Story at-a-glance –
- The fact that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accepts millions of dollars from drug companies and vaccine makers may be at the heart of many harmful and nonsensical health recommendations
- The CDC has long fostered the perception of independence by stating it does not accept funding from special interests. In reality, it receives millions of dollars each year from commercial interests through its government-charted foundation, the CDC Foundation, which funnels those contributions to the CDC after deducting a fee
- Several watchdog groups — including the U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), Public Citizen, Knowledge Ecology International, Liberty Coalition and the Project on Government Oversight — are petitioning the CDC to cease making these false disclaimers and retroactively acknowledge conflicts of interest
- CDC accepted $79.6 million from drug companies and commercial manufacturers between 2014 and 2018 alone. Since its inception in 1995, the CDC Foundation has accepted $161 million from private corporations
- Government-chartered foundations allow corporations to fund and thereby control the work of agencies that are supposed to regulate them
The fact that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention accepts millions of dollars in funding from drug companies and vaccine makers is no minor problem. It may in fact be at the very heart of why so many harmful and nonsensical health recommendations end up being pushed down our throats.
The CDC has long fostered the perception of independence by stating it does not accept funding from special interests. In disclaimers peppered throughout the CDC website1 and in its publications, it says the agency “does not accept commercial support” and has “no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.”
Several watchdog groups — including the U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), Public Citizen, Knowledge Ecology International, Liberty Coalition and the Project on Government Oversight — are now petitioning2 the CDC to cease making these false disclaimers.3…
Third source confirms an Infowars original report that Secret Service is investigating event as a potential assassination attempt
The War Room – November 18, 2019
Alex Jones joins Owen Shroyer in the War Room to explain the latest details on this groundbreaking development. Share this live broadcast!
Human fertility is in a downward spiral, and scientists are warning that modern life — with its technological and chemical “progress” — is likely to blame. While female infertility tends to get the most attention, male infertility has made headlines in recent years, as research sheds light on the dramatic decline in sperm concentration and quality. According to the largest meta-analysis of its kind, sperm counts around the world declined by more than 50% between 1973 and 2013, and continue to dwindle today. The most significant declines were found in samples from men in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand.
While there are many factors that can affect male fertility, research suggests endocrine disrupting chemicals — found in plastics, personal care products, herbicides, non-organic foods and more — are largely to blame for the dramatic decline in reproductive health among men.
The Unites States permits more than 84,000 chemicals to be used in household products, cosmetics, food and food packaging, and a majority of these have never been tested for safety. In a 2005 study, the Environmental Working Group found an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in the umbilical cord blood of infants born in the U.S. Tests detected a total of 287 chemicals from pesticides, consumer products, food packaging and environmental waste, including BPA, flame retardants, PCBs and even DDT.
While endocrine disrupting chemicals are high on the list of contributing factors, they’re not the only ones. Other variables that can affect a man’s reproductive ability include EMF exposure, nutritional deficiencies and/or food intolerances, stress, immune deficiencies and obesity or inactivity….
No mention of the extreme toxicity of fictional reserve banking, debt based money and all the social and economic catastrophes they create and facilitate under the direction of the aristocrats who will occupy the other half of the earth. There can be no environmental sustainability on any scale when productive output is vacuumed into the subterranean crypts of the satanic establishment instead of being recycled back into the economy.
As the extinction crisis escalates, and protest movements grow, some are calling for hugely ambitious conservation targets. Among the most prominent is sparing 50% of the Earth’s surface for nature.
‘Half Earth’ and similar proposals have gained traction with conservationists and policy makers. However, little work has gone into identifying the social and economic implications for people.
Now, researchers have produced the first attempt to assess how many and who would be affected if half the planet was ‘saved’ in a way that secures the diversity of the world’s habitats.
A team of scientists analysed global datasets to determine where conservation status could be added to provide 50% protection to every “ecoregion”: large areas of distinct habitats such as Central African mangroves and Baltic mixed forests.
Even avoiding where possible “human footprints” such as cities and farmland, their findings suggest a “conservative” estimate for those directly affected by Half Earth would be over one billion people, primarily in middle-income countries.
Many wealthy and densely populated nations in the Global North would also need to see major expansions of land with conservation status to reach 50% — this could even include parts of London, for example.
The study’s authors, led by University of Cambridge researchers, say that while radical action is urgently required for the future of life on Earth, issues of environmental justice and human wellbeing should be at the forefront of the conservation movement.
“People are the cause of the extinction crisis, but they are also the solution,” said Dr Judith Schleicher, who led the new study, published today in the journal Nature Sustainability. “Social issues must play a more prominent role if we want to deliver effective conservation that works for both the biosphere and the people who inhabit it.”…
Money will be redirected to clean energy innovation, efficiency and renewables
The European Investment Bank will cease lending for fossil fuel projects in two years, officials announced late yesterday.
The EIB board of directors adopted the plan after heated debate, with some countries objecting to the inclusion of natural gas in the lending ban. The shift is the boldest measure taken against fossil fuels by a development bank to date, and it may pressure other financial institutions to follow, such as the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.
The new policy means that EIB will cease issuing loans for projects aimed at coal, oil and natural gas infrastructure. The move takes effect at the end of 2021, officials said, allowing enough time for projects underway to be completed….
Projects such as military deployments and forced vaccinations perhaps? But I’m sure they’ll be exempt anyway.
Since all money is created by bank loans, you can see the effect this will have over time. Slow strangulation of carbon-based energy production, with no comparable energy alternatives available.
After a class-action lawsuit was filed in October against the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS), several hospitals, and several doctors, audio has surfaced of some of the defendants in the case plotting to collude with DCFS to take children away from parents extra-lawfully.
Recordings of these doctors at a committee meeting appear to support the plaintiffs’ claims alleged in the lawsuit, which states that the hospitals and agencies named in the suit:
“..used the power given to them as State officials and/or employees and through their authorities and investigative powers to cause the Plaintiffs to be threatened and coerced into accepting unwanted and unnecessary medical procedures.”
In April of 2018, the Perinatal Advisory Committee (PAC) that operates under the Illinois Department of Health met to discuss giving injections of Vitamin K in violation of the written refusals of parents. Not all the people on the recording can be identified by voice. PJ Media reached out to the members of the PAC but none would respond to identify who is speaking. But it is certain that all persons speaking are on the committee and a list of who was there can be seen at the end of this article. According to PJ Media, following is a transcript of the recording….
Synthetic Vitamin K Injection Is Not Risk-Free as Claimed
As noted in a 2001 article in Pediatric Pharmacotherapy,12 the standard practice in the US is to administer an intra-muscular injection of 0.5-1 milligram (mg) of phytonadione within one hour of birth. Phytonadione is a fat-soluble synthetic vitamin K1 analog.
Ironically, the phytonadione13, 14 drug insert warns that it can cause severe, sometimes fatal, allergic reactions when injected into a muscle or vein,15, 16 and is ideally taken by mouth or injected under the skin. Signs of an allergic reaction include hives, trouble breathing, swelling of the face, lips, tongue, or throat.
One recent PLOS ONE study17 looking into this issue found that allergic reactions appear to be linked to the preservatives in the vitamin K1 injection:
“[S]erious anaphylaxis-like symptoms appeared in beagle dogs after the administration of vitamin K1 injection for the first time. The plasma histamine concentration increased, and blood pressure decreased sharply. After sensitization, dogs were challenged with vitamin K1 injection and displayed the same degree of symptoms as prior to sensitization. However, when the vitamin K1 injection-sensitized dogs were challenged with a vitamin K1-fat emulsion without solubilizers such as Tween-80, the abnormal reactions did not occur…
Our results indicate that the adverse reaction induced by vitamin K1 injection is an anaphylactoid reaction, not anaphylaxis. Vitamin K1 injection induces the release of inflammatory factors via a non-IgE-mediated immune pathway, for which the trigger may be the solubilizer.”
Even more ironic, pregnant women are warned that it is not known whether taking phytonadione might harm their baby if taken during pregnancy or while breast feeding.18 The recommended daily allowance (RDA) for infants 0-6 months is 2 micrograms (mcg) per day, so they are receiving a dose that is 5,000 times the RDA.
The RDA for adult women is 90 mcg/day. If you’re an adult suffering minor bleeding due to warfarin use, a one-time dose of 2.5-5 mg is recommended. If an adult overdoses on phytonadione, they’re advised to call Poison Control. And yet newborn babies are given a 1 mg injection whether they in need of it or not. This is a highly irrational approach anyway you look at it. It’s simply not supported by the science in any way shape or form …
… Phytonadione Injectable Emulsion, USP injection is a yellow, sterile, aqueous colloidal solution of vitamin K 1 , with a pH of 3.5 to 7.0, available for injection by the intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes. Phytonadione Injectable Emulsion, USP is available in 1 mg (1 mg/0.5 mL) single-dose vials. Each 0.5 mL of Phytonadione Injectable Emulsion, USP contains the following inactive ingredients: 10 mg polysorbate 80, 10.4 mg propylene glycol, 0.17 mg sodium acetate anhydrous, and 0.00002 mL glacial acetic acid. Additional glacial acetic acid or sodium acetate anhydrous may have been added to adjust pH to meet USP limits of 3.5 to 7.0. …
Wow, so their precision quality controlled manufacturing process can result in a pH ranging from strongly acidic to neutral? WTF? Do manufacturing standards exist even in principle?
HepB vaccine is also often given at birth:
… 2.3 Recommended Dose and Schedule
Persons from Birth through 19 Years
Primary immunization for infants(born of hepatitis B surface antigen[HBsAg]-negative or HBsAg-positive mothers), children (birth through 10 years), and adolescents (aged 11 through 19 years) consists of a series of 3doses(0.5mLeach)given on a 0-, 1-, and 6-month schedule….
… Each 0.5-mL pediatric/adolescent dose contains 10mcg of HBsAgadsorbed on 0.25mg aluminum as aluminum hydroxide….
Polysorbate 80 is used to transport drugs and even nanoparticles across the blood brain barrier:
Would the aluminum hydroxide from the simultaneous vit K shot act differently?
And then there’s the benzyl alcohol and propylene glycol factors (look it up if you dare).
Medicine’s cluelessness about the umbilical cord is probably also an important factor in newborn hemorrhage: the cord could be clamped while the placenta is undergoing compression in the contracting uterus:
Also the sudden shift in circulation pattern when the cord is clamped temporarily increases blood pressure on the brain:
How immediate cord clamping causes intraventicular haemorrhage
But who cares? You don’t want to be branded an “anti-vaxxer” do you? Trust your assigned authority figures. It will go easier that way.
Nearly 3,000 people attended a rally on the National Mall in Washington on Friday to bring attention to what they say is an epidemic of vaccine injury in America, an epidemic that is not getting either the medical or media attention it needs.
The event, called the Vaccine Injury Epidemic Event, was organized by the non-profit group Crazymothers. Founder Hillary Simpson told Epoch Times that she organized the event to bring doctors lawyers, scientists, legislators, and mothers together to address the vaccine issue from every angle.
“I think when you have 53 percent of American children suffer from a chronic issue you have to start to look at it,” she told The Epoch Times.
Simpson’s son had a severe reaction after receiving several vaccinations on the same day. After she made a video describing what happened, she estimates that she heard from thousands of parents who reported similar symptoms to her son’s. Common symptoms described in the reports were very high fevers, immediate signs of gastrointestinal issues, encephalitis (swelling of the brain), and seizures.
The other common theme she said is that when parents take a child with these symptoms back to their doctor, physicians say this isn’t a vaccine reaction.
Event speakers included Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Del Bigtree a journalist and producer of the documentary “Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe,” which looks at evidence of fraud in one of the key MMR safety studies done by the CDC, and Dr. Andrew Wakefield, the director of “Vaxxed.” The film’s makers say the film has been heavily censored.
The event also included a screening of “Vaxxed II: The People’s Choice,” a compilation of interviews with parents collected by the “Vaxxed” film team while on a screening tour for the first film.
On the 18-month tour, over 7200 people wrote on the tour bus the names of their loved ones who they believe were injured or killed by vaccines. At Friday’s rally, over 1200 new names were added, “Vaxxed” team members told Epoch Times.
The event comes amidst increasing calls for vaccine mandates and a culture of disbelief of parents who have concerns.
This year New York became the fifth state to not allow any religious or philosophical objections to receiving vaccines.
And Jimmy Kimmel, who has used his show on multiple occasions to discredit concerns about vaccine safety, implied in a segment with Dr. Oz that none of these parents were rational.
“What is going on nowadays? I know people who appear to be reasonable people who are questioning whether or not they should vaccinate their kids,” Kimmel said.
However concerns are pretty widespread. In an article in September, the New York Times cited a 2011 study that found a quarter of American parents had serious concerns about vaccines and that 30 percent worried that they might cause learning disabilities, including autism.
Media Don’t Show
Simpson said there were several documentary teams in attendance and some people who came from Australia and Europe. However, despite notifying media of the event, there was no mainstream coverage.
“We were not able to have any type of mainstream media coverage. I think it’s a question that is concerning and should be looked at: Why were thousands of parents who’ve experienced this showing up on our Capitol to raise awareness? Why was there a complete blackout?”
She and her team are all mothers whose children experienced vaccine injury, and all work unpaid, she said.
“There is one goal, and that is to get the message out about the marginalization of women around this issue because I think it’s a really important thing to talk about,” she added….
These quarterly meetings include a report from the Department of Justice (DOJ) on cases settled for vaccine injuries and deaths as mandated by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). The September 2019 report can be found here.
The NVICP was started as a result of a law passed in 1986 that gave pharmaceutical companies legal immunity from being sued due to injuries and deaths resulting from vaccines.
So far in 2019 the NVICP has paid out $206,295,187.00 in damages due to vaccine injuries and deaths. (Source.)
This is public information, but it is not covered in the corporate “mainstream” media. As far as we know, Health Impact News is the only media source that publishes these DOJ reports on vaccine injuries and deaths each quarter. Past reports can be found here.
In fact, by publishing these government reports, we are accused of publishing “fake news,” even though all the facts we are publishing here come from government-funded reports. (See: Self-Appointed Internet Police Declare MedicalKidnap.com and DOJ Vaccine Court Reports Fake News.)
The only narrative that corporate “mainstream” media outlets are allowed to publish regarding vaccines, is that they are “safe and effective,” and that the “science is settled.” Only medical professionals who agree to this narrative are allowed a voice in these media outlets.
Where the true facts regarding the danger and risks caused by vaccines are hard to hide are in the courts, such as these quarterly DOJ reports, which are mandated by law to be published.
So outrageous are the efforts of the corporate media giants to suppress this information, that in the rare instances where an attorney may be interviewed by them, the attorney’s credibility is attacked, usually by appealing to the authority of a doctor….