Category Archives: Mind Control

Save the Children from the “Elite”

Where do all the missing children go?

This is a video that is very difficult to watch. I had to turn off the sound to get through it… and at the end, I still couldn’t watch.

This video is a bit of what Kerth Barker’s books discuss… very disturbing… very very disturbing.

Demonic abusers, indeed! And these are the people we are allowing to make big decisions who belong to both governments and non-government organizations that affect the country and the world.

This is what Donald Trump means by “draining the swamp”. It must be done. It’s been going on for way too long. Children are disappearing in large numbers daily and this is where many of them are going. Innocents are being sexually abused, terrorized, tortured, killed. The abusers are themselves part of – and therefore protected by – government agencies, legislators, the judiciary, medical professionals, the education system, news and entertainment industries, police and military.

Revelation of this level of abuse has been dribbling in for years and so far has been ridiculed and ignored. Now it’s time to take it very seriously and – time to drain the swamp.

MIND CONTROL DOCUMENTARY (NEW UNAUTHORIZED FOOTAGE 2016)

Published on May 27, 2016

Exposing the truth behind the US media; FEAR MONGERING, ISIS, FALSE FLAGS, EBOLA, ZIKA, 9/11 & OTHER TERROR ATTACKS.

Mass Media serves one purpose, and it’s not journalism: “Fear, Fear, Fear!!!” – Deliberate use of fear including exaggeration and usually repetition, to influence the public to achieve a desired outcome. “Do not question authority! Submit and Obey!” The more TV you watch, the more likely you are to think that what you are watching represents reality.

Orlando Cops Told to Stand Down — Not to Pursue Shooter for 15-20 Minutes

One of those things that makes you say, “Hmm???” or “WTF?” The current level of corruption in our country and world must be heartbreaking for idealistic, honest police officers and members of the military who chose to work where they work because they sincerely want to be helpful and save lives.

Kerth Barker has convinced me through his revelations about Luciferian and Satanic secret societies, that the only thing that makes sense of it all is that things are run by the values of death and destruction rather than life and creativity. (Search here on TCR.net for Kerth’s articles and see his books and videos at KerthBarker.com). Thanks to Kerth’s work, I no longer scratch my head over things like this. I just say, “Oh, yes, another bit of evidence that “the cult” is working overtime.”

Let’s encourage one another and everyone we come in contact with to live up to their highest values and to reject orders to allow theft, treason and murder to happen right under our noses. If we don’t start speaking out, nothing will change.

The testimony of a Belle Isle police officer was given this week allowing for the first public account of what happened inside the Pulse nightclub earlier this month. Officer Brandon Cornwell’s account of what happened could explain why the death toll was so high — they were told to stand down and not to pursue the shooter.

Read more here: Confirmed: Orlando Cops Told to Stand Down — Not to Pursue Shooter for “15-20 Minutes”

9/11 Commission member Bob Kerry unmistakably states that 9/11 was a 30-year conspiracy

When questioned about the 9/11 conspiracy by an activist-journalist several years ago, 9/11 Commission member Bob Kerry unmistakably states that 9/11 was a “30-year conspiracy”. One might wonder, what did Kerry mean by this?

It is interesting to note how a 30-year time frame is used when it comes to true revelations about false flag attacks. In the meantime, it’s all propaganda.

Source: Deep Inspection Of State Sponsored Propaganda Reveals Truth About Information War

Educate Yourself: Read, Watch, Think and Do…

“The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism.” – Murray N. Rothbard

Beneath the rule of men entirely great, the pen is mightier than the sword.” – Edward George Bulwer Lytton

  • Read Propaganda, by Edward Bernays.
  • Read Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury.
  • Get rid of your television. Preferably,  destroy it.
  • Read Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley
  • Clear your mind. Make a commitment to not use mind-altering substances for 90 days. If you fail, go to an AA meeting and restart the 90 days.
  • Read The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve – 5th Edition, by G. Edward Griffin.
  • Read 1984, by George Orwell.
  • Make your very own set of Fallacy Flash Cards from the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
  • Hold internet authors accountable by citing fallacies.
  • Read The Law, by Frédéric Bastiat.
  • Make a list of your natural rights.
  • Read The Constitution of the United States and The Bill of Rights.
  • Read Animal Farm, by George Orwell.
  • To discover who your two senators and one congressman really represent, do a little research at https://www.opensecrets.org/ Make a list of “your representatives” 10 biggest donors and send the lists to your senators and congressperson by email or letter.
  • Read War is a Racket, by Smedley D. Butler.
  • Read On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, by Dave Grossman.
  • Watch this TED Talk, A radical experiment in empathy, by Sam Richards.
  • Read Anatomy of the State, by Murray Rothbard.

This [slightly edited] list was taken from this article at ZeroHedgeFund

Please feel free to share your own recommendations. Simply click  “LEAVE A COMMENT” under the title of this article,

Reprise: 25 Rules of Disinformation

In case you are confused by all the voices busily delivering contradictory messages on the TV, radio and Internet, here are some of the rules some troublemakers/ disinformation artists play by… (from http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/twenty-five-rules-of-disinformation.html)

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it — especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.

2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the “How dare you!” gambit.

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such “arguable rumors”. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a “wild rumor” which can have no basis in fact.

4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviates”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning — simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.

7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.

8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough “jargon” and “minutiae” to illustrate you are “one who knows”, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.

9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.

10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues — so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.

11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the “high road” and “confess” with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made — but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, “just isn’t so.” Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for “coming clean” and “owning up” to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.

12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.

13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.

15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.

16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.

17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can “argue” with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.

18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.

19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the “play dumb” rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.

22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.

25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.