Aside from the obvious draconian nature of forcing people of all ages to take an experimental vaccine that not only doesn’t prevent you from getting Covid, but also doesn’t prevent you from getting it so severely that you could be hospitalized…
I see Biden’s presidency as an Ellen Pao situation.
For those who don’t remember, Ellen Pao was the CEO of Reddit. Under her leadership, the site completely changed, thousands of subreddits were banned, TOS was changed, moderation centralized and a ton of other platform-killing measures were taken in order to clean up the less savory parts of the website, make it more friendly to advertisers and remove the ability of people with the “wrong ideas” to congregate and discuss those ideas.
Now sure, Reddit has always been cancer. But after her tenure as CEO, it morphed into the Stage IV terminal cancer we know it as today.
After making all of those changes, Ellen Pao was universally hated and people were pissed. She and the board of Reddit mutually agreed to her resignation and she left, Ellen Pao haters taking this as a win. But the changes were already made.
She was the fall guy to implement these new policies that people hated and that may have been the plan all along.
Joe Biden is Ellen Pao for the United States of America…
Why does author Diana West believe that communist ideology has infiltrated America’s intelligence agencies?
After looking into key figures involved in the Spygate scandal, what information did Diana West uncover about their ideological beliefs?
How is Donald Trump a “counter-revolutionary” president, in West’s view?
In this episode, we’ll sit down with Diana West, a journalist and author of “The Red Thread: A Search for Ideological Drivers Inside the Anti-Trump Conspiracy.”
Why are the NGOs (non-government organizations) that plan against countries and populations, not charged with “hate crimes”?
Do a search on this site for “Rockefeller Foundation”. David Rockefeller was the mastermind for plans to take control of the population of “Operation Lockstep” from 2010: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/blog/innovating-for-a-bold-future/
Made in 2002, this movie tells the tale of a U.S. Army scientist turned CIA agent who supposedly jumped from a hotel window to his death. It chronicles a cruel mind-control system called Operation Artichoke. Frank Olson was originally involved in research on a highly classified biological weapons project before the CIA claimed him. His son has worked for years to discover what really happened to his father.
What do Richard Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld have to do with all this? (See minute 51 in video.) This movie was made when those two were back in power. And what does this movie have to do with today’s biowarfare?
Watch this fascinating video here: https://archive.org/details/mk-ultra-related-documentation/Arthichoke/ARTICHOKE+-+biological+warfare+and+The+CIA+53m44s.mp4
Reviewer: DevonSeaMoor – August 22, 2021
Why does it sound familiar in parts, anno August 2021?
I’m familiar with the concept of mind-control, after reading about Project Blue Beam, and studying the reports of people like Jordan Maxwell, William Cooper (Behold a Pale Horse) and others in that same category.
After seeing the movie “The man in high castle” I felt an interest in looking a bit more into the Nazi history, and their use of mind control by means of experiments. And so, I found this archived documentary, which, after watching it, made me ponder the present conditions all around the globe, and the why, how, and also those who are involved in the design of it.
I’m convinced, due to the complex pattern and design of events in the months that humanity lives with the threat of a virus, or so we’re told, showing the characteristics of mind-control, as I perceive it, that we’re living in an experiment where humanity itself is the guinea pig.
To me, it seems that we’re exposed to an attempt to minimize the world population, alter its genetic blueprint, with mind-control induced by means of fear, doubt, and confusion, in waves of hope and despair, ups and downs, weakening the human immune system, and our human emotional stability.
To me, after watching Dr David Martin’s presentation about the history of science, the pharmaceutical industry developing since around 1900, using digital technology at some point, there’s clear evidence that humanity is under attack right now.
Nevertheless, this documentary, about which I try to write a review, moving rather in a roundabout way, could be helpful educational material for those who look deeper in the origin of germs, and the use of germs as part of biological warfare, accompanied by the practice of psychological warfare, and climate change corruption.
The methods are refined, based on experience with understanding in tow, through time, and experiments, first done on individuals in prison or psychiatric clinics, and now, since the start of 2020, on the entire global community. We’d better educate ourselves, and act on what we disclose about methods of mind control.
On January 10th, 1963, a document titled Current Communist Goals was presented to the US Congress and was added to the Congressional record “under unanimous consent”. It lists 45 goals pursued by the Communists to overthrow America by infiltrating and corrupting its key institutions.
That list is an excerpt from the 1958 book The Naked Communist written by FBI special agent Cleon Skousen. Reading it today is as mind-blowing as it is troubling. While some points are somewhat outdated – especially those concerning geopolitics – most of them are, today, more relevant than ever.
While going through this list, one cannot help but realize that many goals have been fully achieved several years ago. Others are being aggressively pursued right before our eyes…
More, including the list in full, at https://vigilantcitizen.com/vc-resources/how-this-1963-list-of-communist-goals-is-becoming-a-reality-right-before-our-eyes/
Clif High has been around a long time, quantifying recurring words and phrases from the WWW and translating them into “real life” predictions. He says “they” are going to try to pull off more mischief – this month, perhaps – and that we, the people, are not going to fall for it this time. We, the people, will watch but most of us now know better than to get involved emotionally and to react violently.
However, he says there will be people from the alphabet agencies we have come to know and distrust who will come out to wreak havoc and try to get us to destroy one another. Don’t fall for it, folks. Be an observer and have a good laugh at the theatrics, just as you would in a theater.
The explanation of Clif’s fascinating work and the transcript for this video (in case you’d rather read than watch) is here: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/wooplosion/
There are people in this world who are obsessed with controlling others and influencing them. This is the stuff of psychopathy.
Bravo to David Martin, PhD for his deep research, courage, and willingness to go public with the important information on this subject. Seems to be what’s up now… and hopefully it will come to the general public’s awareness. Mercola is always a good source. Watch video linked at bottom of this post.
Dr. Martin quotes Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, who has promoted the “official” narrative that SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin:
“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”
But research makes it clear that the very profitable “novel coronavirus” does not have a natural origin. Dr. Martin states:
And what we found … are over 120 patented pieces of evidence, to suggest that the declaration of a ‘novel coronavirus’ was actually entirely a fallacy. There was no novel coronavirus … it’s not been novel for over two decades.
- Hundreds of patents show SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade virus that has been tinkered with for decades. Much of the research was funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci, and may have been an outgrowth of attempts to develop an HIV vaccine
- In 1999, Fauci funded research at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to create “an infectious replication-defective coronavirus” specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. This appears to be the virus that became known as SARS-CoV
- U.S. Patent 7279327 shows we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein, and other elements of SARS-CoV-2 were engineered and could be synthetically modified using gene sequencing technologies
- The CDC holds patents to a SARS coronavirus that is 89% to 99% identical to the sequence identified as SARS-CoV-2, as well as the PCR test to diagnose it
- 120 patents detail supposed “unique” features of SARS-CoV-2: the polybasic cleavage site, the spike protein and the ACE2 binding, proving it’s not a novel virus at all
… and then there’s the Soros connection…
Something relevant I (Rich) ran across:
On September 11, USA Today published an article with a headline declaring, “Fact check: Fauci, Gates, Epstein and Soros have no ties to drug company Moderna”.
But that headline was false.
Both Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and member of the White House coronavirus task force, and Bill Gates do have ties to Moderna, a pharmaceutical company developing a COVID-19 vaccine using mRNA technology.
The article does rightly identify misinformation presented in a video widely shared on social media.
With respect to Fauci, USA Today notes that the video’s claim that Fauci was the first CEO of Moderna is false. Nevertheless, Fauci does have ties to Moderna.
Similarly, the article notes that the video’s claim that Fauci and Gates were college roommates is false. But Gates, too, nevertheless does have direct ties to Moderna.
In fact, USA Today contradicts its own headline by acknowledging that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation “is listed as one of Moderna’s collaborators” on the company’s page at the investor website Flagship Pioneering.
The closest connection USA Today acknowledges with Fauci is his having been “a co-reviewer of a vaccine platform Moderna is working to improve”, as indicated by a 2019 Shareholder Letter. This refers to a review of vaccine technologies Fauci coauthored that was published last year in the journal Nature Reviews Immunology.
Although USA Today doesn’t mention it, the same letter, under the subheading “Partnerships”, mentions having $187 million in funding from grants, with a footnote reference. The footnote specifies that the grants are from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
That both Fauci and Gates have close ties to Moderna is no secret. Having encountered the headline in a news feed, I knew it was false and so did a quick Google search to document its falsity. It took about ten seconds to fact check USA Today’s “Fact Check”.
My search immediately turned up a page published in March on the website of the NIAID, which operates under the National Institutes of Health (NIH), announcing the beginning of a phase one clinical trial for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. The webpage notes that Fauci’s NIAID is “funding the trial.”
Furthermore, Moderna’s candidate vaccine “was developed by NIAID scientists and their collaborators” at Moderna.
The page quotes Fauci saying that the trial was “an important step” toward developing “a safe and effective vaccine to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2”.
Similarly, I was able to immediately pull up a page from Moderna’s website listing the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as a “strategic collaborator”, with the foundation having “entered a global health project framework agreement” in January 2016 “to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases.”
I emailed the author and the corrections editor on September 13 to request that they correct their false headline and acknowledge the NIAID’s partnership with Moderna, in accordance with USA Today’s code of ethics.
I also pointed out that, even if they were unaware of that partnership, since the collaboration between the Gates Foundation and Moderna is acknowledged in the article, they knew that their headline was false. I also noted the hypocrisy of fact checking others while willfully misinforming the public themselves.
Two days later, I received a reply from the author, Chelsey Cox, thanking me for my comments but sticking to the headline with the reasoning that “The headline reflects the analysis of the claim subject to fact-checking.”…
Who Will Fact-Check the Mainstream Media?
The spread of misinformation is a serious problem in our society today. But the mainstream narrative is that it’s coming from individuals on social media or alternative media websites. The reality is that the greatest purveyors of misinformation are the government and mainstream media.
Notice that the mainstream media’s self-proclaimed “fact checkers” don’t fact check each other despite endless opportunities to do so. Instead, they focus on “debunking” information from alternative sources.
The use of the term “fake news” is illustrative. The corporate media accuse alternative sources of propagating “fake news” to maintain their own dominance as purveyors of misinformation, such as the unevidenced conspiracy theory propagated by the New York Times that the Russian government hacked the US election infrastructure in 2016.
To illustrate, a New York Times editorial published in November 2019 pointed out that oppressive regimes had been using the term to dismiss criticisms over human rights violations, then blamed this phenomenon on Donald Trump for having repeatedly referred to mainstream media sources as propagating “fake news”. It was Trump, they alleged, who gave rise to “the epithet of ‘fake news’ as a weapon”.
But that was a blatant lie. In fact, it was the New York Times and other mainstream media who had weaponized the term “fake news” by attacking online independent journalism that threatens both the business model of the major corporate media and the political agendas those corporations tend to align themselves with.
In this case, mainstream media’s political agenda was to manufacture consent for the censorship of information from alternative media sources on social media….
This is what can happen when a country of very intelligent, independent thinkers, falls for the “turn in your guns” edict. It’s happened throughout history.
COVID: A VACCINE SO SAFE YOU HAVE TO BE THREATENED TO TAKE IT, FOR A DISEASE SO DEADLY YOU HAVE TO BE TESTED TO KNOW IF YOU EVEN HAVE IT.
- Outdoor Gatherings are limited to: Two People
- Exercise: Within 10km of home
- Browsing in Shops: PROHIBITED
- One (1) Person per household, per day may engage in Essential Shopping (Food and supplies)
- Funerals: Limited to Ten (10) People
07/10/2021: Australia announces the New World Order pic.twitter.com/1d5r1VLmKJ
— Pieter Christiaens (@PieterChrist) July 10, 2021