“Crisis actors” are people they hire to show up when an event is planned to create a demand for gun control.
Virginia has an open casting call right now for “crisis actors”…at the same time a massive pro gun rally is to take place. AMISSVILLE. VA – SEEKING ACTORS FOR ONGOING “LIVE” ROLE PLAYING PROJECT – CURRENT – PAID LINK
This idea is heretical in the academic community so this professor is very courageous to voice his point of view. Darwin’s theory is just that – a theory – and it was designed to establish science as the new religion, a religion that the materialists could use to run the world.
The Facts:Darwin’s Theory of Evolution has, for a great many scientists, become relatively obsolete in the face of new research into the creation and generation of life.
Reflect On:Can we see that the belief in the randomness of the creation and evolution of life, as posited by Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, is a limitation on human progress and no longer serving us in our collective evolution?…
Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asked for records of White House meetings in 2016 between Obama administration officials, Ukrainian government representatives, and Democratic National Committee (DNC) officials.
Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, and Grassley, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, asked Archivist David Ferraro to produce records so as to “better understand the nature of these meetings, including who attended and what was discussed,” in a letter sent on Thursday (pdf).
“According to recent reports, in January 2016 Ukrainian governmental officials and corruption investigators met with members of former President Obama’s National Security Council (NSC), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of State and Department of Justice (DOJ). Obama Administration officials also met with Alexandra Chalupa, a contractor for the DNC, who reportedly worked with Ukrainian officials to undermine the Trump campaign,” Grassley said in a news release…
This is an incredible explanation by Attorney General William Barr, of a “resistance” movement that went into gear immediately after the 2016 election.
One comment said, “If courts say there was a D.S. [Deep State] coup on Trump, he could get up to three terms.” Wading through the D.C swamp must be something like walking in jello, so additional time in office might make it possible for him to accomplish what he promised. He has a long history of building big projects and he’s a “get it done” kind of person, so it must be very frustrating for him to have his work blocked at every turn by people who are in office to milk the system – and to destroy the USA.
There has been a plan for many years to destroy this country. Someone told me after the 2016 election: “Everything we have worked for, for 250 years – gone!” “We who?” is what I ask… and what is gone? Obstruction has been the name of the game since the 2016 election.
The official story of Jeffrey Epstein’s death is highly debated on the www. Some say he committed suicide, as reported by the press. Others say he was murdered – killed by a person or persons unknown. Others believe he was whisked away by mysterious parties and is alive and well in a remote location. Some speculate the body on the gurney was not even Epstein, but another man; after all, the nose and ears match those of Anthony Bourdin (who supposedly committed suicide by hanging himself on a doorknob with a red scarf). Many are adding the words “Epstein did not kill himself” here and there and everywhere – in the middle and at the end of interviews and posts, tweets and comments; it’s all over the web. So is it any wonder that a high-ranking FBI official asked:
“How can (Attorney General) Barr claim the FBI is conducting a thorough investigation of Epstein’s death if there is no DNA test?”…
“This is absolutely outrageous,” another top Justice Department official said about the failure to perform a DNA test. “This is not a routine case where someone died in their sleep. He was in federal holding in MCC.”…
The FBI is investigating Epstein’s prison death but are we to believe the Bureau too failed to obtain a DNA sample from Epstein for analysis at the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory (FBI Laboratory) which routinely conducts analyses of forensic DNA cases as well as of convicted offender samples? The Justice Department collects and warehouses DNA samples from persons who have been charged or convicted of certain crimes, especially like Epstein’s previous crimes. Epstein was a registered sex offender.
These convicted offender DNA samples are uploaded into the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) and compared with DNA profiles generated from evidence collected from crime scenes and victims as part of routine criminal investigations.
It appears the FBI dropped the ball here as well by not treating Epstein’s body as evidence and securing a DNA sample prior to releasing the body.
Thanks to the following article from Salon, it occurred to me that Epstein might have enrolled his famous scientist friends to support the bankers’ worldwide carbon tax plan – which surely would have been a very profitable venture – and to rally behind “climate change” because they had unquestionable credentials and “star power”. Or might they have been promised “star status” (or other “goodies”) if they would just jump on the “climate change” bandwagon? Bribery, seduction, blackmail, threats… all are tools of the “elite” as they like to call themselves. And Epstein was apparently serving the “elite” in various ways, especially with adolescent girls, whom he also entrapped with cold cash.
The list of confidants and friends who were fêted by the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein included a number of prominent scientists. Among the eye-popping names that appeared on the list: the late cosmologist Stephen Hawking, Nobel-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, physicist Frank Wilczek, neurologist Oliver Sacks, and geneticist George M. Church…
That Epstein was interested in cavorting with scientists does not bode well for the sciences at large — mainly, what it says about the culture of scientists is dangerous and antithetical to the process of science…