[When you hear the word “virus” below, think exosomes, which are very similar in morphology to viruses and are excreted by cells under stress, the kind of stress that would be caused by calcium overload. Then see Martin Pall’s lecture about 5G and “voltage gated calcium channels” below. Personally I think there’s a synergistic toxicity between 5G and whatever virus is circulating at any given time, including this lab-created, ultra-contagious but not ultra-lethal virus. In other words, we’re dealing a binary weapon. -rw]
A former head of Vodaphone’s 5G department blows the whistle revealing that Coronavirus is being used to cover up the fact that it’s actually 5G frequency radiation that’s causing cell poisoning and killing people.
No “vaccine” will protect people from 5G. Hopefully the Luciferian-Satanic diabolical plans will come to naught.
The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:
“Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.”…
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.
If people really understood how this “science” was done, I would hope they would storm the gates and demand honesty, transparency and truth…
This NGO (non-government organization) is making inroads, already cutting deeply into your personal freedom.
Wearing your mask?
Staying a good distance away from others?
Wondering what happened to your school, job, income?
Feeling a bit like 2020 is a build-up to “1984”?
But don’t worry. The Rockefeller Foundation has everything under control. Thanks to their brilliant 2010 plan, mega financial support and broad influence in NGOs David Rockefeller established all over the world, we’re well on our way to (as they put it):
A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback
Dr. Peter Breggin, a psychiatrist, has written more than a dozen bestselling books on psychiatry and the drug industry. He’s frequently referred to as “the conscience of psychiatry” because he’s been able to successfully reform the psychiatric profession, abolishing one of the most harmful practices, namely lobotomies and other experimental psychosurgeries.
He was the first to take a public stand against lobotomies as a young man, and was able to change the field as a result. He’s featured in Aaron and Melissa Dykes’ excellent documentary, “The Minds of Men.”1
Now 83 years old, Breggin has seen a lot, and in this interview, he shares his own evolution and experiences as a psychiatrist. His interest in psychiatry began at the age of 18, when he became a volunteer at a local state mental hospital.
“It was a nightmare,” he says. “It was like my uncle Dutch’s descriptions of liberating a Nazi concentration camp. The place stank. People were sitting in these bare, barren concrete corridors.
They had a TV set that wasn’t working … and bolted down tables and chairs so the people couldn’t throw them at each other. No attention being given to them at all. Often just sitting there; some hallucinating, and somebody told me that the girl in the corner coiled up in a ball on the floor by a radiator had been a Radcliffe student …
The doctors were callous, the aids were callous, there was just no love in the place at all. I could tell, even though I didn’t really have much experience growing up with love, I could feel that what was missing was love, care, nurturing. It was so clear.”
Breggin eventually became the leader of that volunteer program. He and 200 other students painted the walls and took patients for walks. He asked the superintendent to assign one patient per volunteer aid, to build real relationships. The superintendent balked at the idea, but eventually gave in. Breggin tells this story in his book, “Toxic Psychiatry.”2
“We ended up getting almost every patient out of that hospital,” he says. “We got them placed in different places that were much better. We got some back with their families. It was so clear to me that this was the way to go …
Breggin Spearheaded Drug-Free Psychiatry
Breggin focused on helping people without medication. “I learned very quickly that the most disturbed people would calm down and relate when somebody cared about them, wasn’t afraid of them, was interested in them and made no pretense of being superior to them,” he says. Drugs, he explains, were simply stifling the patients. While they might ease some of the suffering, that relief came at the expense of brain damage…
The first I heard of the big ag – FDA – medical industry – pharmaceutical industry merry-go-round was when I read a book by the Ralph Nader group: A Chemical Feast. The book called them “bedfellows”: “Scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours.” Think about it. Still true today.
“The Real White Devil” is a mini-documentary about the evolution of the American diet, particularly focusing on the last fifty years, detailing the rise of added sugars and processed foods, the correlation between the introduction and widespread use of high fructose corn syrup alongside rising rates of obesity, the dangers of too much fructose in the diet, and finally, asking the question: who is benefitting from the obesity epidemic?
Sugar: The Bitter Truth is a fantastic lecture by Robert H. Lustig, MD, UCSF Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology, in which he explores the damage caused by sugary foods. I definitely recommend you watch it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnni…
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has given millions of taxpayer dollars to a U.S.-based group that partnered with the Wuhan, China lab to study bat coronaviruses.
NIH cancelled some funding under pressure in April after the partnership with the Wuhan lab was reported by the media.
A few weeks ago, NIH awarded more tax money to the U.S. group.
Scientists have long experimented with and genetically altered coronavirus to use as a vaccine “vector.”
Starting in 2014, the National Institutes of Health granted millions of dollars in U.S. tax money to a “global environmental health nonprofit” called EcoHealth Alliance based in New York City.
The grant was for an eleven-year-long project entitled: “Understanding the risk of bat coronavirus emergence.” It aimed to study coronavirus in bats in China to determine which strains had the greatest risk of spillover to humans. (In other words, in hopes of preventing something like the Covid-19 pandemic and/or providing quick mitigation.)
A total of $3,748,715 was given for the project from 2014-2019.
EcoHealth Alliance’s partners on the taxpayer-funded project included scientist at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The Chinese researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology also “received assistance from the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch and other U.S. organizations.”…
Chocolate reduces stress. Fish stimulates the brain. Is there any truth to such popular beliefs? The findings of researchers around the world say yes: It appears we really are what we eat.
A study in a British prison found that inmates who took vitamin supplements were less prone to violent behavior. And in Germany, a psychologist at the University of Lübeck has shown that social behavior is influenced by the ingredients consumed at breakfast. But what really happens in the brain when we opt for honey instead of jam, and fish rather than sausage? Scientists around the world are trying to find out.
Neuro-nutrition is the name of an interdisciplinary research field that investigates the impact of nutrition on brain health. Experiments on rats and flies offer new insight into the effects of our eating habits. When laboratory rats are fed a diet of junk food, the result is not just obesity. The menu also has a direct influence on their memory performance.
The role of the intestinal flora has been known for some time, but scientists are currently discovering other relationships. So-called “brain food” for example: The Mediterranean diet that’s based on vegetables and fish is said to provide the best nutrition for small grey cells. Omega-3 fatty acids, which are found in fish, for example, protect the nerve cells and are indispensable for the development of the brain – because the brain is also what it eats!
If this topic interests you, you might enjoy this book: Food and Behavior by Barbara Reed Stitt; it was published in 1997 but it’s still the best I’ve found on the subject of foods and moods. Foods are drugs.
Why do you think our medical monopoly is restricting a simple, inexpensive, effective treatment that works successfully in the rest of the world? Why are European countries, Mexico and Canada especially prone to Covid deaths? Does the degree of restriction on HCQ in a country correlate with the degree of control by Luciferians? Are they trying to kill us? Asking for a friend.
In 2004 – investigative journalist, Liam Scheff, exposed the fact that hundreds of Foster children at Incarnation Children’s Center [ICC] in NYC were used and abused as lab rats for unsupervised and unrestricted AIDS research and Vaccine studies by Big Pharma and The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID].
Years later in separate investigations – 13,878 children were discovered to have been made subject of the same fate during the 1980’s and 1990’s in six other states: Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, North Carolina, Colorado and Texas.
The other reports validated what Scheff had uncovered: there was no one watching the activities – but those who stood to gain from the torturous atrocities happening behind the closed doors of zealous profiteers where most illegal procedures were done without any parental permission, any outside oversight from an independent committee or child welfare agency.
Eventually a Congressional Hearing was held on the matter. (See link #1 below in the References for Liam Scheff’s exposé, link #2 for the documentary: ‘Guinea Pig Kids: ARV-Babies in New York City’, link #3 for more reports from The AP and The Washington Post, and link #4 for the record from The Congressional Hearing.)
As Scheff stated in his report:
“This former convent houses a revolving stable of children who’ve been removed from their own homes by the Agency for Child Services [ACS]. These children are black, Hispanic and poor. Many of their mothers had a history of drug abuse and have died.
Once taken into ICC, the children become subjects of drug trials sponsored by NIAID (National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, a division of the NIH), NICHD (the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) in conjunction with some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies – GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Genentech, Chiron/Biocine and others.
The drugs being given to the children are toxic – they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage and fatal skin disorders.
Note the Skull and Bones on the label of these ‘Black Box’ drugs.
Did you know SARS-COV (coronavirus) was patented in 1999?
Did you know that only man-made products can be patented?
Did you know that in October 2019, Johns Hopkins, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation held Event201, an exercise planning the upcoming “surprise” epidemic that Anthony Fauci had announced in January 2017?
Did you know that in May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published a plan called “Lock Step” for stepping up “government control and more authoritarian leadership” – facilitated by a pandemic?
This is an excellent documentary. Watch and listen very carefully.
Plandemic II: Indoctornation – powered by ise.media