Category Archives: Psychology

“Unhinged” – Circumcision Key to Jewish Psyche?

Roger Dommergue (1924-2013) was the half-Jewish heir of a wealthy French family that converted to Christianity. He was raised by his Jewish maternal grandmother but was not circumcised. He fought with the Free French air force during World War Two and was a Freemason for a while. He earned a PhD in Psychopathogy, was a professor and controversial writer.

Original interview with subtitles:
1 of 4    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ17CZnR8SM
2 of 4    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWplHgJD4D8
3 of 4    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3l4gdyCbCY
4 of 4    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3JVQQcQylo

The following are notes from the first video of Roger Dommergue speaking about one of his books. In it, he describes the “Jewish psyche” he observed in his family and society, as well as his reactions, as an uncircumcised Jewish man.

While observing his family, he found a mentality that astounded him, asked himself if it was him or them who were crazy, and finally figured it wasn’t him but them…

It was everywhere. It was in capitalism. It was in marxism. It was everywhere… basically a speculative system of thought, absolutely cold hearted, grossly overdeveloped, not factoring in any human characteristic, all while it claims… to serve them. Enormous hoax.

We saw the results of marxism, pseudo-altruistic marxism, lead to tens of millions of deaths, lead to a concentration camp the size of a gigantic country which is Russia, and consequently lead to death. These are doctrines of death…

Jewish researchers are champions of medical research but all this is without capacity for synthesis, capacity for heart. They are deprived of heart, of synthesis. They have an idealism which backfires on the people they claim to defend. There’s also the crooks, bankers and financiers which control absolutely everything.

from HenryMakow.com… Henry is a Jewish man who developed a game called Scruples.

Endocrinologist traced Jewish behavior to an hormonal imbalance caused by circumcision.

On what do we blame, or can we blame, objectively, the Jewish mindset? [which is becoming universal]

To be able to win in one operation 500 billion francs, and crash the Bank of England with one phone call, you have to be a Jew… I found the origin of this Jewish speculation — this speculative-parasitic mind, Jewish of course, which for 5,000 years… has weighed down on the entire planet; it’s the 8th day circumcision which we’ll talk about…

Well, you know in the commentary of the Torah, it is written that circumcision is something that goes beyond human understanding — that you shouldn’t try to understand. I read it myself in the commentary of the Torah, so I say this knowingly. Well, that’s not the case anymore. Now we understand the mystery. And we know — well I know and some people know — Albert Camus knew… and Dr. Gautier who figured it out of course knew better than me, some philosophers like Gustave Thibon etc. know. But the masses ignore it, and the Jews are totally unaware of their ordeal – because it’s an ordeal they live through – You know, to torment and to kill others, it’s also hell for them, it’s a disease. You know Nietzsche said ‘it was the sick who invented malice.’ Consequently these are people you need to cure, and to cure the Jews it’s very simple: stop circumcision.

It’s obvious that it isn’t the Jewish religious education and the Jewish intellectual formation that gives them this particular mindset. Nor is it the fact that they’ve supposedly been told to work handling money and nothing else. That’s not true at all, not true at all.

All of that is wrong; it doesn’t make sense. In reality … Not to mention most Jews I came to know in the "Jewish" high aristocracy of the world, could care less about Judaism, and knew nothing at all of the Jewish scriptures. And I tell you this eruditely because I know and I’ve experienced it. My uncles, my aunts knew absolutely nothing of the Torah. They went to funerals and other Jewish ceremonies only to brag, that was all. So that’s not it.

Well there is, for the Jews, an operation you get done on the 8th day after birth, it’s called circumcision.

Read more and watch the videos… they put it all together… "Unhinged" – Circumcision Key to Jewish Psyche? – henrymakow.com.

Obama Stonewalling Release of Classified 9/11 Report

9/11 Commission Chairs, Congressmen and Intelligence Officers All Call for Declassification …

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/08/movement-declassify-911-materials-gathers-momentum.html

I have an idea.  Let’s go on pretending that we still live in a democracy!  As long as they get to keep on the velvet glove we get to keep going to the movies and watching tv and buying cheap stuff at walmart. Let’s pretend that we don’t know that elements of the federal government were involved in 9/11.  Let’s wait around and see if the people who are really in control of washington and the media allow their treason, mass murder and financial crimes to be exposed and prosecuted.  They just need a little more time to start WWIII or do another terrorist or biowarfare attack so the sheep stampede into whatever hell they’ve prepared for us.

As long as we keep our end of the “bargain” they’ll let us stay in the matrix a little while longer, at least until the dollar is worthless.  Then it’s the IMF and the military to the rescue!  Yay!  We can all eat mud pies and bullets until we just fade away, just like what has happened in every other country under bankster occupation.

Even the CFR is having second thoughts on the US coup in Ukraine

According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin’s decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.

But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia’s orbit and integrate it into the West. At the same time, the EU’s expansion eastward and the West’s backing of the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine — beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004 — were critical elements, too. Since the mid-1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine’s democratically elected and pro-Russian president — which he rightly labeled a “coup” — was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.

Putin’s pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia’s backyard and threatening its core strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly. Elites in the United States and Europe have been blindsided by events only because they subscribe to a flawed view of international politics. They tend to believe that the logic of realism holds little relevance in the twenty-first century and that Europe can be kept whole and free on the basis of such liberal principles as the rule of law, economic interdependence, and democracy.

But this grand scheme went awry in Ukraine. The crisis there shows that realpolitik remains relevant — and states that ignore it do so at their own peril. U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia’s border. Now that the consequences have been laid bare, it would be an even greater mistake to continue this misbegotten policy. …

U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia’s border.

THE WESTERN AFFRONT

As the Cold War came to a close, Soviet leaders preferred that U.S. forces remain in Europe and NATO stay intact, an arrangement they thought would keep a reunified Germany pacified. But they and their Russian successors did not want NATO to grow any larger and assumed that Western diplomats understood their concerns. The Clinton administration evidently thought otherwise, and in the mid-1990s, it began pushing for NATO to expand.

The first round of enlargement took place in 1999 and brought in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. The second occurred in 2004; it included Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Moscow complained bitterly from the start. During NATO’s 1995 bombing campaign against the Bosnian Serbs, for example, Russian President Boris Yeltsin said, “This is the first sign of what could happen when NATO comes right up to the Russian Federation’s borders. … The flame of war could burst out across the whole of Europe.” But the Russians were too weak at the time to derail NATO’s eastward movement — which, at any rate, did not look so threatening, since none of the new members shared a border with Russia, save for the tiny Baltic countries.

Then NATO began looking further east. At its April 2008 summit in Bucharest, the alliance considered admitting Georgia and Ukraine. The George W. Bush administration supported doing so, but France and Germany opposed the move for fear that it would unduly antagonize Russia. In the end, NATO’s members reached a compromise: the alliance did not begin the formal process leading to membership, but it issued a statement endorsing the aspirations of Georgia and Ukraine and boldly declaring, “These countries will become members of NATO.”

Moscow, however, did not see the outcome as much of a compromise. Alexander Grushko, then Russia’s deputy foreign minister, said, “Georgia’s and Ukraine’s membership in the alliance is a huge strategic mistake which would have most serious consequences for pan-European security.” Putin maintained that admitting those two countries to NATO would represent a “direct threat” to Russia. One Russian newspaper reported that Putin, while speaking with Bush, “very transparently hinted that if Ukraine was accepted into NATO, it would cease to exist.”

Russia’s invasion of Georgia in August 2008 should have dispelled any remaining doubts about Putin’s determination to prevent Georgia and Ukraine from joining NATO. Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, who was deeply committed to bringing his country into NATO, had decided in the summer of 2008 to reincorporate two separatist regions, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. But Putin sought to keep Georgia weak and divided — and out of NATO. After fighting broke out between the Georgian government and South Ossetian separatists, Russian forces took control of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Moscow had made its point. Yet despite this clear warning, NATO never publicly abandoned its goal of bringing Georgia and Ukraine into the alliance. And NATO expansion continued marching forward, with Albania and Croatia becoming members in 2009.

The EU, too, has been marching eastward. In May 2008, it unveiled its Eastern Partnership initiative, a program to foster prosperity in such countries as Ukraine and integrate them into the EU economy. Not surprisingly, Russian leaders view the plan as hostile to their country’s interests. This past February, before Yanukovych was forced from office, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the EU of trying to create a “sphere of influence” in eastern Europe. In the eyes of Russian leaders, EU expansion is a stalking horse for NATO expansion.

The West’s final tool for peeling Kiev away from Moscow has been its efforts to spread Western values and promote democracy in Ukraine and other post-Soviet states, a plan that often entails funding pro-Western individuals and organizations. Victoria Nuland, the U.S. assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, estimated in December 2013 that the United States had invested more than $5 billion since 1991 to help Ukraine achieve “the future it deserves.” As part of that effort, the U.S. government has bankrolled the National Endowment for Democracy. The nonprofit foundation has funded more than 60 projects aimed at promoting civil society in Ukraine, and the NED’s president, Carl Gershman, has called that country “the biggest prize.” After Yanukovych won Ukraine’s presidential election in February 2010, the NED decided he was undermining its goals, and so it stepped up its efforts to support the opposition and strengthen the country’s democratic institutions.

When Russian leaders look at Western social engineering in Ukraine, they worry that their country might be next. And such fears are hardly groundless. In September 2013, Gershman wrote in The Washington Post, “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe will accelerate the demise of the ideology of Russian imperialism that Putin represents.” He added: “Russians, too, face a choice, and Putin may find himself on the losing end not just in the near abroad but within Russia itself.” …

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/141769/john-j-mearsheimer/why-the-ukraine-crisis-is-the-wests-fault

Not sure how he defines “democracy” but in any case it’s interesting that this understanding of world events is held in common between the “conspiracy theorists” and the CFR.  But the sheep will probably stay focused on MSNBC’s narrative, because they’re LAZY and laziness leads to ignorance and stupidity, which is what makes them sheep.

Ukrainian Nazis: Another Tool of the US Ruling Class

We don’t have to go abroad to look for the real terrorists, they’re right here in the “homeland”, pretending to protect us.  But it’s actually just a protection racket.  Control freaks make a tool of everyone for their own glorification.  Another version of munchausen by proxy, the psychological analog of false flag terrorism.

commondreams.org targetted by zionist psyop

Like many other news websites, Common Dreams has been plagued by inflammatory anti-Semitic comments following its stories. But on Common Dreams these posts have been so frequent and intense they have driven away donors from a nonprofit dependent on reader generosity.

A Common Dreams investigation has discovered that more than a thousand of these damaging comments over the past two years were written with a deceptive purpose by a Jewish Harvard graduate in his thirties who was irritated by the website’s discussion of issues involving Israel.

His intricate campaign, which he has admitted to Common Dreams, included posting comments by a screen name, “JewishProgressive,” whose purpose was to draw attention to and denounce the anti-Semitic comments that he had written under many other screen names.

The deception was many-layered. At one point he had one of his characters charge that the anti-Semitic comments and the criticism of the anti-Semitic comments must be written by “internet trolls who have been known to impersonate anti-Semites in order to then double-back and accuse others of supporting anti-Semitism”–exactly what he was doing. (Trolls are posters who foment discord.)

The impersonation, this character wrote, must be part of an “elaborate Hasbara setup,” referring to an Israeli international public-relations campaign. When Common Dreams finally confronted the man behind the deceptive posting, he denied that he himself was involved with Hasbara.

His posting on Common Dreams illustrates the susceptibility of website comment threads to massive manipulation. As another illustration, he even audaciously tricked the white-supremacist Vanguard News Network, posing as “DeShawn S. Williams,” a “Pro-White/Black, anti-jew.”

DeShawn S. Williams Profile 1One of “DeShawn S. Williams” profile pictures on the Vanguard News Network.On Vanguard, where this African-American persona posted more than 1,400 times, he encouraged the malevolence of Frazier Glenn Miller, the neo-Nazi accused of killing three people whom he believed were Jews outside a Jewish community center and retirement home in Kansas in April. The character Williams was engaged in a comment thread more than 200 times with Miller, whose screen name was Rounder.

In a Vanguard post under the Williams screen name the commenter asked rhetorically, “Are left wing folks finally waking up to the jew?” He then referred the Vanguard online community to a thread of anti-Semitic comments on Common Dreams–most of which he had written himself under several screen names.

A typical DeShawn Williams comment might include: “Israel is a stain on the world that needs to be expunged once and for all.” Or: “The jews are the most racist people on earth. Just look at their Talmud. They consider the ‘goyim’ (non-jews) to be cattle whose only purpose on earth is to serve them.”

But on Common Dreams, DeShawn S. Williams was only one among dozens of screen-name characters this poster created. They seemed to be in competition to revile Jews. Here’s how “HamBaconEggs,” the site’s most prolific anti-Semitic persona, began a conversation last October:


A few posts later the HamBaconEggs character was taken to task for his hatred of Jews by the JewishProgressive character, who responded to another (sincere) poster who had pointed out the anti-Semitism :

JewishProgressive frequently followed HamBaconEggs with an expression of disgust. Here’s an exchange begun at 11:57 a.m. on January 14:

HamBaconEggs: “. . . There are reasons beyond mere ‘anti-Semitism’ why these people were kicked out of 109 countries. You don’t elicit that degree of anger and hostility from host populations without significantly contributing to the problem through your antisocial, predatory behavior.”

JewishProgressive replied 12 minutes later: “You are singlehandedly the most vicious Jew-hater I have ever encountered among those professing to be ‘progressives.’ Do you actually post about anything on CD other than ‘the jews,’ or is that your sole agenda? No true progressive could be so unrelentingly malicious against an entire group of people the way you are.”

At 2:49 p.m., HamBaconEggs responded:

“Oy vey! Cry me a river, you Talmudic parasite. Direct your criticism at your sociopathic tribe of money-grubbers, warmongers, and land thieves.”

Here’s one more example of this back-and-forth:



When Common Dreams examined hundreds of posts in this ugly charade, the aim appeared clear-cut: to cast a deep shadow on, and drive support from, one of the largest and oldest progressive-news websites.

The man who was the source of the charade, however, claimed he didn’t want to hurt Common Dreams. ….

http://www.commondreams.org/hambaconeggs

Regime changing no-fly list rules

The Obama administration is promising to change the way travelers can ask to be removed from its no-fly list of suspected terrorists banned from air travel.

The decision comes after a federal judge’s ruling that there was no meaningful way to challenge the designation, a situation deemed unconstitutional. In response, the Justice Department said the U.S. will change the process during the next six months. As of late last summer, about 48,000 people were on the no-fly list. …

http://money.msn.com/business-news/article.aspx?feed=AP&date=20140819&id=17869617

Fraud, myth, lies, charade, pretend, mind control etc.  The terrorists are pretending to follow the law while pretending to protect us from the pretend enemies that they financed, trained and deployed in their pretend war  that funnels pretend money into their pretend corporate “people” while the real people, the peons, pretend that it’s all about the greater good even though they personally can only pretend to have a decent standard of living by borrowing the same pretend money from other pretend “people” that create it out of thin air.   It’s the same mindset required of watching a movie: suspension of disbelief.  The red pill is admitting 9/11 was a domestic false flag operation.  Until you do, you’re just a tool of terrorists.

Ferguson: Is the DHS Planting Provocateurs?

With the National Guard now being sent to Ferguson, Missouri as the unrest extends into a second week, questions are being asked as to whether provocateurs are being used by authorities to stage violence in order to justify the militarized police crackdown.

Trouble flared once again last night as demonstrators threw molotov cocktails at police officers while cops deployed tear gas and rubber bullets before the midnight curfew even came into effect. Numerous reporters said they were threatened with violence and arrest by cops if they didn’t leave the area.

Despite the fact that some of the violence and looting is obviously being carried out by criminal opportunists and frustrated locals, many are beginning to question whether agent provocateurs are being used to demonize peaceful protesters and create a justification for heavy-handed police tactics.

Corporal Justin Wheetley of the Missouri State Highway Patrol last night blamed “outsiders” for the mayhem, with KMOV reporting that the trouble was, “stirred up by influences from outside of Ferguson.”

Radio host Dave Hodges also claims to have spoken to a source from within the Department of Homeland Security who told him that violent rioting and looting, “was encouraged and exacerbated by undercover DHS agents posing as members of the Black Panthers.”

“In the past five days I have been contacted, via one of my most trusted sources, a member of DHS, who is opposed to the events and DHS involvement in Ferguson, Missouri. This source stated that DHS is running the Ferguson Police Department and that their actions are designed to antagonize and to provoke the locals to violence. He further stated that he believed that the ultimate goal is to inflame the local citizens to such a point martial law will be declared,” writes Hodges.

Indeed, video footage of a member of the New Black Panthers leading a chant which calls for the death of Darren Wilson, the officer who shot 18-year-old Michael Brown, confirms that individuals from the militant group are intent on radicalizing the demonstrators.

Members of the New Black Panthers have been caught working undercover for the federal government in the past, with the most recent example being Richard Aoki, who was outed as an FBI informant in 2012.

A key question surrounding the police response to the unrest has been why law enforcement officers were ordered to stand down during looting on Friday night. During the first night of looting on Sunday last week, cops were also completely AWOL.

Whereas militarized police have been out in force to intimidate and target peaceful demonstrators and members of the press, they have failed to respond to the very same looting that has been used as a justification for their crackdown.

“Why did the police in Ferguson refuse to do their jobs?” asks Michael Snyder. “Who told them to stand down? Someone in the mainstream media needs to start asking some of these hard questions.” …

The presence of provocateurs during riots and unrest is by no means a new phenomenon.

Following the SPP protests in Canada back in 2007, Quebec provincial authorities were forced to admit that three rock-wielding black mask-wearing “anarchists” were in fact police infiltrators used to gather information on protesters.

During the G20 Summit in Pittsburgh in 2009, police also dressed up as anarchists in an attempt to infiltrate protesters.

Alex Jones’ film Police State 2: The Takeover also exposed how the black bloc anarchists were completely infiltrated and provocateured by the authorities during the violent 1999 WTO protests in Seattle.

Numerous observers of the unfolding situation in Ferguson are also starting to ask hard questions about whether provocateurs are responsible for at least some of the violence. …

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ferguson-riots-being-exacerbated-by-violent-provocateurs.html

Any government capable of inflicting radical muslim fundamentalism on the middle east and staging 9/11 for empire games is capable of using the same tactics for domestic political purposes.    But in fact there’s no need to speculate.  The history of the FBI’s cointelpro program in the 60’s and 70’s is a matter of public record.   Not to mention the fabulously lucrative “drug war” where the feds play on both sides of the fence.  And implanting the white house with the first “black” president presents special opportunities for domestic psyops.

“PSYCHIC DEVELOPMENT for PROSPERITY, SELF-DEFENSE & POLITICAL INFLUENCE” – NEW BOOK BY KERTH BARKER

angel-gabriel-cover-thumbnail

ULTIMATELY THE ILLUMINATI’S ATTACK ON THE PEOPLE OF EARTH IS A SPIRITUAL WAR. YOU CAN NEVER BE COMPLETELY FREE FROM THE ILLUMINATI’S INFLUENCE UNTIL YOU DEVELOP YOUR PSYCHIC ABILITIES. POLITICAL SOLUTIONS WILL FOLLOW ONCE SPIRITUAL LIBERATION TAKES PLACE. YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW POWERFUL YOU REALLY ARE. IF YOU WANT TO FIND OUT, READ PSYCHIC DEVELOPMENT WHICH YOU CAN ACCESS THROUGH THE LINK BELOW:

http://angelicdefenders.theshamecampaign.com/category/psychic-development-book/

Kerth Barker’s new book, Psychic Development for Prosperity, Self-Defense and Political Influence is now available at the Angelic Defender website. The cost of this book is only $.99.