The London Guardian has suggested that global lockdowns will be needed every two years in order to save the planet.
The outlet used the (now changed) alarmist headline ‘Global Lockdown Every Two Years Needed To Meet Paris CO2 Goals – Study’.
The piece refers to study published in the Nature journal by a team of researchers at the University of East Anglia, who concluded that CO2 emissions need to drop by the same amount as they have during the recent lockdown period “roughly every two years” in order to offset global warming.
The study did not advocate global lockdowns in order to achieve this, despite the Guardian’s misleading headline. In fact it called for “completely different methods”.
— James Lindsay, cultural phenomenon (@ConceptualJames) March 3, 2021
The headline was changed to the slightly less fear mongering ‘Equivalent of Covid emissions drop needed every two years – study’ after a backlash ensued.
Evidently I wasn't the only one who thought the original headline was terrible – the Guardian changed the title, eliminating the suggestion that we need a lockdown every 2 years. 👏👏
Equivalent of Covid emissions drop needed every two years – study https://t.co/mA2uEoMiWV
— Hayley Stevenson (@hayley_stev) March 3, 2021
After many climate alarmists began touting the environmental virtues of lockdowns last year, we warned that climate lockdowns would become a thing:
The Guardian also has a history of over-hyping alarmist climate warnings, having previously reported that by 2020 we would be seeing “millions” of deaths, major European cities being sunken, and nuclear war due to planetary warming.
Remember guys, it's just 5 days until the UK is "plunged into a Siberian climate."
From the same trustworthy people who gave you mass starvation of humanity by the 80's, "ice free" Arctic summers by 2013 and Greta Thunberg.
You can trust them. pic.twitter.com/afGut28mXv
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) December 27, 2019
The Newspaper’s alarmist call for lockdowns comes days after the World Economic Forum was slammed for praising the effects lockdowns have had on cities:
Called it. The future will be "climate lockdowns." pic.twitter.com/LhZfruxGEX
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 27, 2021
The WEF had posted a video praising the “silence” and cleaner air due to a lack of people, but later deleted the post after social media users pointed out that cities are not supposed to be quiet, and lockdowns are leaving many facing extreme financial hardship.
In a properly functioning, healthy society, cities aren’t supposed to be “quiet.” Always very revealing when they let the mask slip. https://t.co/v2BukFoqf9
— Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 28, 2021
They’re telegraphing their intentions to you. Are you listening?
According to master gates,
CO2 = P * S*E*C
P=population, S=services per capita, E=energy produced to provide those services, C=carbon emitted by production of that energy.
Gates said in his ted talk, “one of these factors has to get pretty close to zero”. There was an audible chuckling in the audience. I supposed either P or S would suffice, given the immutability of E and C under our regime of scientific censorship. Simply imposing S->0 would create social chaos resulting in wasteful policing and military activities. Much more energy efficient to directly tweak P, at first utilizing fabian techniques like toxic food and vaccines while pacifying the masses with endless covid bailouts, until money ceases to have value. At that point a more direct approach will be needed.
Don’t expect these satanists to show mercy to the non-essentials. Have they shown mercy to the vaccine-damaged children whose lives they’ve already ruined? They’re thinking algorithmically. Can you overcome your fear and do the same? Or will you forever be puppetted by their psyops?