One of our first shows, recorded 8/31/2009:
Veronica’s web site:
The Bonobo web site:
One of our first shows, recorded 8/31/2009:
Veronica’s web site:
The Bonobo web site:
My name is Marquart (Mark) Ewing Phillips, born May 17, 1943 in Nashville, Tennessee, I have no criminal record and I have never been adjudged insane, I am not a scholar, professional writer, or mental health physician. While I lack the official published academic credentials, I am recognized internationally by mental health and law enforcement professionals as an authority on the secret science concerning external control of the mind.
The purpose of Part I of this book is to document how this reputation was gained. This brief and highly condensed contribution is intended to provide an understanding of why, when, and where I embarked on a study of the most secret technology known to man: Trauma-based mind control. Through the publication of declassified United States Government documents, our U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) admits that this ancient wizard’s mechanism for control is so dangerous that most information pertaining to it must remain Classified as TOP SECRET. As tbe employee of a DOD subcontractor with exposure to mind-control research, I was required to sign an oath of secrecy. To this day I am restricted by law from revealing certain specific information that directly pertained to my employment as, among other “sensitive” exposures, a U.S. DOD subcontractor in mind-control research.
This super secret technology is an evolved system of remote human physical find psychological manipulation that has only recently been officially recognized by accredited mental health physicians for what it is, absolute mind control.
My first encounter with mind-control research began in the late 1960s in Atlanta, Georgia on the Emory University campus at the Yerkes Primate Center, It was there that I learned about primate behavior modification-the basis for human mind control. Part I of this book is my attempt to impart an understanding of how this and other exposures would prepare me for the Challenge of a lifetime.
What I witnessed, in terms of technology, at the Yerkes Primate Center and Other government sponsored research facilities, combined with years of personal research into this science of mind manipulation, did not adequately prepare me for what I would be exposed to in 1988 through an unexpected chain of events. This exposure came in the form of personal acquaintance with the human results officially entitled by DOD as, among other cryptic file titles, MK-Ultra. 1
I have outlined this noxious introduction in hopes that the material provided by one MK-Ultra survivor, Cathy O’Brien, will incite a legitimate federal investigation of her claims.
I was able to liberate MK-Ultra victims, Cathy O’Brien and her daughter, Kelly, from the invisible grip of this U.S. Government secret weapon of control. In the process, I also helped Cathy recover her mental and physical health. However, I have not been successful in enlisting the cooperation of my government to pursue the justice issue. There is a reason for this failure to obtain justice that you, the reader, NEED TO KNOW. I have been told repeatedly, “Justice is not obtainable, For Reasons Of National Security.”
This book is primarily the autobiography of Cathy O’Brien, who did not volunteer for service to her country, but was used her entire life against her innate, voluntary will for perpetuating criminal activity by many so-called leaders within the U.S. Government. These “treasonous leaders” did volunteer for political “service” to our country. They must be held accountable for their actions.
Together, Cathy and I have dedicated our lives to the pursuit of justice and rehabilitation for her and Kelly. All avenues for justice and rehabilitative relief have been blocked For Reasons Of National Security. The question arises, whose security? Cathy O’Brien provides the logical answer. Perhaps after reading this work, you will inspire others to read it. Collectively, as patriots, we can make a positive difference for Cathy and Kelly, our government, and humanity, by having our voices heard. In my opinion, our great United Stales Constitution does not need to be amended it needs to be enforced.
The grim reality we must all embrace is that there is, in human terms, no justice, and no revenge adequate to equal what these two, and many other victims of this U.S. Government secret weapon experienced. The only remaining remnant of opportunity for justice for these survivors would be derived from a public forum expose of what they experienced. What these survivors need to witness is the mass dissemination of their story and a radical, positive change in their government’s management of secrets. This would be an acceptable, though belated, substitute for justice. Their hope lies in the belief that-
“Truth lives a wretched life, but always survives a lie.”
Or buy the hard copy here:
It’s not her fault… or his
75 percent of women can’t achieve orgasm from penis-in-vagina sex alone. In other words, if a woman is “getting off,” it’s usually before the penis goes in or after it’s pulled out, with a helping hand or tongue.
No one seems exactly sure why this is. It’s a frustrating mystery no “sex”pert has been able to solve.
Others have blamed men — not enough foreplay, not enough after play, not gentle enough, not hard enough, not fast enough, not slow enough…
Practitioners of tantra say men just don’t last long enough. If they could learn “edging” and ejaculation control, she’d have time to “get there.” I’m a personal fan of this theory, but a lot of women say intercourse doesn’t do much for them no matter how long it lasts and can even get uncomfortable or painful if it lasts too long.
Others have given up, saying vaginal orgasms just don’t exist, so we should just forget about them and focus on the clitoris. This poor, bitter woman is among countless millions who’ve settled on the belief men and women weren’t meant to enjoy sex simultaneously — foreplay is for her and intercourse is for him.
Vaginal orgasms are not a myth
To me, this is tragic. I know for a fact vaginal orgasms are real. I’ve experienced at least a dozen firsthand.
The trouble is it took me over 30 years to have a really good one, and, like I said, I’ve only had about a dozen. Apparently it takes men a ton of work to give them to me, and I’ve found them nearly impossible to give myself.
In the last couple of years since my first unmistakable cervical orgasm, I’ve become obsessed with telling my friends the good news. But the more I tried to explain how I did it — something I didn’t quite understand myself — the more frustrated they would get. “We’ve tried all that… it isn’t working,” they’d say.
This can’t be right, I thought. It shouldn’t be this hard. Something is missing.
Now would be a good time to explain how I got my first cervical orgasm. I’m polyamorous and in an open relationship. I started having sex with my roommate Ben almost two years ago. Of the 10 guys I’ve had sex with, he had one thing the rest didn’t – a partial foreskin. …
I stayed up all night reading it in tears. I’ve known about and written about the general horrors of circumcision for several years, but didn’t realize how deep a divide it’s created in American marriages and relationships since it became the norm here about 75 years ago.
“There is something missing in millions of bedrooms across America —” the book begins. “A necessary part of human sexuality from the beginning, yet, incredibly, its importance has been completely overlooked.”
“For too many women, the lure of would-be delicious sex often turns out a disappointment that leaves them hungering for something more,” author Kristen O’Hara writes.
“Men too have been left wanting for something seemingly out of reach … in a survey of over 52,000 men … 55 percent said they were dissatisfied with their sex lives and 39 percent admitted to various problems such as disinterest in sex. Others said they had relatively good sex but complained ‘it’s not all it’s cracked up to be’ and wonder ‘if they are missing something.‘”
According to O’Hara, they definitely are.
If you don’t have time for the whole book, I highly recommend checking out her website SexAsNatureIntendedIt.com, which explains the mechanics of circumcised versus “natural” sex. …
When this social explosion finally goes off, doktors will be hiding their diplomas in their desks instead of hanging them on the wall. They’ll be suing their medical schools for their money back. They’ll be lucky to get a job flipping burgers. And just maybe, parents will no longer allow their kids to be injected with toxic and useless vaccine concoctions.
American metasin is toast. They are absolutely terrified. And they should be.
Seriously, can anyone doubt that we are under occupation by a hostile power? The only question is where this power is based. If it was just random corruption it would be less systemically directed at rendering us helpless and dependent on the system which oppresses us. The pattern here is reminiscent of what the declaration of independence referred to: “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, [envincing] a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism … The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.”
The amazing thing about this is that the power behind the throne in britain at the time was the very same power oppressing us now, the money changers, who have bought for themselves the “right” to create money out of nothing. Never has there been a more clear case of history repeating itself. Maybe this is why they made history so boring in grade school. It’s totally subversive to the status quo.
Or more accurately, the war of the money changers against humanity:
He killed the seth rich investigation and could now be in charge of the awan brothers investigation.
Last week I wrote an article and did an interview explaining that in my reading of the new Russia sanctions bill just signed by President Trump, there is a measure opening the door to a US government crackdown on some of the non-mainstream media. In particular, Section 221 of the “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act” would punish “persons” who are “engaging in transactions with the intelligence or defense sectors of the Government of the Russian Federation.”
At first one might think this is reading too much into the text, however as a twelve year Capitol Hill veteran bill-reader I can assure you that these bills are never written in a simple, expository manner. There is always a subtext, and in this case we must consider the numerous instances where the Director of Central Intelligence and other senior leadership in the US intelligence community have attempted to establish the idea that foreign news channels such as RT or Sputnik News are not First Amendment protected press, but rather tools of a foreign intelligence organization.
You can see in the current atmosphere, where anti-Russia hysteria has spread like typhoid, how readily-accepted such a notion would be by many. The reds are under our beds and the Russkies have taken over our airwaves.
I don’t think the crackdown will stop at Russian government funded news organizations like RT and Sputnik, however. Once the initial strike is made at the lowest hanging fruit, the second wave will target Russia-focused organizations not funded by governments but that challenge the official US government line that Russia is our number one enemy and its government must be overthrown. Popular private alternative websites like The Duran and Russia Insider will likely be next on the list for prosecution.
Sound farfetched? Think of it this way (I can assure you the neocons do):if the Russian government and RT are opposed to sanctions and you operate a website that also takes a line in opposition to Russia sanctions are you not doing the work of Russian intelligence? Are you not seeking to influence your readers in a manner that Russian intelligence would want? Are you not “engaging in transactions” even over the airwaves?
And after this second wave you can be sure there will be a push to move on other alternative media that has nothing to do with Russia but that opposes US interventionist foreign policy: ZeroHedge, Lew Rockwell, Ron Paul Institute, ConsortiumNews, etc.
Crazy, you say? Don’t forget: this war against us already started last year when the Washington Post ran a front page article accusing all of the above of being Russian agents!
What would be next? Do you read any of these alternative news sites? Do you pass along articles that oppose US sanctions policy toward Russia? You are engaging in transactions. You will be subject to “sanctions” as described in the “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act,” which is now the law of the land.
This would never happen, you might say. The government would never compile, analyze, and target private news outlets just because they deviate from the official neocon Washington line.
Perhaps not yet. But some US government funded “non-governmental” organizations are already doing just that.
The German Marshall Fund has less to do with Germany these days than it did when founded after WWII as a show of appreciation for the US Marshall Fund. These days it’s mostly funded by the US government, allied governments (especially in the Russia-hating Baltics), neocon grant-making foundations, and the military-industrial complex. Through its strangely Soviet-sounding “Alliance for Securing Democracy” project it has launched something called “Hamilton 68: A New Tool to Track Russian Disinformation on Twitter.”
This project monitors 600 Twitter accounts that the German Marshall Fund claims are “accounts that are involved in promoting Russian influence and disinformation goals.” Which accounts does this monitor? It won’t tell us. How does it choose which ones to monitor? It won’t tell us. To what end? Frighteningly, it won’t tell us.
How ironic that something called the German Marshall Fund is bringing Stasi-like tactics to silence alternative media and opinions in the United States!
So what does the “Hamilton 68” project do? In its own words it firstly “shows tweets from official Russian propaganda outlets in English, and a short post discussing the themes of the day. This is Russia’s overt messaging.”
But it goes further than that. It tracks and stores information about others who have no connection to Russia but who “on their own initiative reliably repeat and amplify Russian themes.” This is what the German Marshall Fund calls a “network” of second tier disinformation distributors.
What does this “network“ of people with no connection to Russia but who amplify Russian “themes” do?
It “reflects Russian messaging priorities, but that does not mean every name or link you see on the dashboard is pro-Russian. The network sometimes amplifies stories that Russia likes, or people with like-minded views but no formal connection to Russia.”
So, according to the self-proclaimed alliance for securing democracy you might not even know it when you are pushing Russian state propaganda! …
Since these taxpayer-funded bullies can’t win an argument based on facts, they resort to the threat of violence. Not only do they hate the bill of rights, they hate rationality itself.
What could be more satanic or treasonous?