Colonial Iraq

“Our war there will be over. All of our troops will be out of Iraq,” President Barack Obama said in his Dec. 17 weekly radio address.

“But while combat troops are leaving, for now at least, the U.S. government is creating a staff of 16,000 for its newly constructed embassy in the heart of Baghdad. Although Iraq has only 28 million people, the new U.S. embassy is the largest in the world. It is a massive compound that is one and a half square miles-—an enormous complex of 22 buildings and the size of 94 football fields. Half of the 16,000-person staff will consist of a private military army made up of mercenaries under the control of the State Department. The State Department budget for the embassy is estimated at $25-30 billion over the next five years.

“In addition, the Pentagon retains a vast network of bases, sea and air power surrounding Iraq. Washington’s intention clearly is to dominate Iraq for many years to come in a colonial-type relationship. Iraq possesses the second largest oil reserves in the world.”

Why is the Media Lying About NDAA Indefinite Military Detention of Americans?

“Why is the media taking such pains to knowingly and falsely claim that the new power of the military to detain and imprison people without charge or trial, for life, does not include US citizens?”]  We know what happened.  The Bill of Rights has been overturned.  And enough has been written on the deceptive language first warned of by Congressman Justin Amash, when he told The Grand Rapids Press that the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was “carefully crafted to mislead the public,” for newspaper editors to know better.”

“Iranian nukes”: They absolutely refuse to stop lying

“U.S. Defense Secretary: Iran could get nuclear bomb within a year

“Speaking in an interview with CBS Evening News, Leon Panetta says Israel’s concern for a nuclear Iran is a ‘common concern’ of the U.S., who does not rule out a military strike.”

Is it a sickness, some kind of mental defect that forces them to lie all the time?  Of COURSE he can’t rule out a military strike, because they’ve already decided to attack iran (they’re doing it now, in fact) for reasons that have nothing to do with any fear they have of iran getting nukes.  They want to take over the world, that’s all.  And it requires taking over the persian gulf.  And they think americans are too stupid to be able to read their planning papers and published books some of which have been out in public for decades.

In any case, if iran did decide to get nuclear weapons it would probably be through whatever’s left of the AQ Khan network that the CIA allowed to go on for years.  Oh yeah, we’re supposed to be too stupid to know about that too.

Let’s see, will there be another act of staged terrorism?  Will some mossad agents dressed up in turbans and wearing ahmadinejad masks invade the library of congress and torch the constitution?  (why bother?)  Or maybe they’ll use box cutters to whittle away at the foundation of the washington monument until it collapses into its own footprint.  Or heck, they might just bomb a day care full of kids like they did at OKC.  Why not?  Americans will believe ANYTHING.

I just want to know, if we’re going to be paying for yet another assault on innocent strangers, where is our return on investment?   It seems to me between the looting of iraq under the pretext of deposing Saddam the CIA agent, the plunder of africa and latin america over the years, the decades of CIA heroin and cocaine smuggling etc, there should be enough for at least $1000 for every man woman and child in this country just for starters.

Oh yeah, I forgot.   They’re not working for us, they’re using us.

Occupy Crackdown: CIA plays new version of “I Won’t Tell You”

“CIA Double-Speak on full display as intelligence agency refuses to respond to FOIA request on its role in the nationwide crackdown on Occupy movement

CIA plays new version of “I Won’t Tell You.”

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is refusing to process a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that would reveal what role, if any, the agency has played in law enforcement’s coordinated, nationwide campaign to shut down and evict Occupy movement encampments in cities throughout the country.

The FOIA demand for records was filed by the Washington D.C.-based civil rights legal organization, the Partnership for Civil Justice (PCJF).

The language used by the agency to announce its refusal to process the FOIA request concerning its role in the crackdown on the Occupy movement is “a classic case of CIA-double speak,” according to the attorneys at the PCJF.

The CIA is not specifically denying that it has records and documents that would reveal its role in the coordinated crackdown that evicted the encampments in major cities within a short period of time. Rather, the agency asserts that it won’t look for such records and documents.

“The CIA is apparently asserting that because its involvement in law enforcement’s crackdown of the Occupy movement would be barred by law, it is not possible for the CIA to conduct an effective search for information responsive to our inquiry into its role in the operation,” stated Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the PCJF. “In other words,” she continued, “because the actions would be illegal, they would also be off the books.”

Far from claiming it does not possess responsive records, the CIA stated in its letter to Ms. Verheyden-Hilliard that because such activities would be barred by law, “our records systems are not configured in a way that would allow us to perform a search reasonably calculated to lead to responsive records. Therefore, we must decline to process your request.”

The PCJF has demanded that the CIA reconsider its request and is prepared to take legal action as necessary to force the agency to comply with its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act. This denial comes on the heels of a series of Associated Press articles revealing the CIA’s involvement with the NYPD.

The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the National Park Service (NPS) requesting that the agencies release information that they possess related to the involvement of federal agencies in the planning of a coordinated law enforcement crackdown that has taken places in multiple cities against the Occupy Movement. These requests are also on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild Mass Defense Committee.

The FOIA to the various federal law enforcement agencies states: “This request specifically encompasses disclosure of any documents or information pertaining to federal coordination of, or advice or consultation regarding, the police response to the Occupy movement, protests or encampments.”

Read the FOIA demand to the federal agencies (PDF)

Read the CIA’s response (PDF)

If you believe free speech is a protected right, not criminal activity please support this work today.


And if you’re wondering why the world is being run by twisted bullies with partial genital amputation (PGA), ask your doctor.

Birth Complications + Maternal Rejection = Violent Adults

Results: A significant interaction (P<.0001) between birth complications and early maternal rejection indicated that those who suffered both birth complications and early child rejection were most likely to become violent offenders in adulthood. While only 4.5% of the subjects had both risk factors, this small group accounted for 18% of all violent crimes. The effect was specific to violence and was not observed for nonviolent criminal offending.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that birth complications in combination with early child rejection predispose to violent crime. The findings illustrate the critical importance of integrating biological with social measures to fully understand how violence develops and also suggest that prenatal, perinatal, and early postnatal health care interventions could significantly reduce violence.
(Arch Gen Psychiatry.A 1994;51:984-988)

In other words, the common US experience of needless birth interventions including induced miscarriage (normally the baby initiates labor) and MGM + isolation and lack of breast feeding (which could well be experienced by a mammalian infant as maternal rejection) predisposes to violent crime.  And they’ve known this since the mid-90s.   But think of the profit opportunities both inside and outside of medicine.   Disaster capitalists invested in obstetrics a long long time ago.

Satanists in the Military

After viewing the Iraq: On the Dark Side in Al Doura video below, it’s not hard to believe there might be satanists in the active military.  Googling around, I found the following links:

The following paper was written by Michael Aquino, who seems to be notorious in this regard.  He’s interviewed in the 3rd link below.  The paper is fairly tame by today’s standards, until the end, where he references using directed energy weapons in connection with mind control.  Note he was also stationed at the presidio, where there was an active satanic cult according to the second link.


There appears to be a lot of disinformation mixed in with interesting nuggets out there, which I suppose indicates a predictable psyop campaign to distract and discredit real investigations into the issue.  High level intergenerational satanism would certainly explain a lot about what’s going on in this world.  By their fruits you will know them.

BTW: Remember, when you hear “CIA” think wall street.  Many of the top brass at the  CIA have had wall street connections dating back to its inception (see Mike Ruppert’s video in the ref section) and the CIA itself is a private corporation incorporated in delaware, as I’ve shown previously.   (impossible I know, just as impossible as the wall street ownership of the federal reserve).  And of course one of the CIA’s main functions in the economy is running drugs and funneling the proceeds through wall street money launderers like citibank.