From what I can tell colloidal nano-silver suspension is some kind of miracle anti-virus anti-bacterial topical antiseptic for the lungs, nose and throat. When inhaled from an ultrasonic nebulizer, (either through the nose or the mouth depending on where the problem is) it knocks out pretty much whatever respiratory infections I might have there, quickly and very effectively with zero side-effects. I’m talking about 2 or 3 inhales. See below for why it might be effective against ebola too. I’ve never used it systemically though, although I’ve heard it might be good for some kinds of rna-virus-induced autoimmune diseases.
Beginning today, June 2, the Left Forum (formerly the Socialist Scholars’ Conference), will conduct a three-day event featuring panel discussions on all manner of topics. As the organization states on its website: “Continuing a tradition begun in the 1960s, we bring together intellectuals and organizers to share perspectives, strategies, experience and vision.”
Unfortunately, this year the board, or at least a majority of the board, of the Left Forum has caved in to pressure from a Zionist individual and a group in Germany to cancel panels that include two individuals whom these critics condemn as being “anti-Semitic” or “holocaust deniers.” All four of the cancelled panels were part of a group of five panels organized to discuss issues involving the so-called Deep State and its impact on US and global affairs. The two individuals who were the target of the complaints are Islamic studies scholar and Veterans Today editor Kevin Barrett, and Anthony Hall, a tenured professor of the University of Lethbridge in Alberta, whose position was attacked by the Canadian B’nai B’rith organization.
According to the organizers of the banned panels, the first decision to ban three of the five planned Deep State events was announced by the LF board on May 8, in a brief email message that offered no explanation for the decision, and that was reached without first offering either the panel organizers or the individuals defamed a chance to respond to the unacknowledged charges. Here’s the note that was sent out by the board on May 8 (less than four weeks before the start of the Left Forum event):
Unfortunately, we are writing to inform you that your panels
A) Panel Title: 9/11 Truth: Ground Zero for a Resistance Movement
B) Panel Title: False Flags: Staged, Scripted, Mass Psy-Op Events
C) Panel Title: “Terrorism”: Fake Enemies, Fraudulent Wars
have not been selected as a part of this year’s Left Forum program. We do not take for granted the time and effort organizers put in to the proposal process and understand that this news may come as a disappointment.
We do however want to express our appreciation for your interest in making a programmatic-contribution to the 2017 conference.
We wish you all the best with your work and in the future.
Registration fees already made for speakers can be refunded.
Thank you very much….
Thus the “left” or whatever you want to call it, is faced with a choice of investigating so-called “conspiracy theories” and being branded anti-semitic (basically a passport to exile from respectable discourse), or stay in the herd and shut down their higher brain functions.
Does anyone wonder why pointing out the arithmetic proof that banking is organized crime or that israeli mossad agents had foreknowledge of 9/11 automatically brands you as antisemitic and puts you on the blacklist of intelligence and psyop operations like the brainwashington compost or the southern poverty law center? (I love that name, don’t you? The luciferians are very good at disguises). Luciferians are also adept at disguising themselves with muslim, left, right, gay, straight, national security or human rights activist masks. But there’s always one thing to look for which is a dead giveaway: they’re statists. And the establishment left is definitely controlled by statists (zionists specifically, the same as neocons). That’s why they censor 9/11 facts and fully support the USA’s wars of murder and conquest in the mideast, by collectively accepting the transparently bogus rationalization for it. That’s why the peace movement has been all but shut down on the left by “opinion leaders” like noam chomsky and amy goodman. In this orwellian culture, leftist is just another term for fascist.
Quite obviously, 9/11 was primarily an american operation with both israeli and saudi arabian operatives involved. Totally luciferian, in other words. Luciferians aren’t stupid enough to be racist, their grasp of propaganda enables them to see through such divisive control techniques. They hate everyone with equal venom.
“Our purpose was to document the event”
CIA Pacification Programs, Secret Interrogation Centers, Counter Terror Teams, Propaganda Teams and military and civilian tribunals in all 44 provinces of South Vietnam; 1965 US military sent in; National Liberation Front; secret 1967 CIA General Staff For Pacification combining all CIA, military, and South Vietnamese programs to became The Phoenix Program; Phoenix based on systems analysis theory combining 20-30 programs to pacify South Vietnamese civilians to support the government; Phoenix instituted to more perfectly coordinate CIA and military operations; streamlined and bureaucratized a system of political repression in South Vietnam; media cover-up; CIA Foreign Intelligence including the Hamlet Information Program, the Province Interrogation Center program and Agent Penetrations; CIA Covert Action Program; reliance on corruption; Pacific Architects and Engineers oversaw design and construction of interrogation centers in South Vietnam which became the model for the black sites.
In 2014, a moratorium was placed on federally funded research which involved making flu viruses more lethal. The moratorium was placed after heated debate generated by research published by a Netherlands team, headed up by Ron Fouchier. Fouchier’s research had produced a strain of H5N1 which was able to go airborne, thus greatly enhancing its ability to spread. Fouchier focused on the transmission of the disease among ferrets, which are the lab stand-in for people.
Now, scientists in California have published research concerning enabling the human-to-human transmission of the bird flu virus H7N9. This virus strain is of concern to scientists as it has already infected 1500 people and killed 40% of them. H7N9 has not been known, however, to spread easily from human contact.
The article explaining the three genetic changes which need to be made to transform H7N9 into a virtual pandemic agent was published on June 15, 2017 in the journal PLOS Pathogens.
According to Scripps biologist Jim Paulsen, as quoted in an NPR article, “As scientists we’re interested in how the virus works…. We’re trying to just understand the virus so that we can be prepared.”
The NPR article quotes Paulsen as stating he wants next to test the mutated strain on ferrets.
Reuters reported on a number of scientists who were enthusiastic about the Scripps findings. Reuters quoted immunology expert Fiona Culley, who stated that “This study will help us to monitor the risk posed by bird flu in a more informed way, and increasing our knowledge of which changes in bird flu viruses could be potentially dangerous will be very useful in surveillance.”
Reuters also quoted virologist Wendy Barclay. “These studies keep H7N9 virus high on the list of viruses we should be concerned about,” she said. “The more people infected, the higher the chance that the lethal combination of mutations could occur.”
Not all the scientists interviewed were happy about the research. When posed with the question of scientists making the genetic changes in the actual H7N9 virus, David Relman, a Stanford professor of microbiology and immunology, was quoted by NPR as stating, “I would be very hesitant, were they to want to do that. In fact, I would be reluctant to have them do that.”
What are the chances that this research may be used for nefarious purposes?
Since 2001, the US government has poured over $100 billion dollars into what was initially called “Biodefense” but has euphemistically been renamed “Health Security.” Many of these programs are dual-use; that is to say the research can be used for either protection or weaponization. Scientists argue that it is necessary to first create the weapon (in this case a pandemic agent) in order to research the cure.
However, the US’s record of straightforwardness surrounding her “Biodefense” or “Health Security” programs has been abysmal. The limp-wristed investigation into the anthrax mailings of 2001, in which federal investigators neglected or refused to consider any lab but Fort Detrick as the locus for mailing the anthrax spores — which killed five and sickened over a dozen — resulted in the probable culprit at US Army’s Dugway Proving Ground getting a “Get out of Jail Free” card.
It was less than two years ago when Dugway was caught sending live anthrax through the mail to labs, worldwide. Initially, it was thought that nine labs received the live anthrax. The number soon expanded and it was ultimately admitted that 575 separate shipments of live anthrax had gone out in the span of a decade.
The official excuse, “We didn’t know our deactivating equipment wasn’t working!” was suspect, given numerous earlier reports that the equipment was faulty.
It has also come to light that the US has been leading the UN around by its virtual nose and providing false information both to the Biological Weapons Convention and also to the 1540 Committee concerning its “Biodefense” programs.
The reality is that the sort of research that delves into how to make H7N9 spread easily and efficiently among humans is the kind of research that should raise substantial alarm. According to sources in the US government, the moratorium on publishing this type of research is soon to be lifted. Shortly, anyone with two specimen vials to rub together may very well be able to surf the Web and learn how to create a worldwide plague. And in our current technocracy, with its worship of science as an inherent good, there just doesn’t seem to be much concern about this.
In 1998, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said,“Iraq is a long way from [America], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm.”
We never found those weapons in Iraq. In our zeal to protect ourselves from bogeymen and “rogue states,” we may well have become the very threat that we feared.
Janet Phelan is an investigative journalist whose articles have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The San Bernardino County Sentinel, The Santa Monica Daily Press, The Long Beach Press Telegram, Oui Magazine and other regional and national publications. Janet specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption and addresses the heated subject of adult conservatorship, revealing shocking information about the relationships between courts and shady financial consultants. She also covers issues relating to international bioweapons treaties. Her poetry has been published in Gambit, Libera, Applezaba Review, Nausea One and other magazines. Her first book, The Hitler Poems, was published in 2005. She is also the author of a tell-all book EXILE, (also available as an ebook). She currently resides abroad.
Sean Stone, co-host of RT’s ‘Watching the Hawks,’ debuts his new documentary, ‘A Century of War,’ chronicling the American shift to a post-industrial society and offering strategies to rebuild US infrastructure, starting with energy.
“What happened to the American Century? What happened to America’s ideal of progress?” Stone asks, as the centennial of the US entering World War I approaches.
This election year saw the triumph of Americans feeling squeezed out of the traditional middle-class economy. Stone argues that “a century of war has taken its toll on the great American republic.”
He links America’s petrodollar economy with its global military empire, often extended to secure corporate access to natural resources. Between guns and butter, America’s ruling elites chose guns.
“We’ve seen America fulfill its mission as the ‘city upon the hill,’ but at the expense of the homeland. Physical infrastructure is decaying, and the population is weighed down by debt,” says Stone.
In his quest to give context to America’s transformation away from a society committed to raising its people’s standard of living through industry, Stone interviews self-confessed “economic hitman” John Perkins, former Wall Street insiders Nomi Prins and Catherine Austin Fitts, former Senator Mike Gravel, former Microsoft insider Ramez Naam, and SRI Energy Director Michael McKubre, to make A Century of War, inspired by the William Engdahl book.
“We must look to our past if we’re to fix our problems of the present and future,” says Stone. Rather than offering a prognosis of despair, he looks at the tremendous future opportunities of nuclear thorium fission as well as fusion processes. Stone says he’s “inspired by President Kennedy, who had a vision for the US space program as well as domestic infrastructure to preempt California’s current water crisis” and believes “there are no problems we as humans are faced with that cannot be addressed and overcome.”
A Century of War will air in four parts on ‘Watching the Hawks’ beginning November 15 and will be available on RT.com.
Sean Stone is an author of Greystone Park and the documentary Fight Against Time: Oliver Stone’s Alexander, as well as other short documentaries. He currently co-hosts the nightly show ‘Watching the Hawks’ on RT America. Stone recently published a history book titled New World Order: A Strategy of Imperialism.
RT America airs from Washington, DC and is part of RT, a global television news network. It is the proud home of ‘Politicking with Larry King,’ ‘News with Ed Schultz,’ ‘On Contact with Chris Hedges,’ ‘America’s Lawyer with Mike Papantonio,’ ‘The Big Picture’ with Thom Hartmann, award-winning financial show ‘Boom Bust’, and ‘Watching The Hawks’ with Tyrel Ventura, Tabetha Wallace, and Sean Stone.
Published on Jun 9, 2017
Part 2: Dutch spoken, English subs. A DVM-TV production.
In accordance with part 1 (link below) see here part 2, in which Ronald Bernard describes how the pyramid of power functions and converges. At the end of the interview you see a short overview of part 3 in which many questions will be answered. Soon more parts will follow. Related article:
Part 1, full version: https://youtu.be/VzoaxTudJks
Nazism is usually depicted as the outcome of political blunders and unique economic factors: we are told that it could not be prevented, and that it will never be repeated. In this explosive book, Guido Giacomo Preparata shows that the truth is very different: using meticulous economic analysis, he demonstrates that Hitler’s extraordinary rise to power was in fact facilitated — and eventually financed — by the British and American political classes during the decade following World War I. Through a close analysis of events in the Third Reich, Preparata unveils a startling history of Anglo-American geopolitical interests in the early twentieth century. He explains that Britain, still clinging to its empire, was terrified of an alliance forming between Germany and Russia. He shows how the UK, through the Bank of England, came to exercise control over Weimar Germany and how Anglo-American financial support for Hitler enabled the Nazis to seize power. This controversial study shows that Nazism was not regarded as an aberration: for the British and American establishment of the time, it was regarded as a convenient way of destabilising Europe and driving Germany into conflict with Stalinist Russia, thus preventing the formation of any rival continental power block. Guido Giacomo Preparata lays bare the economic forces at play in the Third Reich, and identifies the key players in the British and American establishment who aided Hitler’s meteoric rise.
Nafeez Ahmed deals briefly with the thesis in this excellent lecture “Creating Terror”: