Category Archives: Uncategorized

Sandy Hook: FBI Report is Not a Smoking Gun

Intelligence operations (grassroots or otherwise) aren’t for passive entertainment.  You have to dig and reevaluate constantly if you want to utilize the net effectively.  The price of laziness in a maze of constant disinformation is finding yourself in a smaller herd of sheep than the dominant herd, while you’re still being led to the slaughter.   It takes a lot of time.  Sometimes it’s tedious.  Many people just don’t have the energy, and I can’t blame them.  But the dangers we face are historically unprecedented.   Literally millions of people are being killed abroad and being set up to be killed at home, that much I’m sure of.    For me, it all started with researching 9/11.   The propagandists can’t rewrite the laws of physics, and I happen to know something about the subject.  If I didn’t I’d  have probably thrown up my hands and walked away a long time ago.

To put this issue in context, there’s plenty of other problems with the official story of sandy hook as well as a number of real mass shootings in recent history as this blog has covered over the years.  The overarching agenda is disarmament of the american people by any means necessary, and in this world it’s not hard to see why that’s a bad idea.

The Rockefeller Legacy

The Rockefeller Legacy

In all of world history, it would be difficult to link as much mischief to any one name as can be traced to the Rockefeller family over the past century. From the ruthless monopoly capitalism that characterized the early industrial era to the building of an investment empire that spans the globe, the name of Rockefeller is usually the first that comes to mind. The slaughter of union organizers, blackmail of competitors, industrial and political espionage, ruthless population control schemes, and plots to overthrow governments are all part of the Rockefeller legacy.

It was John Davison Rockefeller, the patriarch of the Rockefeller dynasty, who built the family fortune with the Standard Oil Company he founded in 1870 at the age of 31. Within ten years, Rockefeller’s new firm had gained a stranglehold on oil refining in America, controlling such a huge share of production and shipping that he was able to undermine competitors by extracting from the railroads a private “tax” for every non-Standard Oil petroleum shipment they accepted.

By the mid 1880s, John D. Rockefeller had become a millionaire many times over. He had also become what one historian calls the most hated man in America, if not the world. Several state attorneys tried in vain to have him jailed for his corrupt business practices. And by the turn of the century, Rockefeller’s widely-criticised financial dealings prompted the passage of federal regulatory legislation to curb the power of monopolies. Even these anti-trust laws, however, were insufficient to limit the expansion of the vast Standard Oil empire.

Rockefeller himself was an austere, humourless Baptist, with an annoying habit of proclaiming that his wealth came from God. In reality, however, his fortune was amassed not only by extortion tactics against the railroads and the systematic sabotage of potential competition, but also through some of the most oppressive labour practices imaginable.

The Devil’s Money

Numerous published accounts of the labour movement in the early 20th century confirm that workers at that time were often subjected to barbaric, slave labour-type conditions. And the situation at the Rockefeller-owned Colorado Fuel and Iron Company in Ludlow, Colorado was among the worst. Labourers worked scandalously long hours under extraordinarily risky conditions. They were physically disciplined by company thugs and paid with vouchers that could only be exchanged for company housing or for food and other commodities dispensed by management. For all practical purposes, in other words, Rockefeller mine workers received substandard family housing and food, but no expendable wages whatever.

In 1913, when the United Mine Workers began organising, management responded by bringing in a battalion of private union busters. The miners promptly walked off the job and evacuated the company premises. The hired enforcers then retaliated by invading a tent city set up by the strikers. Two women and eleven children were killed in that first confrontation, and more than 75 minors lost their lives in a series of bloody battles that followed.

The so-called Ludlow massacre, as the Colorado incident was known, was just one in a series of events that kept the Rockefeller name constantly before the public and prompted the family to launch a then-unprecedented propaganda drive to improve its image. At the time of the Colorado mine revolt, the Rockefeller fortune was in the hands of John D. and his son, John D., Jr. Under the guidance of a clever public relations agent, films and press releases were distributed nationwide portraying the Rockefellers in a favourable light. One of the best-remembered gimmicks of this period was the legendary dime give-away. As the Rockefeller holdings soared more than a billion dollars, John D. Sr., over a period of years, presented shiny new dimes to an estimated 30,000 citizens — always with cameras present to record his “generosity.”

But serious philanthropy was the more durable part of the effort to redeem the Rockefeller name. In 1901, the family launched the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, which later became Rockefeller University. Two years afterward, they established the General Education Board. And a Rockefeller Sanitary Commission was created with family money in 1909.

Then, in 1913, the year of the bloodbath in Colorado, the Rockefeller foundation was launched with $50 million worth of Standard Oil assets. Its charter described the foundation’s goal  as the advancement of “the civilization of the peoples of the United States and its territories and possessions and of foreign lands…”

But the foundation’s “philanthropic” activities more often than not conveniently served the Rockefeller corporate interest, a pattern that continues to this day.

Industrial Colonisation

A foundation allows an investor to avoid paying taxes on that part of the company s profits that is set aside for the “public good.” The foundation is generally administered by the donor with the help of a hand-picked board of directors, and has wide leeway in determining what projects actually serve the public interest.

The Rockefeller Foundation at first turned its attention to science and academia, pouring money into colleges and universities to promote a worldview friendly toward the expansion of investment.

The Rockefellers also developed a keen interest in birth control. The Ludlow, Colorado experience had taught them that growing numbers of discontented, underpaid workers posed an imminent danger to wealthy industrialists such as themselves. The Rockefeller Foundation made its first grant for birth control studies to the Social Science Research Council in 1923. Thirteen years later, the Foundation created an Office of Population Research at Princeton University to address the political aspects of population change….

Re: the above link: if the text area is all black, do an edit->select all to highlight the text.  It’s a problem with the color selection on the web page.

‘Organic Ready’ Corn to Prevent Cross Pollenation with GMO Corn

Here’s some of the best news all year for non-GMO supporters. Frank Kutka is working to save our heirloom corn from cross-breeding with genetically modified corn. He’s been diligently at work for over 15 years now developing what he calls “Organic Ready” corn varieties that have the ability to block cross-pollination, thus eliminating Monsanto’s prevalently grown GMO corn from infesting organic farmer’s crops.

Kutka says:

“We need corn that organic farmers can grow without fear of GMO contamination,” says Kutka, who is in the fourth year of a five-year breeding project funded by the Organic Farming Research Foundation.”

Needless to say, Kutka, like all farmers growing organic crops, faces an enormous challenge. U.S. farmers currently plant millions of acres of GMO corn, among other GMO crops. Around 93% of the year’s corn crop was genetically modified.

While this makes Monsanto happy, it leaves those looking for non-contaminated, heirloom, organic, non-GMO corn a little miffed, to say the least. These millions of acres of corn can also easily contaminate other crops – including those which are not even corn, just because mother nature continues to work. GMO genes cross over into other plants, causing them to contain variant DNA like the mother plant. This is many argue that GMO crops must be banned, and that GMO labeling simply isn’t enough.

Kutka’s research concentrates on gametophytic incompatibility to protect his organic corn. By focusing on naturally occurring traits and the ancient grain teosinte that make it difficult for GMO pollen to enter the corn silks, thus preventing cross-pollination, he hopes to make his corn incompatible with GMO cross-breeding. …

CNN Iraq War Hoax Revealed on Satellite Backfeed

This was recorded from a satellite “backfeed” distributed to cable companies during the first gulf war. The viewer would normally be seeing commercials during part of this time, but they keep the feed going anyway. These days satellite feeds are encrypted so there’s no way to know what goes on behind the scenes, although the finished product speaks for itself.

Note the total lack of delay in the dialog between the anchor in atlanta and the purported feed from saudi arabia around 4:30. Most likely the reporter is actually in atlanta, possibly in or on top of the cnn building.

The “attack” at the end of the tape turns comedic as one reporter goes for a gas mask while the other puts on a helmet. Were they all snorting pentagon-supplied coke?

EPA Censored Honeybee-Pesticide Connection in the 1970’s

For decades, top officials at the Environmental Protection Agency (PEA) were aware that a compound approved for agricultural use in the United States was wiping out the honeybee population, but they chose to ignore the compound’s effects in deference to pressure from agri-giant corporations.

Worse, the agency reacted harshly to anyone within the EPA who attempted to bring the issue to light, including through firings, forced reassignments and other actions.

According to a scholarly 2014 study [PDF] compiled by researcher Rosemary Mason, “on behalf of a global network of independent scientists, beekeepers and environmentalists,” and published on the website of MIT, “We have found historical and chronological evidence to show that the herbicide glyphosate (or other herbicides that are used as alternatives) is responsible for the transformation of garden escapes into super-weeds (in the UK these are termed ‘invasive species’).”

Further, Mason and her team noted that glyphosate — the primary substance found in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide — was introduced in Europe in 1974 “and became a global best-selling herbicide because the public was told by industry and the regulators that it was ‘safe.'”

The results have been disastrous. For one, the heavy use of glyphosate has led to the rise of so-called “superweeds” that are resistant to the herbicide. But there is another compound that was approved by the EPA — over the objections of scientists — that has had a devastating effect on the nation’s honeybee population: clothianidin, which is used for seed treatment on corn and canola, by Bayer.

‘Honeybees are going extinct’

According to this EPA document describing clothianidin [PDF], it “is highly toxic to honey bees on an acute contact basis,” and “has the potential for toxic chronic exposure to honey bees, as well as other nontarget pollinators, through the translocation of clothianidin residues in nectar and pollen.”

“In honey bees, the effects of this toxic chronic exposure may include lethal and/or sub-lethal effects in the larvae and reproductive effects in the queen,” the document further states.

Mason and her research team found additional evidence of corporate/EPA cover-up regarding the effects of clothianidin. This 99-page EPA memorandum dated November 2, 2010, [PDF] noted, in part:

The major risk concerns are with aquatic free-swimming and benthic invertebrates, terrestrial invertebrates, birds and mammals. …

Clothianidin’s major risk concern is to non-target insects (that is, honey bees). Clothianidin is a neonicotinoid insecticide that is both persistent and systemic. Acute toxicity studies to honey bees show that clothianidin is highly toxic on both a contact and an oral basis. … [I]nformation from standard tests and field studies, as well as incident reports involving other neonicotinoids insecticides (e.g., imidacloprid) suggest the potential for long term toxic risk to honey bees and other beneficial insects.

A number of EPA scientists — those with integrity, anyway — have tried along the way to sound the alarm — over both glyphosate and clothianidin. In a piece for The Huffington Post, former EPA scientist Evaggelos Vallianatos wrote that honeybees were on the verge of extinction.

He further noted:

In my 25-year experience at the US EPA, nothing illustrated the deleterious nature of “pesticides” and “regulation” better than the plight of honeybees.

Here is a beneficial insect pollinating a third of America’s crops, especially fruits and vegetables, and we thank it with stupefying killing.

Poisoning of honeybees became routine in the mid-1970s with the EPA’s approval of neurotoxins encapsulated in dust-size particles that took days to release their deadly gas.

He further noted that some of his colleagues have tried to denounce the EPA actions, but the agency reacted “with fury” after one EPA ecologists discovered neurotoxic plastic spheres in the gut of a queen honeybee, which “meant poison in the honey.”

“It forced the scientist out of his laboratory and into paper pushing in Washington. Approval of the industry’s neurotoxins expanded to cover most major crops. This meant honeybees had less and less space to search for food without dying,” Villianatos wrote.

Read the entire Mason report here [PDF].

Faked war footage from “war on” Iraq/ISIS

The story is ISIS shot this video and made it available to the “news media” (i.e. Ministry of Loony Propaganda)

It purportedly shows Allied Forces (the good guys) bombing an artillery piece of ISIS (the bad guys.)

The problem is there seems to be an awful lot of cooperation between the good guys and the bad guys in this video.

For example:

1. The first segment shows lots of bad guys milling around the target, but then with a quick cut they’re all gone – except for one guy in the foreground.

2. This one combatant (actor) seems to know something is about to happen well before it happens and covers his ears.

3. The “missile” appears to fall straight from the sky and hit the target, the artillery piece, perfectly and “luckily” the guy covering his ears and the cameraman (and crew) are far enough away to be uninjured.

Do you see the total ludicrousness of this scenario?

Some basic questions:

How did the bad guys know to leave the scene before the explosion?

Why was the video edited the way it was?

How did the one guy who remained – far away – know to cover his ears well in advance of the “strike”?

Who says the artillery piece wasn’t blown up by a charge placed on it?

Who says that “missile” wasn’t added later in post-production?

Sloppy, careless BS because they think no one is looking and/or has the sense to call nonsense what it is.

Importing Repression: Pentagon to recruit undocumented immigrants

It seems the fascist aristocrats in control of the “government” are having problems gaining the loyalty of american soldiers in their ongoing takeover of the country.  What better source of the mercenary power they need than foreign refugees, unfettered with pre-existing (community inculcated) notions of patriotism and historical perspective.  Eventually when the breakdown of the family is complete and parents no longer pass knowledge and love to their offspring, such projects will be unnecessary.    (see  It’s frustrating to see that netizens are still largely clueless about the medicalization of mind control via obstetrical abuse in this country).

The Pentagon is to start recruiting undocumented immigrants who came into the US as minors and possess valuable skills like speaking Persian and Chinese. The program offering the opportunity is capped at 1,500 recruits per year.

The new policy revealed by the DoD on Thursday expands the existing pilot program called Military Accessions Vital to National Interest, or MAVNI. It has been tried since 2008, offering positions in the US armed forces to foreigners living in America legally as refugees or under a temporary visa.

Starting next fiscal year, MAVNI will also apply to illegal residents who came to US with their parents before age 16, reports the Military Times. The potential recruits would be selected from those eligible for the 2012 Obama administration policy known as Deferred Action for Child Arrivals, or DACA. Getting a DACA illegal immigrant status involves a background check by the Homeland Security Department.

The Pentagon recruits some 5,000 foreigners each year, most of them ‘green card’ holders. The MAVNI program may account for up to 1,500 recruits annually, although the military services are not required to accept them. In practice the Army has been the only service to accept a significant number, while the Navy and Marine Corps are not seeking applicants under it.

A recruit must meet higher-than-usual standards and have certain skills valued by the US military to get a position. Those include medical training and language expertise. Speakers of Arabic, Chinese, Pushtu, Korean, Russian, Urdu, Hindi and Hungarian are among those in demand.

The expansion of the program to illegal residents adds between 1.2 million and 2.1 million children, teenagers and young adults to the potential talent pool. The recruits would be offered an expedited path to US citizenship as an extra incentive to serve. …

Clearly latin american collaborators from US-sponsored death squad regimes will be a large fraction of the pool of new recruits.  One can imagine the kinds of specialized skills such people would have.    I can’t stress this enough: IT ALL COMES DOWN TO STATE-SPONSORED CHILD ABUSE.  This is how societies can be molded into self-perpetuating nightmares and tools of the elite.  See We absolutely need to get the state (medicine) out of the lives of babies and children.  NOW.

It’s about social control by imposing poverty, dissolution of families, child abuse and drugs to undermine stable communities and force mass migrations and social balkanization along racial, ethnic and language fault lines.  Anything that impairs human bonding and grassroots solidarity and organizing fosters mass alienation and dependency and facilitates mass centralized management by immortal entities called  governments and corporations, which have long been sucking up all available resources for their own use.   A social phase transition from lumpy semi-crystalline goo to easily manipulable fluid flowing around mountains of permanent hierarchies.  It’s modern fascism, with democide of the economically “unfit” being the logical conclusion, since meaningful human empowerment is becoming nearly impossible.   Continuous war will be essential to maintaining domestic order.

Book: The Anthrax Deception

macqueen-cover-298x447In his new book “The 2001 Anthrax Deception,” Dr. Graeme MacQueen, co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, lays out the case for a domestic conspiracy in the 2001 anthrax attacks in the US. In this conversation, James and Graeme discuss the context in which these attacks happened, the way they were portrayed by the government and the mainstream media, their ultimate effect, and the voluminous evidence that disproves the FBI’s assertion that the attacks were the work of Dr. Bruce Ivins.

Visit the book’s website:

Interview by James  Corbett: