Becoming the first credentialed, well-known media insider to step forward and state publicly that he was secretly a “propagandist,” an editor of a major German daily has said that he personally planted stories for the CIA.
Saying he believes a medical condition gives him only a few years to live, and that he is filled with remorse, Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, the editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, one of Germany’s largest newspapers, said in an interview that he accepted news stories written and given to him by the CIA and published them under his own name. Ulfkotte said the aim of much of the deception was to drive nations toward war.
Dr. Ulfkotte says the corruption of journalists and major news outlets by the CIA is routine, accepted, and widespread in the western media, and that journalists who do not comply either cannot get jobs at any news organization, or find their careers cut short.
Dr. Ulfkotte is the author of a book currently available only in German, “Bought Journalists” (Kopp 2014.) Aged 55, he was also once an advisor to the government of German Chancellor Helmet Kohl.
The book has become a bestseller in Germany but, in a bizarre twist which Ulfkotte says characterizes the disconnect caused by CIA control of the western media, the book cannot be reported on.
“No German mainstream journalist is allowed to report about [my] book. Otherwise he or she will be sacked. So we have a bestseller now that no German journalist is allowed to write or talk about.”
Among the stories Ulfkotte says he was ordered to plant in his newspaper over the years was a story that Libyan President Moammar Gaddafi was building poison gas factories in 2011. Ulfkotte also says he was an eyewitness to Saddam Hussein’s use of poison gas against Iranians in the war between Iran and Iraq, but that the editors he worked for at the time were not interested, because Iraq was a US ally at the time.
Ulfkotte says he is better positioned to come forward than many journalists because he does not have children who could be threatened. Ulfkotte told the Russian newspaper Russian Insider (RI):
“When I told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Ulfkotte’s nwspaper) that I would publish the book, their lawyers sent me a letter threatening with all legal consequences if I would publish any names or secrets – but I don’t mind. You see, I don’t have children to take care of. And you must know I was severely injured during the gas attack I witnessed in Iran in 1988. I’m the sole German survivor from a German poison gas attack. I’m still suffering from this. I’ve had three heart attacks. I don’t expect to live for more than a few years.” …
Supply and demand? What a joke! Absolutely everything is controlled by monopolies, and those monopolies are organically merging together with the global satanic mafia to create one vast pile of crap that has a collective god complex. And Russia seems to be one of the last holdouts. But if average americans think they’re going to wind up on top they’re in for a rude awakening.
Who’s surprised? Various stories had been invented by media houses across the Western world in an attempt to explain why oil prices have conveniently fallen, just in time to pressure Russia, Venezuela and Iran, and all while covert political subversion, attempts to sell all-out-war and other measures have completely failed to assert US interests around the world. The obvious answer was market manipulation, an answer US and other Western news sources refused to admit … that is until now.
The New York Times in their article, “Saudi Oil Is Seen as Lever to Pry Russian Support From Syria’s Assad,” finally admits, “Saudi Arabia has been trying to pressure President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to abandon his support for President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, using its dominance of the global oil markets at a time when the Russian government is reeling from the effects of plummeting oil prices. ” But of course, despite this grain of truth, Saudi Arabia didn’t do this on their own, since Saudi Arabia isn’t destabilizing Syria on its own, or for its own interests. Saudi Arabia, while playing a significant part in the manipulation of global oil prices, is solely blamed for the purpose of compartmentalizing public perception. The reality is that global oil prices are being manipulated at the behest of the US not only to overthrow the government of Syria or pressure Iran, but to strike at Russia itself.
The New York Times would have us believe that Saudi Arabia is rigging international oil prices to “bring peace in Syria,” making no mention of Saudi Arabia’s role in backing heavily armed militants streaming into the country turning it into a war zone to begin with. The NYT also makes no mention of the prospect of peace that might result should Saudi Arabia stop its immense state-sponsorship of international terrorism.
For the “cause of peace,” Saudi Arabia is already estimated to have lost $39 billion. For a regime that chops the heads off its political opponents in public demonstrations meant to inspire medieval fear among its people, the idea that it is willing to lose billions in oil revenue to “promote peace” in Syria is plainly absurd, and raises serious questions about the legitimacy of the NYT.
The New York Times would also mention Crimea’s return to Russia, but would stop short of linking oil market manipulation to the conflict in Ukraine. However, this is actually the key to understanding global geopolitics and how dropping oil prices fit in. Syria and Ukraine are linked, and Saudi Arabia’s role in putting pressure on Russia for one that matters a little to Riyadh (Syria), and another that matters not at all (Ukraine), shows how Riyadh’s foreign policy is driven not by national interests, but by obligations it apparently owes to Washington and London (significant obligations that if not met would end with the dissolution of the House of Saud).
Instead of focusing on Saudi Arabia and claims that it is solely responsible for global oil prices being cut in half despite no discernible changes in supply and demand, the global public should see a wider confrontation playing out. The US is using its vast influence over finance, energy, the media and many other economic and political sectors to wage full spectrum war on those resisting its hegemonic expansion globally. …
We all know that labeling is deceptive and you have to be careful where you buy supplements these days. But this really has got to make people wake up and realize how bad things have really gotten. The findings in New York State after an independent study of 24 supplements offered in Target, Walmart, Walgreens and GNC reveal a gross negligence and outright mockery of honesty and integrity. The state’s Attorney General found these items didn’t even contain the main ingredient stated and instead were chock full of cheap rice and other not so healthy fillers.
The attorney general’s team tested 24 products in total. Roughly four out of five supplements tested did not contain the medicinal herbs they were supposed to, and were instead rife with “cheap fillers like powdered rice, asparagus and houseplants, and in some cases substances that could be dangerous to those with allergies,” according to a New York Times report.
There are now four cease-and-desist letters from the attorney general’s office to demanding an explanation on how these potentially hazardous supplements could have been sold in the stores. “Mislabeling, contamination and false advertising are illegal,” says Eric T. Schneiderman, the state attorney general, according to The Times. “They also pose unacceptable risks to New York families — especially those with allergies to hidden ingredients.” …
Europe has been deprived of supplements via signing on to the eugenicist Codex Alimentarius treaty which, if adopted here, would essentially treat all non-FDA approved substances as hazardous by default regardless of their history of theraputic usage or knowledge of being an essential trace element or vitamin. It costs millions of dollars to get FDA approval, especially with the added cost of bribery. Only corporate behemoths can afford such an undertaking, and they hardly have to worry about the quality of what they sell. Their business model is based on advertising and ignorance, and their network of corporate ownership ensures that what they sell is under the control of a few insiders despite the illusion of diversity in consumer products. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2012/12/the-illusion-of-choice/
The popular backlash to this agenda in the USA resulted in the passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. This act is the only reason you can go to the store and buy vitamin D, without which you would otherwise need to drink 32oz of milk daily to get the FDA’s miniscule RDA (which will only prevent rickets) or (perish the thought!) go outside in the sunshine on a regular basis.
Do you see the pattern here? Vitamin D is essential for immune regulation and detoxifying free radicals. Kids who are deficient in vitamin D are more likely to develop autism due to dietary glyphosate (roundup) and the CDC’s vacccination assault schedule. Black kids are more likely to be deficient because of their skin pigment. Poor kids are less likely to have regular doctor visits, and the CDC’s vaccination schedule promotes “catch-up” regimes where multiple vaccinations are given at once when they do visit a doctor. An artificial gradient is created where poor black kids are being selectively targeted for autism.
Meanwhile the american diet is full of aluminum from soda cans, aluminum cookware, aluminum-based bread leavening, aluminum based artificial colors (blue lake) etc. We also get a high dose of fluoride from the water and from teflon coatings on aluminum cookware. Fluoride transports aluminum across the blood brain barrier. A minor oversight I’m sure.
It’s very simple: when autism first began to be widely recognized, there was a careful and commonsensical delineation of early vs late onset autism in the literature, for obvious reasons: late-onset children were entirely normal until the onset of symptoms (typically between the age of 1 and 2), whereas early onset children were never normal. This clear difference points to entirely differing causes: in early onset the brain damage happens before or at the time of birth (often, as it turns out, from immediate umbilical cord clamping, see my “munchausen obstetrics” letter above). In late onset the brain damage occurs sometime after birth.
Today, these two groups are no longer recognized as distinct, and are lumped together for the purposes of statistical analysis. So instead of perhaps 75% of late-onset children becoming symptomatic shortly after vaccination, the statistic becomes maybe 40% of all autistic children become symptomatic shortly after vaccination. Viola! The correlation fades and another lucrative medical research industry is born.
The claim being made today is that the parents of late-onset kids simply didn’t notice that their children were autistic at first. The fact that this claim has been taken seriously in the research community is symptomatic of a seriously autistic and conflicted medical culture.
Where is the research showing that multiple simultaneous vaccinations act independently in the body? There is none that I know of, and it’s entirely plausible that multiple foreign proteins introduced simultaneously in conjunction with the cumulative dose of preservatives and adjuvants might create a broad immunological scattershot response that is more likely to target the body’s own proteins, leading to autoimmune disease which has already been associated with autism.
But heck, I’m not a PhD medical researcher or even a fascist eugenicist masquerading as one. What do I know?
The Globalization of War is undoubtedly one of the most important books on the contemporary global situation produced in recent years.
In his latest masterpiece, Professor Michel Chossudovsky shows how the various conflicts we are witnessing today in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq and Palestine are in fact inter-linked and inter-locked through a single-minded agenda in pursuit of global hegemony helmed by the United States and buttressed by its allies in the West and in other regions of the world. — Dr Chandra Muzaffar, President of the International Movement for a Just World (JUST)
The “globalization of war” is a hegemonic project. Major military and covert intelligence operations are being undertaken simultaneously in the Middle East, Eastern Europe, sub-Saharan Africa, Central Asia and the Far East. The U.S. military agenda combines both major theater operations as well as covert actions geared towards destabilizing sovereign states.
Under a global military agenda, the actions undertaken by the Western military alliance (U.S.-NATO-Israel) in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Ukraine, Syria and Iraq are coordinated at the highest levels of the military hierarchy. We are not dealing with piecemeal military and intelligence operations. The July-August 2014 attack on Gaza by Israeli forces was undertaken in close consultation with the United States and NATO. The actions in Ukraine and their timing coincided with the onslaught of the attack on Gaza.
In turn, military undertakings are closely coordinated with a process of economic warfare which consists not only in imposing sanctions on sovereign countries but also in deliberate acts of destabilization of financial and currencies markets, with a view to undermining the enemies’ national economies.
The United States and its allies have launched a military adventure which threatens the future of humanity. As we go to press, U.S. and NATO forces have been deployed in Eastern Europe including Ukraine. U.S. military intervention under a humanitarian mandate is proceeding in sub-Saharan Africa. The U.S. and its allies are threatening China under President Obama’s “Pivot to Asia”. …
This has been long in coming. And it’s well coordinated with the radical shift towards a domestic police state, starting with Clinton’s bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City and Cheney’s 9/11 extravaganza. See “OKC Bombing: what you’re not supposed to know” and the numerous 9/11 links, also in the reference section.
The surest sign of a medical dictatorship is an aggressively enforced blockade against intelligent questions. Intelligent questions, after all, can destroy a medical police state because they expose the fraud of it.
Intelligent questions — which the vaccine industry characterizes as “dangerous” — are the greatest threat to the vaccine delusions still being played out across the world today, which is precisely why such questions are not allowed to be asked. Those daring to ask such questions are now being threatened with mass arrest and imprisonment — that’s how vulnerable the fraudulent vaccine industry has now become. It can be brought down by mere words if only those words are allowed to be circulated.
What sort of questions are we not allowed to ask? Here are 21 censored questions the obedient, pharma-controlled mainstream media will never dare ask: …
The NATO Response Force in Europe might increase to 30,000 troops, more than double the current 13,000, said the alliance’s secretary general after a defense ministers’ meeting in Brussels. Most of the troops are set to be stationed near Russia’s borders.
NATO’s rapid deployment forces will consist of a 5,000-strong brigade, sea and air-based elements and special task troops, said NATO’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenber after meeting with the alliance’s 28 defense ministers in Brussels on Thursday.
Before the meeting he noted that he expected the ministers to “agree on several important elements of a package that increases our collective defense.”
The UK has already announced plans to deploy 1,000 troops and four multirole Typhoon fighter jets to join the Response Force in Eastern Europe.
The spearhead of that force will be 5,000 servicemen, distributed among six compact command centers in Eastern Europe, with about only 50 officers in each.
“It is a response to what we have seen from Russia over a period of time and it is in full accordance with our international obligations,” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters. …
There’s no end to the hypocrisy these people are capable of. Anyone who’s paying attention knows the US and NATO have been militarily encircling russia for 2 decades. Are the peasants in the nato countries who pay for these adventures really going to allow their central-bank-controlled governments to start WWIII?