outlets or pundits on fiscal uncertainties, and the only reaction that is common from them is that they hope that the trade war results in the financial downfall of the US so that Trump can be voted out in 2020.  They may very well get their wish, but they seem to imagine themselves celebrating at the end of the disaster, and I predict they’ll be so concerned with their own financial survival that they won’t have time to celebrate…

The initial reaction in conservative circles to the trade war was unfortunately overconfident denial, with many refusing to call the situation a “trade war” at all and some predicting an end to the conflict before it began. Obviously those assumptions are proving incorrect.

Now that acceptance of the trade war as a reality is setting in, the Trump bandwagon is doubling down and embracing blind enthusiasm for what they assume will be a victorious outcome, no matter how long it takes. Though the team-geopolitics mentality is enticing in some ways, I don’t find much in the facts and evidence department to support the notion of America winning a global trade war. As I outlined in my article America’s Debt Dependence Makes It An Easy Economic Target, as long as the U.S. retains historic levels of debt on a government, corporate and consumer level, and as long as we remain addicted to foreign investment in that debt, trade war opponents have all the ammunition they need.

The argument I now see regurgitated over and over is that this trade war has actually been “going on for decades”, and only now do we “have a president with the guts to do something about it.” I’m not sure where this nonsense meme was started, but it’s everywhere.

The U.S. has NOT been engaged in a trade war “for decades,” not with China or any other nation. It has been involved in a subversive trade arrangement which benefits the elitists on both sides of the world while the common people suffer. Only in the past year have we seen a “trade war” develop, but even now, it is a staged war that will once again empower international banks and global elites….

So what has changed? Why are the old arrangements being abandoned? Is Trump really upsetting the old world order and battling the globalists, or, is he simply helping them to stage the foundation of their “new world order”?

I would suggest that readers look into the International Monetary Fund’s concept of the “global economic reset” for more insight into why this is happening. I would also suggest that people pay close attention to the “predictions” of George Soros back in 2009 on the future of the U.S. economy.

The plan for this global reset seems to revolve around the diminishing of the U.S. as a major economic power. This does not necessarily mean the U.S. will be replaced directly. Instead, as Soros suggests, nations like China will fill the void as “smaller economic engines”. This is often referred to as “harmonization,” but what it really means is that the standard of living for ALL but a highly select minority will be deliberately reduced to a common denominator, and what is more common today than poverty?

For many nations, a lower standard of living is the norm.  For Americans, harmonization means we have a long way to fall yet.  For the reset to take hold effectively in the US, globalists will have to misdirect various groups within the population in different ways in order to avoid revolt.

The Trump fandom is being enticed with notions of a return to a golden era with The Don on his white steed leading the charge.  However, NO president has the power to reverse the economic damage already done in the US; the only solution is a long process of rebuilding the economy from the ground up after the ashes settle.  Any honest president not under the control of the banking cabal would have to be forthright about this fact.  Even under the best possible conditions of reformation, a depression and currency crisis is assured.  You cannot fight against math, and the math of US debt versus US inflation spells stagflationary instability for many years, far beyond the one or possibly two terms of Donald Trump.  When this reality finally hits the Trump Administration devout square in the face, they will be enraged, and the first scapegoat that will be held up to them will be foreign governments like China.

For the liberty movement subset not necessarily enamored with Donald Trump, the lie of the “multipolar world” has been concocted. In essence, we are being told that the death of the dollar will mean the death of globalist centralization, so we should cheer for such an outcome. In truth, there is no “multipolar world.” The IMF and the Bank for International Settlements continue to hold sway over the central banks of the world, in the East as much as the West.

With Russia and China’s calls for the IMF to become the defacto overseer of global monetary trade policy, and even calling for a new global currency system under the control of the IMF, I hardly see any indication that we are moving away from centralization if the U.S. currency falters.  In fact, we will see even more centralization if the globalists get their way.

The key to the reset is undoubtedly the end of the dollar as the world reserve currency.  Without this status, the U.S. loses all economic trade advantage as well as the advantage of perpetual debt monetization. As the dollar’s influence is reduced globally inflation becomes a more pronounced threat at home. The trade war makes the shift away from the dollar possible for international banking elites while they avoid blame for the suffering it will cause the public.

“De-dollarization” is already gaining steam as Russia and China make deals to decouple from the currency while increasing financial cooperation using their own. What trade war cheerleaders don’t understand is that a trade war with China is not a trade war with China alone. As the No. 1 exporter/importer in the world, if China decides to dump the dollar as world reserve its trading partners may very well do the same in order to secure their own import/export relationships.

As a domino effect ensues, I believe it will be the IMF that steps in as a “mediator” to provide the framework for a new system, probably under the Special Drawing Rights basket, and probably leading to a global cryptocurrency system, which the IMF has been praising recently as the next stage of evolution for money and monetary policy.

I have mentioned consistently over the past half year that a trend has developed in terms of the Trump administration’s behavior in the trade war. Specifically, whenever the Federal Reserve raises interest rates or expands cuts to its balance sheet, Trump conveniently expands his rhetoric on tariffs.

When the Fed increases balance sheet cuts, stocks take a hit of 1,000 points or more like clockwork. And, like clockwork, the mainstream media blames the drop in stocks on the trade war and Trump rather than the Fed. I think that this trend will accelerate into the end of 2018, and that stocks will hit critical downward velocity if the Fed does not reverse course. In my view, the Fed has no intention of reversing course because they prefer to see a major market crisis at this time.

But more that simply providing cover for the Fed’s controlled demolition of equities, the trade war may also provide cover for the controlled demolition of the dollar as multiple foreign creditors and trading partners turn America’s greatest strength into its greatest weakness….

The scam artists are ready for the next phase of looting.   And they will be treated as saviors by the clueless desperate peasants.

We Are All Prisoners of the Surveillance State


First broadcast in America 50 years ago, The Prisoner—a dystopian television series described as “James Bond meets George Orwell filtered through Franz Kafka”—confronted societal themes that are still relevant today: the rise of a police state, the freedom of the individual, round-the-clock surveillance, the corruption of government, totalitarianism, weaponization, group think, mass marketing, and the tendency of humankind to meekly accept their lot in life as a prisoner in a prison of their own making.

Perhaps the best visual debate ever on individuality and freedom, The Prisoner (17 episodes in all) centers around a British secret agent who abruptly resigns only to find himself imprisoned and interrogated in a mysterious, self-contained, cosmopolitan, seemingly tranquil retirement community known only as the Village. The Village is an idyllic setting with parks and green fields, recreational activities and even a butler.

While luxurious and resort-like, the Village is a virtual prison disguised as a seaside paradise: its inhabitants have no true freedom, they cannot leave the Village, they are under constant surveillance, their movements are tracked by surveillance drones, and they are stripped of their individuality and identified only by numbers….

The Prisoner’s Village is also an apt allegory for the American Police State: it gives the illusion of freedom while functioning all the while like a prison: controlled, watchful, inflexible, punitive, deadly and inescapable.

The American Police State, much like The Prisoner’s Village, is a metaphorical panopticon, a circular prison in which the inmates are monitored by a single watchman situated in a central tower. Because the inmates cannot see the watchman, they are unable to tell whether or not they are being watched at any given time and must proceed under the assumption that they are always being watched.

Eighteenth century social theorist Jeremy Bentham envisioned the panopticon prison to be a cheaper and more effective means of “obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example.”

Bentham’s panopticon, in which the prisoners are used as a source of cheap, menial labor, has become a model for the modern surveillance state in which the populace is constantly being watched, controlled and managed by the powers-that-be and funding its existence….

This is the electronic concentration camp—the panopticon prison—the Village—in which we are now caged.

It is a prison from which there will be no escape if the government gets it way.

As Glenn Greenwald notes:

“The way things are supposed to work is that we’re supposed to know virtually everything about what [government officials] do: that’s why they’re called public servants. They’re supposed to know virtually nothing about what we do: that’s why we’re called private individuals. This dynamic – the hallmark of a healthy and free society – has been radically reversed. Now, they know everything about what we do, and are constantly building systems to know more. Meanwhile, we know less and less about what they do, as they build walls of secrecy behind which they function. That’s the imbalance that needs to come to an end. No democracy can be healthy and functional if the most consequential acts of those who wield political power are completely unknown to those to whom they are supposed to be accountable.”

Unfortunately, we seem to be trapped in the Village with no hope of escape.

That we are prisoners—and, in fact, never stopped being prisoners—should come as no surprise to those who haven’t been taking the escapist blue pill, who haven’t fallen for the Deep State’s phony rhetoric, and who haven’t been lured in by the promise of a political savior….

The internet has provided an interesting variation on the panopticon:

The Watcher is Being Watched

Iceman Tapes: Inside the Mind of a Mafia Hitman

I suppose this video was produced for its shock/entertainment value, but I’m genuinely interested in this guy and how he saw his life in a larger sense.   He seemingly found meaning and even a connection with the eternal in the barren poverty of his “work,” yet professed no  understanding of why he did it.   Here in the land of the psychopaths, this is not an idle academic exercise ( ) .   These people are everywhere, and they tend to gravitate towards positions of power, or put another way, the system tends to channel them into positions of power.   Where do they come from and why does the system select them?   Is the system really channeling them or are they in a sense channeling the system?

There’s a partitioning of empathy between the trusting clueless masses and the sociopathic “realpolitik” classes, with the presence or absence of humane motivations BOTH instrumental in the maintenance of the spontaneously self-perpetuating emergent system of social control.   The task of the elites is to channel or blunt the natural empathic and intellectual potentials of the masses in accordance with elite objectives while themselves not falling prey to “empathic distractions.”  This is the meaning of the “cremation of care” ceremony of bohemian grove fame.  ( )   But the elites are in the matrix as well.   Their agenda is a product of their indoctrination and their specific domains of ignorance, just as the peasants’ are.

If you look at it from the viewpoint of the system as a flow of self-perpetuating and “collectively autocatalytic” intergenerational behavioral re-enactments, you can see some of the same collective network behaviors operating on both the social and biological scales, as well as among the elites and peasants.

Think of it this way: the human body is a totalitarian dictatorship.   Every citizen reads from the same set of instructions and acts according to the role assigned to it by its copy of the DNA “bible,” in the context of its epigenetic learning ( ) and its micro-environment.   At a genetic level, there is no difference between a bone cell and a neuron.   They’re both taking cues from their neighbors, applying them to their own copy of the “bible” and “knowledge” of their individual history and acting accordingly.    And somehow magically from this huge collection of individual behaviors you get a coherent mutually self-reinforcing, self-referential, self-healing and self-reproducing whole.   This is what emergence is all about.   Consciousness, whatever it is, seems to be embedded in complexity itself.   Maybe a time-evolving self-deriving dynamical godelian system in search of completeness, bounded by the “adjacent possible”

At one time this guy was a child, a baby, with all the emotional and intellectual potential that babies have.   The rage and alienation and loneliness he acted out as an adult was largely shaped by the lessons he learned at that pivotal time in his life.   He was embedded in a network of relationships within which he interpreted his physical and emotional needs and individual history and acted accordingly.    My guess is that his early history was one of pleasure/emotional sensory deprivation ( ) combined with episodes of trauma, ( ) without a larger social context in which to interpret his experience, such as a loving older brother.  ( ).   A recipe for an enraged psychopath.

People reach out or stay socially isolated based on their expectations about the consequences of such actions. This guy had no expectation of reward from human interactions, except the interaction of predator and prey, conquest and annihilation.   In a slightly different context or with a slightly different history, he might well have been rewarded as a corporate CEO or a military general instead of imprisoned as a criminal.   The question of whether the system considers his mindset to be pathological is strictly determined by his utility to the maintenance and expansion of the system within its own larger context.  In that sense, his biggest personal obstacle to success is his inability to function in at least a superficially normal social context, such is the level of his own devastation.   More polished psychopaths like kissinger at least have the formalities down.   Needless to say, the latter type of psychopath is far more dangerous.   It’s interesting to speculate on the different psychological impacts of genital mutilation at birth vs one week after birth, when the mother-child relationship has already had a chance to be established.   There would still be a profound sense of betrayal, but perhaps not an internalization of it.

Molecular/genetic/biological/neurological/psychological/social/economic systems are fractal in nature, similar in structure but on vastly different scales.   Each individual and each system interprets, stores and articulates information on a mass scale (N->infinity) and with similar “intent”: that being “self” preservation in the context of its own open micro-environment.

You might call this collective behavior “spirit” if you’re so inclined.   Appeals to theology will have to suffice when logic and deduction are useless.   “Self” and “consciousness” aren’t even well defined concepts.  And maybe that’s ok.   Even the human body is utterly dependent on the “alien” ecosystem which lives in its intestines, a set of entities with their own bibles and contexts which, like bone cells and neurons, have their own agendas, know nothing whatsoever about their role in the larger system and yet play important roles in it.   Kinda like people in orwellian societies.  God has a sense of humor.

Anyway, the point is that we are all oppressed by systems that we largely inherited from our ancestors’ voluntary collective behavior, which we help to perpetuate by our own voluntary actions.   If we are to survive as a species, it would behoove us to be conscious of how those systems “self” perpetuate via the impact they have on babies, who never forget an imprint.    How to beak the cycle of abuse that gives rise to mafia hitmen?  We could start by ditching the steam-engine model of birth and respecting and protecting the neurological/hormonal/psychological support matrix that our open-bounded and unknowable human inheritance has provided babies as a birthright: hormonally energized mothers and fathers who can and are conscious enough to want to act out their own natural impulses by devoting their full attention to their kids and provide them with everything they need without worry or distraction by profit-driven medical institutions and doctors (often well-meaning but who nevertheless were put in positions of authority not by nature, but by the psychopathic system).   The highest authority in any birth must be the mother.   Only then might the full potential of nature’s template for an optimal birth imprint be realized.  ( )

It comes down to the question of whether we believe that we exist for the benefit of the system or vice versa.   From a systems perspective, it’s clear which entity is more evolved.   Compared to a human being, socioeconomic systems are brutes with the intelligence of an amoeba.   Empire builders and collectivists believe “bigger is better”, that there’s strength in numbers etc.  And the brutality displayed by such ideologues through history reflects that.   Whatever their individual merits, if they identify with the larger system they become  tools of that system.  But the larger the system is, the more limiting and taxing and beyond control it becomes to its members.  “Democratic empire” is an oxymoron.  The dynamics of such systems oppress citizens and foreigners alike.

To take the most obvious example of a system which perpetuates itself by oppressing its own participants, here’s the way I see satanism : it is an entity which is every bit as real as any self-perpetuating process/construct living on a complex substrate.   Like a mind on a neural substrate.  It is a set of nested (layers of an onion) emergent systems of self-perpetuating social, economic and psychological predation living on a substrate of intergenerational and institutionalized trauma re-enactment giving rise to a pattern of intergenerational child abuse, which feeds on “outsiders” (insiders being already digested), although like biological systems, the boundary is fuzzy and layered.   ( ) The vast majority of its participants are not conscious of their roles in the system, they are simply acting out their own natures in the context of their satanically influenced history and micro-environments.   Individuals at higher levels of the structure see larger contexts but still act out their intents based on their own histories and beliefs, which usually reflect higher levels of emotional isolation, personal trauma and mind control.   But the entire entity is based on the structured compartmentalization and channeling of custom-tailored information (or misinformation) to specific target audiences.   This information system is what is preserved through the generations.   Like the human body, it persists like a wave in the flux of the cells and molecules that pass through it.   It is the ghost in the machine.   Not surprisingly, the “neurons” of the system have theologized it and called it “satan”.   And it has heavily influenced the obstetrical industry in such a way as to create masses of new recruits, which is how it continues to feed and grow.

And then came the internet.   Bone cell, meet neuron, meet skin cell.

I’m not going to embed the video here. If you think you have the stomach for it, you can find it at  Needless to say, he is both a product of and an unconscious contributor to the perpetuation of the satanic system which destroyed his life.  And he hates himself with an unfathomable passion.

What is done to children, they will do to society.  –Karl Menninger, MD


Antisocial Media Giants hold censorship meeting with US intelligence agencies


The New York Times and Washington Post this week published reports of a private meeting last month between eight major technology and social media corporations and the US intelligence agencies, to discuss their censorship operations in the lead-up to the November 2018 mid-term elections.

The meeting was convened at Facebook’s Menlo Park, California, headquarters on May 23, and was attended by representatives from Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Snap, Twitter and Oath, owner of Yahoo! and a subsidiary of the telecommunications giant Verizon, along with agents from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.

The Post described the meeting, organized at the request of Facebook, as a “new overture by the technology industry to develop closer ties to law enforcement.” Both articles were based on anonymous statements by individuals who attended. One attendee told the Post that the conversation was a “back-and-forth, with both sides talking about how they were thinking about the problem and how we were looking for opportunities to work together.”…

Amazon, Microsoft and Google are competing to secure control over a $10 billion project to host the Pentagon’s Cloud infrastructure, a position that will literally mean hosting the communications between military units engaged in battle. Employees at the three companies have also written letters in recent months denouncing their provision of artificial intelligence technology to improve drone targeting (Google), facial recognition of civilians by police agencies (Amazon), and assisting in the operations of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Microsoft)….

One can foresee the day when such employees will be on the receiving end of these oppressive technologies.

This is pre-nazi germany.   Ask an iraqi  and he’ll probably leave off the “pre-“.

And still it’s considered impolite or paranoid to point out that 9/11 was a false flag.