Why, pray tell, would you feel a need to manipulate people into using your product if you know it is a good one? Why release a vaccine before it’s been thoroughly tested and you know for sure that it’s really, truly beneficial and safe? Why all the fancy footwork?
Watch “A Child’s Voice” on Vimeo.
Removed from Amazon.com.
Tell your friends and family.
Protect your children.
A Child’s Voice on Vimeo:
Books by Alice Miller:
Drama of the Gifted Child
For Your Own Good
The Body Never Lies
Emotion Freedom Technique/Matrix Reimprinting
The video of a pretty young whistleblower who claims to have escaped from China, telling the story of the Wuhan virus (as we have already heard it), reminds me somewhat of the emotional testimony of Nayirah, the 15-year-old Kuwaiti girl, who testified on October 10, 1990, at the U.S. Congressional Human Rights Caucus on Iraqi human rights violations. Nayirah was the star of the show and her story propelled us into Kuwaiti and Iraq, under then-President George H.W. Bush:
“I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the hospital with guns, and go into the room where… babies were in incubators. They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die.”
The public found out later that the massacre had never occurred. Nayirah was actually the daughter of a Kuwaiti dignitary who had been coached by a public relations firm – Hill and Knowlton – to give convincing but false “whistleblower” testimony.
One never knows.
This “whistleblower” story only reinforces the official narrative while not addressing any of the more serious pandemic issues (in no particular order, off the top of my head):
- Why the concerted efforts to exaggerate fatalities?
- Why the concerted efforts to suppress alternative, life-saving treatments?
- Why the draconian measures to lockdown the world?
- Why the unprecedented move to stop the world economy for a disease whose death rate is around 0.26%?
- How did Neil Ferguson and the Imperial Model gain such influence?
- Why the official indifference to how the Imperial Model could be so colossally wrong?
- Why is the response so strangely consistent around the world?
- Why instate the extreme social measures that are unproven to abate viral spread?
- Why do the pandemic efforts satisfy long-held agenda items of Technocratic Globalism?
- Why the nonstop propaganda effort from mainstream news sources to continually build-up the crisis?
- Why the coordinated efforts to censor and shutdown legitimate alternative news sources?
- Why the coordinated efforts to censor and shutdown legitimate, credentialed scientists and healthcare workers whose message deviates from orthodoxy?
- Why does Bill Gates have such an oversized role in policy making?
- Why are blockbuster revelations of lying and deceptions in reporting the COVID story met with indifference from media?
- When did we decide Constitutional rights could be suspended for health safety reasons?
- Why aren’t doctors and researchers successful in treating COVID patients with alternative therapies celebrated as heroes?
- Why no deep investigation into Fauci’s diversion of funds to the Wuhan lab?
- Why aren’t mainstream news sources exploring the timing and uncanny similarity of this pandemic to Event 201 and Rockefeller Foundation scenario games?
- How could Fauci be so prescient that the incoming Trump administration would definitely face a pandemic crisis?
- Most importantly, why are incompetents and proven liars still in charge?
This list of questions is from a comment on this page: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/31/coronavirus-whistleblower.aspx
This is an experiment that shows a difference between a peaceful group and an antagonistic group. Very interesting. The look on Marcos’ face when he realizes the difference is priceless. Note that at 6:31-35, the man on the right in the black t-shirt very deliberately forms the “devils horns” hand sign…
At a 2019 Trump rally in Cincinnati, Ohio, Millie Weaver challenges some of the protesters to walk with her over to see if Trump supporters are as bad as the mainstream media says.After several attempts, Millie meets Marcos, a black American, who takes her up on the challenge. Marcos believes President Trump and his supporters are racist and that if he goes inside the event he will be attacked and told to leave. However, what ends up happening is amazing and will leave you speechless.
The Ohio Board of Pharmacy withdrew a rule preventing the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 after Governor Mike DeWine called on the board to halt the rule, according to the Dayton Daily News.
“As a result of the feedback received by the medical and patient community and at the request of Gov. DeWine, the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy has withdrawn proposed rule 4729:5-5-21 of the Administrative Code,” reads a Thursday statement from the board.
“Therefore, prohibitions on the prescribing of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in Ohio for the treatment of COVID-19 will not take effect at this time.”
Officer Jakhary Jackson of the Portland Police Bureau offers his perspective as a Black officer in the middle of downtown Portland’s nightly protests.“I got to see folks that really do want change, like the rest of us that have been impacted by racism,” Jackson said about the early days of the protests. “And then I got to see those people get faded out by people who have no idea what racism is all about, who never experienced racism.”He said almost invariably every time a person of color tries to speak with him while he’s on duty at a protest, a white person steps in to interrupt.“It says something when you’re at a Black Lives Matter protest and you have more minorities on the police side than you do in a violent crowd,” he said. “And you have white people screaming at Black officers.'”He said he’s also disgusted by people calling his white fellow officers racists, without knowing anything about them.Jackson was interviewed by Lt. Tina Jones during a press availability that also include Police Chief Chuck Lovell.Full story: https://www.kgw.com/article/news/loca…
Find many more videos with Dr. Bartlett by doing a search at AmericaCanWeTalk.org for Bartlett.
Bill Cushing, MD, JD, MBA
Can Adam Schiff, A California congressman and Chairman of the House intelligence Committee, be prosecuted for sedition?
In my opinion, the answer is yes.
Members of Congress are subject to the same laws as are all Citizens of the United States, with one exception. Article 1, Section 6 of the United States Constitution which states:
“They [Congress] shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.”
I have heard both Republican and Democrat Congressmen and women say on TV news shows, that Mr. Schiff has immunity from seditious statements because he is a Congressman. They are wrong. Continue reading CAN CONGRESSMAN SCHIFF BE PROSECUTED FOR SEDITION?
By Harvey A. Risch, MD, PhD,
Professor of Epidemiology
Yale School of Public Health
Newsweek, July 23, 2020
As professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, I have authored over 300 peer-reviewed publications and currently hold senior positions on the editorial boards of several leading journals. I am usually accustomed to advocating for positions within the mainstream of medicine, so have been flummoxed to find that, in the midst of a crisis, I am fighting for a treatment that the data fully support but which, for reasons having nothing to do with a correct understanding of the science, has been pushed to the sidelines. As a result, tens of thousands of patients with COVID-19 are dying unnecessarily. Fortunately, the situation can be reversed easily and quickly.
I am referring, of course, to the medication hydroxychloroquine. When this inexpensive oral medication is given very early in the course of illness, before the virus has had time to multiply beyond control, it has shown to be highly effective, especially when given in combination with the antibiotics azithromycin or doxycycline and the nutritional supplement zinc.
On May 27, I published an article in the American Journal of Epidemiology (AJE) entitled, “Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High-Risk COVID-19 Patients that Should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to the Pandemic Crisis.” That article, published in the world’s leading epidemiology journal, analyzed five studies, demonstrating clear-cut and significant benefits to treated patients, plus other very large studies that showed the medication safety.
Physicians who have been using these medications in the face of widespread skepticism have been truly heroic. They have done what the science shows is best for their patients, often at great personal risk. I myself know of two doctors who have saved the lives of hundreds of patients with these medications, but are now fighting state medical boards to save their licenses and reputations. The cases against them are completely without scientific merit.
Since publication of my May 27 article, seven more studies have demonstrated similar benefit…
Oh, dear. Dr. Mike Adams, a pro-life University of North Carolina-Wilmington faculty member and columnist went head to head in a public debate with an abortionist, essentially accusing him of murdering thousands. Adams influenced young people to think for themselves. He won a $500,000 legal case against UNCW. He wrote intelligent, independent thoughts in his columns and on social media.
All these things are “sins” and dangerous in these “don’t make any waves and color within the lines” times.
The police do not yet know if there was foul play. It will be interesting to see what comes to light in the future. But, hmm… just a thought… does Dr. Adams’ death mean that the University will not have to pay the half million dollar settlement?
In the video below, Dr. Adams said,
My first premise is that it is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human being. My minor premise is that abortion does intentionally kill an innocent human being… and my conclusion is that therefore, abortion is wrong.