Famous boxer David Rodriguez drops some info.
Parents, protect your children.
A long video, well worth watching.
One great, huge, red pill.
The Out Of Shadows documentary lifts the mask on how the mainstream media & Hollywood manipulate & control the masses by spreading propaganda throughout their content. Our goal is to wake up the general public by shedding light on how we all have been lied to & brainwashed by a hidden enemy with a sinister agenda.
With the stress of restrictions and self-quarantines, some Americans are lashing out at one another. They are criticizing each other’s attitudes, decisions and approaches.
When it comes to handling a crisis— or any pressure— I think a lot of an individual’s response has to do with personality type.
An alarmist personality will not be able to convince a fatalist to see things their way, and vice versa. The process of trying can create conflict and frustration.
Here are 17 key personality types when it comes to handling coronavirus. Which type(s) are you? What about your family and friends.
1. The Enforcer: This personality polices everyone else.
“You touched your face!” “Why aren’t you home in isolation?” “You let your kids eat like that?”
2. Drama Queen: This person creates drama around the simplest event.
“OMG! I went to the store and they were COMPLETELY OUT OF MY favorite potato chips! I can’t fall asleep at night if I don’t eat those special chips. I’m going to be a mess tomorrow morning! I won’t get any sleep. I’m definitely going to get sick…”
Read the entire article at: https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/03/17-key-personality-types-when-it-comes-to-handling-coronavirus/
One of the strangest issues to ever preoccupy the minds of the American people:
Every Democratic presidential candidate polling above 1% supports a bill that would force schools to include male athletes who identify as transgender girls on female sports teams.
The Equality Act, which passed the House in May with unanimous Democratic support, amends the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make “sexual orientation and gender identity” protected characteristics under federal anti-discrimination law.
The bill would force public schools to expand female athletic teams to include biological males who identify as transgender girls, as both critics and supporters of the bill have acknowledged. The bill comes as male athletes have racked up victories in female sports…
Former Vice President Joe Biden, the frontrunner, said passing the Equality Act would be his top legislative priority if elected.
Biden said the bill “is long overdue, and will ensure LGBTQ Americans are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve…”
When I was 21… not the Sinatra song, but when I, Patricia, was 21, I followed 20th Century Fox to Los Angeles and watched movie previews almost every evening. Movie critics comprised the audience. After the lights came up, if I felt good and had enjoyed the film, the critics talked about their dislike of the movie. If I felt bad and didn’t like the movie, the critics would praise it to the heavens. Apparently, “Joker” is a movie they didn’t like – not that I would like to watch it, for it sounds gory, but it might, therefore – if critics hate it – have some redeeming, albeit dark, social value in terms of current events.
You might not want to support this movie. One commenter at VigilantCitizen.com wrote:
“I truly believe this movie was created to spark mass violence and create exactly what the movie portrays. Killing people and the byproduct of it creates attention for said killer. Evil. Pure evil.” Another commenter wrote,
“I’m sorry but I personally don’t think that Joker is a good movie despite what you wrote VC. The only good thing about the movie is Joaquin Phoenix’s performance, but story wise the movie is thin. And the most obvious thing, TOO MUCH unnecessary violence. I know the movie makers probably think all the violence depicted in the movie is justified to show the transformation of Arthur Pleck to become the Joker. But c’mon, when you have no solid story in your movie that you need to show all the violence to distract the audience, that is NOT good filmmaking. And I’m not the only one who thinks this way. A lot of my friends, even those who are suckers for violent action movies, also think that this Joker is TOO violent.
“That being said, I agree with some other users here in this forum that comment this movie is not anti-media. As a matter of fact, I personally believe this movie is actually 100% part of the agenda despite it’s anti-media persona. I believe there are 2 goals this movie is trying to accomplish:
1. It makes people become more tolerant and accepting towards violence esp. against other people. In these few years, we have seen how people have truly lost their kindness and compassion towards other human beings. A lot of people (sadly) rather choose animals over other fellow humans. In other words: we, as a society and human beings, have lost our love for other people. This movie only reinstates that violence against other human beings is not only justified or acceptable, but also necessary to “purge” society from the “bad people”.
2. As the media has pointed out, they’re afraid this movie will inspire more Joker-wannabe shooters in the future in a world where there has already been a lot of shootings happening lately. In other words: they’re trying to bring the gun violence issue again so that society will become more prone to accept gun control effort by the government.
“So no, I don’t buy for one sec that the media is giving this movie a backlash because they feel like this movie is a “threat” to them for going against the agenda. I believe the media is on this as well to make the movie reach more mass. You can see that due to so many backlash, people even become more interested and curious about this movie. The Joker has already broken so many box office records even before reaching its 2nd week, further proving that bad press = good press to them.”
Protect your mind and your children’s minds from suggestions this psy-op movie might hold. From VigilantCitizen.com:
In this day and age, mass media critics do not evaluate movies by their artistic merit, but by the direction of their political message. To be deemed “good”, a movie needs to check a list of “agenda” boxes. Well, Joker does not check any boxes and it also goes against the grain. It is an uncompromising piece of art that is more akin to a low-budget auteur film than a DC Comics blockbuster. And, through its deeply unsettling character study of a “loser” who turns into a famous murderer, the movie provides a scattering critique of mass media.
Apparently, media sources did not appreciate the subversive messages in the movie and were quick to deem Joker “problematic”. Even before the official release of the movie, countless news articles associated Joker with “angry white men” and feared it would inspire Joker-copycats who would perpetrate mass shootings. Judging by the insistence of these articles, it was as if mass media was actually looking to speak into existence such as shooter by guaranteeing immediate and worldwide coverage of such an event. Appropriately enough, the movie addresses this exact brand of mass media perversion.
Indeed, on several occasions, the movie highlights the role of mass media in the creation and the validation of the monster that is Joker. And, on a wider scale, the movie links this media coverage to an uprising of the masses who identify the Joker as their hero and leader. In fact, while Joker is a bad guy, the bigger bad guy in the movie is mass media.
And real-life mass media did not appreciate the critique…
Although “Joker” was praised by most “serious” movie critics, mass media sources bashed the movie in all ways possible, even deeming it “dangerous”. Is it because the movie is actually bad? Or because it goes against their [Luciferian] agenda?…
Brad Pitt and Leonardo DiCaprio no longer appear on several ads in Hollywood for Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, as a conservative street artist has swapped their images with those of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and film director Roman Polanski.
The giant billboard had been rented by Sony to advertise the Quentin Tarantino movie that opened Thursday night, but by Friday morning not only had the photos of the actors been altered, but also the film’s title, which now reads: “Once Upon a Time In Pedowood.”
The artist behind the alterations goes by the name Sabo, and he says that the faux ads are meant to insult the entertainment industry for embracing Polanski, who pled guilty to sex with a minor four decades ago, and, to a lesser extent Epstein, who was arrested July 6 for sex trafficking of minors.
He also noted that the backdrop of the movie is the 1969 Charles Manson murders where the most high-profile victim was Sharon Tate, the actress who was married to Polanski at the time…
Is the Netflix juggernaut finally dead? Back in April, when Netflix reported strong Q1 earnings, what surprised most investors was the company’s unexpectedly weak outflook, predicting a sharp slowdown in subscriber growth, with roughly 5 million in new subscriber adds.
In retrospect, nobody was prepared for just how bad the final number would be, because moments ago while Netflix reported strong top and bottom line results, it was the collapse in Q2 subscriber growth that is the reason why the stock is…