Alex Jones breaks down the story behind the internet outage that temporarily took down https://infowars.com/ as the IMF announced imminent ‘Global Financial Collapse.’
The FDA has turned a simple and straightforward Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine records into a 50+-year waiting game. To put it in perspective, Elon Musk would reach Mars way, way before the FDA would ever finish this task.
What was requested?
A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit was filed for documents tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The FOIA process gives the American public the right to request access to records from any federal agency. The law was put into place in 1967 to ensure that citizens remain informed about their government. Federal agencies must comply with the law by disclosing the requested information unless it compromises things like personal privacy or national security. There are nine exemption categories in all.
On an interesting side note, FOIA also requires federal agencies to post frequently requested information online, again unless it compromises one of the nine exemption categories.
Who requested the information?
The FOIA request was originally made by a group of doctors and scientists known as the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) group. PHMPT comprises an esteemed group of over 30 scientists and physicians, including Yale professor Harvey Risch, who has been a consistent voice of common sense during the pandemic. After the FDA denied the original request to expedite record release, PHMPT filed a lawsuit. Here’s the link to that lawsuit if you want to review it.
Like any federal agency, the FOIA mandate states that agencies should rarely withhold information unless it violates one of the aforementioned nine areas, or if for some reason disclosure of such records is prohibited by law. Federal agencies should always consider partial disclosure. In the case of the FDA’s holdings of Pfizer records, neither of these special cases applies.
Did FDA Comply with the FOIA request?
Well…sort of. While the FDA has no choice but to comply with the law and release these records to the American public, that doesn’t mean the agency wouldn’t try to use other tactics or perhaps slow roll the effort. And sure enough, that is what happened. The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Information Policy is in charge of FOIA and issues guidance to all other federal agencies.
As such, DOJ lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow until 2076 to fully release the FOIA-requested documents. With the request, the FDA is effectively sealing the records. The agency’s defense is that 330,000 pages of material were requested, and they simply do not have the resources to fill the request in a timely manner. At a proposed rate of 500 pages per month, it will take 55 years, until 2076, to fulfill the request. Yes, you read that right. 2 0 7 6; the FDA will squeak in right under the deadline – 55 years from now….
Pfizer has whistleblowers, and one of them told the British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the oldest medical journals in the world, that the Pfizer clinical trials were fraught with issues. Whistleblower Brook Jackson worked for Ventavia Research Group which operated several of Pfizer’s clinical trial sites during the latter part of 2020. Jackson claimed that the trial issues included, among other issues, the falsification of data. At the time Jackson alerted the FDA, he was fired within hours of doing so. The BMJ now reports that the FDA never inspected Ventavia’s trial sites even after Jackson alerted them to the problems. The FDA told the Epoch Times that it nevertheless has “full confidence” in the trial data.
As if data falsification is not a big issue, there may be an even bigger elephant in the room. While the federal budget pays 55% ($3 billion) of the FDA budget, the remaining 45% ($2.4 billion) comes from industry user fees paid by manufacturers being regulated. Yes, you read that right – nearly half of the FDA funding comes from the companies it regulates….
Has the FDA released any of these FOIA records yet?
As a matter of fact, the FDA has released the first tranche of Pfizer records after being ordered by the court to comply with the FOIA release. First reported by the Gateway Pundit, the initial release is a bombshell.
In the first 90 days after the Pfizer vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) rollout, from December 2020 to February 2021, tens of thousands of adverse events were reported including 1,200 deaths. Here is the full report.
Furthermore, the report only included researcher-deemed serious cases, meaning thousands more adverse events were not included in the data. To put it a different way, there were so many spontaneous adverse events reported for the Pfizer product that the team had to prioritize the serious cases. Furthermore, the report only includes recorded events, so the number of actual adverse events is likely far, far greater.
The FDA says it best: “(Adverse event) reports are submitted (to VAERS) voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown.”
Worldwide, the number of adverse events over the first 90-day period totaled more than 42,000, with about 13,000 adverse event reports within the US and the UK, repectively. Women were three times more likely to experience a reaction than men, and just to reiterate, 1,223 fatal reactions (DEATHS) were reported within the first 90 days. The report goes on to elaborate on thousands of “special interest conditions” that could possibly develop after a person takes the vaccine. The Gateway Pundit list is astonishingly nine pages long – single-spaced.
Even more astonishing is that after the FDA review of the first 90 days of data, they concluded the data was satisfactory to move forward to release the EUA for the Pfizer vaccine.
Naturally, this begs the question: Why did the FDA not immediately pull this product? Why have they still not done it?
And there are 329,500 pages to go. Let that sink in. What else will this report reveal?
By the way, Pfizer is projected to make $36 billion in profit in 2021 from the vaccine alone. This amounts to $1,000 per second in profit.
Contents from Hunter Biden’s “Laptop From Hell” reveal audio and text messages between the troubled son of Joe Biden and a top Walmart executive discussing “pulling the trigger to stop Trump” from winning the 2020 presidential election.
A file found in the iTunes folder of Hunter’s laptop reveals an audio transcript from 2018 between Hunter and Walmart Corporation Chairman of the Board Greg Penner discussing “pulling the trigger” to stop President Trump and his movement in the 2020 election.
“Overall objective here is to stop, not only Donald Trump, but to stem the tide of what Donald Trump represents in the political process, for the future of this country,” Biden says. “Which is way more dangerous than I ever thought that it possibly could be.”
“We can pull the trigger on getting something in place on these different ballots…where we wouldn’t even have to have necessarily a specific candidate…” Penner said.
Additional screenshots of text messages and emails show Penner in 2017 asked Hunter to discuss something “that’s best not to be done by text or email.”…
In a 2018 email, Penner asked Hunter to “…visit with you about some options I’ve been working on for the 2020 election…”
In another text message thread from March 2019, Hunter appears to assure Penner that he can arrange introductions with his father Joe Biden.
“He is available tomorrow after 4pm EST if you are. He looks forward to speaking and would gladly meet whenever your schedule and his allows. Give me call [sic] so I can fill you in on at least my reasons for not replying to you until now. Best, Hunter”
Penner and Hunter share a lot in common: they’re both 1992 graduates of Georgetown University.
Additionally, like Hunter, Penner has a history of dealings with the Communist Chinese, having served on the board of Baidu – a Chinese tech company – for 14 years until 2017.