Obama Stonewalling Release of Classified 9/11 Report

9/11 Commission Chairs, Congressmen and Intelligence Officers All Call for Declassification …


I have an idea.  Let’s go on pretending that we still live in a democracy!  As long as they get to keep on the velvet glove we get to keep going to the movies and watching tv and buying cheap stuff at walmart. Let’s pretend that we don’t know that elements of the federal government were involved in 9/11.  Let’s wait around and see if the people who are really in control of washington and the media allow their treason, mass murder and financial crimes to be exposed and prosecuted.  They just need a little more time to start WWIII or do another terrorist or biowarfare attack so the sheep stampede into whatever hell they’ve prepared for us.

As long as we keep our end of the “bargain” they’ll let us stay in the matrix a little while longer, at least until the dollar is worthless.  Then it’s the IMF and the military to the rescue!  Yay!  We can all eat mud pies and bullets until we just fade away, just like what has happened in every other country under bankster occupation.

The USA is Now a 3rd World Country

Slightly more than one American household with children in every 25 is surviving on less than $2 per day of income from all sources. One quarter of that 4.3% (that’s 1% of all Americans with children) receive less than $1.25 per day. One third (that’s about 1.33% of all Americans) receive between $1.25 and $2. Another third of that 4.3% receive enough government benefits to be living on between $1.25 and $2 a day. A tiny 0.1% of that 4.3% are even surviving somehow on “Negative income & benefits.”

On 26 August 2014, the co-authors of a Brookings Institution paper published a chart of those findings (reproduced here below, courtesy of the Brookings Institution) that looks like it might be some painting at the Museum of Modern Art, though what it refers to isn’t nearly so pretty, and is actually quite miserable:

These findings were originally published in the June 2013 Social Science Review, but have not yet been reported in the mainstream press. That study’s co-authors are H. Luke Shaefer of the University of Michigan, and Kathryn Endin of Harvard. The study was posted online by its funding organization, the National Poverty Center.

Titled, “Rising Extreme Poverty in the United States and the Response of Federal Means-Tested Transfer Programs,” the researchers reported that there has been “an increase in the prevalence of extreme poverty among U.S. households with children between 1996 and 2011.” Furthermore, “The prevalence of extreme poverty has risen sharply since 1996, particularly among those most impacted by the 1996 welfare reform,” which was signed into law by President Bill Clinton and which embodied numerous elements of President Ronald Reagan’s views on poverty. It “replaced a need-based entitlement program, Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), with a more restrictive federal block grant program called Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).” The authors explain as follows the $2/day cutoff they’re focusing on:

The measure of “extreme poverty” used here is based on one of the World Bank’s key indicators of global poverty: $2 per person, per day. Tellingly, the World Bank does not release official estimates for the United States for this metric because it is meant to capture poverty based on “the standards of the poorest countries.” … Living below this metric is widely considered to be a marker of extreme destitution, which is assumed to be very uncommon among wealthy nations. …


All just a terrible mistake…. economics is SO very complicated, they just haven’t figured it out yet.  But give them a few more years and it won’t matter.

Research Reveals How Sugar CAUSES Cancer

What’s the scariest boogieman out there? CANCER! Billions, perhaps trillions have been collected from the faithful to be ostensibly spent to find a “cure” yet there still is none in sight. It seems to be an inevitable death sentence that we all  shudder to think of. Yet – is it really? Did any of the big cancer foundations ever think to study the effects of sugar on the body? Well, the research has been done and the results are now in: sugar causes cancer.

Make no mistake, friends, the medical industry is a business and cancer is big business. There are beaucoup bucks in cancer. Every cancer treatment yields huge dividends. If researchers had wanted a cure, they would have simply read the books I did when I was twenty years old – 45 years ago. And the story I will tell you now, seals the deal – that the cancer industry does not want to find a cure, This incident is from my personal experience…

I once worked with an oncologist, professor at a state university medical school. He wrote articles about his research and it was my job to make the articles letter perfect for submission to medical journals. When I asked him to tell me in layperson’s terms about his research, he described what I had read in a book several years before: Laetrile, Nature’s Answer to Cancer. I told him what he was doing was going to work and he asked me how I knew.

I said, “Because what you are describing is Laetrile.”

We had been walking on a busy beach – it was the first warm day in spring – and when I said the word Laetrile, he stopped and stood like a statue in the sand, eyes wide open and raised to the sky, unfocused. His mouth was open, but not a sound came from him. I just watched. Finally he spoke.

“They’ll destroy me,” he said. “They’ll destroy me.”

“Who?” I asked.

It took him a long while to finally respond and when he did, he turned his face to the ground and said, “The AMA.  The AMA will destroy me.”

That sounded pretty serious, so I just kept quiet and we began walking again. Then he told me the story about his early career as a medical doctor and researcher. He was working at the National Institutes of Health, the NIH, in the Washington, DC area and was assigned to a committee that was to evaluate a new cure for cancer – Laetrile, discovered by two German doctors, a father-son team, the Drs. Krebs.

The entire NIH study consisted of this:

All the researchers were gathered around a table and the chairman of the committee entered the room. In the center of the table was a small bowl of powder, Laetrile. The chairman licked his finger and put it in the powder, then tasted it. He immediately spat it out. “That’s cyanide!” he exclaimed. And that was the extent of the study. Laetrile was immediately outlawed in our fair country.

Millions upon millions of Americans have died since, of cancer and our rank in health in the world is 37th due to it. Other countries that have a “handle” on cancer, are not too proud or stubborn to use Laetrile as one of their primary tools to prevent and treat tumors and cancers – and they rank among the top five countries in health.

My own mother had cancer. She went along with the modern American approach of slash, poison and burn. It “killed” her cancer but it also killed her.  She died in her husband’s arms.

The article linked below tells you how to prevent cancer. Why flirt with pain and suffering and a medical industry that is not really dedicated to optimal health? Read this article, “Research Reveals How Sugar Causes Cancer.”

Then ask yourself, “Can I let go of sugar for the sake of my health?” I hope you will vote for yourself. There are many other ways to get a sweet hit without sugar. Go buy a big bag of your favorite fruits (organic is not only healthier; it also tastes better) and take a walk through the honey and date section of your local health food store. You don’t have to give up goodness, just leave processed sugar behind. Read labels – these words indicate sugar:  “Sugar, sucrose, beet sugar, sugar, fructose, corn syrup…”

If you suck on some fresh, raw sugar can stalk or eat a fresh, raw, delicious grated beet, or fresh, juicy peaches, you will be ok… but processed sugars should certainly never show up on your grocery list – or mine.  Do your own research on the Internet – find alternatives to a major cause of cancer.

Good book:  Sugar Blues by William Dufty.

Research Reveals How Sugar CAUSES Cancer | GreenMedInfo | Blog Entry.

Obama Opens Fracking to BP in the Gulf of Mexico

In little-noticed news arising out of a recent Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and gas lease held by the U.S. Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the floodgates have opened for Gulf offshore hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”).

With 21.6 million acres auctioned off by the Obama Administration and 433,822 acres receiving bids, some press accounts have declared BP America — of 2010 Gulf of Mexico offshore oil spill infamy — a big winner of the auction. If true, fracking and the oil and gas services companies who perform it like Halliburton, Baker Hughes and Schlumberger came in a close second.

On the day of the sale held at the Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana, an Associated Press article explained that many of the purchased blocks sit in the Lower Tertiary basin, coined the “final frontier of oil exploration in the Gulf of Mexico” by industry analysts.

“The Lower Tertiary is an ancient layer of the earth’s crust made of dense rock,” explained AP. ”To access the mineral resources trapped within it, hydraulic fracturing activity is projected to grow in the western Gulf of Mexico by more than 10 percent this year, according to Houston-based oilfield services company Baker Hughes Inc., which operates about a third of the world’s offshore fracking rigs.”

Unlike other Gulf oil and gas, Lower Tertiary crude is located in ultra-deepwater reservoirs, industry lingo for oil and gas located 5,000 feet — roughly a mile — or deeper under the ocean.

Just over a week before the lease, the Mexican government passed energy reform legislation that will prop open the barn door for international oil and gas companies to sign joint ventures with state-owned oil company Pemex, including in Mexico’s portion of the Gulf of Mexico. …


The US is to be turned into just another resource extraction zone to leverage the empire’s power past the collapse of the persian gulf petrodollar.   The cost to the environment on and off land will be huge.  When they say there are too many people in the world, who do you think is at the top of their list?  There are far too many americans to fill jobs in the “new” economy and there won’t be enough untainted food to eat in any case.  Democide is on the agenda.  You could see it 20 years ago with the passage of NAFTA.  We are worse than expendable.   We are a threat.  The undeclared war is being fought right now.

Facing Defeat, Empire planning ‘rapid-deployment force’ of 10,000 troops to counter Russia

It appears the neocons are facing a military defeat in eastern Ukraine.  But the empire will not be denied.

“We are currently witnessing an epic and historic event. The Ukrainian regular army and the punitive battalions are suffering a catastrophic defeat to the south of Donetsk…..It still is not quite clear how the Junta intends to avoid a complete defeat here…. By squandering the most combat-capable brigades in systematic offensive operations, the Junta sustained enormous losses and at the same time suffered a crushing, purely military defeat. The southern front has collapsed.” – The Southern Front Catastrophe – August 27, 2014″, Colonel Cassad, Military Briefing, Novorossiya, Ukraine …


NATO is reportedly working towards the creation of an expeditionary force composed of 10,000 troops from seven different member states as a result of escalating tensions with Russia over the conflict in Ukraine.

According to the Financial Times, the force’s creation will be spearheaded by Britain and involve contributions from Denmark, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Norway, and the Netherlands. Canada is also interested in joining the group, but it’s not known what its final decision will be.

Although no formal announcement has been made, British Prime Minister David Cameron is expected to declare its formation at the upcoming NATO summit in Wales on September 4th.

Many specifics have yet to be worked out or announced, but planners are reportedly implementing ways to increase the number of soldiers involved even more if necessary. Air and naval units will be integrated into the group, as well as ground troops led by British commanders.

As noted by the Times, the creation of the force comes as a response to Russia’s involvement in the ongoing Ukrainian crisis, with the ultimate goal being to “create a fully functioning, division-sized force for rapid deployment and regular, frequent exercises.” NATO has accused Russia of deploying more than 1,000 troops into Ukraine to bolster separatists in the eastern part of the country.

Russia, however, insists that it does not have troops operating inside of Ukraine and has dismissed NATO’s assertions. …


It appears Obama’s coup machinations are backfiring.

Jim Rickards On the Next Great Ripoff

This is basically an advertisement but still informative.    The question does arise of why he’s not toeing the government line.  Is he just trying to sell a book?  In any case, yet more confirmation that we all need to prepare.