Henry Makow is a Jew who sees through the mischief that has occurred and occurs still in his tribe. He is not shy to share his insights with the world. Read this and many more excellent essays at his website, HenryMakow.com
Like deaf men tuning a piano, professors try to explain the human condition without any reference to the Creator, or man’s Divine Spirit.
“In order to effect the destruction of all collective forces except ours, we shall emasculate the first stage of collectivism, the universities, by re-educating them in a new direction.” Protocols of Zion, 16
Replacing Old Thoughts with Empowering New Beliefs
One of the most valuable techniques to overcome fear is the active re-writing of the script you’ve got in your head. Of course, replacing limiting beliefs with empowering ones is more than just “being positive.” Like any change you seek to make to your physical body, it takes hard work and practice to break mental habits and create new ones.
Here’s how you can make it happen.
Identify The Core Limiting Belief
Go beyond what you say to others and identify what you’re really telling yourself. If you say, “I’m just a loner,” for example, you might have the root negative belief, “I’m awkward and people don’t like me.” Even if you want to connect with others more, your limiting belief that you are better off alone prevents you from putting yourself out there.
List The Reasons You’ve Come to That Conclusion
Even if you know these reasons are illogical, write them all down and look at them. The reasons may be built up from things you’ve been told, experiences you’ve had, or your own evaluation of yourself and your success.
Turning to the example of believing you are awkward and unlikeable, your list of reasons might include things like:
“My brother always calls me ‘the weird one.”
“I don’t have many friends.”
“I got laughed at when I was on stage in the school play.”
Consider The Possibility That The Belief Is Not Based in Truth
No matter what the reasons are for your limiting belief or the supposed evidence you use to support it, chances are that much of it is driven by baseless negative self-talk. As you examine the reasons you’ve listed, you’ll likely find that you cannot confirm the validity of many of them. The belief might instead be based on poor self-esteem, a traumatic experience, or even a simple misunderstanding.
Start putting the “evidence” for your belief to the test…
Russell Brand is a brilliant British comedian who now is a “newscaster” or “commentator” who posts videos every day. He has 4.9 million subscribers on YouTube. Unlike most mainstream media superficiality, Brand’s insights are deep and wide.
Comedy is a wonderful way to say things which may be politically incorrect, but are correct all the same.
Another chapter in the ongoing war against our children – and life itself. This committee took a cavalier approach to experimenting on children with the experimental whatever-you-want-to-call-it. All it takes is one to voice the decision that may have already been made by the manufacturers of the product – and the others just go along with it.
10-26-2021 FDA approved injecting children 5-11 years. Dr Rubin shockingly admits experimentality & unknown safety of “vaccine”, but pushes approval regardless.
On October 26, 2021, The FDA met to debate the approval of the Pfizer Covid Injection for children. One of the voting FDA members Dr Eric Rubin said: “We’re never gonna learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes… I do think we should vote to approve it,” and they did…
Despite Dr. Rubin’s admission, the panel’s decision ended up being unanimous, with one abstention, in favor of formally recommending Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine for kids 5 to 11 years old under the current emergency use authorization.
They admittedly chose to experiment with children’s lives, on mass. They did this despite the fact that children have statistical zero risk of serious disease or death from covid. The FDA, like others, already knew about the record setting death and harm caused by these injections. So we rightfully accuse them of voting for child sacrifice…
Dear Rand Paul, please ask the right question. Why keep going around in circles with Fauci? When Fauci says “gain of function” is not the correct term; ask him what the correct term is and use it to get meaningful answers out of him. So far he is playing a game of linguistics. Are you forbidden to call a spade a space?
• Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.
• The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
• “The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
• Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.
It is not unreasonable to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are being used (without other forms of PPE protection), have no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus. Current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful. The body of evidence indicates that face masks are largely ineffective.
My focus is on COVID face masks and the prevailing science that we have had for nearly 20 months. Yet I wish to address this mask topic at a 50,000-foot level on the lockdown restrictive policies in general. I build on the backs of the fine work done by Gupta, Kulldorff, and Bhattacharya on the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) and similar impetus by Dr. Scott Atlas (advisor to POTUS Trump) who, like myself, was a strong proponent for a focused type of protection that was based on an age-risk stratified approach.
I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children…
“You see Henry you proceed to attack us based on the old and outmoded method of arguing which is with facts and reasons. That is not the way things are done anymore.
“People generally like to pretend and generally will believe anything they see most other people believing in or else they simply do what they are led to do by the media and what we want. If someone like you goes against their interests and beliefs, they are likely to discount what you say and completely shut it out of their minds.”
Are these really the words of Jacob Rothschild? There is more of this “message” to be read after this excerpt, if you follow the link. Read and decide for yourself… Is this possibly true? It kinda sounds congruous with what we know already. Read more…
“In your efforts to protect your old and failing civilization we are dismantling, we find these means necessary. If people will allow such vaccines to invade their own bodies and their children’s in order to comply and to be the same or “equal” to “everyone” else they most certainly will not object to or oppose their wealth, use of resources and life styles being equalized as well.”
“Everyone must do the same. In all communist nations we have fostered, it is customary that for “equality” for the desired and planned “levelling” in this new order, in order for people to have the same in their needs and wants, everyone has to be psychologically trained to obey the same commands”
“The universal vaccine programs not only open the door for behavior control through gene modification and enhancement, but more importantly for the present operation – psychological behaviour control with the vaccines is even more fundamental. Regardless of whether or not the vaccines are unnecessary and useless regarding the virus, or even harmful for many, they are the most uniform and concerted psychological weapon ever devised to control human behaviour.”
In it, he confirms that covid is a hoax, but claims it is necessary to re-engineer humanity in order to address the problems we supposedly face.
“We see a future world without enough to go around, and therefore we must learn first to control it and then to share what is there as we deem most advantageous to those whom we choose. That is what power is for.”
The NWO requires “a material levelling for equality and a radical reduction of the population of the world.”…
“That is what power is for.” ?
Luciferians have quite a distorted view of the world. They don’t think in terms of using their “power” to lovingly tend this beautiful worldwide garden and kindly support Earth’s inhabitants, nurturing their mental, emotional, physical and spiritual health. Rather, they think in terms of destroying world by raping its resources and oppressing the people of the planet.
I have heard that the Prosecutor in the Rittenhouse case has political aspirations and might have seen this trial as an opportunity to make a name for himself. He behaved in a way that made me think of daytime soap operas.
In fact, after the closing arguments, a new high definition video emerged. The Prosecutor should have provided it to the Defense but had not.
If you watched the trial, read through and see which of these “Special Responsibilities” were met and which were not met:
The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:
(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;
(b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;
(c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights, such as the right to a preliminary hearing;
(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;
(e) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:
(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;
(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and
(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information;
(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor’s action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.
(g) When a prosecutor knows of new, credible and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted, the prosecutor shall:
(1) promptly disclose that evidence to an appropriate court or authority, and
(2) if the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction,
(i) promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay, and
(ii) undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit.
(h) When a prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit, the prosecutor shall seek to remedy the conviction.
LYNNWOOD, WA—Sources confirmed Tuesday that local freethinker Jared Olson called into question the “absurd” idea that God had ever done anything for him, all while inhaling oxygen and exhaling carbon dioxide in a complex process well beyond his mind’s capability of understanding in its entirety.
“The idea of ‘god’ is really just holding us back,” Olson opined, addressing the other members of the philosophy club at Edmonds Community College, as the membrane across his larynx vibrated to modulate the flow of air from his lungs, making his speech audible to the people listening, whose intricate ear structures then instantly transformed the invisible sound waves into abstract thought in their brain’s nervous tissue…