An extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections. …
We quote here from the author’s summary and the paper:
“Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics)  but also, their own Code of Practice.”
Dr Lucija Tomljenovic continues:
“The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release …”
Obama’s granting of impunity to bush says volumes about the level of coordination going on among supposedly disparate political groups. Psychopaths have made an art of elite networking. Just a conspiracy theory I know.
A popular cosmetic product since time immemorial, lipstick has long been used by women in many diverse cultures to accentuate their femininity and emanate their own unique expressions of elegance and style to the outside world. But a new study released by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) School of Public Health raises fresh concerns about the safety of using conventional lipstick products, as many of them were found to contain dangerously high levels of aluminum, cadmium, lead and other toxins.
UCB researchers tested 32 common lipstick and lip gloss products widely sold in stores today and found that many of them are loaded with cadmium, chromium, aluminum and at least five other metals. Published in the peer-reviewed journal Environmental Health Perspectives, the findings revealed that women who use such products even at modest levels could be greatly increasing their risk of developing a host of potential health conditions, including gastrointestinal upset, nerve damage, and cancer.
“Lipstick and lip gloss are of special concern because when they are not being blotted on tissue or left as kiss marks, they are ingested or absorbed, bit by bit, by the individual wearing them,” explains a UCB press release about the study. “Using acceptable daily intakes derived from this study, average use of some lipsticks and lip glosses would result in excessive exposure to chromium, a carcinogen linked to stomach ulcers.”
Most conventional beauty products contain a multitude of toxins at varying levels
Of the 32 products tested, researchers found that 24 of them, or 75 percent, also contained lead, which is known to cause brain, cellular, and DNA damage. Since no level of lead exposure is considered safe for young children, this discovery is particularly concerning as many younger girls use lipstick with their friends when they play dress up and other childhood games. …
Maybe they’re right. Either way, people who have their eyes open will know who’s responsible for the next attack. That in itself might be enough to stop it.
Taken on its own, the KOMO 4 News report below out of Seattle paints a stark and frightening picture of police battling “angry parents” in a simulated shooting at a school. The practice of police training to take on everything from homeschoolers to patriots and constitutionalists – “rightwing extremists” in government parlance – is anything but a rarity. Such exercises are now a prominent feature of the expanding police state. …
Control the kids and you control the future.
“Federal government” BUSTED for forcing American nuclear industry to become a ticking time bomb
You have been told the nuclear waste must go somewhere. You have been told it needed to be stored inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and menace to the world for millions of years. You have been told there is nothing we can do about it. But what if you have been told a lie? What if that “spent fuel” was not spent at all? What if a technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over, twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be safe enough to handle directly straight out of the reactor? Think any “spent fuel pools” would be full? And even if this never happened,
What if foreign nations, (France was one) offered us hundreds of billions of dollars for our “spent fuel” only to have the U.S. Government refuse the offer for no reason at all? Would that not solve the problem of getting rid of it? And the final question, WHY would the Fed want so much nuclear material sitting around the country, only to become a menace? Could it be that we do not have a government, and instead have a band of usurpers in power who have intentionally set us up for a fall? After reading this report, I believe you will be inclined to think so.
This report consists of hard scientific fact, and even harder answers.
In my journey of discovery in my investigation into the Fukushima disaster, I interviewed an 85 year old nuclear engineer who worked in the nuclear industry during America’s glory days, and earned GE over 100 patents. He was one of the engineers who designed Fukushima, so naturally when conducting a real investigation into such a disaster a responsible journalist would want that type of reference. I was surprised when my prior study of the reactor systems there was so thorough that he had no information about Fukushima I did not already dig up, and he was very surprised when I told him details about the inner workings of the reactor he never expected anyone in the media to know.
When I started to think I was going to walk away with nothing, he dropped a bombshell on a totally different subject. He opened his new direction of the discussion with the phrase “My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order …
Carter claims he was concerned with proliferation issues. Maybe so. Apparently Donald Rumsfeld wasn’t so worried: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2013/04/rumsfeld-sat-on-board-of-company-that-sold-nuclear-reactors-to-north-korea/
In any case, skeptics should ask why nuclear power plants are designed to require a connection to the electrical grid in order to run their cooling pumps. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/04/are-most-nuclear-power-plants-vulnerable.html This is insane on the face of it. What the hell is going on here?
The first rule of activism is that the guy with the explosives is always the government agent.
I thought Abbie Hoffman said this but haven’t been able to confirm it. In any case, it really should be uppermost in every activist’s mind. The forces at work in this world think, live and breathe false flag terrorism. How could it be otherwise?
There is a new national threat that has, apparently, been making headline news all over the country in recent years. According to law enforcement officials in Washington that domestic terror threat involves armed and angry parents acting in concert to take over a school.
It’s an active shooter situation that police officers, SWAT and emergency response personnel are currently simulating in training exercises.
The question is, why?
What better way to control adults than to hold their children hostage? Of course there will have to be a plausible cover story about protecting the children from some threat, or perhaps protecting society from some plague in the schools. The latter actually sounds plausible if the rest of the city is in lockdown, since schools are petri dishes for mixing whatever is making the rounds among different families that would normally be isolated. Another good reason to do home schooling.
If society is collapsing as intended, the rationale might be to feed and house the kids, who are far more valuable and less of a threat to the satanists than their parents who understand what’s happening. Like cambodia under brzezinski’s khmer rouge, the objective would be to wipe the social slate clean and start over.
Of course this is crazy, as crazy as torturing peasants in guatemala or exterminating millions in cambodia or protecting nazi mind control scientists after world war II. All of which have been committed by the “government” in question.
The schemers and warmongers who want to start war with china to preserve the petrodollar need to ask themselves who arranged for china to become an industrial powerhouse and gutted the USA’s industrial infrastructure. I’m not talking about individuals, I’m talking about institutions like the CFR and the wall street banks. There are multiple layers to this onion and every layer is being puppeteered by the layers within. If you’re an “inside outsider”, will you really benefit by continuing to play the game? If no one warned you that vaccines often contain cancer-inducing monkey viruses or GMO corn is corrupting your gut bacteria and possibly altering your dna or that male genital mutilation amounts to an emotional lobotomy, can you still pretend to be one of the winners?