Why not just “go organic”? It will save the planet, save our health, save our farmers. You’ll have to go to the Mercola website to watch the video (link at the end of this post).
Ronnie Cummins’ new book, “Grassroots Rising,” details how transforming our food and farming system worldwide can solve many of our most pressing problems, including environmental pollution, health problems, climate change and rural poverty
Transitioning to regenerative organic farming has the ability to solve all of these problems simultaneously
Far from solving world hunger, genetically engineered crops destroy soils and make food more toxic and less nutritious. Regenerative farming has demonstrated its superiority with regard to yield and nutrition, without the use of toxic chemicals
Education, innovation, policy changes and investment are the four things that drive this change of paradigm
The Via Organica farm in Mexico is promoting a novel way to produce inexpensive yet highly nutritious animal feed made from native agave plants
The Prediction: Top climate specialists and environmental activists predicted that “global cooling trends” observed between WWII and 1970 would result in a world “eleven degrees colder in the year 2000 … about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” Bitter winters and floods from “delayed typhoons” would trigger massive drops in food production, followed by widespread famine…
What Actually Happened: Global cooling trends didn’t continue unabated, and temperatures stabilized. Within a few years, the same alarmists were predicting a life-threatening rise in temperatures, presaging many of the same dire effects on plant and animal life. Those new predictions were continually revised as their “near certainty” collided with the truth year after year, but prophets seem unchastened by their abysmal historical accuracy. Newsweek issued a correction to the 1975 article in 2006.
“Is he in heaven? Is he in hell? That damned, elusive Pimpernel!” Was Tesla a gift to humanity or have his “gifts to humanity” been taken and twisted by those who wish to “dumb down”, control and eventually eradicate the human race? Who was his bookkeeper? Who was his bookkeeper’s son? Who “disappeared” his files when he died? Who or what is using his gifts to humanity now – against the entire human race?
The life story and work of Nikola Tesla at pbs.org/tesla/
He invented AC electricity, neon lights, radio transmission, the electric motor, wireless electricity transfer, remote control, hydraulics, lasers, space weapons, robotics, and many, many more things.
Some electro-mechanical devices and principles developed by Tesla: * various devices that use rotating magnetic fields (1882) * induction motor and high frequency alternator * means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations * alternating current long-distance electrical transmission system (1888) * Tesla coil * bladeless turbine * bifilar coil * Telegeodynamics * systems for wireless communication (prior art for the invention of radio) and radio frequency oscillators * robotics and the “AND” logic gate * X-rays Tubes using the bremsstrahlung process * devices for ionized gases * devices for high field emission * devices for charged particle beams * methods for providing extremely low level of resistance to the passage of electrical current * voltage multiplication circuitry * devices for high voltage discharges * devices for lightning protection * Magnifying Transmitter * VTOL aircraft * Dynamic theory of gravity * concepts for electric vehicles.
Power shutoffs affecting more than 1 million residents, scheduled by PG&E this week throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and Northern California, have sparked a massive backlash, with many community members telling reporters that they are shocked that the company has not done more to upgrade its transmission lines.
The decision to shut off the electricity services, a precaution over concerns about high winds, raises the question of precisely how PG&E has been spending its rate-payers’ money. And the answer isn’t pretty: While neglecting safety upgrades and investments in its aging infrastructure, PG&E has instead been lavishly rewarding shareholders and buying political influence.
Over the last year, reporters have highlighted the large lobby spending and billions of dollars in dividend payments to investors by PG&E, while the company avoided necessary investments in its aging transmission towers — some of which are among the oldest in the world and were known to the company to be a potential fire hazard. The aging transmission lines caused the Camp Fire wildfires last November, the most destructive in California history, that left 86 dead, over a dozen injured, and caused at least $16 billion in damages.
Thanks to the following article from Salon, it occurred to me that Epstein might have enrolled his famous scientist friends to support the bankers’ worldwide carbon tax plan – which surely would have been a very profitable venture – and to rally behind “climate change” because they had unquestionable credentials and “star power”. Or might they have been promised “star status” (or other “goodies”) if they would just jump on the “climate change” bandwagon? Bribery, seduction, blackmail, threats… all are tools of the “elite” as they like to call themselves. And Epstein was apparently serving the “elite” in various ways, especially with adolescent girls, whom he also entrapped with cold cash.
The list of confidants and friends who were fêted by the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein included a number of prominent scientists. Among the eye-popping names that appeared on the list: the late cosmologist Stephen Hawking, Nobel-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, physicist Frank Wilczek, neurologist Oliver Sacks, and geneticist George M. Church…
That Epstein was interested in cavorting with scientists does not bode well for the sciences at large — mainly, what it says about the culture of scientists is dangerous and antithetical to the process of science…
Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling – Peter Ferrara
Climate change itself is already in the process of definitively rebutting climate alarmists who think human use of fossil fuels is causing ultimately catastrophic global warming. That is because natural climate cycles have already turned from warming to cooling, global temperatures have already been declining for more than 10 years, and global temperatures will continue to decline for another two decades or more.
That is one of the most interesting conclusions to come out of the seventh International Climate Change Conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute, held last week in Chicago. I attended, and served as one of the speakers, talking about The Economic Implications of High Cost Energy.
The conference featured serious natural science, contrary to the self-interested political science you hear from government financed global warming alarmists seeking to justify widely expanded regulatory and taxation powers for government bodies, or government body wannabees, such as the United Nations. See for yourself, as the conference speeches are online.
What you will see are calm, dispassionate presentations by serious, pedigreed scientists discussing and explaining reams of data. In sharp contrast to these climate realists, the climate alarmists have long admitted that they cannot defend their theory that humans are causing catastrophic global warming in public debate. With the conference presentations online, let’s see if the alarmists really do have any response.
The Heartland Institute has effectively become the international headquarters of the climate realists…
The pentagon has long bragged that it “owned” the weather, and has used it as a weapon since the US mugging of vietnam. Yet I don’t recall them ever volunteering their expertise to help bring rain to california. Which is strange because they (or whoever they refuse to defend us from) have been spraying california skies incessantly for many years. It’s remarkable that congress has never invited them to testify about this question and have them put their billions of taxpayer-funded research dollars to productive use defending the country.
Or not remarkable at all.
The Great Ripoff of the 30’s had the effect of dislodging huge masses of people from family farms, rural communities and resilient, distributed, largely solar-powered organic economies to urban concentration, pollution, disease and mortal dependency. In fact the “federal” reserve was responsible for the murder of seven million americans through starvation in those years. ( http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2015/02/milton-friedman-on-the-origins-of-the-great-ripoff/ ) And now we see that insurance companies have zoned portions of california as being too risky to insure replacement homes for people who were burnt out and dislocated by the recent seemingly not-so-wild fires.
This guy refers to “scalar” electromagnetic waves, which are supposed to be longitudinal, rather than transverse electric and/or magnetic oscillations along the direction of wave travel. They certainly don’t teach such phenomena in college-level E&M classes but I’ll be the first to admit that this world is far stranger than anything I learned in school!
Another incidence of hollywood clairvoyance? A clip from the robocop movie (1987):
Just another conspiracy theory. Which just happens to be an excellent business model for the ultra wealthy which as we all know don’t really exist. I hope I haven’t given them any ideas!
Has the now 10 year long drought in California (with the only break being the winter season of 2016-2017) in fact been caused by the ongoing illegal climate engineering operations? Examine the data in the “Engineered Drought Catastrophe, Target California” presentation below, and decide for yourself.
Is geoengineering directly connected to the raging firestorms in California, Portugal, Spain, and countless other parts of the world? The data to confirm the connection is undeniable. The 10 minute video below provides essential facts.
“…Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI….”