Anthro-global warming theory justifies this??

Armed Troops Burn Down Homes, Kill Children To Evict Ugandans In Name Of Global Warming

Let’s get this straight please: forget the glaring discrepancies between the computer models and the observations.  Forget the politics and petro-corporate funding of the global warming lobby (the de beers diamond business model: artificial scarcity).  Forget the deleted emails and the biased temperature adjustments and biasing thermometer locations.  Suppose carbon emissions really are feeding a runaway warming effect.  Al Gore, the biggest shareholder of occidental petroleum, wants to use carbon offset trading, mediated in wall street’s funny money, to compensate for the the carbon footprint of wall street’s industrial behemoths by seizing poor farms in africa?

Let’s see, what’s the net carbon effect of shutting down self sustaining solar powered agricultural communities and funneling the hordes of refugees into camps where their survival will depend on food brought in by petro-powered container ships from who knows where under the “generosity” of the international financial institutions which displaced them?  They better hurry up and starve to death or get killed if there’s to be a net reduction in carbon emissions, right?

When did environmentalism become synonymous with malthusian eugenics?