Thirty-six doctors and researchers were summoned to inquisition last week by the World Health Organization Diocese to answer charges of heresy against the Vaccine Church.
The names of the infidels have been engraved in the Holy Muckrakers Registry of Aspersion, to alert faithful Church followers to the danger of cerebral contamination from their blasphemous views.
The accused include a number of well-known physicians and researchers, including:
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, an osteopathic medical doctor, charged with using the Internet to cast aspersions on Church doctrine.
Retired neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock, charged with impugning CDC Scripture.
Dr. Gary Null, charged with the production of blasphemous films, and refusing penance.
Biochemist Dr. Boyd Haley, charged with engaging in satanic rituals designed to unlawfully cleanse Holy Heavy Metals.
Celebrated psychiatrist Dr. Duncan Druggem urged the Ecclesiastical Court to order an immediate psychiatric evaluation of the accused, preferably at his convenient Beverly Hills basilica…
Who benefits from police militarization and steroid-fueled hyper-aggression? Who benefits from indoctrinating cops in tactics and an “us-vs-them” gang mentality that alienates them from their community? It sure as hell isn’t the cops. The deliberate creation of atrocity-inducing situations is a well-researched and well-worn means of orchestrating social control through division in prisons and on the battlefield. Why is the federal government using such techniques not only in domestic police training but in attempting to manipulate the public reaction to it? Is it paranoid to question whether they’re trying to create a dictatorship where everyone is too fearful to question orders, whether they’re cops or “civilians”?
The federalization of the police is not happening in a vacuum. What we’re witnessing is the end game of the luciferians’ reaction to the 60’s rebellions, where for the first time domestic dissent became a serious impediment to conducting a bankster war. The 60’s were followed by policy papers from elite think tanks, such as “The Crisis of Democracy” by Brzezinski’s Trilateral Commission, where the prescription for maintaining control was outlined in the planned destruction of the US middle class, and the first high level feelers into china implemented those recommendations by paving the way for the mass exodus of US jobs.
It’s appropriate that this is called the Lucifer Effect. The irony is that much of the 60’s rebellion was a side effect of the CIA’s research and popularization of hallucinogens as a means of mind control. (See the book “Acid Dreams”)
Anyway, the signs of the rising police state were already present by the mid-90s: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/misc.activism.progressive/hFt9uzBfyls/XEhTB1pXQjMJ
Welcome to LuciferEffect.org, official web site of The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (Random House, 2007). In this book, I summarize more than 30 years of research on factors that can create a “perfect storm” which leads good people to engage in evil actions. This transformation of human character is what I call the “Lucifer Effect,” named after God’s favorite angel, Lucifer, who fell from grace and ultimately became Satan.
Rather than providing a religious analysis, however, I offer a psychological account of how ordinary people sometimes turn evil and commit unspeakable acts. As part of this account, The Lucifer Effect tells, for the first time, the full story behind the Stanford Prison Experiment, a now-classic study I conducted in 1971. In that study, normal college students were randomly assigned to play the role of guard or inmate for two weeks in a simulated prison, yet the guards quickly became so brutal that the experiment had to be shut down after only six days.
How and why did this transformation take place, and what does it tell us about recent events such as the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuses in Iraq? Equally important, what does it say about the “nature of human nature,” and what does it suggest about effective ways to prevent such abuses in the future?
Please join me in a journey that the poet Milton might describe as making darkness visible. Although it is often hard to read about evil up close and personal, we must understand its causes in order to contain and transform it through wise decisions and innovative communal actions. Indeed, in my view, there is no more urgent task that faces us today.
Fear kills faster than the world’s most dreaded disease.
A cancer diagnosis may be the most traumatic thing that can befall a patient within the contemporary medical system; that is, beyond the conventional cancer treatments themselves, many of which have life-threatening and even lethal side effects.
New research now indicates that a cancer diagnosis may be as fatal as the cancer itself, dramatically increasing the risk of suicide and heart-related death in the week following diagnosis.
Published in the New England Journal of Medicine this month, researchers looked at data on more than 6 million Swedes aged 30 and older between 1991-2006 using the country’s health registries in order to determine how the psychological toll of cancer diagnosis impacts the risk for death. After analyzing over 500,000 people who were diagnosed with cancer during that period, the risk of suicide was found to be up to 16 times higher and the risk of heart-related death 26.9 times higher during the first week following diagnosis versus those who were cancer free.
Calling all political reformers who want a democracy free of corruption!…
How YOU can create “common-good” democracy right now!
I have been waiting for ten years for this book to come out, and here it is – released just today!!! Dr. McConochie’s integrity and insight is comparable to theologian David Ray Griffin’s, the author of several books unraveling the mystery of 9-11. The ideas in this book – plus a sincere citizenry who want a corruption-free democracy – will be able to totally transform the world.
Roger Dommergue (1924-2013) was the half-Jewish heir of a wealthy French family that converted to Christianity. He was raised by his Jewish maternal grandmother but was not circumcised. He fought with the Free French air force during World War Two and was a Freemason for a while. He earned a PhD in Psychopathogy, was a professor and controversial writer.
Original interview with subtitles:
1 of 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ17CZnR8SM
2 of 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWplHgJD4D8
3 of 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3l4gdyCbCY
4 of 4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3JVQQcQylo
The following are notes from the first video of Roger Dommergue speaking about one of his books. In it, he describes the “Jewish psyche” he observed in his family and society, as well as his reactions, as an uncircumcised Jewish man.
While observing his family, he found a mentality that astounded him, asked himself if it was him or them who were crazy, and finally figured it wasn’t him but them…
It was everywhere. It was in capitalism. It was in marxism. It was everywhere… basically a speculative system of thought, absolutely cold hearted, grossly overdeveloped, not factoring in any human characteristic, all while it claims… to serve them. Enormous hoax.
We saw the results of marxism, pseudo-altruistic marxism, lead to tens of millions of deaths, lead to a concentration camp the size of a gigantic country which is Russia, and consequently lead to death. These are doctrines of death…
Jewish researchers are champions of medical research but all this is without capacity for synthesis, capacity for heart. They are deprived of heart, of synthesis. They have an idealism which backfires on the people they claim to defend. There’s also the crooks, bankers and financiers which control absolutely everything.
from HenryMakow.com… Henry is a Jewish man who developed a game called Scruples.
Endocrinologist traced Jewish behavior to an hormonal imbalance caused by circumcision.
On what do we blame, or can we blame, objectively, the Jewish mindset? [which is becoming universal]
To be able to win in one operation 500 billion francs, and crash the Bank of England with one phone call, you have to be a Jew… I found the origin of this Jewish speculation — this speculative-parasitic mind, Jewish of course, which for 5,000 years… has weighed down on the entire planet; it’s the 8th day circumcision which we’ll talk about…
Well, you know in the commentary of the Torah, it is written that circumcision is something that goes beyond human understanding — that you shouldn’t try to understand. I read it myself in the commentary of the Torah, so I say this knowingly. Well, that’s not the case anymore. Now we understand the mystery. And we know — well I know and some people know — Albert Camus knew… and Dr. Gautier who figured it out of course knew better than me, some philosophers like Gustave Thibon etc. know. But the masses ignore it, and the Jews are totally unaware of their ordeal – because it’s an ordeal they live through – You know, to torment and to kill others, it’s also hell for them, it’s a disease. You know Nietzsche said ‘it was the sick who invented malice.’ Consequently these are people you need to cure, and to cure the Jews it’s very simple: stop circumcision.
It’s obvious that it isn’t the Jewish religious education and the Jewish intellectual formation that gives them this particular mindset. Nor is it the fact that they’ve supposedly been told to work handling money and nothing else. That’s not true at all, not true at all.
All of that is wrong; it doesn’t make sense. In reality … Not to mention most Jews I came to know in the "Jewish" high aristocracy of the world, could care less about Judaism, and knew nothing at all of the Jewish scriptures. And I tell you this eruditely because I know and I’ve experienced it. My uncles, my aunts knew absolutely nothing of the Torah. They went to funerals and other Jewish ceremonies only to brag, that was all. So that’s not it.
Well there is, for the Jews, an operation you get done on the 8th day after birth, it’s called circumcision.
Read more and watch the videos… they put it all together… "Unhinged" – Circumcision Key to Jewish Psyche? – henrymakow.com.
9/11 Commission Chairs, Congressmen and Intelligence Officers All Call for Declassification …
I have an idea. Let’s go on pretending that we still live in a democracy! As long as they get to keep on the velvet glove we get to keep going to the movies and watching tv and buying cheap stuff at walmart. Let’s pretend that we don’t know that elements of the federal government were involved in 9/11. Let’s wait around and see if the people who are really in control of washington and the media allow their treason, mass murder and financial crimes to be exposed and prosecuted. They just need a little more time to start WWIII or do another terrorist or biowarfare attack so the sheep stampede into whatever hell they’ve prepared for us.
As long as we keep our end of the “bargain” they’ll let us stay in the matrix a little while longer, at least until the dollar is worthless. Then it’s the IMF and the military to the rescue! Yay! We can all eat mud pies and bullets until we just fade away, just like what has happened in every other country under bankster occupation.
According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin’s decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.
But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia’s orbit and integrate it into the West. At the same time, the EU’s expansion eastward and the West’s backing of the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine — beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004 — were critical elements, too. Since the mid-1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected and pro-Russian president — which he rightly labeled a “coup” — was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.
Putin’s pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia’s backyard and threatening its core strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly. Elites in the United States and Europe have been blindsided by events only because they subscribe to a flawed view of international politics. They tend to believe that the logic of realism holds little relevance in the twenty-first century and that Europe can be kept whole and free on the basis of such liberal principles as the rule of law, economic interdependence, and democracy.
But this grand scheme went awry in Ukraine. The crisis there shows that realpolitik remains relevant — and states that ignore it do so at their own peril. U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia’s border. Now that the consequences have been laid bare, it would be an even greater mistake to continue this misbegotten policy. …
U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia’s border.
THE WESTERN AFFRONT
As the Cold War came to a close, Soviet leaders preferred that U.S. forces remain in Europe and NATO stay intact, an arrangement they thought would keep a reunified Germany pacified. But they and their Russian successors did not want NATO to grow any larger and assumed that Western diplomats understood their concerns. The Clinton administration evidently thought otherwise, and in the mid-1990s, it began pushing for NATO to expand.
The first round of enlargement took place in 1999 and brought in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. The second occurred in 2004; it included Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Moscow complained bitterly from the start. During NATO’s 1995 bombing campaign against the Bosnian Serbs, for example, Russian President Boris Yeltsin said, “This is the first sign of what could happen when NATO comes right up to the Russian Federation’s borders. … The flame of war could burst out across the whole of Europe.” But the Russians were too weak at the time to derail NATO’s eastward movement — which, at any rate, did not look so threatening, since none of the new members shared a border with Russia, save for the tiny Baltic countries.
Then NATO began looking further east. At its April 2008 summit in Bucharest, the alliance considered admitting Georgia and Ukraine. The George W. Bush administration supported doing so, but France and Germany opposed the move for fear that it would unduly antagonize Russia. In the end, NATO’s members reached a compromise: the alliance did not begin the formal process leading to membership, but it issued a statement endorsing the aspirations of Georgia and Ukraine and boldly declaring, “These countries will become members of NATO.”
Moscow, however, did not see the outcome as much of a compromise. Alexander Grushko, then Russia’s deputy foreign minister, said, “Georgia’s and Ukraine’s membership in the alliance is a huge strategic mistake which would have most serious consequences for pan-European security.” Putin maintained that admitting those two countries to NATO would represent a “direct threat” to Russia. One Russian newspaper reported that Putin, while speaking with Bush, “very transparently hinted that if Ukraine was accepted into NATO, it would cease to exist.”
Russia’s invasion of Georgia in August 2008 should have dispelled any remaining doubts about Putin’s determination to prevent Georgia and Ukraine from joining NATO. Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, who was deeply committed to bringing his country into NATO, had decided in the summer of 2008 to reincorporate two separatist regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. But Putin sought to keep Georgia weak and divided — and out of NATO. After fighting broke out between the Georgian government and South Ossetian separatists, Russian forces took control of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Moscow had made its point. Yet despite this clear warning, NATO never publicly abandoned its goal of bringing Georgia and Ukraine into the alliance. And NATO expansion continued marching forward, with Albania and Croatia becoming members in 2009.
The EU, too, has been marching eastward. In May 2008, it unveiled its Eastern Partnership initiative, a program to foster prosperity in such countries as Ukraine and integrate them into the EU economy. Not surprisingly, Russian leaders view the plan as hostile to their country’s interests. This past February, before Yanukovych was forced from office, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the EU of trying to create a “sphere of influence” in eastern Europe. In the eyes of Russian leaders, EU expansion is a stalking horse for NATO expansion.
The West’s final tool for peeling Kiev away from Moscow has been its efforts to spread Western values and promote democracy in Ukraine and other post-Soviet states, a plan that often entails funding pro-Western individuals and organizations. Victoria Nuland, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, estimated in December 2013 that the United States had invested more than $5 billion since 1991 to help Ukraine achieve “the future it deserves.” As part of that effort, the U.S. government has bankrolled the National Endowment for Democracy. The nonprofit foundation has funded more than 60 projects aimed at promoting civil society in Ukraine, and the NED’s president, Carl Gershman, has called that country “the biggest prize.” After Yanukovych won Ukraine’s presidential election in February 2010, the NED decided he was undermining its goals, and so it stepped up its efforts to support the opposition and strengthen the country’s democratic institutions.
When Russian leaders look at Western social engineering in Ukraine, they worry that their country might be next. And such fears are hardly groundless. In September 2013, Gershman wrote in The Washington Post, “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe will accelerate the demise of the ideology of Russian imperialism that Putin represents.” He added: “Russians, too, face a choice, and Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.” …
Not sure how he defines “democracy” but in any case it’s interesting that this understanding of world events is held in common between the “conspiracy theorists” and the CFR. But the sheep will probably stay focused on MSNBC’s narrative, because they’re LAZY and laziness leads to ignorance and stupidity, which is what makes them sheep.
We don’t have to go abroad to look for the real terrorists, they’re right here in the “homeland”, pretending to protect us. But it’s actually just a protection racket. Control freaks make a tool of everyone for their own glorification. Another version of munchausen by proxy, the psychological analog of false flag terrorism.