Category Archives: Law

Missouri judge says COVID-19 public health orders must be lifted

A Missouri judge ruled that local health officials can no longer issue COVID-19 safety orders, which he said infringe upon the constitutional separation of powers between branches of government, reported the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

The ruling from Cole County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Green means local health regulations throughout Missouri are struck down and rendered obsolete, reported the Post-Dispatch.

“This case is about whether Missouri’s Department of Health and Senior Services regulations can abolish representative government in the creation of public health laws, and whether it can authorize closure of a school or assembly based on the unfettered opinion of an unelected official. This court finds it cannot,” said Green, according to the Post-Dispatch.

“Missouri’s local health authorities have grown accustomed to issuing edicts and coercing compliance. It is far past time for this unconstitutional conduct to stop,” added Green, a Republican who was first elected as county judge in 2010.

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2020 and claimed that state health officials were overstepping their authority by issuing coronavirus mitigation measures such as quarantines and business closures, reported the Post-Dispatch…

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/582891-missouri-judge-says-covid-19-public-health-orders-must-be-lifted

January 6 prisoners evacuated on stretchers after guards gas them

Sixth Amendment:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

“The history of the right to a speedy trial and its reception in this country clearly establish that it is one of the most basic rights preserved by our Constitution.” So finding, the Supreme Court held in the 1967 case of Klopfer v. North Carolina…

What’s the delay in the January 6 political prisoners’ right to a “speedy trial”? It’s been ten months already. Will the detainees sue the government, aka the citizens of the USA, for the poor conditions and treatment in the prison and their lost time – at work, with family and friends, etc? There have been other reports of abuse and neglect in this prison, toward these citizens.

On Friday, the attorney for Kelly Meggs, one of the prisoners being held without bail for events on January 6, filed a notice informing the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of a report that guards had negligently or intentionally disbursed a toxic substance in such a way that prisoners were inundated with it, resulting in several being evacuated on stretchers. Meggs’s lawyer also mentioned the dire conditions in the jail and requested, that the court release on bail those arrested in connection with events on January 6.

Here, in its entirety, is what Meggs told his family about the gas incident in the jail, all because one of the detainees didn’t want to wear a mask (which they’re forced to wear 24/7, even when in solitary):

When a January 6 detainee in the CTF / D.C. jail refused to wear a mask, the guards responded with some kind of mace or pepper spray.

This created a disturbance and the wing was locked down at 10 AM.

“They sprayed mace or some type of gas at an inmate and kept missing so it went into an intake that fed into other cells and the lady with the key left because she didn’t like the gas, so the inmates in the cells who were being fed the gas from that intake were locked in for like 15 minutes while it was going into their rooms and they couldn’t see/breathe.”

“Had to take some guys out in stretchers to the med bays”

That is. it seems to have been the ventilation system acting on its own that created most of the problems, although one wonders if the initial action was the correct action.

There may have been much more of a confrontation and disturbance, but counsel has no confirmation of that.

Other reports are that three detainees were taken out on stretchers, although it is not clear if this was merely preventative.

It is not clear if this led to more than one detainee being in a conflict with guards.

Kelly Meggs was not in one of the cells that the gas was being cycled into by the ventilation system.

The attorney, clearly, is trying not to exacerbate things even more when it comes to the guards’ treatment of prisoners, but we’ve heard about what’s being done to them. This is un-American in the extreme: It’s cruel and unusual punishment and the denial of the right to a speedy trial, not to mention overcharging political prisoners…

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/11/january_6_prisoners_evacuated_on_stretchers_after_guards_gas_them.html

American Bar Association Rule 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

I have heard that the Prosecutor in the Rittenhouse case has political aspirations and might have seen this trial as an opportunity to make a name for himself. He behaved in a way that made me think of daytime soap operas.

In fact, after the closing arguments, a new high definition video emerged. The Prosecutor should have provided it to the Defense but had not.

If you watched the trial, read through and see which of these “Special Responsibilities” were met and which were not met:

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

(a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;

(b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining, counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;

(c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights, such as the right to a preliminary hearing;

(d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;

(e) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:

(1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by any applicable privilege;

(2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; and

(3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information;

(f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor’s action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused and exercise reasonable care to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6 or this Rule.

(g) When a prosecutor knows of new, credible and material evidence creating a reasonable likelihood that a convicted defendant did not commit an offense of which the defendant was convicted, the prosecutor shall:

(1) promptly disclose that evidence to an appropriate court or authority, and

(2) if the conviction was obtained in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction,

(i) promptly disclose that evidence to the defendant unless a court authorizes delay, and

(ii) undertake further investigation, or make reasonable efforts to cause an investigation, to determine whether the defendant was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit.

(h) When a prosecutor knows of clear and convincing evidence establishing that a defendant in the prosecutor’s jurisdiction was convicted of an offense that the defendant did not commit, the prosecutor shall seek to remedy the conviction.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_8_special_responsibilities_of_a_prosecutor/

VICTIM: “BIDEN & OBAMA RAPED ME”: POWERFUL ELITES, CELEBS, DEMONIC SEX ABUSE RING

Much like Kerth Barker’s books… Ally Carter’s story is not an exaggeration. This is what Trump was working to end and since he was doing that work, he was hated by those who profit from it. Listen up, America. These are our “leaders” and we need to clean house.

https://rumble.com/vp0za3-victim-biden-and-obama-raped-me-powerful-elites-celebs-demonic-sex-abuse-ri.html

Secret Contracts between People of The World & Corporations, Governments, Agencies, Banks – becoming Sovereign

Who are you really and what are your rights as a human being, a citizen of the world? What is your worth on the stockmarket? You’ll be surprised to find out the answers to these questions… but there is much more to learn than is in this recent interview of Bibi Bacchus by Jason Liosatos:

It is quite unbelievable what swindle is being done to billions of people all over the world by the slavery system….

For more infos visit: https://newearth.university/courses/u

New Earth Project channel: https://bit.ly/32D17dW

https://newearth.media/

Gemstone University channel: https://bit.ly/2IYNVZq

https://rumble.com/vo73ld-secret-contracts-between-people-of-the-world-and-corporations-governments-a.html

Nebraska AG’s Devastating Critique re Suppression of Effective Covid Therapies

By Jarrad Winter, American Thinker, October 19, 2021

Legal opinions usually aren’t terribly fun to read, but if you’ve been an ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine advocate for use against Wuhan Plague, this one definitely will bring you much joy.

It’s a rather lengthy and full spectrum opinion issued by Doug Peterson, Nebraska’s Attorney General, in response to a query from the state’s Department of Health and Human Services as to whether physicians can be persecuted and tormented for prescribing ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine to patients sick with the China Flu. What the AG’s response amounts to is a full and complete takedown of the conspiracy to suppress cheap and effective early Covid-19 treatments.

All the players — FDA, CDC, Fauci, Big Pharma, the media, all of them — get a glorious and swift kick in the rear end. Portions of it even made me laugh out loud. As far as legal documents go, it’s definitely easy reading and understandable to everyone. It seems clear that the AG’s office went to some trouble to layout the whole saga in a way the masses can understand without translation by legal scholars.

What follows are some of the most relevant parts (at least in my sometimes-humble opinion), but it really is in everyone’s best interest to personally read the opinion in full. People must individually understand what’s actually happening for themselves. This is what will enable We The People to course correct and divert from the ruinous path set for us by the overlords…

The rest here: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/10/nebraska_ags_devastating_critique_of_the_suppression_of_effective_covid_therapies.html

Nebraska Doctors Now Legally Able to Prescribe Ivermectin & Hydroxychloroquine

Odd, don’t you think, that doctors have been punished for recommending, or even talking about these two remedies? This sad fact reveals how “free” or oppressed the medical industry actually is. Once upon a time, I knew an oncologist who had discovered a cure for cancer, but he said the AMA would destroy him if they knew.

Many good doctors have been sacrificed for the sin of helping people beat cancer. What do you think is the inhibiting factor in the health field? Hint: it starts with an “L”, its center sounds like “fear” and it is an “ism”… a “religion” that is based not on Love and Life, but on death and destruction. That’s right – Rockefeller medicine.

  • The Facts:
    • Nebraska’s Attorney General’s office has ruled that physicians who prescribe ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine in the state to treat or prevent COVID in patients will not face legal action.
    • Doctors must get informed consent from their patients.
    • Many doctors and scientists around the world have alleged they treated COVID patients successfully with ivermectin and HCQ.
    • Mainstream media and health authorities maintain that it has no value when it comes to COVID.
  • Reflect On:
    • Why has there been such resistance to allowing physicians to use a safe treatment for COVID-19?
    • How many lives could widescale treatment have saved?

Throughout this pandemic, doctors have been barred from prescribing hydroxychloroquine & ivermectin for patients with COVID. Nebraska state Attorney General Doug Peterson issued his “official opinion” claiming that doctors in the state can now prescribe the two medications off-label, so long as patients give their informed consent…

Much more – including the process they went through in Nebraska, at https://thepulse.one/2021/10/18/nebraska-doctors-now-legally-able-to-prescribe-ivermectin-hydroxychloroquine/

Legal advice if you are ordered to vx or lose your job – stay un-injected & free – Dr Trozzi

From a lawyer:

If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a great way to handle it. (Conditional acceptance)

The secret is NOT to refuse it. [Rather, send this to your employer:]

“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead. I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements.”:

  1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?
  2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?
  3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?
  4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?
  5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?
  6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code?
  7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?
  8. Can you please advise me if I were to experience any adverse reactions is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable? If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company I’m currently employed with with be responsible & liable as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

  1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.
  2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.
  3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.”

The point is that if they CANNOT provide that information you’ve NOT refused.

https://drtrozzi.com/2021/10/legal-advice-to-stay-un-injected-and-free/

TOP LAWYER TOM RENZ HAS PROOF THEY’RE COVERING UP MASS VAXX DEATHS – SGT Report

So many videos, so little ability to embed them, so please go to

https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/10/top-lawyer-has-the-proof-theyre-covering-up-mass-vaxx-deaths-tom-renz/

Dr. Daniel Nagase – Nuremberg Trials 75th Anniversary

On the Steps of the Vancouver Art Gallery on October 1st, celebrating the 75 Anniversary of the Nuremberg Code, Dr. Nagase gave this Powerful Speech.

Master of Ceremonies: Joseph Roberts, Publisher and Founder of Common Ground Magazine

Dr. Daniel Nagase has been a doctor for over 15 years, he graduated from Dalhousie Medical School in 2004.
He has been an emergency doctor for 10 years and has been working in rural underserviced communities throughout Alberta since 2015.

He has a story he’d like to share with you about what happened after he gave Covid patients Ivermectin in a small hospital west of Red Deer.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cLZ3s6spE6k3/