The current CDC vaccination schedule for children is so dynamic; it almost looks like a training manual to keep parents paying into the medical system on a timely, consistent basis. This vaccination schedule is literally conditioning families to depend on consistent jabs and prescriptions throughout their life while turning to the medical system for every sniffle and headache. For example, the DTaP vaccine is recommended up to four times before a child is even 18 months. The Hepatitis B shot is recommended three times starting at birth to 18 months. Before a kid is one and a half years old, the CDC recommends a child be jabbed 25 times by a combination of 14 different vaccination types. See the schedule[PDF] for yourself. …
The CDC also advises pregnant women to get a Tdap vaccine, despite the fact that the vaccine insert[PDF] clearly states, “Safety and effectiveness of [Tdap] vaccine have not been established in pregnant women. … Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with [Tdap] vaccine. It is also not known whether [Tdap] vaccine can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. [Tdap] vaccine should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.” …
Still, anyone who questions vaccine safety is quickly stereotyped as an anti-vaxxer. Those who look to vaccination as a religion are quick to slander anyone who questions the vaccine schedule and all its set authority. When those in the national spotlight question vaccine safety, they are quickly defamed by a malicious vaccine cult that does everything in its power to squelch free thinking and the idea that other forms of immune system therapy exist.Yes, there is a vaccine mafia that seeks to destroy the careers of all who question vaccine safety. The most recent example occurred when vaccine worshipers attacked comedian Rob Schneider. Schneider vocally questions vaccine safety and has said that “parents should decide what’s in the best interests of their child, not Gov’t mandates.” Schneider was recently featured in a State Farm commercial that was unrelated to vaccination. When the vaccine mafia heard that Schneider was doing an ad for an insurance company, they went into full-on attack mode, criticizing State Farm for showcasing an “anti-vaxxer.” State Farm caved to the pressure and took that ad down and replaced the image of Schneider on their social media pages.
State Farm spokesman Phil Supple said in a statement, “State Farm advertising is intended to inform and entertain. The copy guy ad was unintentionally used as a platform for discussion unrelated to the products and services we provide. With that, we removed the ad from rotation.”
The sudden passing of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has raised heated discussion regarding his replacement. Whether his successor is nominated by President Barack Obama or the next president, the selection will be a pivotal one for the future of the country.
For proof, look no further than the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling.
Earlier this month, the court ruled 5-4 to halt President Obama’s controversial Clean Power Plan. Part of the administration’s enormous strategy to curb global warming, the plan would have forced coal-fired and natural gas power plants to cut carbon dioxide emissions by roughly one-third by 2030….
At 5-4 in favor of a stay on the Clean Power Plan, the ruling is an obvious sign of where the balance of the court is for issues such as these. By the narrowest of margins, the court rightly tapped the brakes on the do-something-now process. The court’s order blocks President Obama’s rules from taking effect until after a legal battle in appeals court and further Supreme Court appeals have played out.
With the plan, the president had ordered a complete restructuring of the American energy sector through regulatory fiat. The plan would give the Environmental Protection Agency the kind of authority that not even the president is provided, allowing it to coerce states into adopting policies that would never pass Congress — the abandonment of coal-fired power, cap-and-trade schemes, more aggressive transitions to more costly green power — to meet the arbitrary goal of reducing the country’s carbon emissions 32 percent by 2030, from 2005 levels. This would dramatically increase power costs, stifle economic growth, reduce standards of living and decrease the reliability of the power grid.
And all of it would go down without a single day’s debate in Congress. …
This video means nothing unless you’re already suspicious:
Quick: what’s the first thing you remember about the climate conference in Paris last December?
The weather astrologers’ absurd resolution to control the amount of temperature rise the world will experience over the next century?
The predictable (but no less retch-inducing) hypocrisy of the jetset glitterati descending on Paris in their private jets and limousine fleets to dine on banquet lunches from Micheline-starred chefs before lecturing humanity on how we’ll all have to tighten our belts for the new climate austerity?
Of course that’s what you remember. Because that’s what you’re expected to remember. As long as you never peek under the hood, never lift the lid to check what’s inside the COP21 documents, they’re perfectly happy for the usual drivel about saving the planet to be printed in the mainstream press. They’re perfectly happy for the progressive press to print the usual nonsense lamenting the fact that there isn’t a strong enough global government to save us from the weather demons. They’re even happy for the dissenters to debunk the flawed science and point out the hypocrisies and lambaste the silly political statements because all of these things miss the heart of the issue.
The heart of the issue (for those who need it elaborated) is this: the future of $90 trillion of energy infrastructure investments and the $1 trillion green bond market and the multi-trillion dollar carbon trading market and the $391 billion (and growing) climate finance industry hangs in the balance.
Of course it does. What else explains the convergence of interest in the organizations, structures and mechanisms for global governance that the magical global thermostat narrative affords?
It’s why General Electric, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, Pepsi, Siemens, AIG and a host of other Fortune 500/CFR companies joined BP, ConocoPhillips, GM and a host of other oiligarch companies as founding members of the US Climate Action Partnership whose “Blueprint for Legislative Action” became the backbone of the Wall Street-backed Waxman-Markey bill of 2009.
Heck, it’s why EDF, Engie, Air France, Renault, BNP Paribas and a host of other oiligarch companies footed 20% of the bill for the Paris conference itself (and why the French government bent over backwards to point out their “green” credentials).
Take just one structural element of the climate swindle: the Green Climate Fund. Never heard of it? Hardly surprising. It’s just the facility through which the UN is expected to be clearing $100 billion in climate funding per year by the end of the decade. That’s right: $100 billion per year. Every year.
The Fund was established at the 2010 edition of the UN Climate Conference (COP16) in Mexico in order “to support concrete mitigation actions by developing countries that are implemented in a transparent way,” which is UN Newspeak for “create a bottomless trough of pork for corrupt kleptocrats, bureaucrats, kakistocrats and tyrants to siphon off before funneling some loose change into some makework projects.” And it brags that it represents “a new and equitable form of global governance to respond to the global challenge of climate change” which you hardly need the globalist decoder to figure out. The Fund is headquartered in the Songdo Business District of Incheon, South Korea, because the Korean Secretary-General of the UN and the Korean President of the World Bank probably just threw darts at a map (since, as we all know, blatant political nepotism never happens at those institutions).
Even the Fund’s biggest supporters are criticizing the “transparent way” it is handling its first disbursement. The Fund claims it consulted indigenous communities before approving $6.2 million for a Peruvian wetlands resilience programme, but there is no verification that this ever took place. Worse, details of the projects it has decided to fund so far have not been publicly released, only proposal documents (and in two cases, only a summary).
But for those who still believe this money is being handled by angels with nothing but the best interests of humanity in mind, note this passage from the Nature article on the Fund’s shadiness:
“For some, another contentious issue is that the GCF is flowing its money mainly through international organizations, such as multilateral or private banks such as the World Bank and Deutsche Bank — rather than sending it directly to institutions in developing countries where the projects are taking place.”
For some? You mean, for people with their head screwed on straight?
Oh, and the kicker? The Fund’s Executive Director just happens to be an ex-Citibank investment banker. Who woulda thunk it?
Yes, the global climate swindle is well under way, brought to you by the same trustworthy folks in the banking industry and in the Fortune 500 / CFR / globalist jetset who have been steering us into the happy economic, political and environmental conditions that we enjoy today…
If there’s any bright spot in all of this it’s that so far the Fund has only managed to raise just over $10 billion in pledges from the developed countries. And even that is an inflated number which includes the $3 billion which Obama made a big show of pledging in 2014 but so far hasn’t actually delivered. It’s a long way to go to get to that $100 billion/year mark they’re hoping to reach by 2020.
Don’t feel too sorry for the globalists, though. Their game is a war of attrition, and as long as people continue to buy into the narrative that all of this money is going to help the poor and downtrodden (by way of the UN and the World Bank and their corporate crony Wall Street financial institutions) then it’s only a matter of time before this thin edge of climate cronyism turns into the full wedge of global kleptocracy.
Obama is purging every branch of the US armed forces at an alarming rate.
He’s deliberately crippling our military, setting them up for failure and defeat. Through his actions he is rapidly demoralizing our troops en masse, creating a dangerous situation at home and abroad, leaving our troops, our country and we citizens open to attack.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, recipient of the U.S. military’s highest decoration, the Medal of Honor, as well as other top retired officers, say Obama’s agenda is decimating the morale of the U.S. ranks to the point members no longer feel prepared to fight or have the desire to win.
Our Army has not trained for six months. Meanwhile there is tremendous domestic and foreign unrest taking place. “To have the Chief of Staff of the Army confess to the world that our Army has not trained for six months is highly disturbing,” says former Florida Congressman Allen West. “[It] should make us all sleep less soundly at night.”
Since Obama took office an unprecedented number of top military leaders have been removed from their posts – nearly 200 generals, flag officers and other high-ranking officials. They are being “removed” at a rate of about one per week.
Allen West, who served on the House Armed Services Committee, is calling for hearings “to determine exactly why” so many officers, especially senior officers, are being given the boot. …
Velly intellesting: wreck the military’s cohesion and effectiveness while goading russia and china into war. It’s not crazy if obama is part of the NWO cult.
Published on Jan 6, 2016
“Declassifying the Truth: 9/11 Transparency on the Rise, 14th Anniversary Symposium,”
September 12, 2015, New York City, at the West Park Presbyterian Church.
Barbara Honegger, M.S., is a leading researcher, author and speaker on the 9/11 Pentagon and anthrax attacks. Barbara has served in high-level positions in the Federal Government, including White House Policy Analyst and Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President.
Her pioneering book “October Surprise “– on the deep story behind the Iran side of the Iran/Contra scandal now confirmed by formerly classified documents — led to a full-subpoena-power Congressional investigation funded at the level of the 9/11 Commission.
From 2000 to 2011, Barbara served as Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School, the premiere science, technology and national security affairs graduate research university of the Department of Defense.
With the recent whistleblowing action by the lead FBI anthrax investigator, it’s vital to present a current insight into the significance of the anthrax attacks and their role in the 9/11 events.
FBI Sweeps Anthrax Under the Rug: http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com/…
Produced: 2015, Episode: DTT-BH, Category: Education, 22:46
Phone your local public TV station and ask them to broadcast this film to your local community. Your station can download the film in TV broadcast format from PEGMedia.org .
This film is available for any Public TV station in the country – and world – to broadcast.
Stations that use Telvue, DVDs or other media can contact 911TV1@gmail.com for instructions.
This PEGMedia Episode: (PEGMedia Episode Link)
More 911TV Films On PEGMedia
View This Show On YouTube: https://youtu.be/PY3TS7omz00
More 911TV Films On YouTube: http://youtube.com/911TVorg
Since Obama has been in office numerous mass shooting events have occurred. Particular one’s of note;
- Fort Hood – Fort Hood, TX Round 1 – Nov 2009
- Gabbie Giffords, Tuscon, AZ – Jan, 2011
- Batman Shooting, Aurora, CO – July 2012
- Sandy Hook Shooting, Newtown, CT – Dec 2012
- Navy Yard Shooting, Washington, D.C – Sept 2013
- Fort Hood – Fort Hood, TX Round 2 – Apr 2014
- Charleston Church, Charleston, SC – June 2015
- Umpqua College Shooting, Roseburg, OR – Oct 2015
- San Bernardino Shooting, San Bernardino, CA – Dec 2015
Most have substantial and significant evidence of false-flag events, with the primary goal of pushing the Gun-Control agenda. But so far this has not been working. If anything it is backfiring. Every time one of these events occurs there is a spike in gun sales. So instead of making people afraid of guns, it’s making people afraid not to own one. The gun-control propaganda is not working as intended. I attribute this to several factors. First, Americans entertain themselves with a tremendous amount of gun violence. TV, movies, video games. And what does this exposure teach us? That those who have guns have power, and those who don’t are nothing but victims. Second, and in conjunction with the first, pro-gun propaganda. Really, it is more accurate to call it pro-war propaganda. Because it’s darn hard to be pro-war without being pro-gun. The classic image of the modern soldier is always with their rifle. Third, the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Forth, over saturation of false-flag events. I recently heard someone claim that false-flags are a modern phenomenon. I strongly disagree. People using deception (false-flags) for their own gain is not a modern phenomenon, it is ancient. However, what is a modern phenomenon is the systemic nature of current false-flags and the massive volume of false-flags that are occurring now. This over-saturation, plus just the shear amount of noise in our mass media, causes each successive event to have less impact.
This leaves the Obama administration in a dilemma. For his 2nd term objective is to enact serious gun control legislation. Obama succeeded in his first term objective, the Affordable Care Act. The piece of legislation written by the Insurance Companies in which Nancy Pelosi proudly announced “we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”. I’m sure she did not read it, that was part of the bribe(s) condition. This illegal tax, has done nothing but decrease quality of care, decrease choice of health care providers, increase Rx drug costs, and increase the cost of insurance. It will also be used as the vehicle to force vaccinations. No vaccinations, no ObamaCare for you! It was also because of this ‘success’ that Obama won the next election, not that that was hard to do against Romney, and yet his margin of victory was only 4% points. Obama was re-elected on Nov 6, 2012, the Sandy Hook Capstone Event occurred on Dec 14, 2012. Plus, as already listed, a series of other false-flag events designed to push or ‘nudge’ for serious gun-control law. And by serious I mean the same kind of legislation that the Port Authur, Australia false-flag event in 1996 was used for to ban most semi-auto rifles and semi-auto shotguns in Australia, restrict handguns to 9mm or smaller, 10 round magazines, and only for Shooting Club use, and require license and permission to own any firearm.
However, it is my opinion, that there is simply way too much resistance to pull this off. That is why they have been pushing/selling this concessionary stance, that San Bernardino seems to have kicked off. The stance of banning firearm sales to those on the ‘No Fly’ list. Which on the surface seems reasonable right? Except this is extremely dangerous. Why? Because we have no idea how one get’s on the No Fly list, and it is very difficult to get off of it if one should ‘accidentally’ get on it. The government claims the No Fly list is to stop terrorism. But we don’t have a domestic terrorism problem in the USA. Well, other than those events created or encouraged by the FBI. But we do know our Federal Government is corrupt. Certainly the people know. The #1 fear of Americans is… ‘Government Corruption‘, this was the top fear for just under 60% of the population. …
So if Obama is to be successful in his 2nd term then he needs gun-control legislation with teeth. And that means he needs a problem-reaction-solution. And that means they must create a false-flag event. A BIG event. Mass casualties. Real casualties. Shock and Awe.
But I say no. If we are to defeat the globalist then we must stop constantly spending our time ‘reacting’ to what they do. We will never overcome their machinations if all we do is react to their actions. …
Since I am convinced that the Obama administration has got one more BIG event in the works then I’m going to get out in front of it. My purpose is not to predict the event, but to prevent it. At the very least to expose it ‘pre’ event to such a degree that they will have to modify it and hence limit its effectiveness or use this article as PROOF when it does occur that it is a planned false-flag event. So this is my calling out of the plans and intentions of the criminals in charge of the US Govt.
So I’m gonna put my money where my mouth is, well more precisely where my writing is. I will use the ‘Event Plan’ outline from my Anatomy of False-Flag Events article to construct this false-flag before it happens.
The False-Flag Event Plan by sections:
- Event Type
- Main Event
- Event Execution
- Back-up plans
- Official Narrative
I initially am constructing this using the following assumptions; A BIG event is needed. 100+ deaths. Shock value is very important. Therefor, unlike so many of the recent events, I believe real deaths are going to be needed. …
The US economy died when middle class jobs were offshored and when the financial system was deregulated.
Jobs offshoring benefitted Wall Street, corporate executives, and shareholders, because lower labor and compliance costs resulted in higher profits. These profits flowed through to shareholders in the form of capital gains and to executives in the form of “performance bonuses.” Wall Street benefitted from the bull market generated by higher profits.
However, jobs offshoring also offshored US GDP and consumer purchasing power. Despite promises of a “New Economy” and better jobs, the replacement jobs have been increasingly part-time, lowly-paid jobs in domestic services, such as retail clerks, waitresses and bartenders.
The offshoring of US manufacturing and professional service jobs to Asia stopped the growth of consumer demand in the US, decimated the middle class, and left insufficient employment for college graduates to be able to service their student loans. The ladders of upward mobility that had made the United States an “opportunity society” were taken down in the interest of higher short-term profits.
Without growth in consumer incomes to drive the economy, the Federal Reserve under Alan Greenspan substituted the growth in consumer debt to take the place of the missing growth in consumer income. Under the Greenspan regime, Americans’ stagnant and declining incomes were augmented with the ability to spend on credit. One source of this credit was the rise in housing prices that the Federal Reserves low interest rate policy made possible. Consumers could refinance their now higher-valued home at lower interest rates and take out the “equity” and spend it.
The debt expansion, tied heavily to housing mortgages, came to a halt when the fraud perpetrated by a deregulated financial system crashed the real estate and stock markets. The bailout of the guilty imposed further costs on the very people that the guilty had victimized. …
It turns out that 2015 was an active year in the fight over GMO labeling. While the majority of consumers have made it clear they they want foods made with GMOs to carry labels, members of Congress introduced opposing bills about GMO labeling. One of those bills is much closer to becoming law than the other.
In February, the Genetically Engineered Food Right-to-Know Act was introduced for a second time. The act would require the FDA to “clearly label genetically engineered (GE) foods so that consumers can make informed choices about what they eat.” There has been no significant movement on that proposed legislation since its introduction.
In March, the Safe And Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015 was introduced. That bill has been dubbed the Deny Americans the Right to Know (DARK Act) by those who want GMO labeling. The act would make individual state labeling laws illegal and allow a voluntary labeling system.
The DARK Act was introduced in the House as H.R. 1599 and moved quickly. On July 23, 2015, it passed with a vote of 275-150. The next day it went to the Senate and sat there for a while. Then on Feb. 19, 2016, Senate Agriculture Chairman Pat Roberts of Kansas introduced a similar bill to H.R. 1599, putting the DARK Act one step closer to becoming law. That new bill will be discussed in the Senate this week.
Right-to-know advocates are speaking out against the Senate bill, which would also pre-empt any state efforts to make labeling mandatory, such as the one that is due to become law in July in Vermont. Colin O’Neil, agriculture policy director for the Environmental Working Group, issued this statement:
It’s outrageous that some lawmakers in the Senate continue to ignore the wishes of nine out of 10 Americans. The version of the DARK Act that has been introduced by Chairman Roberts would rob Americans of their right to know what’s in their food and how it’s grown. We continue to hope that thoughtful food companies like Campbell’s will work with consumer groups to craft a non-judgmental GMO disclosure to put on the back of food packaging. Americans should have the same right as citizens of 64 other countries to know what’s in their food and how it’s grown. …