Category Archives: Satanic Ritual Abuse

Save the Children from the “Elite”

Where do all the missing children go?

This is a video that is very difficult to watch. I had to turn off the sound to get through it… and at the end, I still couldn’t watch.

This video is a bit of what Kerth Barker’s books discuss… very disturbing… very very disturbing.

Demonic abusers, indeed! And these are the people we are allowing to make big decisions who belong to both governments and non-government organizations that affect the country and the world.

This is what Donald Trump means by “draining the swamp”. It must be done. It’s been going on for way too long. Children are disappearing in large numbers daily and this is where many of them are going. Innocents are being sexually abused, terrorized, tortured, killed. The abusers are themselves part of – and therefore protected by – government agencies, legislators, the judiciary, medical professionals, the education system, news and entertainment industries, police and military.

Revelation of this level of abuse has been dribbling in for years and so far has been ridiculed and ignored. Now it’s time to take it very seriously and – time to drain the swamp.

Six (6) case studies that point to a massive child-pedophile ring at the highest levels of power

For anyone who has read our own Kerth Barker‘s books – Angelic Defenders, Demonic Abusers and Cannibalism, Blood-Drinking & High-Adept Satanism – the information in this article will not be all that surprising. What is surprising is that the abuse persists. The article linked below makes it clear that those in charge of investigating the problem appear to have been carefully chosen to block investigation. Is the fox guarding the hen house? Could be.

“The Mountain of Evidence for a Massive International Pedophile Ring Protected by Police and Intelligence Agencies”

From reddit.com : Two high-profile pedophilia cases have come to light in recent years, the abuses of Jerry Sandusky at Penn State and those of famed British entertainer Jimmy Savile. While both cases certainly garnered their fair share of media attention, their time in the spotlight has ended and we are led to believe that their horrific abuses were the result of a lone pedophile preying on children, while esteemed institutions turned a blind eye to their indiscretions.

Occasionally, however, the media would pick up on a story such as “Jimmy Savile was part of satanic ring,” or “Jerry Sandusky was part of pedophile ring, victim claims.” These stories seem absurd at first glance. Yet if they are investigated further, we are led down a horrific and disturbing rabbit hole of pedophiles populating positions of power in government, finance, and entertainment.

This post will lay out the evidence for an international pedophile ring of massive proportions. The information contained within is of tremendous importance, for we are sitting on our very own modern holocaust, a holocaust of children. I promise that this statement is by no means an exaggeration, and urge you to not be scared away by these walls of text, which are as concise as possible while still conveying the necessary information. Throughout, I will be completely transparent with my sources, and will not beat you over the head with conclusions, but rather present you with evidence and let you decide for yourselves…

Read more here: http://wakeup-world.com/2017/01/03/6-case-studies-that-point-to-a-massive-child-pedophile-ring-at-the-highest-levels-of-power/

Vital Video reprise: Autism: Made in the USA

This video is 5 years old and the rate of autism in the USA is now twice as high as it was then – 1 child in 50. The problem is more than a problem; it is a crime. The post will reveal how deep that rabbit hole goes. And there is much good information in the last half about how to restore the health of those stricken with autism. The body is resilient and can correct problems if it is given what it requires for optimal health. An interesting fact this movie points out is that autism was unknown before 1939, when three uses for mercury were “invented”.

Circumcision, Social Control and the Loss of Family Stability

The fact that circumcision weakens the faculty of sexual excitement and sometimes perhaps diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened. The Sages, may their memory be blessed, have explicitly stated: It is hard for a woman with whom an uncircumcised man has had sexual intercourse to separate from him. In my opinion this is the strongest of the reasons for circumcision.

— Moses Maimonides (Rambam) medieval Jewish rabbi, physician and philosopher

http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/

The phenomenon of circumcision […] serves a practical function of lowering excitability and distractibility quotients-sexual arousal-of pubescent males, i.e. biasing young males toward increased tractability which would enhance group efforts and less toward individual goals of amorous exchanges. Neurological data suggest that early lesions of the prepuce/foreskin tissues would generate a reorganization/atrophy of the brain circuitry. This re-organization/atrophy, in turn, is suggested to lower sexual excitability. […] Inferential data support the hypothesis that a practical consequence of circumcision, complementary to any religious-symbolic function, is to make a circumcised male less excitable and distractible, and, hence, more amenable to his group’s authority figures.

A Biocultural Analysis of Circumcision.
Ronald Immerman, Department of Psychiatry,
MetroHealth Medical Centre, Case Western Reserve University, and W.C Mackey.  Social Biology 1998,
Volume 44, Pages 265-275.

http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/immerman2/

CIA Mind Control Project Financed Circumcision Psychological Research

… The results obtained for the different psychological tests indicate that circumcision is perceived by the child as an aggressive attack on his body, which damaged, mutilated and in some cases totally destroyed him. The feeling of ‘I am now castrated’ seems to prevail in the psychic world of the child. As a result, he feels inadequate, helpless, and functions less efficiently….

http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/06/cia-mind-control-project-financed-circumcision-psychological-research/

The 12th century physician and rabbi Moses Maimonides advocated male circumcision for its ability to curb a man’s sexual appetite [17]. Further, he implied that it could also affect a woman’s sexuality, indicating that once a woman had taken a lover who was not circumcised, it was very hard for her to give him up. The impact of male circumcision on the sexual pleasure experienced by both males and females is largely unstudied. While the brain is often cited as the primary ‘sexual’ organ, what impact does surgical alteration of the male genitalia have for both partners? Based on anecdotal reports, a survey was developed to determine the effect of male circumcision on a woman’s ability to achieve vaginal orgasm (both single and multiple), to maintain adequate vaginal secretions, to develop vaginal discomfort, to enjoy coitus and to develop an intimate relationship with her partner. This review presents the findings of a survey of women who have had sexual partners both with and without foreskins, and reports their experiences. …

The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner, BJU INTERNATIONAL, Volume 83, Supplement 1, Pages 79-84, January 1, 1999.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/

The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.

http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/sorrells_2007/

 Even from a strictly Darwinian perspective, empathy is humanity’s ace in the hole.  It is the foundation of social organization, without which we would not have language, science, technology or the desire to pass these gifts on to future generations.  Without empathy, we would not have family and community.  We would be isolated, defenseless, naked apes, easy prey for any carnivore of even moderate size, or, in a modern day context, for any social grouping of sufficient cohesion  among themselves. Thus, in a very real sense, empathy is power. …

The War on Empathy, Love and Family http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/02/the-war-on-empathy-love-and-family/

Global Warming: Founder of Weather Channel on CNN

My best guess is that he’s right, there is no manmade global warming (or “climate change”, the sleight of hand they’ve substituted since the onset of more severe winters recently). Look people, they’ve constructed this tissue-thin facade of legitimacy around 9/11 and the “war on terror” and propped it up for 13 years with nothing but money and propaganda in order to justify massive war crimes in africa and the middle east and the impending police state at home. Clearly there is no pretense to human decency or fact-based reporting any more, and most people seem content to believe the “experts” without regard for the possibility that they’re being bought off in mass in order to justify an elite agenda, something which is clearly not beyond the realm of possibility given the vast concentration of wealth and convergence of financial interests that has occurred over the past 30 years.

I’m not a climate scientist but I’m not totally clueless about how the world works and I do have tools for throwing light on the darkness, including the published historical record of elite planning in the early 90’s which preceded the first mention of this “crisis” in the mass media by several years: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/05/the-club-of-rome-agenda-for-social-control/. It’s the Hegelian Dialectic.  http://www.infowars.com/the-hegelian-dialectic-and-its-use-in-controlling-modern-society/

I also know something about the near impossibility of accurately modeling chaotic systems like the climate over extended periods of time. It’s not a matter of good algorithms or measurements, it’s a matter of the exponential amplification of unavoidable measurement errors and random perturbations. When you see someone pointing to computer models to prove something about the climate, you probably need to take it with a grain of salt. Furthermore, the divergence beween global CO2 concentration and average global temperatures for the past 15 years is totally unaccounted for by these computer models or the handwaving arguments I’ve seen put forth to explain their failure.  Admittedly there’s a possibility that there’s some kind of phase change going on (methane hydrate becoming gaseous?). But I’m cynical enough to avoid jumping on that hypothesis without some evidence. Al Gore’s Nobel prize-winning hockey stick hoax (the historical record is that CO2 follows global temperature change, not the other way around) is enough to reinforce my cynicism.

So what would be the motivation for such a massive propaganda mobilization? Something else that we can glean from published history: a long-term bankster plan for global governance, the very plan which is being pursued through the war on terror: http://www.wanttoknow.info/articles/tragedy_hope_banking_money_history. An integral part of this plan is the imposition of mass poverty as a tool of social control. And make no mistake, the “solutions” being put forth in order to address this “crisis” will lead to mass poverty and death through starvation, particularly in resource-rich enslaved countries such as those in Africa, which in all likelihood is currently under a bioweapon assault precisely to rid the continent of those pesky humans that get in the way of our corporate masters.

Remember, no matter how cynical you are, it’s not enough. Most people make the mistake of assuming that the powers that be have some human-based motivation. And they do, but like all humans their motivations are derived from their micro-environment, which just happens be a distillation of centuries of cumulative corruption, satanism and intergenerational child abuse among the invisible owners of the world. http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/05/reprise-how-they-live-2/

More children undergo shock therapy

An older article, from December 6, 1995, but still timely, as they are still doing electro-convulsive treatments.

For the first time in four decades, children and adolescents are being used as subjects of significant new shock therapy studies.

The studies are being done quietly at respected schools and hospitals such as UCLA, the Mayo Clinic and the University of Michigan.

Shock therapy’s use is on the rise, especially among the elderly. Children and other high-risk patients are receiving more shock as well, mostly as a treatment for severe depression.

Children still account for a small percentage of shock patients, and no national estimates exist.

But at a seminar for shock therapy doctors in May, one-third of psychiatrists raised their hands when asked if they did shock on young people.

University of Pennsylvania neuroscientist Peter Sterling, a shock opponent, calls the child studies "horrifying. . . . You’re shocking a brain that is still developing."

California and Texas ban shock therapy on kids under 12. Most states permit it with approval of two psychiatrists and a parent or guardian.

Shock researchers met in Providence, R.I., in the fall of 1994 to discuss early results of the new studies, mostly unpublished.

"There’s no evidence that electroconvulsive therapy affects brain development of children in any permanent way," says researcher Kathleen Logan, a Mayo Clinic psychiatrist.

"Parents and patients have been receptive in a vast majority of cases," Logan says. "We do a lot of education. We show them a video and the ECT suite. They’re so desperate that they’ll give it a try."

The latest child shock researchers compare their results to the pioneering work in the field: a 1947 study by psychiatrist Lauretta Bender.

Bender’s study reported on 98 children (ages 3-11) shocked at Bellevue Hospital in New York. She reported a 97% success rate: "They were better controlled, seemed better integrated and more mature."

In 1950, Bender shocked a 2-year-old who had "a distressing anxiety that frequently reached a state of panic." After 20 shocks, the boy had "moderate improvement."

But in a 1954 follow-up, other researchers could not find improvement in Bender’s children: "In a number of cases, parents have told the writers that the children were definitely worse," they wrote.

Today’s researchers interpret Bender’s study as evidence that shock works, at least temporarily.

The new studies are again reporting great success. A UCLA study had 100% success in nine adolescents. The Mayo Clinic found 65% were better. At Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, 14 who received shock spent 56% less time in the hospital than six who refused the treatment.

Ted Chabasinski, who as a 6-year-old foster child was shocked 20 times by Bender, says the research is unethical and should stop.

"It makes me sick to think children are having done to them what was done to me," says Chabasinski, a lawyer. "I’ve never met anyone other than myself who’s functional after being shocked as a child."

By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY

via More children undergo shock therapy (December 6, 1995 08:30 PM).

Fed Pulls Rug Out From Under Municipal Finances

In an inscrutable move that has alarmed state treasurers, the Federal Reserve, along with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, just changed the liquidity requirements for the nation’s largest banks. Municipal bonds, long considered safe liquid investments, have been eliminated from the list of high-quality liquid collateral. assets (HQLA). That means banks that are the largest holders of munis are liable to start dumping them in favor of the Treasuries and corporate bonds that do satisfy the requirement.

Muni bonds fund the nation’s critical infrastructure, and they are subject to the whims of the market: as demand goes down, interest rates must be raised to attract buyers. State and local governments could find themselves in the position of cash-strapped Eurozone states, subject to crippling interest rates. The starkest example is Greece, where rates went as high as 30% when investors feared the government’s insolvency. Sky-high interest rates, in turn, are the fast track to insolvency. Greece wound up stripped of its assets, which were privatized at fire sale prices in a futile attempt to keep up with the bills.

The first major hit to US municipal bonds occurred with the downgrade of two major monoline insurers in January 2008. The fault was with the insurers, but the taxpayers footed the bill.  The downgrade signaled a simultaneous downgrade of bonds from over 100,000 municipalities and institutions, totaling more than $500 billion. The Fed’s latest rule change could be the final nail in the municipal bond coffin, another misguided move by regulators that not only does not hit its mark but results in serious collateral damage to local governments – maybe serious enough to finally propel them into bankruptcy.

Why this unprecedented move by US regulators? It is not because municipal bonds are too risky, since corporate bonds with lower credit ratings are accepted under the new rules. Nor is it that the stricter standard is required by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the BIS-based global regulator agreed to by the G20 leaders in 2009. The Basel III Accords set by the BCBS are actually more lenient than the US rules and do not include these HQLA requirements. So what’s going on?

From the Inscrutable, Unaccountable Fed

The rule change was detailed by Pam Martens and Russ Martens in a September 4th article titled “The Fed Just Imposed Financial Austerity on the States.”    They write that on September 3rd:

The Federal regulators adopted a new rule that requires the country’s largest banks – those with $250 billion or more in total assets – to hold an increased level of newly defined “high quality liquid assets” (HQLA) in order to meet a potential run on the bank during a credit crisis. In addition to U.S. Treasury securities and other instruments backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government (agency debt), the regulators have included some dubious instruments while shunning others with a higher safety profile.

Bizarrely, the Fed and its regulatory siblings included investment grade corporate bonds, the majority of which do not trade on an exchange, and more stunningly, stocks in the Russell 1000, as meeting the definition of high quality liquid assets, while excluding all municipal bonds – even general obligation municipal bonds from states with a far higher credit standing and safety profile than BBB-rated corporate bonds.

This, rightfully, has state treasurers in an uproar. The five largest Wall Street banks control the majority of deposits in the country. By disqualifying municipal bonds from the category of liquid assets, the biggest banks are likely to trim back their holdings in munis which could raise the cost or limit the ability for states, counties, cities and school districts to issue muni bonds to build schools, roads, bridges and other infrastructure needs. This is a particularly strange position for a Fed that is worried about subpar economic growth. …

That the Fed and its regulatory cohorts have to resort to this implausible plan – which crimps the ability of states and localities to raise essential funds to operate – in a strained effort to pretend that they’ve found a means of avoiding another massive bailout of Wall Street in a crisis, is just further proof that the only way to seriously deal with too-big-to-fail banks is to restore the Glass-Steagall Act and break up these complex creatures before they strike again.

The rule change may not have much effect in a crash, but where it will have a major effect is on the cost of credit, which will increase for municipal governments and decrease for corporate and financial institutions. The result will be to further shift power and financial resources from the public sector to the private sector.

Why would regulators dangerously jeopardize state and local government budgets in this way? Skeptical observers speculate that the intent is to Detroit-ize municipal governments, so that assets can be stripped as is being done in that imperiled city. The international bankers got away with asset-stripping Greece. Why not make the US itself a wholly-owned subsidiary of private banking interests?

If that seems far-fetched, consider what is happening with Argentina, which has been forced into bankruptcy by a US court to satisfy the exaggerated claims of certain hold-out vulture funds. IMF regulators have discussed establishing an international bankruptcy court that could strip a country such as Argentina of its assets, including prime sections of real estate, to pay off the nation’s creditors. …

http://ellenbrown.com/2014/09/08/preparing-to-asset-strip-local-government-the-feds-bizarre-new-rules/

Also see: http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/03/reprise-bernanke-admits-fed-caused-great-depression/

Psychiatry: The Ultimate Scam

Well maybe not the ultimate.  Creating money out of thin air comes close.  In any case:

This is an article about the intentional construction of false reality.

Not a minor construction—a huge, enduring, institutional, wing-flapping, money-munching, poison-dispensing, Matrix-welding, yet “humanity-saving” invention.

In the wake of CDC whistleblower William Thompson’s confession that he buried a vaccine-autism connection, some people reacted with shock—as if this was the first case of rank fraud that had ever taken place within the hallowed halls of medical research.

How about a whole branch of modern medicine that is a fraud from top to bottom?

Let us turn the page to Psychiatry.

And the lying liars who lie about it.

Most Americans don’t have a clue about the way psychiatry actually works or its pose of being a science.

The public hears techno-speak and nods and surrenders.

If psychiatrists are experts on the human mind, mice can navigate the Arctic in canoes. But psychiatrists are educated to be able to talk a good game.

And politicians are more than happy to mouth vagaries, and consign the problems of society to “mental-health professionals.”

It turns out that the phrase “mental health” was invented by psyop specialists, who needed to create an analogy to physical well-being. They needed to, because:

THERE ARE NO DEFINITIVE LABORATORY TESTS FOR ANY SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDER.

And along with that:

ALL SO-CALLED MENTAL DISORDERS ARE CONCOCTED, NAMED, LABELED, DESCRIBED, AND CATEGORIZED by a committee of psychiatrists, from menus of human behaviors.

Their findings are published in periodically updated editions of The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), printed by the American Psychiatric Association.

Of course, pharmaceutical companies, who manufacture highly toxic drugs to treat every one of these “disorders,” are leading the charge to invent more and more mental-health categories, so they can sell more drugs and make more money.

But we have a mind-boggling twist. Under the radar, one of the great psychiatric stars, who has been out front in inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues. And for years, almost no one noticed.

His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.” (Dec.27, 2010).

Major media never picked up on the interview in any serious way. It never became a scandal.

Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV. This tome defines and labels and describes every official mental disorder. The DSM-IV eventually listed 297 of them.

In an April 19, 1994, New York Times piece, “Scientist At Work,” Daniel Goleman called Frances “Perhaps the most powerful psychiatrist in America at the moment…”

Well, sure. If you’re sculpting the entire canon of diagnosable mental disorders for your colleagues, for insurers, for the government, for Pharma (who will sell the drugs matched up to the 297 DSM-IV diagnoses), you’re right up there in the pantheon.

Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired’s Greenberg and said the following:

“There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.”

BANG.

That’s on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, “Well, I knew there would be a problem.”

After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, “These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders.”

Frances might have been referring to the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many MORE diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.

Finally, at the end of the Wired interview, Frances flew off into a bizarre fantasy:

“Diagnosis [as spelled out in the DSM-IV] is part of the magic…you know those medieval maps? In the places where they didn’t know what was going on, they wrote ‘Dragons live here’…we have a dragon’s world here. But you wouldn’t want to be without the map.”

Translation: Patients need hope for the healing of their troubles; so even if we psychiatrists are shooting blanks and pretending to know one kind of mental disorder from another, even if we’re inventing these mental-disorder definitions based on no biological or chemical diagnostic tests—it’s a good thing, because patients will then believe and have hope; because psychiatrists place a label on their problems…

Needless to say, this has nothing to do with science. …

Dr. Frances’ work on the DSM-IV allowed for MORE toxic drugs to be prescribed, because the definition of Bipolar was expanded to include more people.

Adverse effects of Valproate (given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:

* acute, life-threatening, and even fatal liver toxicity;

* life-threatening inflammation of the pancreas;

* brain damage.

Adverse effects of Lithium (also given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:

* intercranial pressure leading to blindness;

* peripheral circulatory collapse;

* stupor and coma.

Adverse effects of Risperdal (given for “Bipolar” and “irritability stemming from autism”) include:

* serious impairment of cognitive function;

* fainting;

* restless muscles in neck or face, tremors (may be indicative of motor brain damage).

Dr. Frances’ label-juggling act also permitted the definition of ADHD to expand, thereby opening the door for greater and greater use of toxic Ritalin (and other similar compounds) as the treatment of choice. …

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/08/vaccine-fraud-what-about-psychiatric-fraud-staggering/

Psychiatric child abuse isn’t confined to their targetting of unhappy kids with their quackery, it extends to their complicity in obstetrical medicine’s abuse of children.  Male genital mutilation is a case in point.  The culpability of the “real doctors” is bad enough, but at least they can say that their “therapy” is only lacking in efficacy (for every single problem they marketed it for).  Psychiatry on the other hand, has not only refused to address the documented adverse psychological impact (their purported area of expertise) of MGM on infants and adults, but actually promoted it in the interests of social control, and have resorted to labelling people who question the established wisdom.    See footnotes 102 and 106 of http://members.tranquility.net/~rwinkel/MGM/primer.html   Is medicine full of sado-pedophiles?

These are very sick people.

Fed still blaming its victims for consequences of its own savagery

Despite arguments to the contrary from the Obama administration, mounting evidence suggests that the U.S. economy is rapidly falling back into negative growth territory. More Americans are out of the workforce than ever before, median household incomes are at levels not seen since 1967, and consumer spending is coming to a veritable standstill. The crisis is apparently so significant that a Federal Reserve governor recently said U.S. policymakers are crafting regulations that will force bank depositors to cover any losses should their financial institutions fail.

The question that many are asking is, how did this happen? How, after six years of recovery efforts and trillions of dollars printed, is it possible that the economy is not booming again?

This week the Federal Reserve published a report that claims to have figured it out and it turns out that the renewed economic downturn has nothing to do with foreign outsourcing, high taxation, increased health care costs for business or rising consumer prices for food and energy.

No, according to the Fed it is your fault. Apparently, you are not spending enough money. In order for the economy to recover you need to stop hoarding cash now and get out there and start buying more homes, cars, vacations, and electronics. Otherwise, you’ll only have yourself to blame when the system comes unhinged.

From the St. Louis Federal Reserve:

The issue has to do with the velocity of money, which has never been constant, as can be seen in the figure below . If for some reason the money velocity declines rapidly during an expansionary monetary policy period, it can offset the increase in money supply and even lead to deflation instead of inflation.…

During the first and second quarters of 2014, the velocity of the monetary base2 was at 4.4, its slowest pace on record. This means that every dollar in the monetary base was spent only 4.4 times in the economy during the past year, down from 17.2 just prior to the recession. This implies that the unprecedented monetary base increase driven by the Fed’s large money injections through its large-scale asset purchase programs has failed to cause at least a one-for-one proportional increase in nominal GDP. Thus, it is precisely the sharp decline in velocity that has offset the sharp increase in money supply, leading to the almost no change in nominal GDP…

So why did the monetary base increase not cause a proportionate increase in either the general price level or GDP?

The answer lies in the private sector’s dramatic increase in their willingness to hoard money instead of spend it. Such an unprecedented increase in money demand has slowed down the velocity of money

Top tier economists, it seems, are unable grasp why consumers have decided to hoard – in other words, save – their money even though the central bank is engaged in an unprecedented monetary expansion.

The answer is simple, really, and you don’t need to look at detailed government charts and statistics to figure it out….

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/report-its-your-fault-fed-says-americans-who-hoard-money-are-to-blame-for-poor-economy_09062014

First it was “deadbeat homeowners” who were summarily evicted.  Now it’s greedy savers  who see through the smoke and mirrors of the bought and paid for media.   Not just an insult to the victim, it’s an insult to the audience’s intelligence.

http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/08/why-did-the-fed-pump-and-dump-us-real-estate-markets

http://thoughtcrimeradio.net/2014/03/reprise-bernanke-admits-fed-caused-great-depression/

Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton [Friedman] and Anna [Schwartz]: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.  — Ben Bernanke, lying through his teeth.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/BOARDDOCS/SPEECHES/2002/20021108/

All a terrible mistake which led to the biggest concentration of wealth in human history up to that time.  And guess who profited the most?  The shareholders of the federal reserve inc.