Vitamin D is an essential nutrient that is manufactured by the body when it is exposed to sunlight, yet Vitamin D is blocked by melanin in dark skin, so supplements are important for dark-skinned people, especially in cool climates.
This is a two-hour video and the “table of contents” is below and also on the page where you will find the video on YouTube.
Bret Speaks with Gruff Davies and Linda Benskin on the subject of Vitamin D as a preventative measure for Covid.
00:00 Welcome and introductions
01:15 Vitamin D initial review in May 2020
03:40 VitaminDforAll letter
07:00 Inference and randomized controlled trials
11:05 Vitamin D toxicity
13:08 Public health authorities are worse than incompetent
15:07 Vitamin A and D toxicity
19:17 Negative Brazil vitamin D study
21:05 Positive studies on vitamin D
23:00 Normal function of vitamin D
25:20 Vitamin D from the sun and supplements
29:07 Africa and sunshine
30:21 MERS and seasonality
31:30 Ecuador and sunshine
33:03 Air pollution in Italy and Korea
35:00 Brazil and vitamin D deficiency
36:55 Jamaica and politically correct science
39:46 Censorship from big tech
43:26 Health disparities and funding
47:14 Operation Warp Speed
50:18 Pascal’s wager
52:02 Intelligent heroes and cognitive dissonance
54:30 Financial incentives
56:40 Pre-hormone D
58:04 Vitamin D from food
01:00:11 Avoiding colds and flu in winter season
01:04:15 Australia lockdown
01:05:10 Finland and food fortification
01:05:54 Sweden and Somali refugees
01:08:30 Recommended Daily Allowance
01:10:44 Vitamin D and mechanism for COVID immunity
01:15:00 Excusing doctors and “disproving” vitamin D in underpowered studies
01:21:38 Fluvoxamine and monoclonal antibodies
01:24:40 Emergency use authorization
01:25:32 Reducing harm with vitamin D
01:29:30 Zoonotic transmission and driving COVID extinct
01:35:51 Influenza outbreaks and vaccines
01:37:33 Not just vitamin D
01:39:57 What distinguishes vitamin D
01:42:00 Vitamin D, sun, and balance of risk
01:46:23 3 recommendations
01:47:47 Suspicion of public health authorities
01:50:44 Debunking negative studies
01:53:14 What does vitamin D expose
01:57:40 Funding of journals and fact checkers
01:59:25 Wrap up
If ever there was a good reason to bust up Facebook into little, tiny pieces like ‘Ma Bell’, the one-time telephone monopoly, it’s this: Mark Zuckerberg’s social media creation has become so big, so rich and so powerful, it allowed him to literally buy the 2020 election for Joe Biden and his band of left-wing sycophants.
That’s not hyperbole; that is according to documents filed by the Zuckerberg-funded Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
Those documents show that the nonprofit org spent $332 million in “grants and other assistance to domestic organizations and domestic governments” during the 2020 election to “increase civic participation by modernizing engagement between local gov[ernment] and the people they serve.”
As reported in October 2020 by Breitbart News, “Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced on Tuesday that he and his wife have donated an additional $100 million to a ‘safe elections’ project run by the non-profit Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL), bringing their total contributions to that project to $350 million since September 1.”
Critics of the organization and Zuckerberg’s massive ‘gift’ for “local election administration” have long claimed that the CTCL was nothing short of a massive “get out the vote” effort for Democratic candidates, and especially for Biden (hence his ’81 million votes’ — though we’re not sure that he actually got that many votes).
Sponsored solution from the Health Ranger Store: The Big Berkey water filter removes almost 100% of all contaminants using only the power of gravity (no electricity needed, works completely off-grid). Widely consider the ultimate “survival” water filter, the Big Berkey is made of stainless steel and has been laboratory verified for high-efficiency removal of heavy metals by CWC Labs, with tests personally conducted by Mike Adams. Explore more here.
“The 2020 presidential election witnessed an unprecedented and coordinated public-private partnership to improperly influence the 2020 presidential election on behalf of one particular candidate and party. Funded by hundreds of millions of dollars from Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and other high-tech interests, activist organizations created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican strongholds,” Amistad Project Director Phil Kline wrote in the executive summary of a report released by his organization in December 2020, when then-President Donald Trump’s campaign was frantically trying to get federal courts to listen to their allegations of ‘vote-fixing’ and vote fraud, in part committed by changes to state laws and CTCL efforts.
Kline’s organization identified three key actions that, when taken in sum, “represent the beginning of the formation of a two-tier election system favoring one demographic while disadvantaging another demographic.”…
Last year when a Texas cattleman died in New Mexico after testing “positive” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), the corporate-controlled media in conjunction with the federal government went on a propaganda blitz against ivermectin, falsely blaming the drug for the man’s death.
New Mexico Human Services Secretary Dr. David Scrase, for instance, announced the case as his state’s first ivermectin “overdose.” Not long after, a second death caused by covid would also get blamed in ivermectin, which the government-media complex would eventually use to come up with the term “ivermectin toxicity.”
Both of these deaths, it turns out, had absolutely nothing to do with ivermectin, and everything to do with the deadly bioweapon that was unleashed by the likes of Tony Fauci with his tampered coronaviruses and Donald “father of the vaccine” Trump with his spike protein-tainted Operation Warp Speed injections.
Scrase has since admitted, in so many words, that he was wrong to blame ivermectin for the two deaths. The media at large, however, along with the government, continues to spread lies about how ivermectin is “dangerous” and should be avoided in favor of the Fauci-Trump vaccines.
On December 1, Scrase issued a little-noticed online press briefing explaining that toxicology reports confirmed that the cattleman’s death occurred due to “natural” causes. No link to ivermectin was found, and yet not a single major media outlet reported on this revelation.
“Not a single media outlet reported Scrase’s admission, even as dozens, including the The Hill and The New York Times, had eagerly covered his original assertions about ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015,” reports Michael Capuzzo on his “RESCUE” Substack.
Sponsored: NEW Biostructured Silver First Aid Gel created by the Health Ranger combines three types of silver (ionic silver, colloidal silver, biostructured silver) with seven potent botanicals (rosemary, oregano, cinnamon and more) to create a breakthrough first aid silver gel. Over 50 ppm silver, verified via ICP-MS lab analysis. Made from 100% Texas rain water and 70% solar power. Zero chemical preservatives, fragrances or emulsifiers. See full details here.
“‘I don’t want more people to die,’ read one early headline, quoting Scrase. ‘It’s the wrong medicine for something really serious,’ Scrase said in the Times article.”
Ivermectin is safer than aspirin
It turns out that many experts took notice of the media’s mind games. It quickly became apparent that a sinister agenda was at play against the use of ivermectin – and yet once the facts came out, no corrections were ever made.
“Doctors, scientists, and toxicologists worldwide were puzzled by the assertions, because ivermectin is an extraordinarily safe, FDA-approved drug,” Capuzzo further writes.
“A fixture on the WHO’s list of 100 essential medicines all hospital systems are recommended to carry, nearly four billion doses have been given in four decades.”
Everywhere that ivermectin has been widely administered as treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) has seen a massive reduction in mortality – meaning lives are being saved. And everywhere that ivermectin is banned, including in the United States, has seen deaths soar.
There is a direct correlation between deprivation of ivermectin and death, and yet many people still believe the government-media when it comes to the idea that the system is still just trying to keep everyone “safe” with its restrictions.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is, of course, also involved in the anti-ivermectin crusade. Back in August, the faux regulatory agency warned that ivermectin is for livestock, even though the FDA approved ivermectin for human use back in the early 1990s.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is also playing its role in denigrating ivermectin by issuing its highest-level health warning against it – even though there is zero evidence to suggest that the drug is at all dangerous.
“Ivermectin is one of the safest medications on this planet; far safer than aspirin or acetaminophen,” says Dr. Paul Marik, founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. “This is a fairy tale. Disney could not come up with a better fairy tale.”
Media propaganda has reached a fever pitch in the age of the plandemic. To keep up with the latest, visit Propaganda.news.
If our own government isn’t jacking up inflation with lousy fiscal and economic policies as well as out-of-control spending, leave it to billionaire global corporatists — with the full backing of the Biden regime –to set us up for major food production shortages over the hoax of ‘human-caused climate change.’
As reported by Humans Are Free, the ‘climate change’ hoaxers are having an effect on the world’s youth, and that will lead to more control over the world’s population, including Americans, if left to continue along the same trajectory. Consider:
— The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s most recent report was met with a great deal of alarm.
— Citing the report, the BBC claimed that it represented “code red for humanity.”
— The New York Times chimed in, claiming (without context), “A Hotter Future Is Certain” (and it might be, but that doesn’t mean humans are causing it).
— A headline from the far-left Guardian claimed that major climate changes were “inevitable” and “irreversible” (both true — but again, without context, these predictions can be spun to mean anything).
— Both UK publications, the BBC and The Guardian, cheered the fact that their constant fear-mongering over ‘climate change’ is leading to a massive population decline: 4 in 10 young people are now almost uncontrollably concerned that climate change will destroy the planet in their lifetime.
“According to the survey, nearly half of 16-25-year-olds around the world are hesitant to have children as a result of what they believe is a climate crisis and feel that governments are doing too little to prevent it,” Humans Are Free reported.
Now, what can governments and globalists do with a petrified population?
Control them. And that’s where the threat to our food supplies (and liberties) comes in.
In October, Whitney Webb of Unlimited Hangout reported on one of these plans involving an organization called the Intrinsic Exchange Group, or IEG, which has pledged to save humanity from this alleged catastrophe of climate. According to the organization, with the aid of billionaires, multinational corporations, investors — and, of course, the UN — the org will save our planet from climate extinction.
In September, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) announced it had developed a new asset class and listing vehicle aimed at “preserving and restoring the natural assets that ultimately underlie the ability for there to be life on Earth.” The vehicle, known as a natural asset company, or NAC, will enable the formation of specialized firms “that own the rights to the ecosystem services produced on a certain piece of land, such as carbon sequestration or clean water.” The natural assets that these NACs commodify will subsequently be maintained, managed, and grown by them.
‘Maintained, managed, and grown’ — to suit the UN’s nonsensical definition of “sustainable,” of course. And since this globalist Marxist organization has always pushed for fewer people on the planet rather than more, because fewer are ‘more sustainable,’ then you can surely guess what this kind of ‘land and food production management’ will look like: Less is more.
And in case you may have thought that this is all just talk, Webb notes that the purchase of land for the stated purpose has already begun in the United States.
Summit Carbon Solutions is working to obtain land in the bread belt, so to speak — northern Iowa — for the proposed Midwest Carbon Express pipeline.
The company, “an offshoot of Summit Agriculture Group, is behind the $4.5 billion Midwest Carbon Express project,” Humans Are Free noted. “It would be the largest carbon capture project in the world with the goal of sending 12 million tons of CO2 annually to western North Dakota, where it can be stored underground.
“Landowners expressed concerns regarding Summit Carbon’s use of eminent domain, which allows the company to build the pipeline on land without consent from the landowner,” the outlet continued, explaining: “Eminent domain is when a government body can acquire private property for public use, with compensation for affected landowners.”
In short, these ‘carbon’ corporations are going to be using this constitutional method (noted in the Fifth Amendment) to control how much food is grown, what kind and how it can be used, and for whom.
“While shady deals like these have been happening in the US for decades, these new corporations — soon to be traded on the stock market casino — aren’t going to be largely focused on land looted in the US,” Humans Are Free reported, adding:
Allegedly, NACs will use the funds from these newly obtained and monetized natural assets to help fight climate change by ‘preserving’ the rain forests, mountains, and lakes mostly abroad. They also vow to change the “conventional agricultural production practices” of farms to make them more efficient and sustainable.
But, the creators of NACs concede the ultimate goal is to extract trillions in profits from natural processes such as photosynthesis, apply intrinsic values to natural processes, and then monetize it.
Trillions in ‘carbon capture’ are about to be made by these ‘environmental’ corporations, and at the expense of our food production land….
The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.
No need to worry. It is doubtful that anything will happen because the work wasn’t published in a peer-reviewed journal so will be ignored by the scientific community. That’s just the way it works.
I got an email recently from Mike Yeadon, former VP of Pfizer, who urged me to check out this video. He wrote me this email on 12/24/21:
This is about the worst 15min I’ve ever seen.
Mass covid19 vaccination is leading to mass murder.
The video references this paper, posted on December 10, 2021, On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination by Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD. It has been getting a lot of attention lately.
Check out the number of likes and retweets… just in the first 3 hours!!!!
The authors did an autopsy in 15 patients who died (from 7 days to 6 months) after receiving the COVID vaccine. These were all cases where the coroner ruled as NOT being caused by the vaccine.
They discovered that in 14 of the 15 patients there was widespread evidence of the body attacking itself, something that is never seen before. The heart was attacked in all 14 cases.
A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:
- inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endotheliitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
- the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
- a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.
Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.
Here’s the video presentation of the results.
VAERS as well as other independent studies (e.g., see this vaccine injury paper) shows the vaccines are killing people and that cardiac events were highly elevated. This study is consistent with those results.
This work independently validates the analysis of Peter Schimacher who showed a minimum of 30% to 40% of the deaths after vaccine were caused by the vaccine….