All posts by Patricia Robinett

Those “in the know” joke about the JFK murder…

Nixon…

George H.W. Bush…

George H. W. Bush may be one of the few Americans of his generation who cannot recall exactly where he was when John F. Kennedy was shot in Dallas on November 22, 1963. Bush stayed at the Dallas Sheraton Hotel November 21 and returned home on November 23.

Two FBI memos and a photograph of a man standing outside the Texas School Book Depository are among the intriguing items addressed in Jerome Corsi’s new book Who Really Killed Kennedy

Another new book out for the 50th anniversary of the JFK murder: They Killed Our President: 63 Reasons to Believe There Was a Conspiracy to Assassinate JFK by Jesse Ventura with Dick Russell and David Wayne

BRAINWASHING: A Synthesis of the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics

The following treatise on communist brainwashing, which has been published and republished since the 1930s, is an edited version of an actual textbook on Russian “psychopolitics.” It was used as a primer, here in America, to teach communist agents how to brainwash people, and, in fact, how to subvert entire populations. While the wording of this particular treatise and there are any number of them may or may not be completely authentic, two things are historically certain: 1) Such brainwashing activities really occurred, and 2) this volume accurately conveys the principles and techniques employed.

Today it is fashionable to consider the twin Soviet threats of the past nuclear attack, and subversion of America’s people and institutions as having been either exaggerated by the West, or downright imagined in the first place. Yet, ironically, the upheaval in the communist world is bringing with it startling revelations confirming many of the most serious accusations ever made against Moscow. For instance, two major books were recently published detailing for the first time Soviet complicity in Americas drug epidemic. It turns out that all those “paranoid, right wing” fears that the Soviets were intent on demoralizing America’s youth through drugs were well founded. For years, America’s liberal intelligentsia considered such notions as paranoid delusions.

An objective look at the state of America today her institutions, her socialistic political-economic drift, her young people’s values shows precisely the results that the Soviets, for decades, bragged they wanted to achieve. It is almost as though, while communism is dying (as a political system) throughout most of the world, the seeds of corruption it planted here in the U.S. have germinated and borne bitter fruit.

Don’t take my word for it. Read the following treatise on psychopolitics, and see whether the conditions predicted back then are not exactly what America faces today in the 1990’s. Consider the methods described herein the degradation of youth through sex and drugs, the seduction of this nation’s media, educational, and religious institutions, the discrediting of her leaders and decide tor yourself whether or not they are the very means that have been employed to accomplish these ends…

Download the pdf document and read much, much more. You will readily see the “communist” influence that has influenced the people of the USA. It really is a manual on how to create a fascistic, tyrannical state, not an economic system. Where did my America go?

The British Royal Family’s Circumcision Tradition

The British Royal Family’s Circumcision Tradition
Genesis and Evolution of a Contemporary Legend

  1. Robert Darby – Independent Scholar, Canberra, Australia
  2. John Cozijn – Media Research Consultant, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

The birth of Prince William’s son in July 2013 was the occasion for an outpouring of media speculation about the fate of the royal baby’s foreskin. The possibility that he might be circumcised was connected to a purported tradition of circumcision within the British royal family, said to be have been initiated either by Queen Victoria or by George I. In this article, we trace the origins and evolution of these stories and assess their validity. Our conclusion is that belief in a royal circumcision tradition derives from the reported circumcision of Prince Charles by the mohel Jacob Snowman in 1948, and the efforts of the British Israelite movement to concoct a “lost tribes of Israel” origin for the British race. These elements merged into a fully developed narrative that was widely disseminated from the late 1990s. The initially separate claim that the tradition was imported from Hanover by George I can be sourced precisely to 2012. We further show that these stories are inventions, and that the royal family circumcision tradition should be regarded as a classic instance of a contemporary legend or urban myth.

Read more at http://sgo.sagepub.com/content/3/4/2158244013508960.full

The ultimate “F you” – Fluoride in your water

This interview was recorded live in Holland in the 1970′s, and as a result of it being broadcast, 100,000 people took to the streets and had fluoride removed immediately.

In Dr. Dean Burk’s own words; “This amounts to public murder on a grand scale, it is a public crime, it would be, to put fluoride in the drinking water of people”.

Comparing ten big American cities that used fluoride to ten big American cities that did not – that had identical death rates before fluoridation – Burk determined that within a few years, the death rates from cancer and heart disease skyrocketed in the cities that fluoridated their water. Fluoride is, after all, rat poison.

fluoride

Read more at http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/fluoridated-water-amounts-public-murder-grand-scale-dr-burk

Also see The Codex, Fluoride, Auschwitz, Monsanto Connection By Barbara H. Peterson

Shaken baby syndrome? Or vaccine-induced meningitis-encephalitis?

A baby has died. There is bleeding inside the brain, bleeding behind the eyes, and swelling inside the brain. Many of these cases have been blamed on Shaken Baby Syndrome.

Yet the theory that these injuries can be produced by shaking a child has never been proven. To the contrary, biomechanics prove that it is not possible to manually shake a child with enough force to cause those symptoms.

Another cause of the triad of injuries associated with SBS is vaccine-induced meningitis/encephalitis, a severe reaction to vaccinations. And one researcher found that in every single case of SBS, the symptoms appeared shortly after the baby’s vaccinations.

Many parents or caregivers have been intimidated into “confessing” to killing the baby via the commonly used 9-step ‘Reid Technique’ police interview (detailed in the article linked to, below). In short, an innocent, grieving parent is often railroaded into confessing to the murder of their child – doubling the tragedy.

Read much more at: http://vactruth.com/2013/06/22/shaken-baby-syndrome/

Autarky, aristocracy, autocracy and amorality

autarky |ˈôˌtärkē| noun
economic independence or self-sufficiency.
• a country, state, or society that is economically independent.
ORIGIN early 17th cent.: from Greek autarkeia, from autarkēs ‘self-sufficiency,’ from autos ‘self’ + arkein ‘suffice.’

aristocracy |ˌariˈstäkrəsē| noun
the highest class in certain societies, esp. those holding hereditary titles or offices : the ancient Polish aristocracy had hereditary right to elect the king.
• a form of government in which power is held by the nobility.
• a state governed in this way.
• figurative a group regarded as privileged or superior in a particular sphere : high-level technocrats make up a large part of this “technical aristocracy.”
ORIGIN late 15th cent.: from Old French aristocratie, from Greek aristokratia, from aristos ‘best’ + -kratia ‘power.’ The term originally denoted the government of a state by its best citizens, later by the rich and wellborn, hence the sense [nobility,] regardless of the form of government (mid 17th cent.).

autocracy |ôˈtäkrəsē| noun
a system of government by one person with absolute power.
• a regime based on such a principle of government.
• a country, state, or society governed in such a way.
• domineering rule or control : a boss who shifts between autocracy, persuasion, and consultation.
ORIGIN mid 17th cent. (in the sense [autonomy] ): from Greek autokrateia, from autokratēs (see autocrat).

amorality |ˌāməˈralitē| noun
lacking a moral sense; unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something : an amoral attitude to sex.
USAGE See usage at immoral : Immoral means ‘failing to adhere to moral standards.’ Amoral is a more neutral, impartial word meaning ‘without, or not concerned with, moral standards.’ An immoral person commits acts that violate society’s moral norms. An amoral person has no understanding of these norms, or no sense of right and wrong; the word may refer to a ‘social deviant.’ Amoral may also mean ‘not concerned with, or outside the scope of morality’ (following the pattern of apolitical, asexual). Amoral, then, may refer to a judicial ruling that is concerned only with narrow legal or financial issues. Whereas amoral may be simply descriptive, immoral is judgmental.

In bygone days, everyone was independent and self-sufficient – autarkic. There were no possessions and there was no money, for everything was given free by Mother Nature. Then, along came a clever class that invented a new game – Monopoly – ownership, exchange, competition, money, castles and a history of its own making. Taxes were invented. Autarky went out the window. No one could live on planet Earth free of the game of Monopoly – a game in which a few won and most lost.

Aristocrats used wealth, wiles and hired hands they called “soldiers” to devastate and force villages to join into towns and towns into cities and cities into states, and states into countries. Lines were drawn in the sand and on the maps of the globe – and these lines were taken very seriously by all the little people who forgot that they once were autarkic.

Aristocrats competed one with another and went to great lengths to extend and protect their power and possessions. They gladly sacrificed the common people pawns to win another round of rich boy chess. They rewarded themselves with thrones, crowns, robes and titles.

Yet, as competitive as they were with one another, there was one way in which aristocrats gladly cooperated. They sat together in boardrooms, smoked cigars, and laughed uproariously as they made up outrageous stories aimed at convincing the good, simple, loving, peaceful, respectful people that their homes, families and friends were in danger, so they would be moved to fight other good, simple, loving, peaceful, respectful people – all for “national security” purposes… yes, this they all agreed on.

Thus was man set against man and country pit against country. And out of this was born man’s inhumanity to man, for aristocratic autocrats reward cruelty with medals and ribbons and parades, metal discs and pieces of paper with dollar signs printed on them.

The lines you see on the globe are not there when you visit in person, or even when you fly above the earth. The lines you see on globes are artificial boundaries, invented by those who take the lines and themselves very seriously. They continue to be committed to their own vision of the world – where judgment, degradation, separation, competition, violence, bloodshed, material possessions, power, and the deaths of millions – nay, billions – are all thought to be good things. “Good for business; bad for the people.”

The following little movie tells the tale of ownership and territoriality rather well:  The Gods Must Be Crazy. Compliments of Crackle.com…

TheGodsMustBeCrazy