Guardian Promotes ‘Global Lockdown’ Every Two Years To Combat Climate Change


The London Guardian has suggested that global lockdowns will be needed every two years in order to save the planet.

The outlet used the (now changed) alarmist headline ‘Global Lockdown Every Two Years Needed To Meet Paris CO2 Goals – Study’.

The piece refers to study published in the Nature journal by a team of researchers at the University of East Anglia, who concluded that CO2 emissions need to drop by the same amount as they have during the recent lockdown period “roughly every two years” in order to offset global warming.

The study did not advocate global lockdowns in order to achieve this, despite the Guardian’s misleading headline. In fact it called for “completely different methods”.

The headline was changed to the slightly less fear mongering ‘Equivalent of Covid emissions drop needed every two years – study’ after a backlash ensued.

After many climate alarmists began touting the environmental virtues of lockdowns last year, we warned that climate lockdowns would become a thing:

The Guardian also has a history of over-hyping alarmist climate warnings, having previously reported that by 2020 we would be seeing  “millions” of deaths, major European cities being sunken, and nuclear war due to planetary warming.

The Newspaper’s alarmist call for lockdowns comes days after the World Economic Forum was slammed for praising the effects lockdowns have had on cities:

The WEF had posted a video praising the “silence” and cleaner air due to a lack of people, but later deleted the post after social media users pointed out that cities are not supposed to be quiet, and lockdowns are leaving many facing extreme financial hardship.

They’re telegraphing their intentions to you.   Are you listening?

According to master gates,

CO2 = P * S*E*C

P=population, S=services per capita, E=energy produced to provide those services, C=carbon emitted by production of that energy.

Gates said in his ted talk, “one of these factors has to get pretty close to zero”.    There was an audible chuckling in the audience.   I supposed either P or S would suffice, given the immutability of E and C under our regime of scientific censorship.   Simply imposing S->0 would create social chaos resulting in wasteful policing and military activities.   Much more energy efficient to directly tweak P, at first utilizing fabian techniques like toxic food and vaccines while pacifying the masses with endless covid bailouts, until money ceases to have value.   At that point a more direct approach will be needed.

Don’t expect these satanists to show mercy to the non-essentials.   Have they shown mercy to the vaccine-damaged children whose lives they’ve already ruined?  They’re thinking algorithmically.   Can you overcome your fear and do the same?   Or will you forever be puppetted by their psyops?

Reprise: DHS “Requested” Shooting Targets of Pregnant Women

The Real Enemy: YOU

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.