Attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Children’s Health Defense joins to discuss the much-touted HPV vaccine, which new evidence shows may be ineffective and why it has done tremendous harm. He also explains how legal loopholes exempt vaccine makers from rigorous testing. He goes on to discuss the revolving door between Big Pharma and the bodies that are supposed to oversee it and curtail its abuses. He argues that regulatory capture has turned the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) into “a vaccine company.”
The headline reads:
‘As if a storm hit’: more than 40 Italian health workers have died since crisis began
The article can be found at:
Comment following article:
Notice the 33 in the link that doesn’t relate to the article? Thirty-three (33) is a conveniently recurring number throughout Covid-19 news stories everywhere. Dark occult control symbolism there. Look into it for yourselves, but don’t put too much worry or energy towards it. Just notice the lies it accompanies and look for the Truth.
Double digits are their calling card. Who can forget their masterful destruction of the “twin towers” (II) on 9-11? Or the murder on 11-22-1963 of the wildly popular U.S. President John F. Kennedy? Look at the word Illuminati itself; see the “11”? The digits translate to 9333495129, which add up to 3, their favorite number. They scatter 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 99 everywhere. Why are products priced $9.99? Why is Route 66, Route 66? Why is the oil company called Phillips 66? And then there are triple numbers. WWW = 555. The mark of the beast is 666. Remember 20th Century Fox? FOX = 666. Members of the Illuminati are very superstitious people. They assign great significance to their symbols.
Symbolism will be their downfall. – Q
It must be terribly disheartening to be treated disrespectfully in boot camp, to be used as a guinea pig for new vaccines and trauma-based mind-control methods, and to then be put into a position where you are expected to pass that disrespect and even cruelty on, to others. Additionally, there is the stress of knowing that at any time you could be killed or kill – after a lifetime spent learning, “Thou shalt NOT kill” – being injured yourself and watching your buddies be injured and killed. Finally, after returning home, who pray tell, has your back? Not the government you served, apparently.
War is SO “last millennium”. Hurting people is barbaric. There’s got to be a better way for humans to live in this world, in peace, happiness and with prosperity for all. But then – the “military industrial complex” is big business, so death and destruction mean obscenely huge profits for that segment.
The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) this week released a survey showing that 44 percent of respondents said they have thought about suicide since joining the military, with only 10 percent saying they had thought about it prior to military service.
The top veteran advocacy organization’s 10th annual survey was issued over a three-week period in December and January to all IAVA member veterans and over 1,700 veterans responded.
Only 15 percent of those surveyed said the U.S. is making progress on combating military and veteran suicide. Sixty-seven percent of respondents said they personally know a post-9/11 veteran who has attempted suicide, up from 65 percent in 2019 and 54 percent in 2015.
Sixty-two percent of those polled said they personally know a veteran who has died by suicide, up from 59 percent in 2019, 45 percent in 2015, and 40 percent in 2014.
IAVA members were on Capitol Hill this week for a fly-in event for veterans to meet with lawmakers to lobby on behalf of the post-9/11 generation of veterans…
Listen to this interview with Graeme MacQueen, PhD, and read the pdf of his 2006 entire article, a compilation of compelling eye-witness testimonies of the explosions and “free fall” of the towers on 9-11. A followup article in 2009: “The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis”, details the physics of the impossible “free fall” theory by his co-author, mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti.
Both articles were published in Journal of 9/11 Studies. His more recent book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, examines the connection between 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks.
One of the greatest mysteries of September 11, 2001 is the collapse of the Twin Towers. Claims that explosions contributed to the collapses were made on 9/11 and have persisted, but studies supportive of the U.S. government’s account of events have ignored or denied these claims. A great deal is at stake in this debate. If explosions were critical to the collapses, the official al Qaeda narrative may need to be radically altered or abandoned altogether.
In January, 2006 an article by David Ray Griffin appeared entitled, “Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories.” Drawing on a collection of oral histories from the New York Fire Department (FDNY), Griffin argued the case for controlled demolition of the towers. I found myself intrigued by the data he had used and impressed by his method, but I decided there was room for further research. I wanted answers to two questions.
(1)Are the roughly 31 witnesses to explosions quoted by Griffin the total of all witnesses to explosions in these sources, or are there others he does not mention?
(2)Are there witnesses in these sources whose testimony supports the non-explosive collapse of the Towers—the U.S. government’s perspective?
I decided to read the primary sources in order to answer these questions. This paper gives the results of my research…
Read the full report at
Please send your thoughts and prayers to specifically deny your consent for a false flag in Europe. YOUR vote matters to the universe. AND share with your friends and families.
The “ill-dark-and-naughty” ones require our permission to pull off their dastardly deeds, so to interrupt their plans, we need to withdraw our consent. Simple statements are sufficient, especially when many people join together. This is what I say/pray :
“NO ONE has MY permission to harm me or anyone else” or “I do NOT consent to trickery, lies, theft, murder or destruction.” or other variations on that theme.
Whenever you feel less than happy about anything you hear about or see happening, – or even think – say something like the above to contradict it. These statements can also be used for issues like sleep or pain – physical, mental or emotional – for some naughty ones work on a personal level to torment individuals. Don’t let them “bug” you!
The very naughty people who put on events like 9-11 assume you consent if you don’t reject their hints of coming mischief. TELL THEM CLEARLY THAT YOU DO NOT CONSENT.
I think we might be wise to also withdraw our consent for weather extremes, for some say the harsh hurricanes, earthquakes, flash floods, fake clouds, insanely intense fires, etc may not be natural at all, but may be man-made. Some naughties high up in the government have a goal to “own” the weather by 2020, but hey! – NO ONE has MY permission to manipulate the weather
On CNN in November 2006: “I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that if the West doesn’t wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center.”
New David Icke book – 9/11 – THE TRIGGER: The Lie That Changed The World – Who Really Did It And Why.
David Icke has never been one to follow other people’s rules and impositions or bow to intimidation no matter what the source. He believes that with freedom being deleted by the day that someone has to have the courage to call out those transforming human society into a global prison camp in which only the ‘right’ opinions and information are allowed.
The central theme of The Trigger is what happened on 9/11 and the force that was really behind those attacks – no, not 19 ‘Islamic extremists’ who somehow flew wide-bodied jets with fantastic skill while being dubbed incompetent by flying instructors in one-engine ‘puddle-jumpers’.
The Trigger, however, is not only about 9/11. In exposing the network that orchestrated and covered-up those horrific attacks Icke reveals the force that is dictating your life in increasingly fine detail and leading the world along a dark and dangerous road to total Orwellian global control.
The book is written in two distinct, but fundamentally connected parts, and together they represent perhaps the most controversial book of modern times – and long before that – given the ever-gathering climate of mass oppression, censorship and freedom deletion. David Icke has had the courage to write it.
Do you have the courage to read it? If you do it will transform your view of 9/11. It will transform your view of everything.
Icke says Jews should especially read this book so they understand how they have been used and abused by the so-called “elite”. This series of “green sweater” videos is very interesting and worth a watch. Just keep moving from one to the other on YouTube. Icke is an excellent researcher.
Little did we know at the time, 9/11 was not a normal day of blue sky aviation. On the contrary, it was one of the busiest days in the history of American aviation, a dense forest of live fly exercises, drills, simulations, fake radar injects and utter confusion. And that was before the attacks even began. This is the story of 9/11 that you didn’t watch unfold on your TV that fateful day in 2001. This is the story of the 9/11 War Games.
Just a little horror from the war against the civilians of iraq. But it’s crazy conspiracy theory to think that the allied and integrated multigenerational mafias that control the western empire are satanists.
BTW: do you see the strategy of disintegration being used in the USA? It’s already well beyond info-psyops. The FBI-managed OKC bombing (search this site) was blamed on the media’s stereotypical mirage of bible-beating gun-hoarding white racist constitutionalists. The last word is key: the legal framework of the targeted country is the first casualty of such social engineering projects. Trump is an easy target for the controllers, but their obsession with him is strong evidence that he’s not on the inside like hillary. It’s a measure of the USA’s own advanced state of disintegration that his election was the lesser of two evils.
The erosion of a target country’s integrity and viability has always been a conscious goal of the Western colonial project. Creating instability and dissatisfaction with existing reality was a necessary prerequisite to “tame” and then integrate native peoples into the dominant hierarchical model. Today, of course, we are told that colonialism is a thing of the past. The leading nations of the international community no longer seek to enslave their less fortunate neighbours, but rather pursue policies of world benefaction – within the limits imposed by healthy competition, of course. When this miraculous conversion took place we are not told, but perhaps it occurred incrementally, parallel to the increasing divide between the world’s rich and poor. In any case, a casual glance at the state of the Muslim world is enough to shatter this foolish delusion.
As Iraqi society descends further and further into mayhem, comedians, satirists and commentators of all kinds have made great hay from the supposed incompetence and stupidity of our leaders. But as the Canadian Spectator suggested recently, if it should happen that the United States is not run by buffoons, “one must conclude that chaos, impoverishment and civil war in the Muslim world…far from being the unintended consequences, are precisely the objectives of U.S. policy.” (1)
As with 9/11, the trigger event for the War on Terror, incompetence is the preferred explanation for the nightmare scenario in Iraq today. Though counterintuitive to the domesticated populations of the West, a plan to deliberately fragment Iraq along ethnic lines is amply confirmed by the published record. Resuscitating earlier Zionist schemes, the US Council on Foreign Relations recently called for the dissolution of the “unnatural Iraqi state.” (2) On the grounds of its ethnic diversity, Iraq is said to be a false, artificial construct, a product of arbitrary colonial decisions in the early 20th century. It is a judgment that could apply to many of the world’s countries, and yet the theme is being enthusiastically adopted by reams of ‘experts’ who would never dream of questioning state sovereignty in Quebec, the Basque Country or Northern Ireland. In typical fashion, policy analyst Michael Klare recently dismissed Iraq as an “invented country…to facilitate their exploitation of oil in the region [the British] created the fictitious “Kingdom of Iraq” by patching together three provinces of the former Ottoman Empire…and by parachuting in a fake king from what later became Saudi Arabia.” (3) Accepting the Bush Administration’s bogus rationale for the invasion, Klare ascribed Sunni resistance to the desire for a bigger share of oil revenues in the future partition of the country. Missing is any idea that resistance extends beyond “Sunnis” or could be motivated by Iraqi nationalism or the need for self-determination.
Ultimately, the ease with which Western academics casually decide to reshape the countries of their choice owes itself to the continuing legacy of Orientalism. In classic nineteenth century style, the chattering classes suggest that Iraq, despite its five thousand-year history, is now incapable of managing itself, and so its fate must be decided by outside powers. A country that held together in 1991 through six weeks of the most intensive bombing campaign in history, (which according to the UN left Iraq in a “pre-industrial age”) and continued to survive through 12 years of the most complete and devastating sanctions ever imposed on any nation is now blithely consigned to history by concerned Western experts. To bolster their case, the myth of ancient sectarian hatreds, a staple of the ‘humanitarian intervention’ crowd, is rehashed and fed on a daily basis by journalists who neither question the authorship of “sectarian” attacks nor report the view of ordinary Iraqis, who blame the Occupation army and its puppet government for the orchestrated chaos…. [see important documentation omitted here -rw]
… Long after piles of corpses began appearing by the roadsides, victims of anonymous assassins, Newsweek magazine reported on a Pentagon plan to use counterinsurgency death squads to eliminate Iraqi Resistance fighters and their supporters. The so-called ‘Salvador Option’, named after a similar campaign in Central America in the 1980s, was confirmed by later reports of Interior ministry involvement in the burgeoning death squads. As the victims mounted, the corporate media filtered the story through its angle of Sunni fanatics targeting innocent Shia civilians. But the facts showed a different story. According to a report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the bulk of resistance attacks (75%) were on Coalition Forces, far exceeding that of any other category in their survey (with attacks organized by quantity, type of target, and numbers killed and wounded). In sharp contrast to the corporate media’s picture, civilian targets comprised a mere 4.1% of attacks. After 300,000 Baghdad Shias staged the largest popular demonstrations since 1958, M. Junaid Alam asked: “Would such a massive number of Shiites have shown up to protest the occupation if they thought that most of the Sunni-based armed resistance, also opposed to the occupation, was trying to kill them?” (11)
2005 saw a spectacular rise in the use of car bombs, many directed against innocent civilian targets. Though the Zarqawi network was said to have no more than about a thousand men in Iraq, it apparently had an endless supply of personnel ready to sacrifice themselves for the holy war. Other accounts, however, suggest a different explanation.