London Trader: Tremendous Silver Shortages

“King World News’ London trader source today explains how the gold and silver price suppression schemes are working with increasing desperation as metal gets tighter and tighter. Echoing silver market analyst Ted Butler’s commentary this week (, he says the scheme now involves shorting metal from the SLV exchange-traded fund. And as your secretary/treasurer replied the other day to the Bank of England’s pose of propriety in gold dealings (, the London trader says bullion banks working with central banks know just how much gold the central banks will make available for market manipulation and this constitutes insider trading. In any case Chinese buyers, the London trader says, are happy to take all the metal being offered in such desperation to support the crumbling Western financial system.”

In other words, if you have money in SLV, they’re using it to suppress the price of silver!  How’s that for fraud?

The emperor’s clothes are falling away people, and boy is he ugly!

“Government” says it can kill, detain americans at will

“Government Says It Can Assassinate or Indefinitely Detain Americans on American Soil Without Any Due Process of Law

“I’ve previously noted that Obama says that he can assassinate American citizens living on U.S. soil.

“This admittedly sounds over-the-top. But one of the nation’s top constitutional and military law experts – Jonathan Turley – agrees.


* Is the second most cited law professor in the country

* Has worked as both the CBS and NBC legal analyst during national controversies

* Ranks 38th in the top 100 most cited ‘public intellectuals’ in a recent study by a well-known judge

* Is one of the top 10 lawyers handling military cases

* Has served as a consultant on homeland security and constitutional issues

* Is a frequent witness before the House and Senate on constitutional and statutory issues

Turley said yesterday on C-Span (starting at 15:50):

President Obama has just stated a policy that he can have any American citizen killed without any charge, without any review, except his own. If he’s satisfied that you are a terrorist, he says that he can kill you anywhere in the world including in the United States.

Two of his aides just … reaffirmed they believe that American citizens can be killed on the order of the President anywhere including the United States.

You’ve now got a president who says that he can kill you on his own discretion. He can jail you indefinitely on his own discretion


I don’t think the the Framers ever anticipated that [the American people would be so apathetic]. They assumed that people would hold their liberties close, and that they wouldn’t relax …

US military: unconstitutional orders are unlawful

“US military take an Oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

The US Constitution refutes the so-called “National Defense Authorization Act” provisions for US military to seize people in America (here, here, here).  The 5th and 6th Amendments of the US Constitution promise that if the government is to seize you, they damn sure have to demonstrate you’ve committed a crime (my comments). Note that these promises apply to all persons, not just citizens:

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury (that means a jury of one’s peers, not the dictatorship of “the leader” – “fuehrer” in German)… nor shall any person… be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;…

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury…, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

The Oath to the US Constitution is first and primary for the US military to defend America and our freedoms. By definition, America’s freedoms are in our Constitution. The respect Americans and the world have for US military is in proportion to upholding the freedoms in the US Constitution.

US military are trained to refuse unlawful orders. The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 92 makes US military duty clear to obey lawful orders. The primary source for lawful orders is the US Constitution. A nation’s constitution are its central and defining laws.

Any order that interferes with constitutional law is by definition an unlawful order that must be refused. Using the US military to seize Americans is such an obvious breach of the US Constitution that it evokes the legal term, ab initio: void and without legal effect from the beginning. Such orders are such an attack upon the US Constitution that the closest crime I can imagine for those voting for it is treason: war upon the US Constitution and its people.

Another unlawful order would be against the 1st Amendment to interfere with Internet freedom of speech and/or Occupy movements: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”

US military who defend the US Constitution from those attacking it will also be attacked.

Those attacks will come in various forms of threats. Requiring that orders be written, signed, and explained how they support the US Constitution might be a good first line of defense to make the choice of sides clear to your brothers and sisters in uniform.

It will take courage to defend the Constitution against predictable uses of intimidation and force. With enough US soldiers’ defense of the US Constitution, enemies to it will be seen for what they are, be isolated, and face justice.

I assert that depression and suicide of your brothers and sisters in uniform are a direct function of your being ordered into unlawful wars (resources below to explain and document). Standing for the Constitution is how you fight back.

US military: honor your Oath. Support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Be heroes for the brighter future we all feel, see, and choose to build.

The solution is to arrest and prosecute the obvious criminals in areas of war policy and corporate media that lie in provable commission and omission to continue US CRIMINAL wars.

The pentagon has to decide whether they are a lawful part of a lawful government or a mercenary army of a transnational conspiracy which has already gutted the industrial infrastructure of this country.  Your families and neighborhoods are already going to pay a heavy price for the acts of your pretend leaders.  Open your eyes and see how you’ve been deceived like the rest of us.  Words have been used as weapons against you.  Psychological operations have exploited your bonds with your comrades to create a false sense of belonging to the beast which is destroying everything you hold dear.  Compartmentalization has isolated you from the terrible truth of what has been going on behind your back, which is now freely available on the internet.  Decide what’s worth fighting for and carry on the legacy of the founders.  Your country needs you.

The enemy is among us, but by their fruits you will know them.


“Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security advisor to president Carter, is now Obama foreign policy consultant.




The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Geostrategic Imperatives,
Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1997

“For the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of geostrategically dynamic states and the careful handling of geopolitically catalytic states, in keeping with America’s twin interests: the short-term preservation of its unique global power and the long-run transformation of it into an increasingly institutionalized global cooperation.

“To put it in terminology that hearkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together.”

“Brzezinski brags about relatively unknown CIA Intervention in Afghanistan BEFORE, to provoke soviet invasion:
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser
Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998

Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs [“From the Shadows”], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.

Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?

B: It isn’t quite that. We didn’t push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.

Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against a secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn’t believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don’t regret anything today?

B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.

Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalism, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?

B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.

B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn’t a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites Christian countries.”

Much more at:

Colonial Iraq

“Our war there will be over. All of our troops will be out of Iraq,” President Barack Obama said in his Dec. 17 weekly radio address.

“But while combat troops are leaving, for now at least, the U.S. government is creating a staff of 16,000 for its newly constructed embassy in the heart of Baghdad. Although Iraq has only 28 million people, the new U.S. embassy is the largest in the world. It is a massive compound that is one and a half square miles-—an enormous complex of 22 buildings and the size of 94 football fields. Half of the 16,000-person staff will consist of a private military army made up of mercenaries under the control of the State Department. The State Department budget for the embassy is estimated at $25-30 billion over the next five years.

“In addition, the Pentagon retains a vast network of bases, sea and air power surrounding Iraq. Washington’s intention clearly is to dominate Iraq for many years to come in a colonial-type relationship. Iraq possesses the second largest oil reserves in the world.”

Why is the Media Lying About NDAA Indefinite Military Detention of Americans?

“Why is the media taking such pains to knowingly and falsely claim that the new power of the military to detain and imprison people without charge or trial, for life, does not include US citizens?”]  We know what happened.  The Bill of Rights has been overturned.  And enough has been written on the deceptive language first warned of by Congressman Justin Amash, when he told The Grand Rapids Press that the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was “carefully crafted to mislead the public,” for newspaper editors to know better.”

“Iranian nukes”: They absolutely refuse to stop lying

“U.S. Defense Secretary: Iran could get nuclear bomb within a year

“Speaking in an interview with CBS Evening News, Leon Panetta says Israel’s concern for a nuclear Iran is a ‘common concern’ of the U.S., who does not rule out a military strike.”

Is it a sickness, some kind of mental defect that forces them to lie all the time?  Of COURSE he can’t rule out a military strike, because they’ve already decided to attack iran (they’re doing it now, in fact) for reasons that have nothing to do with any fear they have of iran getting nukes.  They want to take over the world, that’s all.  And it requires taking over the persian gulf.  And they think americans are too stupid to be able to read their planning papers and published books some of which have been out in public for decades.

In any case, if iran did decide to get nuclear weapons it would probably be through whatever’s left of the AQ Khan network that the CIA allowed to go on for years.  Oh yeah, we’re supposed to be too stupid to know about that too.

Let’s see, will there be another act of staged terrorism?  Will some mossad agents dressed up in turbans and wearing ahmadinejad masks invade the library of congress and torch the constitution?  (why bother?)  Or maybe they’ll use box cutters to whittle away at the foundation of the washington monument until it collapses into its own footprint.  Or heck, they might just bomb a day care full of kids like they did at OKC.  Why not?  Americans will believe ANYTHING.

I just want to know, if we’re going to be paying for yet another assault on innocent strangers, where is our return on investment?   It seems to me between the looting of iraq under the pretext of deposing Saddam the CIA agent, the plunder of africa and latin america over the years, the decades of CIA heroin and cocaine smuggling etc, there should be enough for at least $1000 for every man woman and child in this country just for starters.

Oh yeah, I forgot.   They’re not working for us, they’re using us.

Occupy Crackdown: CIA plays new version of “I Won’t Tell You”

“CIA Double-Speak on full display as intelligence agency refuses to respond to FOIA request on its role in the nationwide crackdown on Occupy movement

CIA plays new version of “I Won’t Tell You.”

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is refusing to process a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that would reveal what role, if any, the agency has played in law enforcement’s coordinated, nationwide campaign to shut down and evict Occupy movement encampments in cities throughout the country.

The FOIA demand for records was filed by the Washington D.C.-based civil rights legal organization, the Partnership for Civil Justice (PCJF).

The language used by the agency to announce its refusal to process the FOIA request concerning its role in the crackdown on the Occupy movement is “a classic case of CIA-double speak,” according to the attorneys at the PCJF.

The CIA is not specifically denying that it has records and documents that would reveal its role in the coordinated crackdown that evicted the encampments in major cities within a short period of time. Rather, the agency asserts that it won’t look for such records and documents.

“The CIA is apparently asserting that because its involvement in law enforcement’s crackdown of the Occupy movement would be barred by law, it is not possible for the CIA to conduct an effective search for information responsive to our inquiry into its role in the operation,” stated Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the PCJF. “In other words,” she continued, “because the actions would be illegal, they would also be off the books.”

Far from claiming it does not possess responsive records, the CIA stated in its letter to Ms. Verheyden-Hilliard that because such activities would be barred by law, “our records systems are not configured in a way that would allow us to perform a search reasonably calculated to lead to responsive records. Therefore, we must decline to process your request.”

The PCJF has demanded that the CIA reconsider its request and is prepared to take legal action as necessary to force the agency to comply with its obligations under the Freedom of Information Act. This denial comes on the heels of a series of Associated Press articles revealing the CIA’s involvement with the NYPD.

The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) has filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the National Park Service (NPS) requesting that the agencies release information that they possess related to the involvement of federal agencies in the planning of a coordinated law enforcement crackdown that has taken places in multiple cities against the Occupy Movement. These requests are also on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild Mass Defense Committee.

The FOIA to the various federal law enforcement agencies states: “This request specifically encompasses disclosure of any documents or information pertaining to federal coordination of, or advice or consultation regarding, the police response to the Occupy movement, protests or encampments.”

Read the FOIA demand to the federal agencies (PDF)

Read the CIA’s response (PDF)

If you believe free speech is a protected right, not criminal activity please support this work today.


And if you’re wondering why the world is being run by twisted bullies with partial genital amputation (PGA), ask your doctor.

Birth Complications + Maternal Rejection = Violent Adults

Results: A significant interaction (P<.0001) between birth complications and early maternal rejection indicated that those who suffered both birth complications and early child rejection were most likely to become violent offenders in adulthood. While only 4.5% of the subjects had both risk factors, this small group accounted for 18% of all violent crimes. The effect was specific to violence and was not observed for nonviolent criminal offending.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that birth complications in combination with early child rejection predispose to violent crime. The findings illustrate the critical importance of integrating biological with social measures to fully understand how violence develops and also suggest that prenatal, perinatal, and early postnatal health care interventions could significantly reduce violence.
(Arch Gen Psychiatry.A 1994;51:984-988)

In other words, the common US experience of needless birth interventions and MGM + lack of breast feeding (experienced by the infant as maternal rejection) predisposes to violent crime.  And they’ve known this since the mid-90s.

Transparency in all things