Globalist white papers published by the UN’s World Health Organization (WHO) in 2014 detail a sneaky approach to bypassing parental consent when it comes to vaccinating children ages 6-17.
Watch exclusive coverage of this article on Thursday’s broadcast of The Alex Jones Show!
The document, titled, “Considerations regarding consent in vaccinating children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years old,” explains how to deal with that population group which “may present for vaccination without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.”
The paper gives a normal description of “consent” before describing “assent” as “the process of children’s and adolescents’ participation in the decision-making on vaccination.”
According to the UN description of assent, “International law provides strong support for children’s rights to participate in decisions about their health and health care, and also in the planning and provision of health services relevant to them and based on their evolving capacity.”
Next, the globalist organization notes that the average age of adulthood throughout the world is 18-years-old, and that “in the age group 6 to 17 years cannot provide consent to vaccination and so consent is ‘normally’ required from their parent or legal guardian.”
However, the paper continues to insinuate allowing adolescents to choose for themselves is catching on.
“In a growing number of countries, the age of consent for medical interventions is set below the age of majority. This allows adolescents to provide consent for specific interventions, such as access to contraceptives or HIV testing. Some countries have fixed the age of consent specifically to allow HPV vaccination at 12 years.”
The next part of the document discusses what to do “when children present for vaccination [are] unaccompanied by their parents,” admitting, “it is challenging to determine whether parents indeed provided consent.”
The most nefarious section of the UN white papers is under part 3 of a page titled, “Common Approaches for Obtaining Consent for Vaccination.”
There, health workers are told that “implied consent” is a situation where “the physical presence of the child or adolescent, with or without an accompanying parent at the vaccination session, is considered to imply consent.” …
There have now been 2,433 fetal deaths recorded in VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) from pregnant women who have been injected with one of the COVID-19 shots. (Source.)
The vast majority of these have been from the Pfizer shot (1,862 deaths) and the Moderna shot (656 deaths.)
There have been more fetal deaths in the past 11 months following COVID-19 shots than there have been for the past 30+ years following ALL vaccines (2,198 – Source.)
Last month (October, 2021) the New England Journal of Medicine admitted that the original study used to justify the CDC and the FDA in recommending the shots to pregnant women was flawed. (Source.)
Since then, researchers in New Zealand have conducted a new study on the original data, and concluded:
A re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results. (Source.)
And yet, the CDC and FDA still continue to recommend the shots for pregnant women, even though a correct analysis on the original data shows that 82% to 91% of pregnant women will suffer miscarriages if their unborn child is less than 20 weeks old. (Source.)
VAERS is a passive system that is severely under reported. The CDC and FDA have never conducted a study to determine what this under-reported factor is, but independent scientists have, and we have previously published the analysis conducted by Dr. Jessica Rose, who has determined that a conservative under-reported factor would be X41. See:
STUDY: Government’s Own Data Reveals that at Least 150,000 Probably DEAD in U.S. Following COVID-19 Vaccines
This means that there have probably been at least 99,753 fetal deaths following COVID-19 injections so far.
Here is a video report we made on this last month with some very unfortunate gruesome examples of what these shots are doing to unborn babies…..
You know how Event 201 was just the most high profile in a string of “simulations” and “scenarios” (including Clade X, Crimson Contagion, Lock Step and SPARS) that just happened to predictively program the fear of a global coronavirus pandemic into the minds of the global political and managerial class?
And you know how those “exercises” (like the multiple war games that just happened to coincide with the catastrophic, catalyzing events of 9/11) not only anticipated our current predicament, but, more importantly, laid the groundwork for the current global governmental response to the scamdemic—the creation of vaccine passports, the erection of the biosecurity grid, the crackdown on the “infodemic” of online “disinformation,” etc.?
Now, what if I were to tell you that there have been a number of simulations that have taken place in recent years that have similarly spelled out the globalists’ game plan for the post-scamdemic world in black-and-white?
Well, brace yourself. The global planners have been crafting simulations, war games and exercises to simulate our responses to the crises they are intending to create in the coming decade. And, as serious as all of the above-named simulations were, these ones foretell of an even darker vision for humanity in the years to come. . . .
Have you heard about the insider/supergopher “simulation” that foresaw the food crisis that we’re plunging into…and the global carbon tax that helped to “solve” the problem? ….