For years now, the drumbeat for war with Iran has been growing steadily louder from the Likudniks in Israel and their ideological bedmates in Washington. Weary, exhausted, and economically depleted after a year of disastrous entanglements in the Middle East, it is hard to believe that the American public is eager for yet another conflict, yet every few months without fail there are new signs that the Israeli leadership is sharpening their tools of warfare and cries are renewed in the corridors of power in Washington for unflinching support for whatever action Tel Aviv decides to take. As we examined last week, this drumbeat has reached fever pitch yet again in the last few months, and now Washington insiders, think tanks and policy wonks are once again openly discussing the possibility of staging a false flag event to blame on their Iranian enemy and launch a “retaliatory strike.”
But what would the fallout of such an action be? Well, for starters, there would be literal fallout.
In this episode of our EyeOpener Report James Corbett discusses possible consequence of an armed strike on Iran- from the economic fallout, to the potential release of radioactive materials into the atmosphere, and “legitimization” of the use of first-strike nuclear weapons as tactical weapons.
Does allowing people to own or carry guns deter violent crime? Or does it simply cause more citizens to harm each other? Directly challenging common perceptions about gun control, legal scholar John Lott presents the most rigorously comprehensive data analysis ever done on crime statistics and right-to-carry laws. This timely and provocative work comes to the startling conclusion: more guns mean less crime. In this paperback edition, Lott has expanded the research through 1996, incorporating new data available from states that passed right-to-carry and other gun laws since the book’s publication as well as new city-level statistics.
“Lott’s pro-gun argument has to be examined on the merits, and its chief merit is lots of data. . . . If you still disagree with Lott, at least you will know what will be required to rebut a case that looks pretty near bulletproof.”–Peter Coy, Business Week
It’s not rocket science to see that if law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons, criminals will be intimidated. If right-to-carry is abolished, the only citizens with guns will be criminals and they will tend to be emboldened to commit crimes. In that context, it’s clear that making schools “no gun zones” tends to make them targets for criminals, even without the added factor of psychiatric drug-induced insanity.
At a more political level, one can also see that if any government has a monopoly on guns, over time, that government will become more emboldened in doing what all governments eventually do: become tyrannical. Corruption has nothing to do with ideology or the structure of law or governance. It’s a systemic structural problem of spontaneous emergence that always happens eventually in all known forms of government. Citizen ownership of guns is a fundamental prerequisite for the long term preservation of democratic rule, by distributing physical power throughout society.
The general public is becoming more distrusting of media, institutions, government. So it should not come as a surprise that citizen journalists around the world are analyzing the official Sandy Hook story to see if it can stand on it’s own. Many are finding that the story has many holes, some tell tale signs we have seen before, lack of security footage, change in weapons, sequestering media.
Alex Jones now goes on the record with his thoughts and analysis. He highlights some red flags, shows the CNN track record of faking news reports and working with Military Intelligence.
A prominent Texas doctor’s claim that many foster children come from “bad gene pools” is “a frightening throwback to some of the darkest chapters of American history” according to a national non-profit child advocacy organization. ….
There are many different types and levels of mind control and many people who have been subject to them. Some people don’t even know that they’ve been subject to mind control. Some people do suspect that they have been, but don’t know what to do about it. There is a technique that can act as a subtle treatment for mind control victims. It doesn’t require a therapist and it doesn’t trigger the suicide response that some mind control victims have been implanted with to prevent them from seeking therapy. It was explained to me years ago by an expert. It involves using journaling in a structured way. All you need is a pen and notebook and the will to heal yourself. In the evening, everyday, you will make a journal entry. First you write down your full legal name and the day’s date. Then you write down one clear memory from that day. You do this everyday and you periodically review the notebook. All forms of mind control use memory as their means of manipulation. Memories involving pain and unconsciousness are combined with commands to create alternate personalities. The natural ego state of the individual is warped or divided using such methods. But memory is always the key. By using the daily journaling technique and always putting your name and the date above the journal entry you begin to take back a small level of control over your memory. This is a subtle technique that works over time. But it does work. I’ve used it and so have others and always with success. It is not a dramatic deprogramming technique but a slow method that yields positive results over time. If you’ve been subject to mind-control, you should know that you can take back your life one day at a time. Even if you’re not certain that you’ve been subject to mind-control, I give you permission to try this. Always know that it is possible to heal.
” On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack, and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial “large magazines.” Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney. During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, “to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda,” she said.
“I just want you to know that we are working on it,” Brady recalled the president telling them. “We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”