All posts by Rich Winkel

New study links autism, cancer to vaccines made with human fetal cells

A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox) and Hepatitis-A vaccines.

Using statistical analysis and data from the US Government, UK, Denmark and Western Australia, scientists at Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI) found that increases in autistic disorder correspond with the introduction of vaccines using human fetal cell lines and retroviral contaminants.

Even more alarming, Dr Theresa Deisher, lead scientist and SCPI founder noted that, “Not only are the human fetal contaminated vaccines associated with autistic disorder throughout the world, but also with epidemic childhood leukemia and lymphomas.” …

… the FDA has known for decades about the dangers of insertional mutagenesis by using the human fetal cell lines and yet, they chose to ignore it. Instead of conducting safety studies they regulated the amount of human DNA that could be present in a vaccine to no greater than 10ng. (www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/slides/5-4188S1_4draft.ppt )

Unfortunately, Dr. Deisher’s team discovered that the fetal DNA levels ranged anywhere from 142ng – 2000ng per dose, way beyond the so-called “safe” level. …

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/09/09/study-links-autism-to-vaccines-made-with-cells-from-aborted-babies/

The Climate Question

I’m not a climate scientist.   I have to rely on strangers for my understanding of 99% of what I think I know about what’s going on in the world.  Publications I tend to respect are adamant in their opposing views about 2 issues: that the earth is still getting warmer and that it’s due to human-generated CO2.  Mother Jones, for instance, has this very impressive spread in their latest issue which says the oceans and the earth as a whole have never been warmer, with the inevitable implication that it’s due to human activity: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/global-oceans-break-all-time-heat-record-world-pace-warmest-year-ever

But it turns out that both questions (warming, CO2 caused) can be seen in a larger perspective that raises important questions about basic assumptions.   The MJ article can be both correct and incomplete.  According to http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/09/07/global-warming-pause-extends-to-17-years-11-months/, global warming has been fluctating around a high plateau for almost 18 years, despite global CO2 concentrations rising steadily during that time.  This throws a monkey wrench into the IPCC’s theoretical computer models which were already highly suspect in any case, simply because highly non-linear systems like climate are virtually impossible to model accurately over time because of: a) incomplete understanding of positive and negative feedback mechanisms, b) lack of precision of computer representation of real numbers, c) lack of precision and completeness of measurements like temperature, humidity and and atmospheric gases, and d) the inevitable, massive amplification of such inaccuracies in simulations of complex systems over time.   Absent a dramatic change in  inputs, like a large increase in solar irradiance, digital computer models are nearly worthless in predicting the climate over decades.  Quantum computers might offer a solution in the future but for now we’re stuck with present technology.

Unfortunately one must also consider non-scientific issues when trying to judge the facts.  And this is where things get more complicated even than the climate.  Money talks, and seemingly objective scientific authorities can be easily manipulated when their lifestyles and income are involved.  It’s easy to see how such corruption  would work on behalf of the petroleum industry to minimize concerns over global warming, but most people overlook the flip side of the coin: the financial and political interests which stand to gain by implementing the only proposed solutions to rising CO2, which are entirely financial.  There’s no doubt that monetizing CO2 production will result in mass impoverishment and starvation around the world due to drastic rises in energy costs and the costs of everything that depends on energy, from food production and transport to home heating.   We should be very confident of the scientific reality before we implement such drastic measures, because people will die in large numbers.

Beyond the financial interests which are pushing for carbon markets, there’s another very powerful  interest which stands to vastly increase its power via the policing and regulatory infrastructure which would have to be imposed to enforce such a regime.   This is where finance gives way to raw power: those who can create real and virtual money out of thin air already effectively own whole nations.  It would behoove them to consolidate their subsidiaries into a global fascist regime, and carbon taxes would provide both the rationale and the funding to do so, as well as enforce the depopulation agenda which they have pursued for decades.

Despite claims by the MSM, the question of global warming, much less AGW, is far from settled.  At last count 1000 scientists have voiced dissent over the alleged consensus http://cfact.org/pdf/2010_Senate_Minority_Report.pdf.  The antarctic ice cap is currently the biggest in recorded history: http://sunshinehours.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/antarctic-sea-ice-extent-sept-15-2014-another-all-time-record/

Finally there are a couple glaring facts which must be pointed out:

Al Gore’s “hocky stick” graph is a blatant hoax.  It purports to show that global temperature follows global carbon dioxide concentration when the reality is the reverse: atmospheric carbon dioxide follows temperature via well known mechanisms: both ocean and land emit  CO2 when the temperature rises due to changes in gas solubility in water and enhanced biological activity.  It should go without saying that Gore has a large investment in carbon trading http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/11/03/blood-and-gore-making-a-killing-on-anti-carbon-investment-hype/ .

Finally, it turns out that Gore’s rarified social stratum has been banking on using global warming terror to pursue the above global governance objective for some time:

Because of the sudden absence of traditional enemies, “new enemies must be identified. … In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

— The first Global Revolution, Club of Rome, 1991

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_First_Global_Revolution

No one was talking about global warming in 1991 except this well financed group of evidently malthusian social engineers, who BTW are still mute to this day about the proven dangers of real environmental pollutants like endocrine disruptors and GMO’s.    Carbon dioxide is part of the solar-powered biological energy cycle of the earth, an essential input for plant respiration.   Increased CO2 increases plant growth, which might be helpful in remediating some of the devastation wrought by the same moneyed interests represented by the club of rome.

The upshot of all this is that I don’t know whether global warming is a concern but I doubt that it’s human caused in any case.   Just my 2 bits.

Who is Behind the ISIS Beheadings Videos?

SITE curiously surpassed the combined capacities of the entire US intelligence community

… Though routinely overlooked in the flurry of front-page coverage corporate media have allotted the three beheading videos–the most recent of which featured Scottish aid worker David Cawthorne Haines–it is common knowledge that SITE uncannily secures terrorist statements and videos well before the US’s wide array of lavishly-funded intelligence services.

For example, as the Washington Post reported in 2007,

[a] small private intelligence company that monitors Islamic terrorist groups obtained a new Osama bin Laden video ahead of its official release last month, and around 10 a.m. on Sept. 7 … It gave two senior officials access on the condition that the officials not reveal they had it until the al-Qaeda release. Within 20 minutes, a range of intelligence agencies had begun downloading it from the company’s Web site. By midafternoon that day, the video and a transcript of its audio track had been leaked from within the Bush administration to cable television news and broadcast worldwide.[6]

The video later proved to be fraudulent.

With the above in mind, one may ask, If parties within a US presidential administration or the State Department sought to bypass the potential scrutiny of a wide-ranging intelligence community concerning such matters, while simultaneously providing itself with the means to effectively propagandize the American public toward a broader end, what better way than to contract the services of an entity such as SITE? …

http://www.infowars.com/who-is-behind-the-islamic-state-isil-beheadings-probing-the-site-intelligence-group/

What Does the World Bank Do?

As many have heard by now, the leaders of the so-called BRICS nations – Brazil, India, China, Russia and South Africa – used the occasion of the 6th BRICS Summit in Brasilia, Brazil to announce the creation of the long-awaited BRICS Development Bank. Formally the “New Development Bank,” it will be based in Shanghai and capitalized with an initial $10 billion in cash ($2 billion from each of the five founding members) and $40 billion in guarantees, to be built up to a total of $100 billion.

Immediately, the press began touting the new bank as a potential rival to the current IMF / World Bank system of infrastructure development and poverty reduction in the third world. “BRICS Development Bank Could Challenge World Bank and IMF” touts US News & World Report. “BRICS Ink $50 Billion Lender in World Bank, IMF Challenge” asserts Bloomberg. The World Bank, for its part, is downplaying the rivalry, with World Bank President Jim Young Kim openly welcoming the bank at a recent meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. “The only competition we have is with poverty,” he told reporters at the meeting.

But all of this talk about a potential rival to the IMF and World Bank have exposed the general public’s ignorance about what exactly these institutions are and what they do. While most are familiar with the IMF and its predatory lending practices (and those who aren’t are encouraged to acquaint themselves with the “IMF riot” strategy that was developed in the third world and is now being imported to Europe), the World Bank is less scrutinized and less well understood. What is it, what does it do, and why is it important for the BRICS to challenge its hegemony in the development and poverty reduction arenas?

For the answer to that, we’ll need to examine the World Bank’s history, both the official history that it touts to the outside world and the real history of its part in plundering the developing world that it is supposedly there to help. …

http://www.corbettreport.com/so-what-does-the-world-bank-do-exactly/

Assange says ‘Google works like NSA’

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange equated Google with the National Security Agency and GCHQ, saying the tech giant has become “a privatized version of the NSA,” as it collects, stores, and indexes people’s data. He made his remarks to BBC and Sky News.

“Google’s business model is the spy. It makes more than 80 percent of its money by collecting information about people, pooling it together, storing it, indexing it, building profiles of people to predict their interests and behavior, and then selling those profiles principally to advertisers, but also others,” Assange told BBC.

“So the result is that Google, in terms of how it works, its actual practice, is almost identical to the National Security Agency or GCHQ,” the whistleblower argued.

‘Google deeply involved in US foreign policy’

Google has been working with the NSA “in terms of contracts since at least 2002,” Assange told Sky News.

“They are formally listed as part of the defense industrial base since 2009. They have been engaged with the Prism system, where nearly all information collected by Google is available to the NSA,” Assange said. “At the institutional level, Google is deeply involved in US foreign policy.”

Google has tricked people into believing that it is “a playful, humane organization” and not a “big, bad US corporation,” Assange told BBC. “But in fact it has become just that…it is now arguably the most influential commercial organization.”

“Google has now spread to every country, every single person, who has access to the internet,” he reminded.

http://rt.com/news/188896-assange-google-nsa-spying/

There are alternatives such as yandex.com, but google seems to have them all beaten in terms of volume of data and its cache is often a lifesaver if a site goes offline.  But google has an under-appreciated usability problem too.   It keeps tabs on the interests of its users through the use of cookies, arguably to help you home in on what you’re looking for.   When it presents a list of “hits” to you it monitors which ones you click on and builds a profile of your interests.  This is why two people searching for the exact same item often get different results.  The problem is that this personalized “info-bubble” can become confining and limit your horizons to what you already know.  Startpage.com tries to avoid this by performing your google search while blocking your cookies, so your search comes back unfiltered.   Of course who knows who runs startpage, but it’s an option.  Dmoz.org is a different approach, it’s a web directory maintained by humans.  Wikipedia has a list of search engines here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines

The Next Genocide: GMO Grass

Are you ready for some Kentucky Bluegrass? Kentucky Bluegrass isn’t the name of a band touring the South, easing work-a-day blues with a little ditty, it’s the name of a toxic new GMO lawn grass being engineered by Scotts to withstand copious amounts of Monsanto’s vile RoundUp chemicals. If that’s not something to sing the blues about, then I don’t know what is.

Monsanto and Scotts have teamed up to create genetically engineered lawn grass intended for both consumer and commercial use. If people actually start using this stuff, we may as well book B.B. King for some funeral performances in advance. Kentucky Bluegrass will be entirely unregulated, will not be labeled “GMO,” and because of the ease with which grass seed spreads, could in short order contaminate lawns, parks, golf courses, and pastures everywhere.

Just when you thought fighting Monsanto on GMO corn, soy, sugar beets, and alfalfa was enough of a headache, now they want you and your dog to roll in a green carpet of glyphosate-tolerant grass. In one breath, biotech companies tell us they are trying to feed the world and grow crops which will be resistant to weeds. In their very next step to control the natural world, biotech suggests we all grow poisonous weeds. It starts to make you wonder if the people behind Monsanto, Bayer, Scotts, Syngenta, et al, aren’t just a hybrid themselves – a genetically mutated beast.

The next time you head to the country club to play some golf or a park to walk your dog, you could be exposed to GMO grass without even knowing it. And who gave Scott’s and GMO permission to grow lawns everywhere with toxic GM grass? Our own United States Department of Agriculture in July of 2011 – no regulation required, whatsoever! By utilizing rules written in the 1950s that allowed companies to create organisms from plant genes, Monsanto and Scotts are now ready to spread their jacked up seeds everywhere.

In at least once instance, genetically modified grass has been identified as the culprit of taking the lives of livestock. Shockingly (and quite disturbingly), the GMO grass actually produced toxic cyanide and sent the cattle into a life-ending fit that included painful bellowing and convulsions. The deaths have led to a federal investigation centered in Central Texas, where the cattle had resided.

According to EcoWatch:

“Because genetically modified crops use DNA material derived from natural plant pathogens, they technically qualify as ‘plant pests.’

Scotts got around this level of restriction [by the USDA] because they avoided using plant pests in the development of the Kentucky Bluegrass. Instead, the glyphosate-resistant gene originated from other plants that were not considered pathogens. Furthermore, the gene was fired in with a gene gun, instead of being carried by a plant pest bacterium. By avoiding the use of plant pests in the engineering process, Scotts has also avoided that regulation trigger.” …

http://naturalsociety.com/gmo-lawn-coming-suburbia-near/