The death cult that wants to suppress humanity has issued their warning: the lockdown of the world in the name of the global scamdemic is not the end of this madness. It is only the beginning. Join James for this week’s edition of #PropagandaWatch as he dissects the latest attempt to leverage the climate scam on the back of the COVID scam, and how both of these distractions are being used to indoctrinate the public into the death cult.
An excellent comment from a nurse, found under this video:
I’m an RN who knows a handful of other RNs that travel all over the US, and hospitals everywhere (including in NYC) are more than half empty (even in ICU’s).
There is inconsistency with what they say (official narrative), and their story does not hang together with itself. We must utilize logical and scientific analysis with this situation. If their claims are reduced to absurdity, we have a moral duty to ignore and even oppose them. In logic, this is called “reductio ad absurdum,” which is to play their claims out consistently to show their absurdity.
Dr Coleman is a general practitioner principal and a former Professor of Holistic Medical Sciences at the International Open University in Sri Lanka. He has an honorary DSc. He has given evidence to the House of Commons and the House of Lords. He has written over 100 books that have been translated into 25 languages and sell in over 50 countries.
The Prediction: Top climate specialists and environmental activists predicted that “global cooling trends” observed between WWII and 1970 would result in a world “eleven degrees colder in the year 2000 … about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” Bitter winters and floods from “delayed typhoons” would trigger massive drops in food production, followed by widespread famine…
What Actually Happened: Global cooling trends didn’t continue unabated, and temperatures stabilized. Within a few years, the same alarmists were predicting a life-threatening rise in temperatures, presaging many of the same dire effects on plant and animal life. Those new predictions were continually revised as their “near certainty” collided with the truth year after year, but prophets seem unchastened by their abysmal historical accuracy. Newsweek issued a correction to the 1975 article in 2006.
Thanks to the following article from Salon, it occurred to me that Epstein might have enrolled his famous scientist friends to support the bankers’ worldwide carbon tax plan – which surely would have been a very profitable venture – and to rally behind “climate change” because they had unquestionable credentials and “star power”. Or might they have been promised “star status” (or other “goodies”) if they would just jump on the “climate change” bandwagon? Bribery, seduction, blackmail, threats… all are tools of the “elite” as they like to call themselves. And Epstein was apparently serving the “elite” in various ways, especially with adolescent girls, whom he also entrapped with cold cash.
The list of confidants and friends who were fêted by the late financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein included a number of prominent scientists. Among the eye-popping names that appeared on the list: the late cosmologist Stephen Hawking, Nobel-winning physicist Murray Gell-Mann, evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, physicist Frank Wilczek, neurologist Oliver Sacks, and geneticist George M. Church…
That Epstein was interested in cavorting with scientists does not bode well for the sciences at large — mainly, what it says about the culture of scientists is dangerous and antithetical to the process of science…
Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling – Peter Ferrara
Climate change itself is already in the process of definitively rebutting climate alarmists who think human use of fossil fuels is causing ultimately catastrophic global warming. That is because natural climate cycles have already turned from warming to cooling, global temperatures have already been declining for more than 10 years, and global temperatures will continue to decline for another two decades or more.
That is one of the most interesting conclusions to come out of the seventh International Climate Change Conference sponsored by the Heartland Institute, held last week in Chicago. I attended, and served as one of the speakers, talking about The Economic Implications of High Cost Energy.
The conference featured serious natural science, contrary to the self-interested political science you hear from government financed global warming alarmists seeking to justify widely expanded regulatory and taxation powers for government bodies, or government body wannabees, such as the United Nations. See for yourself, as the conference speeches are online.
What you will see are calm, dispassionate presentations by serious, pedigreed scientists discussing and explaining reams of data. In sharp contrast to these climate realists, the climate alarmists have long admitted that they cannot defend their theory that humans are causing catastrophic global warming in public debate. With the conference presentations online, let’s see if the alarmists really do have any response.
The Heartland Institute has effectively become the international headquarters of the climate realists…
“…Another example is the array of technologies—often referred to collectively as geoengineering—that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun’s heat, in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. The process is also relatively inexpensive—the National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology’s potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions at the expense of others could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI’s benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And, as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI….”
Ever look up? Ever wonder what happened to our beautiful blue skies? They still have them over the Bohemian Grove event every year, the Bilderberg meeting, Washington D.C., over the Rockefeller mansion in New York State… but not here in mid-MO, nor in mid-OR. There are websites and FaceBook groups that document the spraying.
For more than 20 years we have been sprayed with RAID like bugs in a jar – “for our own good.” It’s part of the swamp dwellers’ plan for humanity. Drain the swamp!
Drive from coast to coast and you will see a white haze over most of the country, X’s drawn by jets. Here, just watch this video by Clifford Carnicom…
Harsh freezes in SE USA after the fruit trees bloom. Nature is neither stupid nor cruel. But humans can be both foolish and greedy. Could it be the weather is rigged to benefit those who deal in the “futures” market?
A futures market is an auction market in which participants buy and sell commodity and futures contracts for delivery on a specified future date.
What are those planes dropping in those huge plumes that spread out against the blue sky, making it white and hazy all day? Who funds this costly operation? Some call the discharge chemtrails or the activity geoengineering. It’s a nasty business, but somebody has to do it so that investors can bet on “futures” and make a killing on the stock market… and perhaps literally a killing, to wreck crops and reduce the food supply to reduce the population to their “ideal” 500 million mentioned on the Georgia Guidestones.
Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls the money can control the world. – Henry Kissinger, 1973